This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, K.
Right arrow Articles by Conly, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, K.
Right arrow Articles by Conly, J. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2004, p. 4947-4955, Vol. 42, No. 11
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.11.4947-4955.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

New Quadriplex PCR Assay for Detection of Methicillin and Mupirocin Resistance and Simultaneous Discrimination of Staphylococcus aureus from Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci

Kunyan Zhang,1,2,3,4,5* Jennifer Sparling,1 Barbara L. Chow,1,5 Sameer Elsayed,2,3,5 Zafar Hussain,6 Deirdre L. Church,2,4,5 Daniel B. Gregson,2,4,5 Thomas Louie,3,4 and John M. Conly1,2,3,4,5

Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance, Calgary Health Region—Calgary Laboratory Services—University of Calgary,1 Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine,2 Microbiology and Infectious Diseases,3 Medicine,4 University of Calgary, and Division of Microbiology, Calgary Laboratory Services, Calgary, Alberta,5 Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, London Health Science Centre, London, Ontario, Canada6

Received 26 March 2004/ Returned for modification 8 June 2004/ Accepted 22 July 2004


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
Major challenges in diagnostic molecular microbiology are to develop a simple assay to distinguish Staphylococcus aureus from the less virulent but clinically important coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and to simultaneously determine their antibiotic resistance profiles. Multiplex PCR assays have been developed for the detection of methicillin- and mupirocin-resistant S. aureus and CoNS but not for the simultaneous discrimination of S. aureus from CoNS. We designed a new set of Staphylococcus genus-specific primers and developed a novel quadriplex PCR assay targeting the 16S rRNA (Staphylococcus genus specific), nuc (S. aureus species specific), mecA (a determinant of methicillin resistance), and mupA (a determinant of mupirocin resistance) genes to identify most staphylococci, to discriminate S. aureus from CoNS and other bacteria, and to simultaneously detect methicillin and mupirocin resistance. Validation of the assay with 96 ATCC control strains and 323 previously characterized clinical isolates, including methicillin- and mupirocin-sensitive and -resistant S. aureus and CoNS isolates and other bacteria, demonstrated 100% sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. This assay represents a simple, rapid, accurate, and reliable approach for the detection of methicillin- and mupirocin-resistant staphylococci and offers the hope of preventing their widespread dissemination through early and reliable detection.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
Members of the genus Staphylococcus are major human pathogens, causing a wide variety of hospital- and community-acquired infections worldwide. Staphylococcus aureus, in particular, is a leading cause of diseases ranging from mild skin and soft tissue infections to life-threatening illnesses, such as deep postsurgical infections, septicemia, and toxic shock syndrome (9). Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) had been regarded as harmless skin commensals prior to the 1970s; however, they are now recognized as important causes of human infections (23, 36, 37). Data taken from the United States National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System from January 1990 to May 1999 showed that CoNS were the most commonly reported pathogens (37.3% for CoNS versus 12.6% for S. aureus) isolated from bloodstream infections in intensive care unit patients (1). The importance of CoNS as major nosocomial pathogens in the context of prosthetic and indwelling device-related infections has been recognized (18). CoNS are also among the most frequently isolated bacteria in clinical microbiology laboratories (29, 31). More importantly, CoNS often serve as reservoirs of antimicrobial resistance determinants, since they usually have a high prevalence of multidrug resistance (5). Therefore, it is important to characterize and distinguish S. aureus strains and CoNS.

Both S. aureus and CoNS share a remarkable ability to accumulate additional antibiotic resistance determinants, resulting in the formation of multidrug-resistant strains. Such strains have demonstrated resistance to penicillins, clindamycin, tetracyclines, macrolides, linezolid, methicillin (MET) and, more recently, mupirocin (MUP) and vancomycin. This resistance limits therapeutic options for treatment and substantially increases patient morbidity and mortality.

The unique bactericidal action of MUP makes it one of the few antibiotics still effective against MET-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and MET-resistant CoNS (MR-CoNS). MUP (pseudomonic acid A) is, in part, an analogue of isoleucine and exerts its antimicrobial effect by abolishing protein synthesis through irreversible and specific binding to bacterial isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase encoded by a chromosomal ileS gene (19). Topical MUP plays a crucial role in strategies designed to control outbreaks of MRSA and MR-CoNS, particularly in peritoneal dialysis, hemodialysis, and postsurgical patients (12). However, with the increasing use of MUP, resistance to it among staphylococci has emerged, threatening its clinical utility (6-8). Two MUP resistance phenotypes, low-level MUP resistance (L-MuR, with an MIC of 8 to 256 µg/ml) and high-level MUP resistance (H-MuR, with an MIC of ≥512 µg/ml), have been identified (8, 11, 15). L-MuR arises from point mutations within the host ileS gene (4, 8, 11, 38) and is of controversial clinical significance, while H-MuR results from the acquisition of a transferable plasmid containing the mupA (or ileS-2) gene, encoding an additional isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase that is not bound by MUP (17).

