Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2003, p. 4359-4365, Vol. 41, No. 9
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.9.4359-4365.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Use of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification of the IS900 Sequence for Rapid Detection of Cultured Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis
M. Enosawa,1* S. Kageyama,1 K. Sawai,1 K. Watanabe,2 T. Notomi,2 S. Onoe,1 Y. Mori,3 and Y. Yokomizo3
Hokkaido Animal Research Center, Shintoku,1
Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd., Ohtawara,2
National Institute of Animal Health, Tsukuba, Japan3
Received 6 January 2003/
Returned for modification 14 March 2003/
Accepted 3 July 2003

ABSTRACT
We evaluated the usefulness of loop-mediated isothermal amplification
(LAMP) in detecting specific gene sequences of
Mycobacterium avium subsp.
paratuberculosis (MAP). A total of 102 primer sets
for LAMP was designed to amplify the IS
900, HspX, and F57 gene
sequences of MAP. Using each of two primer sets (P-1 and P-2)
derived from the IS
900 fragment, it was possible to detect MAP
in a manner similar to that used with nested PCR. The sensitivity
of LAMP with P-1 was 0.5 pg/tube, which was more sensitive than
nested PCR. When P-2 was used, 5 pg/tube could be detected,
which was the same level of sensitivity as that for nested PCR.
LAMP with P-1 was specific. Although only 2
Mycobacterium scrofulaceum strains out of 43 non-MAP mycobacterial strains were amplified,
the amplification reaction for these strains was less efficient
than for MAP strains, and their products could be distinguished
from MAP products by restriction digestion. LAMP with P-2 resulted
in very specific amplification only from MAP, the same result
obtained with nested PCR. Our LAMP method was highly specific,
and the white turbidity of magnesium pyrophosphate, a by-product
of the LAMP reaction, allowed simple visual detection. Our method
is rapid, taking only 2 h, compared with 4 h for nested PCR.
In addition, the LAMP method is performed under isothermal conditions
and no special apparatus is needed, which makes it more economical
and practical than nested PCR or real-time PCR. These results
indicate that LAMP can provide a rapid yet simple test for the
detection of MAP.

INTRODUCTION
Mycobacterium avium subsp.
paratuberculosis (MAP) causes Johne's
disease, a chronic progressive enteritis in ruminants (
4,
12,
13,
21,
26). Cattle, sheep, goats, deer, alpaca, llamas, rhinoceros,
rabbits, bison, and other herbivores have been diagnosed with
paratuberculosis (
3,
10,
11,
22). The organism has also been
isolated from primates, including humans (
7,
9). The disease
is economically important in the cattle industry but its control
is hampered by the lack of accurate rapid diagnostic tests.
This necessitates the development of high-throughput, sensitive
diagnostic methods for the detection of infected animals and
animal products. Accurate diagnostic tests for Johne's disease
are important in enabling the culling or segregation of infected
animals as well as the identification of disease-free animals
to maintain the economic viability of dairy farming. Bacterial
isolation has to date been considered the most reliable test
for detecting MAP infection in cattle (
25,
26,
31). Fecal culturing
for MAP is technically simple and semiquantitative, detecting
as few as 10 CFU/g (
31). In addition, fecal culturing requires
little investment in equipment. However, because of the slow
growth of MAP, it takes more than 8 weeks for colony formation.
This prolonged test period favors the growth of bacterial and
fungal contaminants that are able to survive the decontamination
process.
