Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2003, p. 3056-3059, Vol. 41, No. 7
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.7.3056-3059.2003
Field Evaluation of the gag-Based Heteroduplex Mobility Assay for Genetic Subtyping of Circulating Recombinant Forms of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire
Souleymane Sawadogo,1 Christiane Adjé-Touré,1 Celestin E. Bilé,1 Rene E. A. Ekpini,1 Terence Chorba,1,2 and John N. Nkengasong1,3*
Projet RETRO-CI, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire,1
Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Surveillance and Epidemiology,3
Global AIDS Program, National Center for HIV, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia2
Received 12 September 2002/
Returned for modification 29 November 2002/
Accepted 9 April 2003

ABSTRACT
The
gag-based heteroduplex mobility assay (
gag-HMA) was evaluated
for its ease and reliability in subtyping circulating recombinant
forms (CRFs) of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)
in Côte d'Ivoire. One hundred thirty-two plasma samples
were analyzed blindly for HIV-1 subtypes by sequencing the
pol gene and by
gag-HMA. DNA sequencing was used as the "gold standard."
Of the 132 samples sequenced, 108 (82%) were CRF02_AG, 14 (11%)
were pure subtype A, 5 (4%) were subtype G, 3 (2%) were subtype
D, 1 was CRF01_AE, and 1 was subtype H. The
gag-HMA correctly
classified 126 (95.5%) of the samples. Of the 108 samples that
were classified as CRF02_AG by DNA sequencing, 107 (99%) were
correctly identified by
gag-HMA, resulting in a positive predictive
value of 96.4%. The
gag-HMA seems to be a valuable tool for
understanding the molecular epidemiology of HIV-1 CRF02_AG in
Côte d'Ivoire and West Africa, which could be important
for developing and evaluating AIDS vaccines, although DNA sequencing
remains necessary for accurate molecular epidemiology.

INTRODUCTION
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is currently divided
into three groups: M for major, O for outlier, and N for non-M,
non-O (
2,
9,
19). HIV-1 group M viruses are further divided
into nine pure subtypes and 12 circulating recombinant forms
(CRFs) (
1,
2). CRF02_AG viruses are predominant in West and
Central Africa, while CRF01_AE viruses are common in Central
Africa and in Thailand and other Asian countries (
1,
7,
9,
13).
Although the clinical implication of the multitude of HIV subtypes
is unknown, genetic diversity has been shown to impact diagnosis
and may be important in vaccine development and evaluation (
2,
3). Indeed, the first HIV-1 vaccine candidates in Africa are
being matched with the predominant viruses in the country where
the vaccine trials are planned (
24). Thus, monitoring and characterization
of HIV-1 diversity continue to be critical for developing or
evaluating potential candidate vaccines and for understanding
the spread of the HIV epidemic. Although full-length sequencing
is the most accurate technique to characterize HIV viral genomes,
it is technically challenging and expensive for use as a screening
tool for large-scale surveillance, especially in field conditions
in developing countries (
3,
6,
7). To circumvent this problem,
easier and faster techniques for subtyping have been developed,
including peptide enzyme immunoassay and restriction fragment
length polymorphism (
2,
15), subtype-specific PCR (
18), and
env-based heteroduplex mobility assay (
env-HMA) (
8). Of these
techniques, the
env-HMA has been extensively used (
6,
7,
9);
however, because of the increasing global spread of CRFs (
4,
5,
10,
11,
12,
16,
19,
20,
22), HIV subtyping based on only
one gene of the virus genome may fail to detect CRFs. Thus,
a
gag-based HMA (
gag-HMA) has recently been developed (
9). The
gag-HMA alone seems to detect some CRFs of epidemiological importance
including CRF01_AE and CRF02_AG and pure subtypes (
9), but it
is unclear how this technique can identify CRF06_cpx. Limited
data exist on the performance of the
gag-HMA in field conditions
and in areas like West Africa where CRF02_AG predominates (
1,
15). Our study was aimed at evaluating the performance of the
gag-HMA in classifying HIV-1 strains in Côte d'Ivoire,
where CRF02_AG is predominant (
1,
15).

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Samples.