This worldwide resistance problem has made it crucial for clinical laboratories to implement a rapid, accurate, and simple method for the identification and discrimination of MRSA, MUP-resistant S. aureus, and CoNS. The use of PCR for the detection of mecA (encoding a low-affinity penicillin-binding protein [PBP2a] that confers broad resistance to all penicillin-related compounds) (16) and mupA (3, 14, 32, 38) was previously described. Only three previous reports described the simultaneous detection of mecA and mupA in S. aureus (28, 30) or in CoNS (13), and they did not describe the identification and discrimination of S. aureus and CoNS or the simultaneous detection of resistance genes in a single PCR.

Here we report a novel quadriplex PCR assay developed to identify most staphylococci, to discriminate S. aureus from CoNS and other bacteria, and to simultaneously detect MET resistance and MUP resistance.


arrow
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 
Bacterial strains and isolates. The bacterial control strains used in our study included a number of strains of S. aureus, CoNS, and various nonstaphylococci that were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, Va.), as well as previously characterized clinical isolates of CoNS obtained from the Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, London Health Science Centre (LH), London, Ontario, Canada (20, 21). Clinical isolates of MUP-resistant S. aureus were obtained from the Toronto Medical Laboratory, Riverdale Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and clinical isolates of MUP-resistant CoNS were obtained from Calgary Laboratory Services (CLS), Calgary, Alberta, Canada; these clinical isolates underwent subsequent phenotypic and genotypic characterizations at the Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (Table 1). Clinical isolates used for validation of the multiplex PCR (M-PCR) assay were obtained from CLS during the period from August 1999 to May 2003 and from the Toronto Medical Laboratory during the period from January 1999 to April 2001.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Phenotypic and genotypic features of S. aureus and CoNS control strains

Identification and phenotypic susceptibility testing of staphylococcal isolates. The staphylococcal isolates were identified morphologically and biochemically by standard laboratory procedures (25). The coagulase plasma test (Remel, Lenexa, Kans.) was performed on organisms exhibiting typical staphylococcal colony morphology to allow for discrimination of S. aureus from CoNS. Screening for MET resistance and other antibiotic resistance phenotypes was done by Vitek (bioMerieux, Inc., Durham, N.C.) or Kirby-Bauer methods, while confirmation of MET resistance was achieved with a routine PCR assay for the mecA gene (21). The MET and MUP MICs were further confirmed by the E-test according to the manufacturer's instructions (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). MUP sensitivity was defined as MICs of ≤4 µg/ml, H-MuR was defined as MICs of ≥512 µg/ml, and L-MuR was defined as MICs ranging from 8 to 256 µg/ml in both S. aureus and CoNS (2, 8, 10). MET susceptibility and MET resistance were defined as oxacillin (OXA) E-test MICs of ≤2 and ≥4 µg/ml, respectively, in S. aureus or MICs of ≤0.25 and ≥0.5 µg/ml, respectively, in CoNS. CoNS strains for which the OXA MIC was 0.5 to 2 µg/ml but which did not possess the mecA gene were recorded as MET susceptible according to NCCLS guidelines (26).

DNA extraction. Frozen bacteria were subcultured twice on 5% sheep blood Columbia agar plates (PML Microbiologicals, Wilsonville, Oreg.) prior to DNA extraction. For rapid DNA extraction, about one to five bacterial colonies were suspended in 50 µl of sterile distilled water and heated at 99°C for 10 min. After centrifugation at 20,000 x g for 1 min, 5 µl of the supernatant was used as a template in a 25-µl PCR mixture.

16S rRNA gene sequence alignment and oligonucleotide primers. With Lasergene Expert sequence analysis software (DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, Wis.) and the GenBank database (National Center for Biotechnology Information), an extensive and comprehensive bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequence database was constructed. This database contained approximately 5,500 complete 16S rRNA gene sequences currently available in the GenBank database (updated as of May 2003) and representing all clinically significant bacteria (species and strains) (25), including 19 sequences from various strains of S. aureus, 78 sequences from various strains of 32 species of CoNS, 77 sequences from various strains of 13 species of Enterococcus, 226 sequences from various strains of 19 species of Streptococcus, and 5,100 sequences from other bacteria. A new Staphylococcus genus-specific 5' primer (Staph756F) was designed based on the comprehensive alignment of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences.