Several PCR protocols to rapidly detect MAP have been published (2, 7, 15, 17, 20, 23, 24, 28, 29). The targets of these methods are the sequences specific to MAP: IS900, HspX, and F57. Among them, IS900 is an insertion sequence that is unique to MAP, and approximately 10 to 20 copies of the sequence are present in the MAP genome (9). It has been reported that IS900-based PCR is highly sensitive and that nested PCR is more sensitive and specific for the detection of MAP than conventional PCR (5). However, these methods require several operations, such as an electrophoresis step, and the risk of contamination is very real. Recently, a real-time PCR method was developed (33). The sensitivity of this method is equal to that of fecal culturing and can detect the amplified products without electrophoresis. However, real-time PCR requires a special apparatus to monitor the amplification of DNA. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), which amplifies target nucleic acids with high specificity, efficiency, and rapidity under isothermal conditions, was developed by Notomi and coworkers (17, 18, 19). LAMP sensitivity is not significantly influenced by the presence of nontarget DNA. This method relies on auto-cycling strand displacement DNA synthesis performed by a DNA polymerase with high strand displacement activity. A specially designed set of two inner and two outer primers is used, but later during the cycling reaction only the inner primers are used for strand displacement DNA synthesis. The reaction is highly specific for the target sequence; this specificity is attributable to recognition of the target sequence by six independent sequences in the initial stage and by four independent sequences during the later stages of the LAMP reaction. LAMP is simple and easy to perform once the appropriate primers are prepared, requiring only four primers, DNA polymerase, and a regular laboratory heat block for the reaction. No special apparatus is needed, which makes it more economical and practical than nested PCR or real-time PCR. Thus, LAMP has several advantages and could be a novel method to replace conventional PCR methods.
One of the characteristics of LAMP is its ability to synthesize an extremely large amount of DNA. Accordingly, a large amount of by-product, pyrophosphate ion, is produced, yielding a white precipitate of magnesium pyrophosphate in the reaction mixture. The presence of this white precipitate allows easy detection of nucleic acids amplified by the LAMP method (16). In addition, the amplification products generated by LAMP can be detected with gel electrophoresis in the same way as for PCR. The LAMP reaction produces many bands of different sizes, forming a ladder of DNA fragments of 100 bp and larger. Production of the bands depends on the presence of the inner primers, the template, and the DNA polymerase. Specific amplification can be distinguished from nonspecific amplification by the difference in the ladder pattern. Digestion with restriction enzymes is also useful in confirming the structure of the amplified product(s) (19). The present study reports the usefulness of the LAMP method for detection of MAP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mycobacterial strains.
The mycobacterial strains used in this study are shown in Table
1; a total of 62 were examined. Strain number 1 was used as
a template for examining the efficiency of LAMP. Strain numbers
2 to 20 of MAP were isolated from the intestinal lymph nodes
of diseased cows. Strain numbers 21 to 43 were obtained from
the original collection of W. B. Schaefer (
23), and strain numbers
44 to 54 came from an authenticated collection of A. Y. Tsang
and coworkers (
27). Strain numbers 55 to 58 were identified
by IS
1245 PCR. Mycobacterial strains other than those of MAP
were cultured on 1% Ogawa medium (Nissui, Tokyo, Japan), and
the MAP strains were cultured on Herrold's egg yolk medium supplemented
with mycobactin. Genomic DNA was extracted from mycobacterial
strains as follows. (i) First, an isolated colony was selected
and resuspended in 1 ml of autoclaved water in a microtube and
centrifuged for 1 min at 10,000
x g, and the supernatants were
removed. (ii) The pellets were suspended in 200 µl of
InstaGene matrix (Bio-Rad, Tokyo, Japan), and the tubes were
incubated at 56°C for 15 to 30 min. (iii) After high-speed
vortex mixing for 10 s, the tubes were placed in a heat block
at 100°C for 8 min. (iv) After vortex mixing again, the
tubes were subjected to centrifugation at 10,000
x g for 2 to
3 min. The supernatant was then used for the examinations.
Plasmid DNA.
IS
900 fragments (
9) were obtained by PCR amplification from
a MAP strain (ATCC 19698). The 1,451-bp amplified fragments
from IS
900 were digested with
SalI and
EcoRI and cloned into
pBluescript II (TOYOBO, Tokyo, Japan) plasmid vectors (pIS
900)
according to standard protocols.