The plasma samples used in this evaluation were collected as
part of an initiative started in 1998 by the Ivorian Ministry
of Health in collaboration with the Joint United Nations Program
on HIV/AIDS, aimed at providing access to antiretroviral therapy
for HIV-infected persons in Côte d'Ivoire. Whole blood
was collected and plasma was separated from cells as previously
described (
1). The HIV-1 strains obtained from the plasma samples
that were used in this evaluation had been previously characterized
by sequencing of the
pol (protease and reverse transcriptase
[RT]) regions of the viruses, and those data had been published
elsewhere (
1).
Laboratory testing.
HIV infection status was determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based parallel testing algorithm (14). CD4+ lymphocytes were enumerated by standard flow cytometry with a FACScan cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, Calif.), and HIV-1 RNA viral load in plasma was quantified with the Amplicor HIV-1 monitor (version 1.5; Roche Diagnostic Systems, Branchburg, N.J.).
RNA extraction and PCR amplification.
Viral RNA was extracted from plasma by the Qiagen method (Qiamp viral RNA kit; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the directions of the manufacturer. Extracted RNA was then used in a one-tube RT-PCR (Access RT-PCR system; Promega, Leiden, The Netherlands) with H1G777 (TCACCTAGAACTTTGAATGCATGGG) sense and H1P202 (CTAATACTGTATCATCTGCTGCTCCTGT) antisense primers as first-round primers. Nested PCR was then performed using H1Gag1584 (AAAGATGGATAATCCTGGG) sense and g17 (TCCACATTTCCAACAGCCCTTTTT) antisense primers to enable amplification of 460 bp encoding amino acid 132 of p24 to amino acid 40 of p7 from the gag gene. The amplification conditions of the RT-PCR were as follows: 45 min at 48°C (cDNA reaction) followed by 2 min at 94°C and 40 cycles of 30, 30, and 90 s at 94, 50, and 68°C, respectively, and 1 cycle of 7 min at 68°C. For nested PCR, cycling conditions were 1 cycle of 2 min at 94°C; 35 cycles of 30, 30, and 60 s at 94, 50, and 72°C, respectively; and 1 cycle of 7 min at 72°C.
gag-HMA.
The gag-HMA was carried out blindly on all the samples. Heteroduplexes were obtained by mixing 4.5 µl of the 460-bp amplified fragment of the unknown subtype sample with the same amount of each of the amplified reference plasmids (gag-HMA kit; NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Md.) in 1x annealing buffer (1 M NaCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl, 20 mM EDTA); the mix was then denatured by being heated for 2 min at 94°C and rapidly cooled in wet ice. Heteroduplexes and homoduplexes were separated by electrophoresis on a 5% polyacrylamide gel (29:1 acrylamide/bisacrylamide ratio) containing 20% urea for 2 h 30 min. The gels were then stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under a UV transilluminator. The heteroduplexes formed by the sample and the reference DNA that migrate faster (close to the homoduplexes at the bottom of the gel) are most closely related to the specific reference DNA. On a 20% urea gel, not all the recombinants (CRF_02 and CRF_01) could be differentiated from pure subtype A because they are more closely related. However, at 30% urea, by increasing the denaturing condition of the gel and extending the electrophoresis time for up to 3 h, the recombinants could be distinguished from the pure subtype A (Fig. 1).
DNA sequencing.
The
pol genes were sequenced as described previously (
1). In
brief, HIV-1 RNA was extracted from plasma by the Qiagen method
(Qiamp viral RNA mini kit). The RNA was used in PCR amplification
of 1.6 kbp of the
pol gene by specific primers. We sequenced
200 ng of purified cDNA by the TrueGene HIV-1 genotyping assay
(version 2.5; Visible Genetics, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (
8).
