Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2003, p. 4487-4488, Vol. 41, No. 9
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.9.4487-4488.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Comparison of Sodium Carbonate, Cetyl-Pyridinium Chloride, and Sodium Borate for Preservation of Sputa for Culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

LETTER
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis is essential for a successful treatment of patients, mainly
those with a previous history of antituberculosis therapy. Susceptibility
testing of strains requires their isolation from sputum samples
within 24 to 48 h of collection and storage at 2° to 4°C.
If the sample is left at room temperature or in refrigeration
for longer periods of time, the recovery of
M. tuberculosis decreases to 63% and contamination rises to 18% (
3). Both problems
occur when the laboratory is located far from the patient's
home, when refrigeration is not available, or when transportation
to the laboratory is inadequate, all common situations in developing
countries. Despite these problems, no preservatives are presently
used to improve the rate of isolation of
M. tuberculosis from
sputum. In previous studies, sodium carbonate (SC), cetyl-pyridinium
chloride (CP), and sodium borate (SB) proved to be good preservatives
of this bacterium (
1,
5,
6-
8).
We compared the efficacy of these three compounds in preserving the viability of M. tuberculosis in 58 sputum samples positive for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) from 23 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis who lived in a rural area of Mexico. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of our institution.
All samples were initially processed in the local laboratory, in Huauchinango Puebla. Each sample was divided into four equal aliquots and placed in a 50-ml conical test tube with one of the following: (i) SC, 75 mg (J. T. Baker, Xalostoc, Mexico); (ii) 5% SB, 800 µl (J. T. Baker); (iii) 1% CP, equal volume (Sigma Aldrich Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.); and (iv) no chemical (control). Aliquots were left at room temperature (25 to 35°C) for 5 to 18 days; 8 samples were stored for 5 days, 17 for 6 days, 13 for 7 days, 6 for 8 days, 8 for 9 days, 1 for 15 days, 3 for 16 days, and 2 for 18 days. Aliquots were then sent to our laboratory where they were digested and were decontaminated with 0.5% N-acetyl-cisteine and 2% NaOH (4). Part of the sediment was smeared and was stained first with auramine-rhodamine (AR) (Sigma-Aldrich) and was then stained with Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) (Sigma-Aldrich) to confirm results. The remaining sediment was resuspended in Na2HPO4-KH2PO4 (0.067 M); 0.5 ml was inoculated in Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium (Becton Dickinson, Mexico City, Mexico) and another 0.5 ml in mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) medium (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, Md.). The remaining sediment was kept at 4°C for 15 days and was redigested if the first culture became contaminated. LJ was incubated at 37°C in 7.5% CO2 and was examined weekly for 8 weeks. MGIT was incubated in the MGIT 960 instrument (Becton Dickinson). M. tuberculosis was identified in positive cultures by DNA probe (Gene Probe, San Diego, Calif.) (2).
AR and ZN stains were AFB positive in 91.4% of smears from samples preserved with SC, 96.6% with SB, and 98.3% of the controls. In contrast, of these samples preserved with CP only, 31% were AR positive and 37.9% were ZN positive.
M. tuberculosis was isolated from at least one of the four aliquots in all 58 sputum samples. AFB were cultured in LJ and MGIT from all samples preserved with SC; however, due to contamination with bacteria and fungi, M. tuberculosis was identified in only 86 and 98% of samples, respectively (Table 1). From samples preserved in CP, 98% grew M. tuberculosis when cultured in LJ, and in contrast, only 71% grew M. tuberculosis when cultured in MGIT. The recovery of M. tuberculosis was significantly lower in samples preserved with SB and in controls, mainly due to contamination (Table 1). We observed viability of M. tuberculosis in samples preserved with all compounds for 5 to 18 days.
Although this study did not include a systematic analysis of
the maximum effective storage time of sputum with the different
compounds, we can conclude that the recovery and staining of
M. tuberculosis were best when sputum was preserved in SC and
was cultured in liquid media. Similar yields were obtained when
sputum was preserved in CP and cultured in LJ.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by CONACyT (G26264-M), PAEP (UNAM Grant
201313), and the Fogarty International Center (FIRCA PA-95-011).
We thank Beatriz R. Ruiz-Palacios for editorial assistance.

REFERENCES
1 - Kestle, D. G., and G. P. Kubica. 1967. Sputum collection for cultivation of mycobacteria. An early morning specimen or the 24- to 72-hour pool? Tech. Bull. Regist. Med. Technol. 37:213-215.[Medline]
2 - Lebrun, L., F. Espinasse, J. D. Poveda, and V. Vincent-Levy-Frebault. 1992. Evaluation of nonradioactive DNA probes for identification of mycobacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:2476-2478.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Paramasivan, C. N., A. Narayana, R. Prabhakar, M. S. Rajagopal, P. R. Somasundaram, and S. P. Tripathy. 1983. Effect of storage of sputum specimens at room temperature on smear and culture results. Tubercle 64:119-124.[CrossRef][Medline]
4 - Ratnam, S., F. A. Stead, and M. Howes. 1987. Simplified acetylcysteine-alkali digestion-decontamination procedure for isolation of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 25:1428-1432.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Richards, W. D., and H. S. Wright. 1983. Preservation of tissue specimens during transport to mycobacteriology laboratories. J. Clin. Microbiol. 17:393-395.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Selvakumar, N., Vanajakumar, P. G. Gopi, K. V. Venkataramu, M. Datta, C. N. Paramasivan, and R. Prabhakar. 1995. Isolation of tubercle bacilli from sputum samples of patients in the field studies by the cetylpyridinium chloride-sodium chloride and sodium hydroxide methods. Indian J. Med. Res. 102:149-151.[Medline]
7 - Smithwick, R. W., C. B. Stratigos, and H. L. David. 1975. Use of cetylpyri-dinium chloride and sodium chloride for the decontamination of sputum specimens that are transported to the laboratory for the isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1:411-413.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Tazir, M., H. L. David, and F. Boulahbal. 1979. Evaluation of the chloride and bromide salts of cetylpyridium for the transportation of sputum in tuberculosis bacteriology. Tubercle 60:31-36.[CrossRef][Medline]
| | | | | |
M. Bobadilla-del-Valle A. Ponce-de-León M. Kato-Maeda A. Hernández-Cruz J. J. Calva-Mercado B. Chávez-Mazari B. A. Caballero-Rivera J. C. Nolasco-García J. Sifuentes-Osornio*
Department of Infectious Diseases Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán Mexico City, Mexico
|
| | | | | |
* Phone: (52-55) 73 12 00, ext. 2174 Fax: (52-55) 13 39 45 E-mail: jso{at}quetzal.innsz.mx |
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2003, p. 4487-4488, Vol. 41, No. 9
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.9.4487-4488.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Pardini, M., Varaine, F., Bonnet, M., Orefici, G., Oggioni, M. R., the LONG-DRUG Study Group, , Fattorini, L.
(2007). Usefulness of the BACTEC MGIT 960 System for Isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Sputa Subjected to Long-Term Storage. J. Clin. Microbiol.
45: 575-576
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pardini, M., Varaine, F., Iona, E., Arzumanian, E., Checchi, F., Oggioni, M. R., Orefici, G., Fattorini, L.
(2005). Cetyl-Pyridinium Chloride Is Useful for Isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Sputa Subjected to Long-Term Storage. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 442-444
[Abstract]
[Full Text]