The oligonucleotide primers used in this study were synthesized and purchased from Qiagen Operon (Qiagen, Inc., Alameda, Calif.). The primers included the newly designed primer Staph756F (5'-AAC TCT GTT ATT AGG GAA GAA CA-3') and the previously published 3' primer Staph750R (5'-CCA CCT TCC TCC GGT TTG TCA CC-3') (22) for Staphylococcus genus-specific 16S rRNA, Nuc 1 (5'-GCG ATT GAT GGT GAT ACG GTT-3') and Nuc 2 (5'-AGC CAA GCC TTG ACG AAC TAA AGC-3') for nuc (34), MupA (5'-TAT ATT ATG CGA TGG AAG GTT GG-3') and MupB (5'-AAT AAA ATC AGC TGG AAA GTG TTG-3') for mupA (3), and MecA1 (5'-GTA GAA ATG ACT GAA CGT CCG ATA A-3') and MecA2 (5'-CCA ATT CCA CAT TGT TTC GGT CTA A-3') for mecA (33).

PCR amplification. A quadriplex PCR assay targeting 16S rRNA (Staphylococcus genus specific), nuc (S. aureus species specific), mupA (a determinant of MUP resistance), and mecA (a determinant of MET resistance) was developed and used in our study. M-PCR assays were regularly performed directly with bacterial suspensions obtained after rapid DNA extraction. An aliquot of 5 µl of bacterial suspension was added to a 20-µl PCR mixture containing 50 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM each deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dATP, dUTP, dGTP, and dCTP) (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, Calif.), 0.12 µM each 16S rRNA and mecA primers, 0.05 µM each mupA primer, 0.04 µM each nuc primer, and 1.0 U of Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen). Amplification was performed by using a GeneAmp PCR system 9700 or 9600 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). Amplification was carried out as follows: an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 5 min; 10 cycles of 94°C for 40 s, 58°C for 40 s, and 72°C for 1 min; 25 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 50°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min; and a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. For increased specificity, strict PCR conditions were used as follows: an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 5 min; 10 cycles of 94°C for 40 s, 68°C for 40 s, and 72°C for 1 min; 25 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 58°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min; and a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. For single-target amplification, PCR was carried out with a 20-µl PCR mixture containing 0.2 µM each primer and with the following cycling parameters: an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 50°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min; and a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. All M-PCR assay runs incorporated a reagent control (without template DNA) and a true-negative control (Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 19615) processed in a fashion similar to that of the clinical isolates. The PCR amplicons were visualized by using a UV light box after electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel containing 0.5 µg of ethidium bromide/ml.

Limiting-dilution experiments for estimation of M-PCR sensitivity. The sensitivity of M-PCR amplification with various pairs of primers was estimated by limiting-dilution experiments. Briefly, bacterial cultures from overnight growth at 37°C on a blood agar plate were suspended in sterile saline (Vitek saline) to a density corresponding to a 1.0 McFarland turbidity standard by using a Vitek colorimeter (bioMerieux). These suspensions were used to prepare serial 10-fold dilutions with sterile double-distilled water. DNA extraction by the rapid method described above was performed for 50 µl of each dilution. The standard M-PCR assay was performed to determine its sensitivity. The lower limits of detection (or the minimal numbers of CFU detectable) of the target genes by M-PCR were calculated based on correlation of the 1.0 McFarland standard to 3 x 108 CFU/ml.

Double-blind validation of M-PCR. Validation of M-PCR was conducted in a double-blind fashion. A technical staff person who knew the phenotypic microbiological data, including the free coagulase plasma test results and the OXA and MUP susceptibility results for the tested isolates, assigned the isolate numbers. Another technologist was involved in subculturing the strains and performing the PCRs but was unaware of the phenotypic microbiological test results. The results were compared when the tests were completed.


arrow
RESULTS
 
Identification of novel Staphylococcus genus-specific primers. The sequences of the previously published Staphylococcus genus-specific primers (22, 24) were not well conserved in the Staphylococcus genus (Fig. 1). To design new Staphylococcus genus-specific primers, we constructed an extensive and comprehensive bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequence database. A new Staphylococcus genus-specific 5' primer (Staph756F) was designed based on the comprehensive alignment of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences. This novel primer targets the 16S rRNA gene (nucleotides 440 to 462 of the S. aureus strain Wu50 16S rRNA gene) and is Staphylococcus genus specific and well conserved in the sequences of almost all of the Staphylococcus species and strains currently available in the GenBank database. Figure 1 shows a comparison of the nucleotide sequences targeted by our Staph756F primer and the previously published Staphylococcus 16S rRNA gene 5' primer for various representative species of staphylococci, enterococci, streptococci, and other bacterial genera. Our new primer was more conserved and genus specific than the previously published primer, with perfect nucleotide sequence matches in all 19 sequences of S. aureus examined and the most medically important CoNS species, including S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, S. lugdunensis, S. saprophyticus, S. cohnii, S. xylosus, S. hominis, S. simulans, S. capitis, and S. caprae; there was only one base mismatch out of 23 nucleotides in the other seven CoNS species of human or animal origin (S. kloosii, S. warneri, S. sciuri, S. muscae, S. pasteuri, S. lentus, and S. vitulus), but there were two mismatches in one medically important staphlococcal species (S. schleiferi) (Fig. 1). A combination of the new 5' primer with the previously published 3' primer for Staphylococcus 16S rRNA (Staph750R) (22, 24) in our novel quadriplex PCR assay allowed us to specifically detect most species and strains of staphylococci.



