Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2004, p. 4879-4881, Vol. 42, No. 10
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4879-4881.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Multilocus Variable-Number Tandem-Repeat Polymorphism among Brazilian Enterococcus faecalis Strains
Ricardo Titze-de-Almeida,1*
Rob J. L. Willems,2,3
Janetta Top,2,3
Isabela Pereira Rodrigues,4
Renato Fonseca Ferreira II,1
Hélène Boelens,5
Maria Christina C. Brandileone,6
Rosemeire C. Zanella,6
Maria Sueli Soares Felipe,7 and
Alex van Belkum5
Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology,1
Infection Control Sector, Universitarian Hospital of Brasília,4
Molecular Biology Laboratory, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília,7
Bacteriology Division, Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo, Brazil,6
Research Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven,2
Erasmus MC, Department of Medical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Rotterdam,5
Division of Acute Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands3
Received 29 March 2004/
Returned for modification 30 June 2004/
Accepted 6 July 2004

ABSTRACT
Multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) for
seven genomic loci was developed for
Enterococcus faecalis.
MLVA and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) resulted in
37 and 31 genotypes among 83 strains, respectively. Both typing
schemes were highly concordant (90.4%). MLVA is an excellent
alternative to PFGE.

TEXT
Enterococci are opportunistic pathogens associated with cardiovascular,
urinary tract, and wound infections (
5). Especially when these
bacteria have acquired resistance to multiple antibiotics, they
are considered prominent agents of nosocomial infection (
2).
Enterococci resistant to glycopeptides (vancomycin-resistant
enterococci [VRE]) are a striking example of a nosocomial pathogen
for which therapeutic options are limited. In order to investigate
the bacterial epidemiology of both VRE and vancomycin-susceptible
enterococci (VSE), several typing methods have been used. Pulsed-field
gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is currently considered the "gold
standard" method for epidemiological investigation of hospital
outbreaks (
4,
7). However, the use of PFGE in peripheral and
small hospital laboratories, especially those in developing
countries, is limited because of high complexity and costs.
Less-complex and cheaper alternatives are usually based on DNA
amplification. Some of these methods aim at assessing allelic
polymorphism among variable-number tandem repeats (VNTRs) (
11-
13).
We have set out to define genome heterogeneity for Brazilian
VRE and VSE by PFGE and to develop an alternative multilocus
VNTR analysis (MLVA) system.
A heterogeneous set of 83 Enterococcus faecalis isolates, 12 VRE and 71 VSE, was studied. The VRE were obtained from rectal swabs (n = 6), a wound lesion (n = 1), tracheal secretions (n = 2), catheters (n = 2), and a urine specimen (n = 1) from patients involved in the first Brazilian VRE outbreak, which occurred in the Santa Marcelina Hospital in São Paulo (1998). The VSE were isolated from rectal swabs from patients hospitalized in intensive care units of the Universitarian Hospital of Brasília (n = 49), the Santa Luzia Hospital (n = 9) and the Regional Hospital of Taguatinga (n = 13) during a 3-year period (2000 to 2002). Standard biochemical tests and (vanA) PCRs were performed for identification (3). PFGE was carried out as described before, and isolates were classified according to published criteria (9, 14).
The MLVA was based on analysis of the number of repeat units present at seven regions of the E. faecalis genome. The ace (B region) and esp (A and C regions) sequences were described earlier (6, 8). The four new repeats described here have been named efa2, efa3, efa5, and efa6. They were identified in the E. faecalis genome (The Institute for Genomic Research; http://www.tigr.org/) by a specific algorithm (http://cbsu.tc.cornell.edu/index.htm). The number of repeat units was calculated on the basis of the sizes of the amplified sequences. MLVA types were determined by the number of repeat units in the seven different targets. MLVA genogroups represent isolates that shared at least six of seven alleles. PCR was performed after automated DNA extraction (Magna Pure kit; Roche Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland). For each PCR, 100 ng of DNA was suspended in 50 µl of a mixture containing a locus-specific pair of oligonucleotide primers (25.0 pmol per primer; Table 1), 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.2 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphates, and 1.2 U of Taq DNA polymerase (SuperTaq; SphaeroQ, Leiden, The Netherlands). The PCR was carried out by initial denaturation at 94°C for 4 min, 15 cycles of "touchdown" amplification-denaturation steps at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 55°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 2 min. The annealing temperature for the first cycle was 70°C and decreased 1°C at each cycle during the next 15 cycles. PCR products were sized on 1% agarose gels (Hispanagar; SphaeroQ).