Primer design for LAMP.
Four primers were used for LAMP reactions, two inner primers and two outer primers (Fig. 1). The two inner primers are called the forward inner primer (FIP) and the backward inner primer (BIP), and each contains two distinct sequences corresponding to the sense and antisense sequences of the target DNA, one for priming in the first stage and the other for self-priming in later stages. For ease of explanation, the sequences (typically 23 to 24 nt) inside both ends of the region targeted for amplification in a DNA fragment are designated F2c and B2. Two inner sequences (typically 23 to 24 nt) 40 nt from the ends of F2c and B2 are designated F1c and B1, and two sequences (17 to 21 nt) outside the ends of F2c and B2 are designated F3c and B3. Given this structure, the sequences of FIP and BIP were designed as follows. FIP contains the sequence (F1c) complementary to F1 and F2. BIP contains B1 and the sequence (B2c) complementary to B2. The two outer primers consist of F3 and the sequence (B3c) complementary to B3. The gene sequences of IS900 (accession no. X16293), HspX (accession no. AF069754), and F57 (accession no. X70277) were obtained from GenBank. The primers for LAMP were designed to amplify the gene fragments of IS900, HspX (1), and F57 (20) of MAP with the Primer Designing Support software (FUJITSU, Tokyo, Japan).
LAMP.
LAMP was carried out in a 25-µl (total volume) reaction
mixture containing 2.4 µM (each) FIP and BIP, 0.2 µM
concentrations of the forward outer primer (F3) and backward
outer primer (B3), 400 µM deoxynucleoside triphosphates
(dNTPs), 0.8 M betaine (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), 20 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 8.8), 10 mM KCl, 10 mM (NH
4)
2SO
4, 4 mM MgSO
4, 0.1% Triton
X-100 (Sigma), 8 U of
Bst DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs,
Beverly, Mass.), and the template DNA. Amplification was undertaken
in 0.2-ml microtubes in a thermal cycler at isothermal conditions
of 65°C for 90 to 120 min. When an amplification result
was tested by real-time monitoring of the turbidity by using
LA-200 (Teramecs, Kyoto, Japan), the absorbance of the reaction
mixture at 650 nm was measured sequentially, and the composition
of 400 mM dNTPs-4 mM MgSO
4-0.1% Triton X-100 changed to 1.4
mM dNTPs-8 mM MgSO
4-0.1% Tween 20. Seven microliters of LAMP
products was electrophoresed at 100 V in 3% agarose gels (1
x Tris-acetate-EDTA), followed by staining with ethidium bromide,
using appropriate size markers (100-base pair [bp] ladder; New
England Biolabs). In addition, to confirm the structure, the
amplified products were digested with several restriction endonucleases
and their sizes were analyzed by electrophoresis.
AflIII cuts
between B1 and B2 of P-1, and
PvuII cuts between B1 and B2 of
P-2. If the amplification occurred as expected, the amplified
products would be fragmented into 107-, 131-, and 197-bp fragments
by
AflIII digestion, and 184-, 201-, and 289-bp fragments by
PvuII digestion. Aliquots (5 µl) of LAMP products and
2 µl of the products digested with restriction enzymes
were also subjected to electrophoresis on 3% agarose gels.
Nested PCR.
To compare LAMP with nested PCR, we tested the sensitivity and specificity of nested PCR with the same template DNA at identical concentrations as were used in the LAMP test. Two-microliter samples were added to 20-µl reaction mixtures containing HotStar Taq Master Mix Kit (1x PCR buffer, 200 µM [each] dNTP, 2.5 U of HotStar Taq DNA polymerase; QIAGEN, Tokyo, Japan) and 1 µM (each) primer in a 0.2-ml microtube. Nested PCR with primers and thermal-cycle conditions as described previously was performed (16). The primary PCR amplification was performed with 30 cycles of denaturation at 97°C for 30 s and combined annealing and extension at 65°C for 30 s in a thermal cycler (TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan). A second PCR was performed by using 0.4 µl of the first PCR solution in 19.6 µl of fresh reaction buffer containing a second set of primers nested inside the first set. The second PCR was performed for 20 cycles with the same conditions as before but with an extension time of 10 min for the last cycle. Samples of PCR amplification products (10 µl) were subjected to electrophoresis on a 3% agarose gel.