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG.1. Comparison of nucleotide sequences targeted by our Staphylococcus genus-specific 16S rRNA 5' primer (Staph756F) and a previously published primer for various representative species of staphylococci and nonstaphylococci. The primer sequence is shown at the top with S. aureus strain Wu50 numbering. The solid and dotted boxes indicate the sequences of our primer (Staph756F) and the previously published primer (22, 24), respectively. Bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences were obtained from the GenBank database; nucleotide sequence accession numbers are shown in parentheses. Staphylococcal species indigenous to human beings are denoted by plus signs, and medically important species are denoted by asterisks. The numbers of nucleotide mismatches with our new primer are shown on the right. SA, S. aureus.

New quadriplex PCR for identifying staphylococci, discriminating S. aureus from CoNS and other bacteria, and simultaneously detecting H-MuR and MET resistance. We developed a new M-PCR assay to discriminate S. aureus from CoNS and other bacteria and to simultaneously detect MET resistance and MUP resistance. The quadriplex PCR assay targeted the 16S rRNA, nuc, mupA, and mecA genes. To ensure that each individual primer pair was adequate for the amplification of all four gene fragments, the single-target PCR protocol with each individual primer pair was conducted prior to M-PCR optimization with our control strains (Table 1). The individual amplifications yielded the fragments of the expected sizes, i.e., 756, 457, 310, and 279 bp, for the 16S rRNA, mupA, mecA, and nuc genes, respectively (Fig. 2A). M-PCR optimization was obtained by assaying different primer concentrations and other PCR components. Amplification of 16S rRNA, mupA, mecA, and nuc targets of phenotypically and genotypically characterized control strains, including groups of MET- and MUP-sensitive or -resistant S. aureus strains and CoNS or other bacteria (Table 1), in a single M-PCR produced distinct bands corresponding to respective molecular sizes that were easily recognizable in agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide (Fig. 2B).



View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. M-PCR identifies all staphylococci, discriminates S. aureus from CoNS and other bacteria, and simultaneously detects H-MuR and MET resistance. (A) Single-target PCR and M-PCR products of the 16S rRNA, mupA, mecA, and nuc genes amplified from control strain H-MuR-MRSA-85. Lanes 1 to 4, single-target PCR amplicons obtained from the nuc, mecA, mupA, and 16S rRNA genes with the corresponding single primers, respectively. Lane 5, quadriplex PCR amplicons from the 16S rRNA, mupA, mecA, and nuc genes simultaneously amplified. Lane 6, negative control for M-PCR in lane 5. (B) M-PCR detecting the 16S rRNA, mupA, mecA, and nuc genes in control strains for MSSA (lane 1), MUP-susceptible S. aureus (lane 2), MRSA (lane 3), H-MuR MRSA (lanes 4 to 6), L-MuR MRSA (lanes 7 and 8), H-MuR MSSA (lanes 9 to 11), H-MuR MR-CoNS (lane 12), H-MuR MS-CoNS (lanes 13 and 14), various species of CoNS (lanes 15 to 21), and a non-S. aureus non-CoNS control strain (lane 22). Table 1 provides details for the strains. Lanes M in both panel A and panel B, molecular size marker (100-bp DNA ladder; New England BioLabs).

Specificity of M-PCR. Although the new Staph756F primer was found to be well conserved in all S. aureus strains and most strains and species of CoNS, one or two nucleotide mismatches were found in several non-medically important species of staphylococci as well as in some members of the genus Enterococcus (Fig. 1). To address the specificity of M-PCR, we tested 47 staphylococcal strains from 19 species or subspecies and 36 nonstaphylococcal bacteria from 27 species of 15 genera, including 15 Enterococcus strains belonging to 6 medically important species (Table 2). The novel M-PCR detected all species of CoNS tested and did not cross-react with other bacteria (Table 2), except for several Enterococcus strains tested under general M-PCR conditions. For a total of 15 Enterococcus strains tested (Table 2), no cross-reaction was observed with 2 strains (Enterococcus faecium ATCC 35667 and ATCC 49032), while faint visible bands were seen in 5 strains (E. casseliflavus 7505-97; E. faecalis ATCC 59532, ATCC 51299, and N00410; and E. faecium CLS isolate) and almost imperceptible bands were seen in the remaining 8 strains (E. avium ATCC 14025; E. durans ATCC 19432 and ATCC 6056; E. faecalis ATCC 19433, ATCC 2912, and ATCC 33186; E. faecium N97-330; and E. gallinarum ATCC 49573). However, these faint cross-reactive 16S rRNA gene bands in enterococcal bacteria disappeared under strict M-PCR conditions (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. M-PCR specificity in various species and strains of staphylococci and other nonstaphylococcal bacteria

