Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2003, p. 4415-4417, Vol. 41, No. 9
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.9.4415-4417.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Confirmation of Nontypeable Streptococcus pneumoniae-Like Organisms Isolated from Outbreaks of Epidemic Conjunctivitis as Streptococcus pneumoniae
Maria Gloria S. Carvalho,1,2 Arnold G. Steigerwalt,1 Terry Thompson,1 Delois Jackson,1 and Richard R. Facklam1*
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia,1
CNPq, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil2
Received 28 April 2003/
Returned for modification 18 May 2003/
Accepted 9 June 2003

ABSTRACT
Eleven isolates representing five distinct outbreaks of pneumococcal
conjunctivitis were examined for phenotypic and genetic characteristics.
None of the strains possessed capsules, and all strains were
susceptible to optochin, bile soluble, and Gen-Probe AccuProbe
test positive. All 11 isolates were confirmed as
Streptococcus pneumoniae by DNA-DNA reassociation experiments.

TEXT
There is no "gold standard" for the identification of alpha-hemolytic
streptococci as
Streptococcus pneumoniae in the clinical laboratory.
Most clinical laboratories use the optochin susceptibility test
or the bile solubility test for presumptive identification (
5,
15). Confirmation of alpha-hemolytic streptococci as
S. pneumoniae requires demonstrating that the culture has a polysaccharide
capsule, preferably by the Quellung reaction with a type-specific
antiserum (
5). While optochin susceptibility and bile solubility
tests are in most instances very useful for presumptive identification
of
S. pneumoniae, there are exceptions, such as instances when
optochin-susceptible viridans group streptococci and bile-insoluble
S. pneumoniae are being tested (
12,
13). The AccuProbe pneumococcus
test (Gen-Probe, San Diego, Calif.), which is based on the rRNA
gene sequence, is also used to identify refractory strains suspected
of being
S. pneumoniae. Several studies, including some of our
own unpublished data, indicate that the AccuProbe test is reasonably
accurate in identifying
S. pneumoniae (
5,
8,
12). However, only
small differences of less than 1% between the 16S rRNA genes
of
Streptococcus mitis (11 bp) and
Streptococcus oralis (14
bp) and that of
S. pneumoniae may raise the question of its
true specificity. Our findings, which are based on the examination
of thousands of sterile-site pneumococcal isolates, indicate
that atypical results with optochin susceptibility, bile solubility,
and AccuProbe tests and the absence of capsules are very rare
(
5,
10). Approximately 0.5% of more than 25,000 sterile-site
isolates failed to react with Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) pneumococcus typing antisera. On the other
hand, when working with nonsterile-site isolates, sputum, oral
pharyngeal isolates, or nasopharyngeal isolates, it is not uncommon
to find that 10% of the isolates fail to react with pneumococcus
typing antisera. Isolates that are optochin susceptible, bile
soluble, and Gen-Probe positive appear to be nontypeable (NT)
S. pneumoniae. It is intriguing that these NT
S. pneumoniae isolates are frequently isolated from nonsterile sites but are
isolated very rarely, if at all, from sterile sites (
5,
10).
The identification of NT
S. pneumoniae isolates from very large,
explosive outbreaks of conjunctivitis and the nature of the
spread of these unusual strains led us to question whether or
not these organisms were truly
S. pneumoniae (
3,
10,
16). Encapsulated
S. pneumoniae isolates are found in epidemic situations but
do not spread like the NT
S. pneumoniae isolates identified
during the large, rapidly spreading epidemics of conjunctivitis.
Investigators have used a variety of molecular techniques to
include these NT
S. pneumoniae isolates in the taxon
S. pneumoniae,
including 16S ribosomal DNA gene sequencing (
10) and PCR for
the pneumolysin gene (
9). The objective of this study was to
confirm the true identity of these bacteria by DNA-DNA reassociation
experiments, which is the only molecular technique with set
standards for establishing bacterial species (
17,
19).
