Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2003, p. 3441-3444, Vol. 41, No. 7
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.7.3441-3444.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
| CASE REPORT |
Departments of Pathology,1 Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 352492
Received 13 January 2003/ Accepted 19 March 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
B. cereus is a motile, aerobic or facultatively anaerobic, spore-forming, gram-positive or gram-variable bacterium of the family Bacillaceae that is found worldwide in dust, air, and water. As a human pathogen, the organism is perhaps best known for its role as a mediator of self-limited foodborne illness. However, in recent years there has been an increasing appreciation for its potential as an opportunistic pathogen in immunocompromised, critically ill, or otherwise debilitated patients, those with foreign bodies, and intravenous drug abusers (6). Among members of this genus, only B. anthracis is potentially more significant as a cause of human disease (21).
Advances in neonatal intensive care over the past several years have improved survival of very-low-birthweight neonates, but due to their immature immune systems (15) as well as their being subjected to prolonged mechanical ventilation and frequent use of long term, intravascular catheters, members of this vulnerable population are particularly susceptible to disseminated disease caused by environmental organisms such as B. cereus. The number of documented cases of clinically significant invasive infections in neonates or older infants due to B. cereus is small. A computerized search of the English language literature in the National Library of Medicine Database provided a total of 22 cases in infants of clinically significant systemic infection proven to be due to B. cereus. These cases are summarized in Table 1. Of the 22 reported infections, 16 occurred in neonates, most of whom were born prematurely. Among 15 individual published reports describing B. cereus infections in infants since 1970, only 5 have come from the United States, with the most recent in 1993 (9). Thus, neonatologists as well as clinical microbiologists in this country may not always appreciate the significance of isolations of B. cereus from clinical specimens obtained from newborns due to its apparent rarity as a nosocomial pathogen; the significance is further clouded by the frequent appearance of the species in cultures as a contaminant (11). In our case, when the preliminary laboratory report for positive blood cultures indicated the presence of gram-positive bacilli, clinicians first assumed it would be Listeria monocytogenes and expressed initial skepticism when the organism was identified as B. cereus, thereby indicating their unfamiliarity with this organism as a potential cause of neonatal bacteremia.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Published reports of clinically significant Bacillus cereus infections in infantsa
|
Clinical manifestations of diseases due to B. cereus have been ascribed to the production of various exotoxins, including the enterotoxin responsible for foodborne disease, lecithinase, phospholipases, proteases, and hemolysins that produce extensive damage and liquefactive necrosis of infected tissues (18). Histopathological examination of tissues collected at autopsies of fatal cases of neonatal B. cereus infections have demonstrated that tissue invasion with multiplication of organisms in various organs can also occur (8, 9,13). The case reports summarized in Table 1 have shown that infections caused by this organism usually involve the bloodstream, CSF, and/or respiratory tract (1, 3,4, 7-10, 13, 14, 16-20).
Assessment of the origin of infections due to organisms such as B. cereus that are widely disseminated in the environment is often difficult and may not yield an obvious source. Nonetheless, a few epidemiologic investigations of outbreaks that have occurred in Europe provide some insights on likely vehicles for infections with B. cereus in neonatal units.
A report from The Netherlands (19) described 35 neonates in a hospital unit that were colonized in the respiratory tract with a single B. cereus clone. Three of them showed signs of respiratory infection, and one died. The epidemic strain of B. cereus was detected on the hands of nursing staff and in mechanical ventilation equipment. Three additional reports from Great Britain (2, 7, 22) also described outbreaks of B. cereus in hospital neonatal units. The first report (2) showed that 28 of 57 (49%) neonates in a unit were colonized asymptomatically in the umbilicus over a surveillance period of 2 weeks, 90% of them with the same B. cereus serotype. The same strain was also identified in the unit's diaper supply. Another report (22) described dissemination of B. cereus over a 4-month period in 48 of 259 (19%) umbilical swabs of asymptomatic neonates in a single hospital unit, most isolates of which belonged to a single serotype. The primary source of the organism could not be established. The third report (7) described an outbreak in which B. cereus was isolated over a 2-week period from endotracheal secretions of six intubated neonates, four of whom developed clinical illness and one of whom died. The B. cereus isolates from four of the neonates were proven to be of the same serotype. Contaminated ventilator equipment was suspected to be the source of infection. Intravenous catheters and ventriculoperitoneal shunts have also been documented as modes of transmission in case reports of neonatal B. cereus meningitis (4, 14).