Sensitivity of M-PCR. The sensitivity of our M-PCR assay was examined with 10 representative strains and species of staphylococcal bacteria, including MET-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), MRSA, H-MuR MRSA, L-MuR MRSA, H-MuR MSSA, H-MuR MR-CoNS, and H-MuR MET-susceptible CoNS (MS-CoNS), as well as 2 species (S. epidermidis and S. saprophyticus) of CoNS with sequences perfectly matching the sequence of our Staph756F primer and a species (S. sciuri) with one nucleotide mismatch (Fig. 1) (Table 3). Under general M-PCR conditions, the assay was capable of detecting, with reproducibility, bands in ethidium bromide-stained gels at dilutions corresponding to 3.0 x 105 to 1.5 x 106 CFU/PCR; the values varied slightly depending on the strain and specific gene examined (Table 3). Overall, the single-target PCR was only 2 to 10 times (1.5 x 105 to 1.5 x 106) more sensitive than our M-PCR (data not shown), suggesting that our M-PCR assay is sufficiently robust.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3. M-PCR sensitivity in various representative strains

Validation of M-PCR. Validation of our quadriplex assay was performed in a double-blind fashion. The results of PCR testing of 323 previously well-characterized clinical isolates, including H-MuR MRSA (n = 56), H-MuR MSSA (n = 6), L-MuR MRSA (n = 6), MUP-susceptible MRSA (n = 49), MUP-susceptible MSSA (n = 47), H-MuR MR-CoNS (n = 72), H-MuR MS-CoNS (n = 35), L-MuR MR-CoNS (n = 1), MUP-resistant MS-CoNS (n = 1), MUP-susceptible MR-CoNS (n = 19), and MUP-susceptible MS-CoNS (n = 31) (Table 4), were compared to the results of staphylococcal identification by a free coagulase plasma test and OXA and MUP E-test susceptibility results. We found a 100% concordance between microbiological and PCR results, including a correlation with antibiotic susceptibility phenotypes (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 4. Validation of M-PCR assay in clinical isolatesa


arrow
DISCUSSION
 
S. aureus and CoNS are major causes of community-acquired and nosocomial infections (1, 9, 18, 27, 36). They are also among the most frequently isolated bacteria in clinical microbiology laboratories (29, 31). Simple and rapid identification and discrimination of S. aureus and CoNS and detection of MET resistance and MUP resistance are essential for prompt institution of effective antimicrobial chemotherapy and for limiting the unnecessary use of certain classes of antibiotics. Since MET resistance (encoded by mecA) and H-MuR (encoded by mupA) are mediated by the expression of PBP2a and by the expression of altered isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase, respectively, PCR detection of mecA and mupA is considered the "gold standard" for the detection of MET resistance and H-MuR (3, 14, 26). Although previous reports evidenced the utility of PCR for the accurate detection of the mupA gene (3, 14, 32, 38), only two studies have included the simultaneous detection of the mecA and mupA genes (28, 30). Nunes et al. (28) were the first to attempt to include femA (an auxiliary gene found in all S. aureus strains), mecA, and mupA in an M-PCR to allow for the identification of S. aureus and the simultaneous detection of MET resistance and MUP resistance in a single PCR. However, these investigators failed to amplify all three targets in a single-tube reaction due to technical problems and finally had to perform two separate PCRs for the detection of mecA and mupA in one tube and femA in another tube (28). Ferreira et al. applied the same duplex PCR for the detection of the mecA and mupA genes in CoNS but did not include any specific bacterial identification marker genes (13). Recently, Perez-Roth et al. (30) demonstrated the feasibility of an M-PCR for the simultaneous identification of S. aureus (femB) and detection of MET resistance and MUP resistance (mecA and mupA, respectively) but not for discrimination between S. aureus and CoNS.

We designed a novel set of Staphylococcus genus-specific primers based on a comprehensive alignment of bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences and successfully developed a quadriplex PCR assay that targets 16S rRNA (Staphylococcus genus specific), nuc (S. aureus species specific), mupA (a determinant of MUP resistance), and mecA (a determinant of MET resistance) and that could identify most staphylococci, discriminate S. aureus from CoNS and other bacteria, and simultaneously detect MUP resistance and MET resistance. This assay, including our simple and rapid boiling method of DNA extraction, offers obvious advantages in clinical laboratory diagnosis and epidemiological surveillance programs.

