This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doleans, A.
Right arrow Articles by Jarraud, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doleans, A.
Right arrow Articles by Jarraud, S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2004, p. 458-460, Vol. 42, No. 1
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.1.458-460.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Clinical and Environmental Distributions of Legionella Strains in France Are Different

Anne Doleans,1 Helena Aurell,2 Monique Reyrolle,2 Gerard Lina,2 Jean Freney,1 Francois Vandenesch,2 Jerome Etienne,2 and Sophie Jarraud2*

Laboratoire de Microbiologie, EA 3090, ISPB, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69373 Lyon,1 Centre National de Référence des Legionella, Laboratoire de Bactériologie INSERM E-0230, Faculté de Médecine, IFR 62, 69372 Lyon Cédex 08, France2

Received 1 August 2003/ Returned for modification 9 September 2003/ Accepted 9 October 2003


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
In France, the clinical distribution of Legionella species and serogroups does not correspond to their environmental distribution. Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 is more prevalent among clinical isolates (95.4%) than in the environment (28.2%), whereas L. anisa is more frequent in the environment (13.8%) than in the clinical setting (0.8%).


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
Legionella infection occurs mainly by inhalation of aerosols generated from water sources such as distribution systems and cooling towers (13). The species Legionella pneumophila accounts for about 90% of the cases of legionellosis, and about 85% are due to serogroup 1 (5, 16). Other Legionella species are rarely pathogenic in humans, the most common being L. longbeachae (3.9%) and L. bozemanii (2.4%), except for in Australia and New Zealand, where L. longbeachae is responsible for 30% of the cases of Legionnaires' disease (16). In contrast, the distribution of Legionella species and serogroups in the environment is poorly known; most environmental studies have involved limited numbers of samples (4, 11, 14, 17) and/or only identified the species L. pneumophila (7, 9, 11, 14, 15).

To determine whether the clinical distribution of Legionella species and serogroups reflects their environmental predominance, we studied three collections of clinical and environmental isolates obtained from the French national Legionella surveillance network.

All of the Legionella strains (n = 259) isolated from patients with Legionnaires' disease in France between July 2001 and December 2002 in 57 French departments were sent to the national Legionella reference center (NRCL) as part of the epidemiological surveillance system. Fifty-eight percent were community acquired, 16% were hospital acquired, and 26% were of undetermined origin. The species and serogroup distribution was comparable to that reported elsewhere: L. pneumophila was responsible for more than 90% of the cases, and L. pneumophila serogroup 1 accounted for the majority of these (Table 1) (5, 16). In contrast to the collection of clinical strains, the NRCL panel of environmental strains is not exhaustive and is not systematically isolated from the environment for clinical cases. To minimize the sampling bias, we studied two different collections of environmental isolates: (i) 2,747 strains isolated by standard methods in 66 French departments between July 2001 and December 2002 and sent to the NRCL for identification and (ii) 381 strains isolated by the NRCL from 554 water samples originating from four French departments between January 2001 and July 2002. The water samples were collected from taps, showers, water valves, boilers, cooling towers, fountains, thermal waters, swimming pools, medical sprays, and air conditioners. Most (87.3%) came from hospital water systems, and the remainder came from private buildings, hotels, airports, spas, and swimming pools (12.7%). Legionellae were isolated in accordance with the ISO 11731 standard procedure (6) and identified to the species and serogroup levels (10 colonies per sample) by direct immunofluorescence with polyclonal rabbit sera raised by the NRCL. Legionella isolates showing cross-reactions with rabbit sera were identified to the species level by random amplified polymorphic DNA PCR (8) or by sequencing of the mip gene (12). The proportion of each species and serogroup was compared between the two environmental panels by using a two-tailed {chi}2 test with a significance level of 5%. The distribution was similar in the two panels (Table 1), and we thus considered the two populations to be representative of environmental Legionella colonization in France. The nationwide and Lyon panels comprised mainly L. pneumophila (75.5 and 75.6%, respectively). L. pneumophila serogroup 1 represented 28.2 and 29.1% of the isolates, respectively, and non-pneumophila species accounted for 24.5 and 24.4% of the isolates, respectively (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Comparative Legionella species and serogroup distribution in clinical and environmental isolates

To determine whether the environmental situation reflected the clinical distribution, the species and serogroup distributions were compared between the 2,747 environmental isolates and the 259 clinical isolates. The distributions of most species and serogroups differed significantly. In particular, L. pneumophila serogroup 1 accounted for 95.4% of the clinical isolates but only 28.2% of the environmental isolates (Table 1), while L. pneumophila serogroup 3 accounted for only 1.2% of the human isolates compared to 10.8% of the environmental isolates. Non-pneumophila legionellae accounted for only 1.2% of the clinical cases but 24.5% of the environmental isolates. L. anisa, the most frequent non-pneumophila species in the environment (13.8%), accounted for only 0.8% of the clinical isolates.

Only 15.8% of the clinical isolates were from confirmed nosocomial cases, whereas 87.3% of the samples collected in the Lyon area were from hospitals; the origin of the 2,747 isolates was not known. However, the distribution of species and serogroups did not change when only nosocomial isolates were considered; for example, L. pneumophila serogroup 1 accounted for 97.6% of the clinical isolates and 27.4% of the environmental isolates.

