Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2004, p. 30-35, Vol. 42, No. 1
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.1.30-35.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Blanca Leaños,1 Adriana Valenzuela,1 Ulises Garza-Ramos,2 Teresa Rojas,2 Fortino Solórzano,1 Lilia Chihu,2 and Jesús Silva2*
Hospital de Pediatría, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City,1 Departamento de Resistencia Bacteriana, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México2
Received 1 July 2003/ Returned for modification 18 August 2003/ Accepted 18 September 2003
|
|
|---|
170-kb conjugative plasmid. Results indicate that dissemination of this resistance was due to clonal and horizontal spread. |
|
|---|
There is limited information in Mexico concerning molecular studies on the type of ESBL selected in vivo in multidrug-resistant enterobacteria (13, 24, 25, 26). In this work we used a molecular approach to determine the epidemiology of an outbreak produced by an endemic multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae strain.
|
|
|---|
Bacterial strains. One hundred eighty-four clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae were isolated from August 1996 to November 1997. During this period an increase in the incidence of isolation was detected. The species of the organisms were verified by tests with the API 20E system (bioMerieux, Marcy L'Etoile, France). Genetic and molecular characterization studies for ESBL production were performed on 50 clinical isolates selected according to their pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns: 21 corresponding to clone A; 11 corresponding to subtype A1; 1 isolate each for subtype A2, subtype A3, clone B, and clone C; and 14 with unique patterns (UNP). All strains were isolated from blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures (see Table 2).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Epidemiological and molecular characteristics of K. pneumoniae ESBL-producing clinical isolates
|
Susceptibility testing and ESBL test.
MICs were determined by agar dilution on Mueller-Hinton agar according to the recommendations of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). Breakpoints for resistance (in micrograms per milliliter) were as follows: ampicillin,
32; carbenicillin,
64; chloramphenicol,
32; amikacin,
64; gentamicin,
16; ceftazidime,
32; cefotaxime,
64; ceftizoxime,
64; cefepime,
32; imipenem,
16; meropenem,
16; norfloxacin,
16. ESBL production was performed by the disk diffusion method with cefotaxime and ceftazidime alone and in combination with clavulanic acid, as recommended by the NCCLS (17).
Genome fingerprinting by PFGE. For PFGE typing, whole-cell DNA was obtained according to the method of Miranda et al. (16). DNA was digested with the XbaI restriction enzyme (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, Md.) and separated in a 1% agarose gel (Pulsed Field-Certified; Pronadisa, Madrid, Spain) with a Gene-Path System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.). The gel was stained with ethidium bromide and visualized with the Gel-Doc system (Bio-Rad). The images were interpreted with Multi-analyst software (Bio-Rad) according to the criteria of Tenover et al. (28).
IEF and bioassay. Isoelectric focusing (IEF) was conducted according to the method described by Matthew et al. (14) by using a Phast system minigel with a pH range of 3 to10 (Pharmacia, LKB). Extracts from TEM-1-, SHV-2-, and SHV-5-producing strains were used as standards for pIs of 5.4, 7.6, and 8.2, respectively. To determine the ESBLs encoded by the strains, a bioassay was performed as described by Silva-Sanchez and Aguilar-Zacarias (27).
Plasmid isolation and conjugation experiments. DNA was extracted from clinical isolates and transconjugants according to the method described by Kieser (10). DNA was visualized after vertical electrophoresis in 0.7% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide. Plasmids R6K (40 kb), RP4 (5 kb), IR (93 kb), and pUD21 (170 kb) were used as molecular weight markers. Matings were performed as described by Miller (15), by using E. coli strain J53-2 (F- pro met Rifr). In all cases, transconjugants were selected on Luria agar supplemented with rifampin (200 µg/ml) in combination with cefotaxime (1 µg/ml) or ampicillin (100 µg/ml). For each successful mating experiment, 25 independent transconjugants were obtained from each selection medium and were tested on Luria plates supplemented with ampicillin (100 µg/ml), cefotaxime (1 µg/ml), kanamycin (25 µg/ml), tetracycline (25 µg/ml), chloramphenicol (10 µg/ml), and gentamicin (1 µg/ml).