Policies in the University of Alabama Hospital Clinical Microbiology Laboratory mandate that fluid from positive blood culture bottles is to be subcultured for a qualitative direct susceptibility test using the agar disk diffusion technique. This practice enables preliminary susceptibility data to be communicated to physicians if requested, pending final organism identification and standardized susceptibility testing according to guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (12) when indicated. This practice also assists technologists in determining whether bacterial isolates growing from more than one blood culture bottle are likely to be of the same species. While standardized testing procedure and interpretation guidelines are available from the NCCLS for agar disk diffusion testing and broth-based MIC testing for gram-positive cocci such as staphylococci and streptococci, no such interpretive guidelines are available for gram-positive bacilli such as B. cereus (12). Therefore, the laboratory does not routinely perform and report susceptibility tests on such organisms without consultation with the physician caring for the patient. When requested under these circumstances, quantitative susceptibility testing has been performed using the agar-gradient diffusion (Etest) technique in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and interpreted using the NCCLS MIC breakpoint criteria for staphylococci (12). A disclaimer indicating the nonstandardized methodology for the test performed under these conditions is reported in the medical record. The B. cereus isolate from the neonate described in this report had an Etest vancomycin MIC of 24 µg/ml (rounded to 32 µg/ml) and was interpreted as resistant according to NCCLS criteria for staphylococci (12). The test was repeated two additional times in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, with results of 16 and 24 µg/ml.
Due to concern about the possible emergence of vancomycin resistance, since the vanA gene responsible for vancomycin resistance in enterococci has been documented previously in B. circulans (5), a broth-based reference method was eventually used at Mayo Medical Laboratories, Rochester, Minn., to determine the vancomycin MIC. The MIC was 4 µg/ml, which would be considered indicative of susceptibility (12).
In view of the increasing awareness of the potential role of Bacillus species as human pathogens, especially in neonates and other immunosuppressed hosts, and in direct response to the B. anthracis bioterrorism events of 2001, our laboratory now pays greater attention to all Bacillus isolates from clinical specimens. We routinely perform a motility test and examine blood agar plates for typical colonial morphology of B. anthracis (11). All Bacillus isolates that grow in two blood culture bottles from the same set or in at least two bottles from 2 sets collected at the same time and any isolate grown on primary culture plates from CSF are subjected to biochemical tests for species identification. Whenever Bacillus species of possible clinical significance are encountered, prompt notification of the species identity and interaction with clinicians are extremely important in view of the high mortality that has been reported for neonatal infections due to these organisms and the variability of antimicrobial susceptibilities (21).
Most strains of B. cereus are resistant to penicillins and cephalosporins. They have been reported to be susceptible to the aminoglycosides, clindamycin, vancomycin, carbapenems, chloramphenicol, and erythromycin (6). This is important to consider, since the other gram-positive bacillus of major significance in neonates, L. monocytogenes, is usually treated with ampicillin. Our experience and that of others (21) with potentially misleading in vitro susceptibility tests using agar-based methods suggests that quantitative broth-based MIC tests performed using NCCLS methods are advisable to guide specific therapy. Combination therapy with vancomycin and another drug such as an aminoglycoside or clindamycin given empirically while awaiting susceptibility data has been recommended for systemic infections (6). Removal of contaminated foreign bodies such as intravascular catheters or intraventricular shunts is also of great importance to avoid persistent or recurrent infection.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»