For the gag gene, a 700-bp fragment corresponding to the p24 region from the gag gene was amplified with previously described primer pairs G00-G01 and G60-G25 (23). The PCR conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation step for 3 min at 92°C, followed by 30 cycles of 92°C for 10 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 1 min at 72°C, with a final extension for 7 min at 72°C, in a final volume of 50 µl. The reaction mixture consisted of 50 mmol of KCl/liter, 10 mmol of Tris-HCl (pH 9)/liter, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1.4 mmol of MgCl2/liter, 10 pmol of each primer, 0.2 mmol of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate/liter, and 2.5 U of Taq polymerase. One microliter from this amplified product was used for the second round with the same reaction mixture and PCR conditions for 40 cycles, in a final volume of 100 µl. The PCR amplification products were detected by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. The amplification product was directly sequenced on both strands with fluorescent dye terminator and an ABI 3100 capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). DNA sequences were edited with Sequencer software (Genecodes, Ann Arbor, Mich.) and aligned with reference sequences representing different subtypes with CLUSTAL and Bioedit software.
Analysis of data.
The HIV-1 subtypes obtained by gag-HMA were compared to those obtained by sequencing the pol (protease and RT) gene. The new nucleotide sequences and sequences of reference strains representing the different genetic subtypes in the gag, protease, and RT genes were aligned by using the CLUSTAL W program. Subtype results by pol gene sequencing were considered to be the "gold standard."

RESULTS
Characteristics of study population.
For the samples from 132 HIV-1-infected patients analyzed, the
median age was 37 years (interquartile range [IQR], 30 to 42
years), median CD4
+ cell count was 166 cells/µl (IQR,
66 to 296), and median plasma viral load was 4.96 log
10 copies/ml
(IQR, 4.19 to 5.70). Of these 132 patients, 76 (57.6%) were
males. The distribution of HIV-1 subtypes among the 132 patients
according to the
pol gene sequences was as follows: 108 (81%)
were CRF02_AG strains, 14 (11%) were pure subtype A, 5 (4%)
were subtype G, 3 (2%) were subtype D, 1 was CRF01_AE, and 1
was subtype H (Table
1).
HIV-1 subtypes by gag-HMA.
All the 132 samples were amplified successfully by PCR testing
and classified into subtypes by using reference plasmids from
the
gag-HMA kit. Of the 132 samples, 111 (84%) were classified
as CRF02_AG, 12 (9%) were subtype A, 5 (4%) were subtype G,
2 were subtype D, 1 was subtype H, and 1 sample was CRF01_AE
(Table
1).
Comparison of gag-HMA and pol gene sequencing results.
Next, we compared the results of HIV-1 subtypes obtained by gag-HMA to those obtained by pol gene sequencing (Table 1). Of the 108 samples that were classified as CRF02_AG by pol gene sequencing, 107 (99%) were correctly classified by gag-HMA and 1 sample could not be differentiated between pure subtype A and the CRF02_AG recombinant virus by gag-HMA. Of the 14 samples that were classified as subtype A by sequencing, 10 (71.4%) were correctly classified by gag-HMA, and 4 were classified as CRF02_AG. The gag-HMA correctly classified all five subtype G samples, the one CRF01_AE sample, and the one subtype H sample. Of the three pol gene sequence-based subtype D viruses, two were classified correctly by gag-HMA and the remaining one was classified as subtype A. The positive predictive value of the gag-HMA for correctly identifying CRF_AG was 96.4%, that is, 107 of the 111 strains classified by gag-HMA were truly CRF02_AG strains. Thus, overall, 126 (95.5%) of the samples analyzed gave concordant subtype results by pol gene sequences and gag-HMA analysis. However, if we group all the CRF02_AG and pure subtype A viruses in the same category of viruses, then only one sample was discordant between subtyping by HMA and that by DNA sequencing.
We investigated further the six samples that were discordant between gag-HMA and pol gene sequencing (Table 2). gag-HMA testing classified four of the six samples as CRF02_AG and two as subtype A. Of the six samples, five gave concordant results between gag-HMA testing and gag sequencing. Only one sample gave concordant results between gag and pol gene sequences (Table 2).

DISCUSSION
Our results indicate that, compared with
pol gene sequencing,
the
gag-HMA has an overall accuracy of 95.5% for classifying
HIV-1 strains in this study and a positive predictive value
of 96.4% for classifying a mixture of pure and recombinant CRF02_AG
viruses in Côte d'Ivoire. Our findings are consistent
with the original report by Heyndrickx and colleagues, who found
96% (76 out of 79 viruses) concordance between genetic subtypes
by DNA sequencing and by
gag-HMA (
9). In that study, the three
strains that could not be classified were one subtype D and
two subtype J strains (
9). Pasquier and colleagues reported
84% concordance between
env-HMA and RT gene-based subtyping
among 49 HIV-1 samples and 79% concordance for the protease
gene among 26 HIV-1 strains (
17).