TEM- or SHV-specific PCR and DNA sequencing. To amplify TEM-related genes from clinical isolates, oligonucleotide primers OT1 and OT2, described by Arlet and Philippon (1), were used for PCR. For SHV-specific PCR, primers SE5 and SB3 were used as described by Silva et al. (26). The PCR mixture for both amplifications (50 µl) contained 30 pmol of each primer, 300 ng of total DNA, 1x reaction buffer, 200 µM MgSO2, 200 µM each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, and 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase. Enhancer buffer (Gibco BRL) at a final concentration of 3x was added to the reaction mixture to enhance the specificity of hybridization. The PCR amplification conditions for both reactions were as follows: initial denaturation (95°C for 5 min); 30 cycles of denaturation (94°C for 30s), annealing (58°C for 30s), and polymerization (72°C for 120s); and an additional polymerization step (72°C for 15 min) at the end of the program. The product of blaSHV amplification was used to determine the nucleotide sequence with the fluorescence-based Taq FS Dye terminator cycle sequencing kit and the same primers. Sequence analysis was performed with Genetics Computer Group software and by BLASTx searching (of the EMBL, SwissProt, and PIR databases). Multiple alignment was performed with the Clustal W program (29).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The nucleotide sequences of shv genes from strains X1529A, X1620A, X1623UNP, R1549UNP, and X1600UNP have been deposited in GenBank under accession no. AY386365 to AY386369, respectively.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (136K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Representative agarose gel PFGE of XbaI-digested genomic DNA of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates. Lane 1, molecular size marker of lambda ladder; lanes 2 to 5 and 13, clone B; lanes 6 to 12, clone A; lanes 14 and 15, clone C; lane 16, UNP.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibilities between K. pneumoniae clone A isolates and URI
|
170 kb and one of 40 to 90 kb. To identify the plasmid responsible for conferring cefotaxime resistance, all clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae were mated to a susceptible E. coli host. Transconjugants were selected on ampicillin or cefotaxime in independent selections and were designated with the letter X and the number of the parental strain. Successful matings were detected for 42 of the 50 clinical isolates; of these, 18 corresponded to clone A, 9 to subtype A1, 1 to subtype A3, 1 to clone B, and 13 to UNP. Ampicillin resistance transfer was successful in all 42 matings; however, when selection was done on cefotaxime, only 27 of 42 transconjugants (64.3%) were obtained. However, the transconjugants that grew only on ampicillin showed cefotaxime resistance in a later test. Frequencies of resistance transfer were 10-2 to 10-5 transconjugants per donor cell for ampicillin and 10-4 to 10-6 for cefotaxime. In general, resistance transfer frequencies were one- to twofold higher for ampicillin than for cefotaxime. All 42 transconjugants harbored only the largest plasmid (
170 kb) and expressed resistance markers for other antibiotics such as tetracycline, kanamycin, gentamicin, and chloramphenicol. Eighteen transconjugantswere susceptible only to tetracycline, 8 were susceptible only to chloramphenicol, 6 were susceptible only to tetracycline and chloramphenicol, and 10 were resistant to the six antibiotics tested. IEF analysis and enzyme inhibition test. Crude sonicates of the 50 clinical isolates and 42 transconjugants were subjected to IEF in order to identify the ß-lactamase profiles. All clinical isolates and transconjugants expressed a ß-lactamase with a pI of 5.4 and two or three additional bands with pIs of 7.0, 7.3, 7.6, or 8.2 (Table 2). One predominant ß-lactamase profile with pIs of 5.4, 7.3, and 8.2 was identified for 38 clinical isolates, of which 18 corresponded to clone A, 11 to subtype A1, 1 to subtype A3, 1 to clone B, and 7 to UNP. Three other, minor ß-lactamase profiles were identified for clinical isolates: the first with pIs of 5.4, 7.0, and 8.2, the second with pIs of 5.4 and 8.2, and the last with pIs of 5.4 and 7.6. In all cases the last enzyme, with a pI of 8.2 or 7.6, was determined to have the capacity to hydrolyze cefotaxime in the bioassay, indicating correspondence to an ESBL. When ß-lactamase profiles were determined for transconjugants, a major pattern of enzymes with pIs of 5.4 and 8.2 was identified. This pattern was expressed in 40 of 42 transconjugants, of which 17 corresponded to clone A, 9 to subtype A1, 1 to subtype A3, 1 to clone B, and 12 to UNP. Two transconjugants, 1 from clone A and 1 with a UNP, showed a ß-lactamase pattern with pIs of 5.4 and 7.6.