All isolates used in this study were taken from the culture collection of the CDC Streptococcus Laboratory. The representative isolates used were from five different conjunctivitis outbreaks caused by NT S. pneumoniae-like organisms in the following states: New York (two strains, 1980), California (three strains, 1981), Illinois (two strains, 1981), New Hampshire (two strains, 2002), and New Jersey (two strains, 2002). The isolates from 1980 and 1981 were stored at -70°C in defibrinated blood. Isolates from recent outbreaks were stored in serum-tryptone-glucose-glycerol medium for 1 year. Serotyping was performed with the Quellung test as previously described (6). Tests were performed according to the instructions described in the 8th edition of the Manual of Clinical Microbiology (15). AccuProbe S. pneumoniae tests were purchased from Gen-Probe, Inc., and were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Isolates were examined for capsules by the colloidal carbon wet-mount capsule-staining procedure (4). Harvesting and lysis of the bacterial cells were performed as previously described (18). Extraction and purification of DNA and the determination of DNA relatedness by the hydroxyapatite hybridization method were done as described by Brenner et al. (2). DNA hybridization experiments were performed at 55°C for optimal DNA reassociation and at the stringent DNA reassociation temperature of 70°C. The levels of divergence within related sequences were determined by assuming that each degree of heteroduplex instability was caused by approximately 1% of unpaired bases. Divergence, expressed by the change in melting temperature, is the decrease in thermal stability (°C) of the heterologous DNA duplex relative to that of the homologous duplexes. Divergence was calculated to the nearest 0.5%.
All conjunctivitis isolates from epidemics investigated in the early 1980s as well as those investigated within the last 12 months were susceptible to optochin, were bile soluble, and reacted positively in the AccuProbe pneumococcus test. None of the isolates had capsules based on examination with CDC pneumococcus typing antisera or the colloidal carbon wet-mount procedure (Table 1). The results of the DNA-DNA reassociation studies, shown in Table 1, indicate that all NT S. pneumoniae conjunctivitis isolates belong to the taxon S. pneumoniae. All strains were more than 70% homologous under optimal reassociation conditions (55°C), and only two strains were less than 70% homologous to the type strain of S. pneumoniae under stringent reassociation conditions (70°C). The divergence in related sequences of all strains was less than 4%. The two isolates from the Illinois conjunctivitis outbreak were somewhat more divergent than the others, but according to the criteria established by the ad hoc committee on bacterial systematics, they belong to the S. pneumoniae taxon (17, 19).
NT
S. pneumoniae isolates have been reported for many years.
It is interesting that Finland and Barnes reported that isolates
from eye swabs are less likely to be typeable than isolates
from any other source (99% for cerebral spinal fluid, 96% for
pleural fluid, 93% for otitic fluid, and 78% for eye cultures)
during the years 1935 to 1974 (
7). NT pneumococcal isolates
are not limited to the United States; Medeiros et al. reported
that more than 51% of epidemic conjunctivitis isolates from
patients living in Brazil were NT (
11). Investigators have reported
sporadic cases of conjunctivitis as well (
1,
14,
20). Identification
of these unusual isolates is controversial. Some investigators
have assumed the Gen-Probe AccuProbe pneumococcus test to be
the gold standard for their studies (
8,
12). This assumption
has led to the inclusion of optochin susceptibility and bile
solubility variants into the taxon
S. pneumoniae. At least one
other investigator has reported that the AccuProbe test should
not be used as a gold standard (
9). These investigators concluded
that neither the AccuProbe nor a probe developed to identify
the pneumolysin gene was useful in the final identification
of atypical pneumococci. The heterogeneity of
S. pneumoniae,
S. mitis, and
S. oralis was elegantly shown in the multilocus
sequence typing data published by Whatmore et al. (
20). These
investigators showed that multiple isolates of each of the three
species clustered after neighbor-joining analysis. In fact,
the
S. pneumoniae cluster was more homologous than that of either
S. mitis or
S. oralis. Also, there were several isolates of
alpha-hemolytic streptococci included in the study that did
not join any of the three clusters but that were closely allied
to the
S. pneumoniae cluster. None of these strains possessed
capsules, and results of the tests for optochin susceptibility
and bile solubility and of the AccuProbe reactions varied. This
leads to the conclusion that there are isolates that are similar
to
S. pneumoniae with similar phenotypic characteristics that
cannot be included in the taxon
S. pneumoniae. Nevertheless,
the data presented in this study clearly show by DNA-DNA reassociation
that the isolates from several large outbreaks of conjunctivitis
are
S. pneumoniae, a finding which confirms the results obtained
by optochin susceptibility, bile solubility, and AccuProbe tests.