RESULTS
A total of 102 LAMP primer sets was designed and tested, based
on three gene sequences reported to be specific to MAP, IS
900,
HspX, and F57. Only two primer sets based on IS
900 were sensitive
enough to specifically amplify MAP DNA by the LAMP method. Eight
primer sets derived from each of the two gene sequences (HspX
and F57) did not amplify or did not show acceptable sensitivity
and specificity (data not shown). Thus, two sets of LAMP primers
(P-1 and P-2) designed from IS
900 were selected (Fig.
2; Table
2), and the following results were obtained. pIS
900 and genomic
DNAs of MAP were used to ascertain the detection limit of the
IS
900 gene by using LAMP. P-1 showed a sensitivity of 0.05 pg/tube
when plasmid DNA in 90-min reactions was used. In the case of
MAP genomic DNA, the detection limit was 0.5 pg/tube under the
same conditions. The LAMP with P-1 had a sensitivity equal to
or greater than that of the nested PCR techniques (Table
3).
P-2 showed a detection limit of 0.1 pg/tube when plasmid DNA
in a 120-min reaction was used. In the case of MAP genomic DNA,
the sensitivity was 5 pg/tube under the same conditions (Table
3).
The specificity of LAMP with P-1 and P-2 was examined with various
mycobacterial DNA samples (Table
1). Both primer sets showed
the same positive results with 20 field strains isolated from
cows infected with MAP. P-1 gave negative results with all 43
mycobacterial strains except for
Mycobacterium scrofulaceum strains (no. 51 and 52), which gave positive reactions but with
lower amplification efficiencies than with MAP. P-2 did not
give a positive reaction with any of the 43 mycobacterial strains;
only MAP was specifically amplified with this primer set.
LAMP amplified extremely large amounts of target DNA and produced magnesium pyrophosphate as a by-product. As shown in Fig. 3, white turbidity was visible; therefore, it was possible to detect the amplification products by the white precipitate of magnesium pyrophosphate in the reaction mixture without gel electrophoresis.
Figure
4A shows the results of turbidity measurements for the
LAMP reaction with P-1 for 90 min at 65°C. The detection
limit of the turbidity was 0.5 pg/tube for MAP. Turbidities
were not observed when other DNA templates, except for those
for
M. scrofulaceum strains (no. 51 and 52), were used. However,
for
M. scrofulaceum strains (no. 51 and 52), there was an increase
in turbidity following LAMP in reaction mixtures containing
more than 100 pg of DNA of each strain per tube. Figure
4B shows
the results of the electrophoretic analysis of the LAMP reaction
mixture using P-1. The ladder pattern confirmed the specific
amplification of the target sequence.
Figure
5A shows the results of turbidity measurements for the
LAMP reaction mixture using P-2, conducted for 120 min at 65°C.
An increase in turbidity was observed in specimens containing
template DNA from MAP. In cases where MAP template DNA was not
present or was less than 5 pg/tube, the turbidity of the reaction
mixture did not increase. Other template DNAs besides MAP did
not show turbidity. Figure
5B shows the results of electrophoretic
analysis of the LAMP reaction mixture using P-2. The amplification
of the target sequence was confirmed by the detection of the
appropriate ladder pattern.