Our findings suggest that the gag-HMA may be a valuable tool for large-scale field epidemiologic studies of HIV-1 strains in Côte d'Ivoire and West Africa, where CRF02_AG is the predominant strain (1, 15). To our knowledge this is the first report of a field evaluation of the gag-HMA in West Africa. If our results are confirmed in other countries in West Africa, the gag-HMA could be a rapid, easy, and reliable tool for understanding the molecular epidemiology of HIV-1 subtypes in the subregion. Our data also show some limitations of the gag-HMA and the more accurate molecular characterization provided by the gold standard DNA sequencing of at least two genes. Knowledge of the molecular epidemiology of HIV-1 subtypes could be important in preparing vaccine evaluations in West Africa. Indeed, because HIV-1 candidate vaccines are being matched with the predominant subtype, simple and accurate techniques are needed for screening populations to determine the dynamics of HIV subtypes before, during, and after vaccine trials. For example, in Bangkok, Thailand, the epidemic that started among injection drug users in 1988 was predominantly due to subtype B strains, but during the 1990s, subtype E (CRF01_AE) emerged as the predominant subtype in this population (20).
The gag-HMA has some advantages over the env-HMA: first, although the env-HMA has been extensively used for assigning HIV-1 subtypes, its use in areas where CRFs are predominant is limited since it cannot differentiate between pure subtypes and the CRFs. Second, increasing numbers of global HIV-1 strains are not amplifiable within the env region with the C2-V5 primers that were developed for the present env-HMA kit (2, 21). Given the high predictive value of the gag-HMA, we proposed an algorithm for assigning subtypes in areas like West Africa where CRF02_AG viruses are predominant; this algorithm consists of analyzing all samples with the gag-HMA and limiting the use of DNA sequencing to only samples that are not assigned clearly as CRF02_AG by gag-HMA.
In conclusion, this field evaluation shows that the gag-HMA is reliable and easy to implement and provides results that are almost as accurate as those obtained by DNA sequencing for assigning CRF02_AG strains. Adapting the gag-HMA technique for analysis of blood samples obtained from a dried blood spot will render this technique even more practical for use in studying the molecular epidemiology of HIV subtypes in remote areas in Africa where blood samples may not be readily collected and centrifuged in the field.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the African AIDS Vaccine Program for providing support
and training of S.S. on the
gag-based HMA.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Surveillance and Epidemiology, National Center for HIV, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga. Phone: (404) 639-0871. Fax: (404) 639-2108. E-mail:
jcn5{at}cdc.gov.


REFERENCES
1 - Adje, C., R. Cheingsong, H. T. Roels, C. Maurice, G. Djomand, W. Verbiest, K. Hertogs, B. Larder, B. Monga, M. Peeters, S. Eholie, E. Bissagnene, M. Coulibaly, R. Respess, S. Z. Wiktor, T. Chorba, and J. N. Nkengasong for the UNAIDS HIV Drug Access Initiative, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. 2001. High prevalence of genotypic and phenotypic HIV-1 drug-resistant strains among patients receiving antiretroviral therapy in Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 26:501-506.