We then examined the level of Legionella colonization of hospital water systems by studying the 554 water samples predominantly collected from hospitals (87.3%). The 286 positive water samples (51.6%) contained between 102 and 107 Legionella CFU/liter, and 138 samples (48.3% of the positive samples) contained >=103 CFU/liter. Despite this frequent contamination of hospital water systems in France, hospital-acquired legionellosis remains relatively infrequent, with about 100 cases annually (15% of all of the cases in France) (3).

The high frequency of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 isolation from clinical samples, as previously observed (5, 16), is not therefore linked to environmental predominance but may be due to higher infectivity or more efficient intracellular growth (1, 2). The low prevalence of non-pneumophila species among clinical isolates relative to their environmental abundance suggests that these species are less pathogenic than L. pneumophila, in keeping with the observation that most confirmed infections involving non-pneumophila species occur in immunosuppressed patients (10).

In conclusion, the clinical prevalence of Legionella species and serogroups appears to be explained by differences in pathogenicity rather than environmental predominance.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank David Young for editing the manuscript and Philippe Vanhems for useful suggestions.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Centre National de Référence des Legionella, Laboratoire de Bactériologie INSERM E-0230, Faculté de Médecine, IFR 62, Rue Guillaume Paradin, 69372 Lyon Cédex 08, France. Phone: (33) 47 877 87 26. Fax: (33) 47 877.86.58. E-mail: sophie.jarraud{at}univ-lyon1.fr. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Alli, O. A., S. Zink, N. K. Von Lackum, and Y. Abu-Kwaik. 2003. Comparative assessment of virulence traits in Legionella spp. Microbiology 149:631-641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    2. 2
  2. Brassinga, A. K., M. F. Hiltz, G. R. Sisson, M. G. Morash, N. Hill, E. Garduno, P. H. Edelstein, R. A. Garduno, and P. S. Hoffman. 2003. A 65-kilobase pathogenicity island is unique to Philadelphia-1 strains of Legionella pneumophila. J. Bacteriol. 185:4630-4637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    3. 3
  3. Campese, C., and B. Decludt. 2003. Les légionelloses déclarées en France en 2002. Bull. Epidemiol. Hebd. 32:153-155.
    4. 4
  4. Codony, F., J. Alvarez, J. M. Oliva, B. Ciurana, M. Company, N. Camps, J. Torres, S. Minguell, N. Jove, E. Cirera, T. Admetlla, R. Abos, A. Escofet, A. Pedrol, R. Grau, I. Badosa, and G. Vila. 2002. Factors promoting colonization by legionellae in residential water distribution systems: an environmental case-control survey. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 21:717-721.[Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Helbig, J. H., S. Bernander, M. Castellani Pastoris, J. Etienne, V. Gaia, S. Lauwers, D. Lindsay, P. C. Luck, T. Marques, S. Mentula, M. F. Peeters, C. Pelaz, M. Struelens, S. A. Uldum, G. Wewalka, and T. G. Harrison. 2002. Pan-European study on culture-proven legionnaires' disease: distribution of Legionella pneumophila serogroups and monoclonal subgroups. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 21:710-716.[CrossRef][Medline]
    6. 6
  6. International Organization for Standardization. 1998. ISO 11731:1998. Water quality—detection and enumeration of Legionella. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
    7. 7
  7. Lee, T. C., J. E. Stout, and V. L. Yu. 1988. Factors predisposing to Legionella pneumophila colonization in residential water systems. Arch. Environ. Health. 43:59-62.[Medline]
    8. 8
  8. Lo Presti, F., S. Riffard, F. Vandenesch, and J. Etienne. 1998. Identification of Legionella species by random amplified polymorphic DNA profiles. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:3193-3197.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    9. 9
  9. Martinelli, F., A. Caruso, L. Moschini, A. Turano, C. Scarcella, and F. Speziani. 2000. A comparison of Legionella pneumophila occurrence in hot water tanks and instantaneous devices in domestic, nosocomial, and community environments. Curr. Microbiol. 41:374-376.[Medline]
    10. 10
  10. Muder, R. R., and V. L. Yu. 2002. Infection due to Legionella species other than L. pneumophila. Clin. Infect. Dis. 35:990-998.[CrossRef][Medline]
    11. 11
  11. Rangel-Frausto, M. S., P. Rhomberg, R. J. Hollis, M. A. Pfaller, R. P. Wenzel, C. M. Helms, and L. A. Herwaldt. 1999. Persistence of Legionella pneumophila in a hospital's water system: a 13-year survey. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 20:793-797.[CrossRef][Medline]
    12. 12
  12. Ratcliff, R. M., J. A. Lanser, P. A. Manning, and M. W. Heuzenroeder. 1998. Sequence-based classification scheme for the genus Legionella targeting the mip gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:1560-1567.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. Steinert, M., U. Hentschel, and J. Hacker. 2002. Legionella pneumophila: an aquatic microbe goes astray. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 26:149-162.[CrossRef][Medline]
    14. 14