To confirm the structure, the amplified products were digested
with several restriction enzymes and their sizes were analyzed
by electrophoresis. As shown in Figure
6, the sizes of the fragments
generated were approximately 107, 131, and 197 bp for
AflIII
digestion and 184, 201, and 289 bp for
PvuII digestion, in good
agreement with the predicted sizes. The products of strain numbers
51 and 52 were not digested by the restriction enzymes. The
sequences of these amplification products demonstrated that
several mutations were present, including some located within
restriction enzyme sites (data not shown).

DISCUSSION
The growth of MAP in culture is so slow that it takes two to
three months for diagnosis of Johne's disease. Therefore, a
rapid diagnostic test for Johne's disease has been anxiously
awaited. This report describes the development of LAMP for the
rapid detection of IS
900, a gene sequence specific to MAP. Two
primer sets specific to MAP were selected for LAMP. These primers
bind in a region similar to that of previously described PCR
primers (
15,
29), which indicates that the specificity of the
IS
900 sequence is located in the first half of the sequence.
It has been reported that sequences similar to IS
900 are present
in other mycobacteria (
6,
14,
32), and sequences in which homology
is 94% with IS
900 were recently reported (
8). In the present
study, LAMP with P-1 amplified
M. scrofulaceum and the sequences
of the amplified products are similar to that of MAP. However,
since several mutations had occurred in the restriction enzyme
site, it was possible to distinguish these sequences from that
of MAP. Moreover, LAMP has the ability to distinguish target
bacteria from similar bacteria by monitoring the difference
in amplification efficiency between them. As shown by the results
with P-2, although there are many insertion sequences similar
to IS
900, by using the LAMP method based on the region of IS
900 specific to MAP, it is possible to specifically detect MAP.
Two primer sets for LAMP were able to detect 0.5 to 5 pg of DNA per tube. This detection sensitivity was greater than that for conventional PCR, which can detect 100 pg of DNA/tube (28), and was similar to that of nested PCR, which can detect 1 pg of DNA/tube (5, 15). Designing appropriate primers for LAMP is one of the most important key points in optimizing the LAMP reaction because LAMP uses four primers that recognize six distinct regions on the target DNA. While, therefore, the design of LAMP primers is much more complex than that for conventional PCR, the use of Primer Designing Support Software enabled us to efficiently design candidate primers. The previously described reaction time for LAMP (19) is 60 min, but the two primer sets used in this experiment required a longer reaction time (90 to 120 min). Examination and further improvement of the primers for LAMP may improve the speed of the reaction and the sensitivity of detection in the future.
The LAMP method was quicker, taking only 2 h, compared with 4 h for nested PCR.
Newer techniques such as real-time PCR are as rapid as LAMP; results can be obtained in a short time, and electrophoresis is unnecessary. In addition to being rapid, LAMP is easy to perform and is suitable for processing many samples at the same time.
This report presents the results of LAMP using cultures of mycobacteria, so it is necessary to consider detection from fecal samples. Many PCR methods for detecting MAP from fecal samples have been reported (5, 15, 23, 28, 30). When attempting to detect MAP by these methods, PCR inhibitors, which are present in fecal samples, cause a problem, and various devices to reduce PCR inhibitors are required. LAMP seems less sensitive to the presence of nonspecific DNA than does PCR. The presence of 100 ng of human genomic DNA in a LAMP reaction mixture to detect six copies of hepatitis B virus target did not adversely affect the amplification efficiency or result in significant background (19). Moreover, LAMP was not inhibited by blood serum and plasma in heparin, which are known to inhibit PCRs (data not shown).
In conclusion, the LAMP method showed high specificity with IS900 primer sets and MAP cultures. In addition, we demonstrated the possibility of a simple visual detection strategy based on the production of the white turbidity of magnesium pyrophosphate, a by-product of the LAMP reaction. For application in the field, further experiments will be necessary to develop a procedure for obtaining DNA from fecal samples.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Hokkaido Animal Research Center, 5-39 Shintoku-nishi, Shintoku-cho, Kamikawa-gun, Hokkaido 081-0038, Japan. Phone: 81-1566-4-5321. Fax: 81-1566-4-3484. E-mail:
m.enosawa{at}agri.pref.hokkaido.jp.