We cannot comment on the true identity of isolates from sporadic
outbreaks of conjunctivitis or from sterile sites or nonsterile
sites (nasopharyngeal or oral pharyngeal). DNA-DNA reassociation
is the only method that can be confirmatory for inclusion of
an isolate into any taxon (
17,
19), but these results suggest
that for identification of NT
S. pneumoniae isolates involved
in conjunctivitis outbreaks, clinical laboratories can rely
upon the conventional physiological tests. The absence of atypical
results for optochin susceptibility, bile solubility, or AccuProbe
tests for these isolates can be explained in part by the fact
that the majority of the isolates belong to a clonal group (
10).
As staff members of a reference laboratory, we will be using
this method in the future to expand this study to include isolates
other than those from outbreaks of conjunctivitis that are NT.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
M. G. S. Carvalho was supported by a "Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento
Científico e Tecnológico-CNPq" postdoctoral fellowship.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd., Mail Stop C02, Atlanta, GA 30333. Phone: (404) 639-1379. Fax: (404) 639-3123. E-mail:
rrf2{at}cdc.gov.


REFERENCES
1 - Barker, J. H., D. M. Musher, R. Silberman, H. M. Phan, and D. A. Watson. 1999. Genetic relatedness among nontypeable pneumococci implicated in sporadic cases of conjunctivitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:4039-4041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Brenner, D. J., A. C. McWhorter, J. K. L. Knutson, and A. G. Steigerwalt. 1982. Escherichia vulneris: a new species of Enterobacteriaceae associated with human wounds. J. Clin. Microbiol. 15:1133-1140.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2003. Pneumococcal conjunctivitis at an elementary schoolMaine, September 20-December 6, 2002. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 52:64-66.[Medline]
4 - Chapin, K. 1995. Clinical microscopy, p. 33-51, In P. R. Murray, E. J. Barron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.). Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
5 - Facklam, R., and N. Pigott. 1994. Description of phenotypic characteristics to aid in the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae, p. 415-417. In A. Totollian (ed.), Pathogenic streptococci: present and future. Lancer Publications, St. Petersburg, Russia.
6 - Facklam, R. R., and J. A. Washington II. 1991. Streptococcus and related catalase-negative gram-positive cocci, p. 238-257. In A. Balows, W. J. Hausler, Jr., K. L. Herrmann, H. D. Isenberg, and H. J. Shadomy (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 5th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
7 - Finland, M., and M. W. Barnes. 1977. Changes in occurrence of capsular serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae at Boston City Hospital during selected years between 1935 and 1974. J. Clin. Microbiol. 5:154-166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Geslin, P., A. Fremaux, C. Spicq, G. Sissa, and S. Georges. 1997. Use of a DNA probe test for identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae nontypeable strains. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 418:383-385.[Medline]
9 - Kaijalainen, T., S. Rintamaki, E. Herva, and M. Leionen. 2002. Evaluation of gene-technological and conventional methods in the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Microbiol. Methods 51:111-118.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Martin, M., J. H. Turco, M. E. Zegans, R. R. Facklam, S. Sodha, J. A. Elliott, J. H. Pryor, B. Beall, D. D. Erdman, Y. Y. Baumgartner, P. A. Sanchez, J. D. Schwartzman, J. Montero, A. Schuchat, and C. G. Whitney. 2003. An outbreak of conjunctivitis due to atypical Streptococcus pneumoniae. N. Engl. J. Med. 348:1112-1121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Medeiros, M. I., P. da Silva, J. O. Silva, A. M. M. Carneiro, M. C. Carloni, and M. C. C. Brandileone. 1998. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae as etiological agents of conjunctivitis outbreaks in the region of Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 40:7-9.[Medline]