The genus Staphylococcus is comprised of at least 35 unique species, with S. aureus and certain CoNS species being considered of great importance in terms of human health. Of the 32 CoNS species, only half have been recovered from humans (23, 36). The main medically important CoNS (most frequently reported species involved in human infections) are S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, S. lugdunensis, S. saprophyticus, S. schleiferi, S. xylosus, S. hominis, S. simulans, S. cohnii, S. capitis, S. caprae, S. kloosii, and S. warneri, although S. epidermidis accounts for most CoNS infections (23, 36, 37). Other staphylococcal species are of minor medical importance (indigenous to humans but less frequently reported as etiologic agents of human infections) or are not medically important (indigenous to other animals and birds and/or found occasionally as part of the transient human flora but without causing human infections) (25). These staphylococcal species and strains are phylogenetically diverse (35), and it is very difficult to select a genus-conserved genetic region for the design of a PCR primer. Previously published Staphylococcus genus-specific primers (22, 24) do not target completely conserved regions in the staphylococcal 16S rRNA gene, having about 1 to 4 nucleotide mismatches even in most medically important CoNS species, including S. epidermidis (1 of 23 nucleotide mismatches), S. haemolyticus (1 of 23 mismatches), S. lugdunensis (2 of 23 mismatches), S. saprophyticus (2 of 23 mismatches), S. hominis (2 of 23 mismatches), and S. simulans (4 of 23 mismatches) in multiple-sequence alignments (Fig. 1). When these primers were used in our PCR assay, we were unable to detect important CoNS, such as S. lugdunensis, S. saprophyticus, S. schleiferi, S. hominis, S. simulans, and S. sciuri (data not shown).

We designed a new conserved Staphylococcus genus-specific 5' primer (Staph756F) and integrated it into our new quadriplex PCR assay, allowing us to detect most species and strains of staphylococcal bacteria (Table 2). However, one or two nucleotide mismatches were noted in several species of non-medically important staphylococci as well as in Enterococcus strains (Fig. 1). To address the cross-reactivity of staphylococci with enterococci in our M-PCR assay, we designed two sets of PCR conditions, general and strict (detailed in Materials and Methods). Under general conditions, the novel M-PCR detected all tested species and strains of S. aureus and CoNS; however, it resulted in faint, presumably cross-reactive bands for the 16S rRNA genes in several Enterococcus strains, but no cross-reactivity with other bacteria was seen. Under strict conditions, our assay specifically detected only staphylococci (Table 2); however, detailed sequence analysis predicts that several staphylococcal species, such as S. schleiferi, S. intermedius, S. felis, S. delphini, S. hyicus, and S. chromogenes, will be missed (Fig. 1). However, these staphylococcal species, with the exception of S. schleiferi, are not indigenous to human beings and are of no or minor medical importance (23, 36, 37). Therefore, different (general or strict) PCR conditions can be used, depending on the particular need, such as using general PCR conditions to detect all staphylococci but applying strict conditions when specificity is needed to exclude enterococci.

One of the limitations of our quadriplex assay is in the setting of mixed cultures of S. aureus and CoNS. As both species may carry mecA and/or mupA, PCR detection of these genes would indicate that one or both organisms harbor one or both of these genes. However, this situation is not expected to be a common occurrence, as organism purity should be ensured prior to PCR testing. Another limitation is the possibility of additional cross-reactions with other, rarely encountered species of medical significance. We were unable to test all species and acknowledge that as new species are identified, the possibility of cross-reactive bands for 16S rRNA genes exists, although our findings suggest that with the use of strict PCR conditions, this possibility would be a minor concern.

The current assay could detect only H-MuR and not L-MuR, since they result from different mechanisms. H-MuR results from the acquisition of a transferable plasmid containing the mupA (or ileS-2) gene, which is distinct from the chromosomal native ileS gene, sharing only 30% homology in the expected amino acid sequences (17). The genetic mechanism responsible for L-MuR is believed to be related to point mutations within the host ileS gene (4, 8, 11, 38), although the association between mutations and L-MuR is still not clear. Additional studies are needed to explore the genetic mechanism responsible for L-MuR in order to develop a comprehensive molecular diagnostic test that reliably detects all types of MUP resistance, including H-MuR and L-MuR.

In conclusion, we successfully developed a novel quadriplex PCR assay which could identify all staphylococci tested, discriminate S. aureus from CoNS and other bacteria, and simultaneously detect MUP resistance and MET resistance. This assay offers clinical laboratories a new rapid, simple, feasible, specific, and accurate tool. Its application will allow the rapid determination of MET resistance and MUP resistance in settings where it is used and hopefully will prevent the widespread dissemination of MET resistance and MUP resistance through early and reliable detection.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank T. Lloyd for technical assistance and H. Didier, N. Hamilton, and H. Semeniuk for assistance in shipping and storing the clinical isolates used in this study.