REFERENCES
1 - Bannantine, J. P., and J. R. Stable. 2000. HspX is present within Mycobacterium paratubercurosis-infected macrophages and is recognized by sera from some infected cattle. Vet. Microbiol. 76:343-358.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Baurfeind, R., S. Benazzi, R. Weiss, T. Schliesser, H. Willems, and G. Baljer. 1996. Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis isolates from sheep, goats, and cattle by hybridization with a DNA probe to insertion element IS900. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1617-1621.[Abstract]
3 - Beard, P. M., D. Henderson, M. J. Daniels, A. Pirie, D. Buxton, A. Greig, M. R. Hutchings, I. McHendrick, S. Rhind, K. Stevenson, and J. M. Sharp. 1999. Evidence of paratuberculosis in fox (Vulpes vulpes) and stoat (Mustelaerminea). Vet. Rec. 145:612-613.
4 - Chiodini, R. J., H. J. Van Kruiningen, and R. S. Merkal. 1984. Ruminant paratuberculosis (Johne's disease): the current status and future prospect. Cornell Vet. 74:218-262.[Medline]
5 - Collins, D. M., D. M. Stephens, and G. W. De Lisle. 1993. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction tests and fecal culture for detecting Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in bovine feces. Vet. Microbiol. 36:289-299.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - Cousins, D. V., R. J. Whittington, I. Marsh, A. Masters, R. J. Evans, and P. Kluver. 1999. Mycobacteria distinct from Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolated from the feces of ruminants possess IS900-like sequences detectable by IS900 polymerase chain reaction: implications for diagnosis. Mol. Cell. Probes 14:431-442.
7 - Dell'Isola, B., C. Poyart, O. Goulet, J. F. Mougenot, E. Sadoun-Journo, N. Brousse, J. Schmitz, C. Ricour, and P. Berche. 1994. Detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis by polymerase chain reaction in children with Crohn's disease. J. Infect. Dis. 169:449-451.[Medline]
8 - Englund, S., G. Bolske, and K.-E. Johansson. 2002. An IS900-like sequence found in a Mycobacterium sp. other than Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 209:267-271.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 - Green, E. P., M. L. Tizard, M. T. Moss, J. Thompson, D. J. Winterborne, J. J. McFadden, and J. Hermon-Taylor. 1989. Sequence and characteristics of IS900, an insertion sequence element identified in a human Crohn's isolate of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Nucleic Acids Res. 17:9063-9073.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Greig, A., K. Stevenson, V. Perez, A. A. Pirie, J. M. Grant, and J. M. Sharp. 1997. Paratuberculosis in wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Vet. Rec. 140:141-143.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Greig, A., K. Stevenson, D. Henderson, V. Hughes, I. Pavlik, M. E. Hines II, I. McKendrick, and J. M. Sharp. 1999. Epidemiological study of paratuberculosis in wild rabbits in Scotland. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1746-1751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Larsen, A. B., R. S. Merkal, and R. C. Cutlip. 1975. Age of cattle as related to resistance to infection with Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Am. J. Vet. Res. 36:255-257.[Medline]
13 - Lawrence, W. E. 1956. Congenital infection with Mycobacterium johnei in cattle. Vet. Rec. 68:312-314.
14 - Marsh, I., R. Whittington, and D. Cousins. 1999. PCR-restriction endonuclease analysis for identification and strain typing of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium based on polymorphisms in IS1311. Mol. Cell. Probes 13:115-126.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 - Miki, T., et al. 1996. Detection and identification of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis by PCR using rapid DNA extract agents. J. Clin. Vet. Med. 14:28-34. (In Japanese.)