12 - Mundy, L. S., E. N. Janoff, K. E. Schwebvke, C. J. Shanholtzer, and K. E. Willard. 1998. Ambiguity in the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae optochin, bile solubility, Quellung, and the AccuProbe DNA probe tests. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 109:55-61.[Medline]
13 - Munoz, R., A. Fenoll, D. Vicioso, and J. Casal. 1990. Optochin-resistant variants of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 13:63-66.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 - Pease, A. A., C. W. I. Douglas, and R. C. Spencer. 1986. Identification of non-capsulate strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from eyes. J. Clin. Pathol. 39:871-875.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Ruoff, K. L., R. A. Whiley, and D. Beighton. 2003. Streptococcus, p. 405-421. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Barron, M. A. Pfaller, J. H. Jorgensen, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 8th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
16 - Shayegani, M., L. M. Parsons, W. E. Gibbons, Jr., and D. Campbell. 1982. Characterization of nontypable Streptococcus pneumoniae-like organisms isolated from outbreaks of conjunctivitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 16:8-14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Stackebrandt, E., W. Frederiksen, G. M. Garrity, P. A. D. Grimont, P. Kampfer, M. C. J. Maiden. X. Nesme, R. Rossella-Mora, J. Swings, H. G. Truper, L. Vauterin, A. C. Ward, and W. B. Whitman. 2002. Report of the ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52:1043-1047.[Abstract]
18 - Teixeira, L. M., R. R. Facklam, A. G. Steigerwalt, N. E. Pigott, V. L. C. Merquior, and D. J. Brenner. 1995. Correlation between phenotypic characteristics and DNA relatedness within Enterococcus faecium strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1520-1523.[Abstract]
19 - Wayne, L. G., D. J. Brenner, R. R. Colwell, P. A. D. Grimont, O. Kandler, M. I. Krichevsky, L. H. Moore, W. E. C. Moore, R. G. E. Murray, E. Stackebrandt, M. P. Starr, and H. G. Trüper. 1987. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 37:463-464.[Free Full Text]
20 - Whatmore, A. M., A. Efstratiou, A. P. Pickerill, K. Broughton, G. Woodard, D. Sturgeon, R. George, and C. G. Dowson. 2000. Genetic relationships between clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus oralis, and Streptococcus mitis: characterization of "atypical" pneumococci and organisms allied to S. mitis harboring S. pneumoniae virulence factor-encoding genes. Infect. Immun. 68:1374-1382.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2003, p. 4415-4417, Vol. 41, No. 9
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.9.4415-4417.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Williamson, Y. M., Moura, H., Woolfitt, A. R., Pirkle, J. L., Barr, J. R., Carvalho, M. D. G., Ades, E. P., Carlone, G. M., Sampson, J. S.
(2008). Differentiation of Streptococcus pneumoniae Conjunctivitis Outbreak Isolates by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 5891-5897
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Richter, S. S., Heilmann, K. P., Dohrn, C. L., Riahi, F., Beekmann, S. E., Doern, G. V.
(2008). Accuracy of Phenotypic Methods for Identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates Included in Surveillance Programs. J. Clin. Microbiol.
46: 2184-2188
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sa-Leao, R., Simoes, A. S., Nunes, S., Sousa, N. G., Frazao, N., de Lencastre, H.
(2006). Identification, prevalence and population structure of non-typable Streptococcus pneumoniae in carriage samples isolated from preschoolers attending day-care centres. Microbiology
152: 367-376
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Berron, S., Fenoll, A., Ortega, M., Arellano, N., Casal, J.
(2005). Analysis of the Genetic Structure of Nontypeable Pneumococcal Strains Isolated from Conjunctiva. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 1694-1698
[Abstract]
[Full Text]