2 - Agwale, S. M., K. E. Robbins, L. Odama, A. Saekhou, C. Zeh, A. Edubio, O. M. Njoku, N. Sani-Gwarzo, M. F. Gboun, F. Gao, M. Reitz, D. Hone, T. M. Folks, D. Pieniazek, C. Wambebe, and M. L. Kalish. 2001. Development of an env gp41-based heteroduplex mobility assay for rapid human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtyping. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2110-2114.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - AIDS. 2001. Approaches to the development of broadly protective HIV vaccines: challenges posed by the genetic, biological and antigenic variability of HIV-1. Report from a meeting of the WHO-UNAIDS Vaccine Advisory Committee, Geneva, 21-23 February 2000. AIDS 15:W1-W25.[CrossRef][Medline]
4 - Baldrich-Rubio, E., S. Anagonou, K. Stirrups, E. Lafia, D. Candotti, H. Lee, and J. P. Allain. 2001. A complex human immunodeficiency virus type 1 A/G/J recombinant virus isolated from a seronegative patient with AIDS from Benin, West Africa. J. Gen. Virol. 82:1095-1106.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Barlow, K. L., I. D. Tatt, P. A. Cane, D. Pillay, and J. P. Clewley. 2001. Recombinant strains of HIV type 1 in the United Kingdom. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 17:467-474.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - Cham, F., L. Heyndrickx, W. Janssens, K. Vereecken, K. De Houwer, S. Coppens, G. Van der Auwera, H. Whittle, and G. Van der Groen. 2000. Development of a one-tube multiplex reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay for the simultaneous amplification of HIV type 1 group M gag and env heteroduplex mobility assay fragments. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 16:1503-1505.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 - Cham, F., L. Heyndrickx, W. Janssens, G. Van der Auwera, K. Vereecken, K. De Houwer, S. Coppens, H. Whittle, and G. Van der Groen. 2000. Study of HIV type 1 gag/env variability in The Gambia, using a multiplex DNA polymerase chain reaction. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 16:1915-1919.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 - Delwart, E. L., B. Herring, A. G. Rodrigo, and J. I. Mullins. 1995. Genetic subtyping of human immunodeficiency virus using a heteroduplex mobility assay. PCR Methods Appl. 4:S202-S216.[Medline]
9 - Heyndrickx, L., W. Janssens, L. Zekeng, R. Musonda, S. Anagonou, G. van der Auwera, S. Coppens, K. Vereecken, K. De Witte, R. van Rampelbergh, M. Kahindo, L. Morison, F. E. McCutchan, J. K. Carr, J. Albert, M. Essex, J. Goudsmit, B. Asjo, M. Salminen, A. Buve, Study Group on Heterogeneity of HIV Epidemics in African Cities, and G. van der Groen. 2000. Simplified strategy for detection of recombinant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 group M isolates by gag/env heteroduplex mobility assay. J. Virol. 74:363-370.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Koulinska, I. N., T. Ndung'u, D. Mwakagile, G. Msamanga, C. Kagoma, W. Fawzi, M. Essex, and B. Renjifo. 2001. A new human immunodeficiency virus type 1 circulating recombinant form from Tanzania. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 17:423-431.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Kusagawa, S., Y. Takebe, R. Yang, K. Motomura, W. Ampofo, J. Brandful, Y. Koyanagi, N. Yamamoto, T. Sata, K. Ishikawa, Y. Nagai, and M. Tatsumi. 2001. Isolation and characterization of a full-length molecular DNA clone of Ghanaian HIV type 1 intersubtype A/G recombinant CRF02_AG, which is replication competent in a restricted host range. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 17:649-655.[CrossRef][Medline]
12 - Montavon, C., F. Bibollet-Ruche, D. Robertson, B. Koumare, C. Mulanga, E. Esu-Williams, C. Toure, S. Mboup, E. Saman, E. Delaporte, and M. Peeters. 1999. The identification of a complex A/G/I/J recombinant HIV type 1 virus in various West African countries. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 15:1707-1712.[CrossRef][Medline]
13 - Montavon, C., C. Toure-Kane, F. Liegeois, E. Mpoudi, A. Bourgeois, L. Vergne, J. L. Perret, A. Boumah, E. Saman, S. Mboup, E. Delaporte, and M. Peeters. 2000. Most env and gag subtype A HIV-1 viruses circulating in West and West Central Africa are similar to the prototype AG recombinant virus IBNG. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 23:363-374.
14 - Nkengasong, J. N., C. Maurice, S. Koblavi, M. Kalou, D. Yavo, M. Maran, C. Bile, K. Nguessan, J. Kouadio, S. Bony, S. Z. Wiktor, and A. E. Greenberg. 1999. Evaluation of HIV serial and parallel serologic testing algorithms in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. AIDS 13:109-117.[Medline]
15 - Nkengasong, J. N., C.-C. Luo, L. Abouya, D. Pieniazek, C. Maurice, M. Sassan-Morokro, D. Ellenberger, D. J. Hu, C.-P. Pau, T. Dobbs, R. Respess, D. Coulibaly, I.-M. Coulibaly, S. Z. Wiktor, A. E. Greenberg, and M. Rayfield. 2000. Distribution of HIV-1 subtypes among HIV-1 seropositive patients in the interior of Cote d'Ivoire. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 23:430-436.