16 - Mori, Y., K. Nagamine, N. Tomita, and T. Notomi. 2001. Detection of loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction by turbidity derived from magnesium pyrophosphate formation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 289:150-154.[CrossRef][Medline]
17 - Nagamine, K., K. Watanabe, K. Ohtsuka, T. Hase, and T. Notomi. 2001. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction using a nondenatured template. Clin. Chem. 47:1742-1743.[Free Full Text]
18 - Nagamine, K., T. Hase, and T. Notomi. 2002. Accelerated reaction by loop-mediated isothermal amplification using loop primers. Mol. Cell. Probes 16:223-229.[CrossRef][Medline]
19 - Notomi, T., H. Okayama, H. Masubuchi, T. Yonekawa, K. Watanabe, N. Amino, and T. Hase. 2000. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:E63.
20 - Poupart, P., M. Coene, H. Van Heuverswyn, and C. Cocito. 1993. Preparation of a specific RNA probe for detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis and diagnosis of Johne's disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:1601-1605.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21 - Rankin, J. D. 1959. Johne's disease in cattle. IV. Experimental infection. Vet. Rec. 71:1157-1160.
22 - Riemann, H., M. R. Zaman, R. Ruppanner, O. Aalund, J. B. Jorgensen, H. Worsaae, and D. Behymer. 1979. Paratuberculosis in cattle and free-living exotic deer. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 174:841-843.[Medline]
23 - Schaefer, W. B. 1965. Serologic identification and classification of atypical mycobacteria by their agglutination. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 92(Suppl.):85-93.[Medline]
24 - Secott, T. E., A. M. Ohme, S. Barton, C. C. Wu, and F. A. Rommel. 1999. Mycobacterium paratuberculosis detection in bovine feces is improved by coupling agar culture enrichment to an IS900-specific polymerase chain reaction. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 11:441-447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25 - Sockett, D. C., T. A. Conrad, C. B. Thomas, and M. T. Collins. 1992. Evaluation of four serological tests for bovine paratuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:1134-1139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26 - Sweeney, R. W., R. H. Whitlock, A. E. Rosenberger, and S. A. Herr. 1992. Isolation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis after oral inoculation in uninfected cattle. Am. J. Vet Res. 53:1312-1314.[Medline]
27 - Tsang, A. Y., I. Drupa, M. Goldberg, J. K. McClatchy, and P. J. Brennan. 1983. Use of serology and thin-layer chromatography for the assembly of an authenticated collection of serovars within the Mycobacterium avium-Mycobacterium intracellulare-Mycobacterium scrofulaceum complex. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 33:285-292.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28 - Van der Giessen, J. W. B., R. M. Haring, E. Vauclare, A. Eger, J. Haagsma, and B. A. M. van der Zeijst. 1992. Evaluation of the abilities of three diagnostic tests based on the polymerase chain reaction to detect Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in cattle: application in a control program. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:1216-1219.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29 - Vary, P. H., P. R. Andersen, E. Green, J. Hermon-Taylor, and J. J. McFadden. 1990. Use of highly specific DNA probes and the polymerase chain reaction to detect Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in Johne's disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:933-937.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30 - Whipple, D. L., D. R. Callihan, and J. L. Jarnagin. 1991. Cultivation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from bovine fecal specimens and a suggested standardized procedure. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 3:368-373.[Free Full Text]
31 - Whitlock R. H., and A. E. Rosenberger. 1990. Fecal culture protocol for Mycobacterium paratuberculosis: a recommended procedure, p. 280-285. In Proceedings of the 94th Annual Meeting of the U.S. Animal Health Association. U.S. Animal Health Association, Richmond, Va.