PCR amplification of blaTEM and blaSHV genes. According to the pIs of the ß-lactamases obtained, the enzyme with a pI of 5.4 should correspond to the TEM-1 ß-lactamase, and enzymes with a pI of 7.6 or 8.2 should correspond to SHV-derived ß-lactamases. In order to corroborate this hypothesis, PCR assays were performed with specific oligonucleotides. Total-DNA preparations of five different clinical isolates and the respective transconjugants, representing the four ß-lactamase profiles, were tested for the presence of blaTEM and blaSHV genes. In the first case, an amplification product of the expected size (503 bp) was obtained for all clinical isolates and transconjugants tested, indicating that the ß-lactamase with a pI of 5.4 corresponded to TEM-1 (Table 3). When PCR amplification was performed for the detection of blaSHV genes, a product of approximately 900 bp was observed in all cases.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Comparison of amino acid sequences of SHV derivatives and detection of TEM ß-lactamase in K. pneumoniae clinical isolates and transconjugants
|
|
|
|---|
Recent studies of hospital-associated infections in the United States have reported that SHV-4 and SHV-5 are becoming the predominant types of ESBLs found in nosocomial isolates of K. pneumoniae. In Germany, SHV-2 and SHV-5 seem to be predominant; and in France, SHV-3, SHV-4, and TEM-3 are more common. SHV-2 is widespread internationally (9).
In order to characterize cefotaxime resistance at the molecular level, 50 clinical isolates were randomly selected; they included type A, with three subtypes, and URI, which included two minor clones (B and C) and UNP. In all clinical isolates, TEM-1 and SHV-5 (and in a minor proportion, SHV-2) enzymes were encoded in a self-transferable
170-kb plasmid. In addition to these two enzymes, a third, non-ESBL ß-lactamase with a pI of 7.0 or 7.3 was expressed. This ß-lactamase was not transferred by conjugation to the E. coli recipient strain, suggesting that this enzyme is not carried on the same plasmid. The prevalence of ESBL producers was almost the same throughout the study period, suggesting that SHV-type ß-lactamase-producing strains were already endemic in the hospital.
The identification of SHV-2 and SHV-5 makes it possible to speculate on the evolutionary sequence of SHV-type ESBLs, i.e., from SHV-2 to SHV-5, according to the mutation process. Because only one amino acid substitution (Gly240Lys) is required, it may be assumed that in this hospital the mutation process in K. pneumoniae clinical isolates was sequential from SHV-2 to SHV-5, thereby disseminating to other strains and/or patients.
When the mating experiments were developed in both genotyping groups (A and URI), the results were very similar, 82 and 88%, respectively. Two antibiotics were used independently for selection, ampicillin and cefotaxime, and frequencies of transfer of resistance to ampicillin were always one- to twofold higher than those for cefotaxime. Considering that the
170-kb plasmid encodes two ß-lactamases, TEM-1 and SHV-2 or SHV-5, these results suggest that the higher frequency for ampicillin resistance transfer may have been due to the fact that TEM-1 expresses preferentially to the ESBL enzyme, conferring resistance to ampicillin in E. coli transconjugants. The cefotaxime phenotype depends on the expression of the SHV-derived enzyme. Also, variations in non-ß-lactam resistance markers associated with the
170-kb plasmid suggest the ability of the plasmid to accept or lose these genes. These could be included in other mobile genetic elements such as transposons or integrons (4). Also, the fact that a minor number of strains were unable to transfer resistance could be due to loss of conjugation by means of a possible mutation along the tra operon, which showed diversity in the clinical isolates. In these isolates, the high frequency of conjugation increases the possibility of dissemination of multidrug resistance among other genera in vivo.
Other studies investigating ß-lactamases and ESBL types in different clinical isolates from Mexico, Poland, and Taiwan (6, 13, 26) have documented the SHV-5 enzyme in association with the TEM-1 ß-lactamase. In the future, our laboratory will undertake investigations using molecular biology techniques to determine whether the plasmids expressing these enzymes are related at the molecular level.
On the basis of susceptibilities to antibiotics, genotyping, ß-lactamase production, and conjugation experiments, it is possible that spread of an endemic strain and horizontal gene transfer were responsible for the high frequency of detection of K. pneumoniae ESBL producers in this setting. Most of these strains were obtained from the NICU and the infant ward, indicating a localized dissemination within the hospital and pointing to a potential source of spread of an SHV-5 ESBL-encoding plasmid in the hospital.
In conclusion, this study highlights the need to establish an antimicrobial resistance surveillance network for K. pneumoniae to monitor the trends and new types of resistance mechanisms in this hospital. Also, the factors responsible for the selection and dissemination of this plasmid encoding the SHV-derived enzyme and clone A need to be identified, controlled, and, where possible, prevented so as to avoid major outbreaks.
We thank Zita Becerra for excellent laboratory assistance.
Present address: Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Chilpancingo, Guerrero, México. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»