16 - Oelrich, R. B., C. Workman, T. Laukkanen, F. E. McCutchan, and N. J. Deacon. 1998. A novel subtype A/G/J recombinant full-length HIV type 1 genome from Burkina Faso. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 14:1495-1500.[Medline]
17 - Pasquier, C., N. Millot, R. Njouom, K. Sandres, M. Cazabat, J. Puel, and J. Izopet. 2001. HIV-1 subtyping using phylogenetic analysis of pol gene sequences. J. Virol. Methods 94:45-54.[CrossRef][Medline]
18 - Peeters, M., F. Liegeois, F. Bibollet-Ruche, D. Patrel, J.-L. Perret, N. Vidal, E. Esu-Williams, S. Mboup, E. Mpoudi, N. Nzila, and E. Delaporte. 1998. Subtype-specific polymerase chain reaction for the identification of HIV-1 genetic subtypes circulating in Africa. AIDS 12:671-673.[Medline]
19 - Robertson, D. L., J. P. Anderson, J. A. Bradac, J. K. Carr, B. Foley, R. K. Funkhouser, F. Gao, B. H. Hahn, M. L. Kalish, C. Kuiken, G. H. Learn, T. Leitner, F. McCutchan, S. Osmanov, M. Peeters, D. Pieniazek, M. Salminen, P. M. Sharp, S. Wolinsky, and B. Korber. 1999. HIV-1 nomenclature proposal. A reference guide to HIV-1 classification. In B. Korber, C. Brander, B. F. Haynes, J. P. Moore, R. Koup, B. D. Walker, and D. I. Watkins (ed.), HIV molecular immunology database 1999. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.Mex. [Online.] http://hiv-web.lanl.gov/content/hiv-db/reviews/nomenclature/Nomen.html.
20 - Subbarao, S., S. Vanichseni, D. J. Hu, D. Kitayaporn, K. Choopanya, S. Raktham, N. L. Young, C. Wasi, R. Sutthent, C.-C. Luo, A. Ramos, and T. D. Mastro. 2000. Genetic characterization of HIV-1 subtype E and B strains from a prospective cohort of injecting drug users in Bangkok, Thailand. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 16:699-707.[CrossRef][Medline]
21 - Tatt, I. D., K. L. Barlow, and J. P. Clewley. 2000. A gag gene heteroduplex mobility assay for subtyping HIV-1. J. Virol. Methods 87:41-51.[CrossRef][Medline]
22 - Thomson, M. M., E. Delgado, N. Majon, A. Ocampo, M. L. Villahermosa, A. Marino, I. Herrero, M. T. Cuevas, E. Vasquez-de Parga, L. Perez-Alvarez, L. Medrano, J. A. Taboada, R. Najera, and the Spanish Group for Antiretroviral Studies in Galicia. 2001. HIV-1 genetic diversity in Galicia, Spain: BG intersubtype recombinant viruses circulating among injecting drug users. AIDS 15:509-516.[CrossRef][Medline]
23 - Vidal, N., M. Peeters, C. Mulanga-Kabeya, N. Nzilambi, D. Robertson, W. Ilunga, H. Sema, K. Tshimanga, B. Bongo, and E. Delaporte. 2000. Unprecedented degree of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) group M genetic diversity in the Democratic Republic of Congo suggests that the HIV-1 pandemic originated in central Africa. J. Virol. 74:10498-10507.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24 - Weidle, P. J., T. D. Mastro, A. D. Grant, J. N. Nkengasong, and D. Macharia. 2002. HIV/AIDS treatment and HIV vaccines for Africa. Lancet 359:2261-2267.[CrossRef][Medline]
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2003, p. 3056-3059, Vol. 41, No. 7
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.7.3056-3059.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.