This work was supported by a CHR/CLS research grant (grant no. 17244) to K.Z. and by an operating grant from the Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance (CAR), CHR/CLS/University of Calgary. J.S. was a 2003 CHR/CLS summer student.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, 9-3535 Research Rd. N.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2L 2K8. Phone: (403) 770-3583. Fax: (403) 770-3347. E-mail: kunyan.zhang{at}cls.ab.ca. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. American Journal of Infection Control. 1999. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System report, data summary from January 1990-May 1999, issued June 1999. Am. J. Infect. Control 27:520-532.[CrossRef][Medline]
    2. 2
  2. Andrews, J. M. 2001. The development of the BSAC standardized method of disc diffusion testing. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 48:29-42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    3. 3
  3. Anthony, R. M., A. M. Connor, E. G. Power, and G. L. French. 1999. Use of the polymerase chain reaction for rapid detection of high-level mupirocin resistance in staphylococci. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 18:30-34.[CrossRef][Medline]
    4. 4
  4. Antonio, M., N. McFerran, and M. J. Pallen. 2002. Mutations affecting the Rossman fold of isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase are correlated with low-level mupirocin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:438-442.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    5. 5
  5. Bastos, M. C., P. J. Mondino, M. L. Azevedo, K. R. Santos, and M. Giambiagi-deMarval. 1999. Molecular characterization and transfer among Staphylococcus strains of a plasmid conferring high-level resistance to mupirocin. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 18:393-398.[CrossRef][Medline]
    6. 6
  6. Boyce, J. M. 1996. Preventing staphylococcal infections by eradicating nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: proceeding with caution. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 17:775-779.[Medline]
    7. 7
  7. Conly, J. M., and S. Vas. 2002. Increasing mupirocin resistance of Staphylococcus aureus in CAPD—should it continue to be used as prophylaxis? Perit. Dial. Int. 22:649-652.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    8. 8
  8. Cookson, B. D. 1998. The emergence of mupirocin resistance: a challenge to infection control and antibiotic prescribing practice. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 41:11-18.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    9. 9
  9. Diekema, D. J., M. A. Pfaller, F. J. Schmitz, J. Smayevsky, J. Bell, R. N. Jones, and M. Beach. 2001. Survey of infections due to Staphylococcus species: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, and the Western Pacific region for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997-1999. Clin. Infect. Dis. 32:S114-S132.
    10. 10
  10. Eltringham, I. 1997. Mupirocin resistance and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J. Hosp. Infect. 35:1-8.[CrossRef][Medline]
    11. 11
  11. Farmer, T. H., J. Gilbart, and S. W. Elson. 1992. Biochemical basis of mupirocin resistance in strains of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 30:587-596.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Farr, B. M. 2002. Mupirocin to prevent S. aureus infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 346:1905-1906.
    13. 13
  13. Ferreira, R. B., A. P. Nunes, V. M. Kokis, N. Krepsky, S. Fonseca Lde, C. Bastos Mdo, M. Giambiagi-deMarval, and K. R. Santos. 2002. Simultaneous detection of the mecA and ileS-2 genes in coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from Brazilian hospitals by multiplex PCR. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 42:205-212.[CrossRef][Medline]
    14. 14
  14. Fujimura, S., A. Watanabe, and D. Beighton. 2001. Characterization of the mupA gene in strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a low level of resistance to mupirocin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:641-642.[Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Gilbart, J., C. R. Perry, and B. Slocombe. 1993. High-level mupirocin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: evidence for two distinct isoleucyl-tRNA synthetases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:32-38.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    16. 16
  16. Hackbarth, C. J., and H. F. Chambers. 1989. Methicillin-resistant staphylococci: detection methods and treatment of infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33:995-999.[Free Full Text]
    17. 17
  17. Hodgson, J. E., S. P. Curnock, K. G. Dyke, R. Morris, D. R. Sylvester, and M. S. Gross. 1994. Molecular characterization of the gene encoding high-level mupirocin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus J2870. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:1205-1208.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    18. 18
  18. Huebner, J., and D. A. Goldmann. 1999. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: role as pathogens. Annu. Rev. Med. 50:223-236.[CrossRef][Medline]
    19. 19
  19. Hughes, J., and G. Mellows. 1980. Interaction of pseudomonic acid A with Escherichia coli B isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase. Biochem. J. 191:209-219.[Medline]
    20. 20
  20. Hussain, Z., L. Stoakes, S. Garrow, S. Longo, V. Fitzgerald, and R. Lannigan. 2000. Rapid detection of mecA-positive and mecA-negative coagulase-negative staphylococci by an anti-penicillin binding protein 2a slide latex agglutination test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2051-2054.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    21. 21
  21. Hussain, Z., L. Stoakes, V. Massey, D. Diagre, V. Fitzgerald, S. El Sayed, and R. Lannigan. 2000. Correlation of oxacillin MIC with mecA gene carriage in coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:752-754.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    22. 22