Differences in repeat numbers resulted in various alleles for
the seven loci. The number of different alleles for each VNTR
locus varied strongly (Table
2). It is notable that three of
the seven loci in 50% or more of the strains studied comprise
0 or 1 repeat copies. This is a striking finding, probably related
to the fact that we focused on repeats with large unit lengths.
The combination of alleles for the seven loci resulted in an
MLVA profile, and each profile represents a specific MLVA type.
Thirty-seven different MLVA types could be discriminated (Table
3), and these were classified into MLVA groups, in which isolates
share at least six of the seven alleles (Table
4). MLVA identified
four major genogroups among VSE isolates (I to IV) and one major
genogroup (V) among VRE (Table
4).
The isolates were also typed by PFGE in order to assess the
discriminatory power of the MLVA. PFGE discriminated 31 different
genotypes, identifying four main genogroups composed of VSE,
named D, J, M, and P, and one primarily composed of VRE, named
X (Table
4). The rate of concordance between MLVA and PFGE results
for the five main clusters of isolates was 90.4%, varying between
71.4 and 100%. For instance, MLVA clustered in genogroup V the
seven VRE classified as PFGE genotype X and another isolate
considered possibly related to them (
9). Isolates of PFGE types
J and M were discriminated in MLVA types 6, 9, 11, 28, and 34.
These results indicated that MLVA can be superior to PFGE, discriminating
isolates with similar or identical PFGE banding patterns (data
not shown). Overall, 26 isolates were identified as unique genotypes
by MLVA and 22 by PFGE. Of these, 18 were typed as unique by
both methods. This leads us to the conclusion that there is
adequate congruence between the data generated with the two
technologies. The Simpson index of diversity for the current
MLVA scheme is 0.933 (95% confidence interval, 0.905 to 0.961).
An MLVA typing scheme for E. faecalis was based upon seven targets obtained from known genes and new ones selected from the genome sequence available at The Institute for Genomic Research database. The targets showed sufficient variability for the identification of 37 different MLVA types in a relatively small group of independent E. faecalis isolates from Brazil. This is comparable to the 31 types identified by PFGE. MLVA-based clustering of isolates included in the present study (85.7% allele similarity) was close to the values described earlier for PFGE (86%) and analysis of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (75%) (14). MLVA detected five main clusters of genetically related isolates from four Brazilian hospitals recovered during different periods. Persistence of enterococcal isolates sharing the same PFGE genotype and their intra- and interhospital spreading have also been described in previous investigations (1, 10). In conclusion, MLVA accomplishes most of the desired typing features, including sufficient discriminatory power, speed, ease of use, and simple result interpretation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We acknowledge the cooperation of the staffs of the Universitarian
Hospital of Brasília, Santa Marcelina Hospital, Santa
Luzia Hospital, Molecular Biology LaboratoryUniversity
of Brasília, Public Health Bacteriology Laboratory of
Federal District, Integrated Microbiology LaboratoryUniversity
of Brasília, and Adolfo Lutz Institute.
R. Titze-de-Almeida was supported by a grant from the CAPES Foundation, Brazil.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Microbiologia Molecular & Biotecnología. Faculdade de Agronomia e, Medicina Veterinária, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, C. Postal 04508, CEP 70910-970, Brasilia-DF, Brazil. Phone: (55) 61 3071162. Fax: (55) 61 2736593. E-mail:
titze{at}unb.br.