32 - Whittington, R. J., A. F. Hope, D. J. Marshall, C. A. Taragel, and I. Marsh. 2000. Molecular epidemiology of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis: IS900 restriction fragment length polymorphism analyses of isolates from animals and a human in Australia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3240-3248.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33 - Ying Fang, W.-H. Wu, J. L. Pepper, J. L. Larsen, S. A. E. Marras, E. A. Nelson, W. B. Epperson, and J. Christopher-Hennings. 2002. Comparison of real-time, quantitative PCR with molecular beacons to nested PCR and culture methods for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in bovine fecal samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:287-291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2003, p. 4359-4365, Vol. 41, No. 9
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.9.4359-4365.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Liang, S.-Y., Chan, Y.-H., Hsia, K.-T., Lee, J.-L., Kuo, M.-C., Hwa, K.-Y., Chan, C.-W., Chiang, T.-Y., Chen, J.-S., Wu, F.-T., Ji, D.-D.
(2009). Development of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay for Detection of Entamoeba histolytica. J. Clin. Microbiol.
47: 1892-1895
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Inacio, J., Flores, O., Spencer-Martins, I.
(2008). Efficient Identification of Clinically Relevant Candida Yeast Species by Use of an Assay Combining Panfungal Loop-Mediated Isothermal DNA Amplification with Hybridization to Species-Specific Oligonucleotide Probes. J. Clin. Microbiol.
46: 713-720
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Han, E.-T., Watanabe, R., Sattabongkot, J., Khuntirat, B., Sirichaisinthop, J., Iriko, H., Jin, L., Takeo, S., Tsuboi, T.
(2007). Detection of Four Plasmodium Species by Genus- and Species-Specific Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for Clinical Diagnosis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
45: 2521-2528
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Minami, M., Ohta, M., Ohkura, T., Ando, T., Torii, K., Hasegawa, T., Goto, H.
(2006). Use of a Combination of Brushing Technique and the Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method as a Novel, Rapid, and Safe System for Detection of Helicobacter pylori.. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 4032-4037
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kato, H., Yokoyama, T., Kato, H., Arakawa, Y.
(2005). Rapid and Simple Method for Detecting the Toxin B Gene of Clostridium difficile in Stool Specimens by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 6108-6112
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lim, D. V., Simpson, J. M., Kearns, E. A., Kramer, M. F.
(2005). Current and Developing Technologies for Monitoring Agents of Bioterrorism and Biowarfare. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
18: 583-607
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yoshida, A., Nagashima, S., Ansai, T., Tachibana, M., Kato, H., Watari, H., Notomi, T., Takehara, T.
(2005). Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method for Rapid Detection of the Periodontopathic Bacteria Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, and Treponema denticola. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 2418-2424
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Enomoto, Y., Yoshikawa, T., Ihira, M., Akimoto, S., Miyake, F., Usui, C., Suga, S., Suzuki, K., Kawana, T., Nishiyama, Y., Asano, Y.
(2005). Rapid Diagnosis of Herpes Simplex Virus Infection by a Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 951-955
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Poon, L. L. M., Leung, C. S. W., Chan, K. H., Lee, J. H. C., Yuen, K. Y., Guan, Y., Peiris, J. S. M.
(2005). Detection of Human Influenza A Viruses by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 427-430
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Horisaka, T., Fujita, K., Iwata, T., Nakadai, A., Okatani, A. T., Horikita, T., Taniguchi, T., Honda, E., Yokomizo, Y., Hayashidani, H.
(2004). Sensitive and Specific Detection of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 5349-5352
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ikadai, H., Tanaka, H., Shibahara, N., Matsuu, A., Uechi, M., Itoh, N., Oshiro, S., Kudo, N., Igarashi, I., Oyamada, T.
(2004). Molecular Evidence of Infections with Babesia gibsoni Parasites in Japan and Evaluation of the Diagnostic Potential of a Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 2465-2469
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Poon, L. L.M., Leung, C. S.W., Tashiro, M., Chan, K. H., Wong, B. W.Y., Yuen, K. Y., Guan, Y., Peiris, J. S.M.
(2004). Rapid Detection of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus by a Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay. Clin. Chem.
50: 1050-1052
[Full Text]