  14. Stout, J. E., V. L. Yu, Y. C. Yee, S. Vaccarello, W. Diven, and T. C. Lee. 1992. Legionella pneumophila in residential water supplies: environmental surveillance with clinical assessment for Legionnaires' disease. Epidemiol. Infect. 109:49-57.[Medline]
    15. 15
  15. Vickers, R. M., V. L. Yu, S. S. Hanna, P. Muraca, W. Diven, N. Carmen, and F. B. Taylor. 1987. Determinants of Legionella pneumophila contamination of water distribution systems: 15-hospital prospective study. Infect. Control 8:357-363.[Medline]
    16. 16
  16. Yu, V. L., J. F. Plouffe, M. C. Pastoris, J. E. Stout, M. Schousboe, A. Widmer, J. Summerserogroupill, T. File, C. M. Heath, D. L. Paterson, and A. Chereshsky. 2002. Distribution of Legionella species and serogroups isolated by culture in patients with sporadic community-acquired legionellosis: an international collaborative survey. J. Infect. Dis. 186:127-128.[CrossRef][Medline]
    17. 17
  17. Zietz, B., J. Wiese, F. Brengelmann, and H. Dunkelberg. 2001. Presence of Legionellaceae in warm water supplies and typing of strains by polymerase chain reaction. Epidemiol. Infect. 126:147-152.[Medline]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2004, p. 458-460, Vol. 42, No. 1
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.1.458-460.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Ginevra, C., Lopez, M., Forey, F., Reyrolle, M., Meugnier, H., Vandenesch, F., Etienne, J., Jarraud, S., Molmeret, M. (2009). Evaluation of a Nested-PCR-Derived Sequence-Based Typing Method Applied Directly to Respiratory Samples from Patients with Legionnaires' Disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 981-987 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Allegra, S., Berger, F., Berthelot, P., Grattard, F., Pozzetto, B., Riffard, S. (2008). Use of Flow Cytometry To Monitor Legionella Viability. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 7813-7816 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cazalet, C., Jarraud, S., Ghavi-Helm, Y., Kunst, F., Glaser, P., Etienne, J., Buchrieser, C. (2008). Multigenome analysis identifies a worldwide distributed epidemic Legionella pneumophila clone that emerged within a highly diverse species. Genome Res 18: 431-441 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yaradou, D. F., Hallier-Soulier, S., Moreau, S., Poty, F., Hillion, Y., Reyrolle, M., Andre, J., Festoc, G., Delabre, K., Vandenesch, F., Etienne, J., Jarraud, S. (2007). Integrated Real-Time PCR for Detection and Monitoring of Legionella pneumophila in Water Systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 1452-1456 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Doleans-Jordheim, A., Akermi, M., Ginevra, C., Cazalet, C., Kay, E., Schneider, D., Buchrieser, C., Atlan, D., Vandenesch, F., Etienne, J., Jarraud, S. (2006). Growth-phase-dependent mobility of the lvh-encoding region in Legionella pneumophila strain Paris. Microbiology 152: 3561-3568 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Joly, P., Falconnet, P.-A., Andre, J., Weill, N., Reyrolle, M., Vandenesch, F., Maurin, M., Etienne, J., Jarraud, S. (2006). Quantitative Real-Time Legionella PCR for Environmental Water Samples: Data Interpretation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 2801-2808 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • van der Mee-Marquet, N., Domelier, A.-S., Arnault, L., Bloc, D., Laudat, P., Hartemann, P., Quentin, R. (2006). Legionella anisa, a Possible Indicator of Water Contamination by Legionella pneumophila. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 56-59 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Borella, P., Montagna, M. T., Stampi, S., Stancanelli, G., Romano-Spica, V., Triassi, M., Marchesi, I., Bargellini, A., Tato, D., Napoli, C., Zanetti, F., Leoni, E., Moro, M., Scaltriti, S., Ribera D'Alcala, G., Santarpia, R., Boccia, S. (2005). Legionella Contamination in Hot Water of Italian Hotels. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 5805-5813 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Roch, N., Maurin, M. (2005). Antibiotic susceptibilities of Legionella pneumophila strain Paris in THP-1 cells as determined by real-time PCR assay. J Antimicrob Chemother 55: 866-871 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Aurell, H., Farge, P., Meugnier, H., Gouy, M., Forey, F., Lina, G., Vandenesch, F., Etienne, J., Jarraud, S. (2005). Clinical and Environmental Isolates of Legionella pneumophila Serogroup 1 Cannot Be Distinguished by Sequence Analysis of Two Surface Protein Genes and Three Housekeeping Genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 282-289 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Huang, B., Heron, B. A., Gray, B. R., Eglezos, S., Bates, J. R., Savill, J. (2004). A Predominant and Virulent Legionella pneumophila Serogroup 1 Strain Detected in Isolates from Patients and Water in Queensland, Australia, by an Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Protocol and Virulence Gene-Based PCR Assays. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 4164-4168 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doleans, A.
Right arrow Articles by Jarraud, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doleans, A.
Right arrow Articles by Jarraud, S.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»