REFERENCES
1 - Cereda, R. F., A. C. Gales, S. Silvert, R. N. Jones, and H. S. Sader. 2002. Molecular typing and antimicrobial susceptibility of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in Brazil. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 23:19-22.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Cetinkaya, Y., P. Falk, and C. G. Mayhall. 2000. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13:686-707.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Dutka-Malen, S., S. Evers, and P. Courvalin. 1995. Detection of glycopeptide resistance genotypes and identification to the species level of clinically relevant Enterococci by PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:24-27.[Abstract]
4 - Murray, B. 1998. Diversity among multidrug-resistant enterococci. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 4:37-47.[Medline]
5 - Murray, B. E. 2000. Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 342:710-721.[Free Full Text]
6 - Nallapareddy, S. R., K. V. Singh, R. Duh, G. M. Weinstock, and B. E. Murray. 2000. Diversity of ace, a gene encoding a microbial surface component recognizing adhesive matrix molecules, from different strains of Enterococcus faecalis and evidence for production of Ace during human infections. Infect. Immun. 68:5210-5217.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Rice, L. B. 2001. Emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7:183-187.[Medline]
8 - Shankar, V., A. S. Baghdayan, M. M. Huycke, G. Lindahl, and M. S. Gilmore. 1999. Infection-derived Enterococcus faecalis strains are enriched in esp, a gene encoding a novel surface protein. Infect. Immun. 67:193-200.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Tenover, F. C., R. D. Arbeit, R. V. Goering, P. A. Mickelsen, B. E. Murray, D. H. Persing, and B. Swaminathan. 1995. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2233-2239.[Medline]
10 - Thal, L., S. Donabedian, B. Robinson-Dunn, J. W. Chow, L. Dembry, D. B. Clewell, D. Alshab, and M. J. Zervos. 1998. Molecular analysis of glycopeptide-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates collected from Michigan hospitals over a 6-year period. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:3303-3308.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - van Belkum, A., W. J. G. Melchers, C. Ijsseldijk, L. Nohlmans, H. Verbrugh, and J. F. G. M. Meis. 1997. Outbreak of amoxicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae type B: variable number of tandem repeats as novel molecular markers. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1517-1520.[Abstract]
12 - van Belkum, A., S. Scherer, W. van Leeuwen, D. Willemse, L. van Alphen, and H. Verbrugh. 1997. Variable number of tandem repeats in clinical strains of Haemophilus influenzae. Infect. Immun. 65:5017-5027.[Abstract]
13 - van Belkum, A., S. Scherer, L. van Alphen, and H. Verbrugh. 1998. Short-sequence DNA repeats in prokaryotic genomes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:275-293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Van den Braak, N., E. Power, R. Anthony, H. P. Endtz, H. A. Verbrugh, and A. van Belkum. 2000. RAPD versus PFGE of SmaI DNA macrorestriction fragments for typing strains of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 192:45-52.[Medline]
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2004, p. 4879-4881, Vol. 42, No. 10
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4879-4881.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Chowdhury, S. A., Arias, C. A., Nallapareddy, S. R., Reyes, J., Willems, R. J. L., Murray, B. E.
(2009). A Trilocus Sequence Typing Scheme for Hospital Epidemiology and Subspecies Differentiation of an Important Nosocomial Pathogen, Enterococcus faecalis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
47: 2713-2719
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Broza, Y. Y., Danin-Poleg, Y., Lerner, L., Broza, M., Kashi, Y.
(2007). Vibrio vulnificus Typing Based on Simple Sequence Repeats: Insights into the Biotype 3 Group. J. Clin. Microbiol.
45: 2951-2959
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Danin-Poleg, Y., Cohen, L. A., Gancz, H., Broza, Y. Y., Goldshmidt, H., Malul, E., Valinsky, L., Lerner, L., Broza, M., Kashi, Y.
(2007). Vibrio cholerae Strain Typing and Phylogeny Study Based on Simple Sequence Repeats. J. Clin. Microbiol.
45: 736-746
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Boxrud, D., Pederson-Gulrud, K., Wotton, J., Medus, C., Lyszkowicz, E., Besser, J., Bartkus, J. M.
(2007). Comparison of Multiple-Locus Variable-Number Tandem Repeat Analysis, Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis, and Phage Typing for Subtype Analysis of Salmonella enterica Serotype Enteritidis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
45: 536-543
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Abele-Horn, M., Vogel, U., Klare, I., Konstabel, C., Trabold, R., Kurihara, R., Witte, W., Kreth, W., Schlegel, P.-G., Claus, H.
(2006). Molecular Epidemiology of Hospital-Acquired Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 4009-4013
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lepage, E., Brinster, S., Caron, C., Ducroix-Crepy, C., Rigottier-Gois, L., Dunny, G., Hennequet-Antier, C., Serror, P.
(2006). Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis of Enterococcus faecalis: Identification of Genes Absent from Food Strains.. J. Bacteriol.
188: 6858-6868
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Johansson, A., Koskiniemi, S., Gottfridsson, P., Wistrom, J., Monsen, T.
(2006). Multiple-Locus Variable-Number Tandem Repeat Analysis for Typing of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 260-265
[Abstract]
[Full Text]