  22. Jaffe, R. I., J. D. Lane, S. V. Albury, and D. M. Niemeyer. 2000. Rapid extraction from and direct identification in clinical samples of methicillin-resistant staphylococci using the PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3407-3412.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    23. 23
  23. Kloos, W. E., and T. L. Bannerman. 1994. Update on clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 7:117-140.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    24. 24
  24. Maes, N., J. Magdalena, S. Rottiers, Y. De Gheldre, and M. J. Struelens. 2002. Evaluation of a triplex PCR assay to discriminate Staphylococcus aureus from coagulase-negative staphylococci and determine methicillin resistance from blood cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1514-1517.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    25. 25
  25. Murray, P. R., et al. (ed.) 2003. Manual of clinical microbiology, 8th ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
    26. 26
  26. NCCLS. 2002. MIC interpretive standards for Staphylococcus spp. An NCCLS global informational supplement, vol. 22, p. 96-125. NCCLS, Wayne, Pa.
    27. 27
  27. NNIS System. 2003. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2003, issued August 2003. Am. J. Infect. Control 31:481-498.[CrossRef][Medline]
    28. 28
  28. Nunes, E. L., K. R. dos Santos, P. J. Mondino, C. Bastos Mdo, and M. Giambiagi-deMarval. 1999. Detection of ileS-2 gene encoding mupirocin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by multiplex PCR. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 34:77-81.[CrossRef][Medline]
    29. 29
  29. Patrick, C. C. 1990. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: pathogens with increasing clinical significance. J. Pediatr. 116:497-507.[CrossRef][Medline]
    30. 30
  30. Perez-Roth, E., F. Claverie-Martin, J. Villar, and S. Mendez-Alvarez. 2001. Multiplex PCR for simultaneous identification of Staphylococcus aureus and detection of methicillin and mupirocin resistance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:4037-4041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    31. 31
  31. Pfaller, M. A., and L. A. Herwaldt. 1988. Laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological aspects of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1:281-299.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    32. 32
  32. Ramsey, M. A., S. F. Bradley, C. A. Kauffman, and T. M. Morton. 1996. Identification of chromosomal location of mupA gene, encoding low-level mupirocin resistance in staphylococcal isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2820-2823.[Abstract]
    33. 33
  33. Ryffel, C., W. Tesch, I. Birch-Machin, P. E. Reynolds, L. Barberis-Maino, F. H. Kayser, and B. Berger-Bachi. 1990. Sequence comparison of mecA genes isolated from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Gene 94:137-138.[CrossRef][Medline]
    34. 34
  34. Shortle, D. 1983. A genetic system for analysis of staphylococcal nuclease. Gene 22:181-189.[CrossRef][Medline]
    35. 35
  35. Takahashi, T., I. Satoh, and N. Kikuchi. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of 38 taxa of the genus Staphylococcus based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 49:725-728.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    36. 36
  36. von Eiff, C., G. Peters, and C. Heilmann. 2002. Pathogenesis of infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2:677-685.[CrossRef][Medline]
    37. 37
  37. von Eiff, C., R. A. Proctor, and G. Peters. 2001. Coagulase-negative staphylococci. Pathogens have major role in nosocomial infections. Postgrad. Med. 110:63-64, 69-70, 73-76.
    38. 38
  38. Yun, H. J., S. W. Lee, G. M. Yoon, S. Y. Kim, S. Choi, Y. S. Lee, E. C. Choi, and S. Kim. 2003. Prevalence and mechanisms of low- and high-level mupirocin resistance in staphylococci isolated from a Korean hospital. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 51:619-623.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2004, p. 4947-4955, Vol. 42, No. 11
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.11.4947-4955.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Zhang, K., McClure, J.-A., Elsayed, S., Conly, J. M. (2009). Novel Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec Type, Tentatively Designated Type VIII, Harboring Class A mec and Type 4 ccr Gene Complexes in a Canadian Epidemic Strain of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 531-540 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zhang, K., McClure, J.-A., Elsayed, S., Louie, T., Conly, J. M. (2008). Novel Multiplex PCR Assay for Simultaneous Identification of Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains USA300 and USA400 and Detection of mecA and Panton-Valentine Leukocidin Genes, with Discrimination of Staphylococcus aureus from Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 1118-1122 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Stamper, P. D., Cai, M., Howard, T., Speser, S., Carroll, K. C. (2007). Clinical Validation of the Molecular BD GeneOhm StaphSR Assay for Direct Detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Positive Blood Cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 2191-2196 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Seaman, P. F., Ochs, D., Day, M. J. (2007). Small-colony variants: a novel mechanism for triclosan resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 59: 43-50 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Revazishvili, T., Bakanidze, L., Gomelauri, T., Zhgenti, E., Chanturia, G., Kekelidze, M., Rajanna, C., Kreger, A., Sulakvelidze, A. (2006). Genetic Background and Antibiotic Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated in the Republic of Georgia.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 3477-3483 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jury, F., Al-Mahrous, M., Apostolou, M., Sandiford, S., Fox, A., Ollier, W., Upton, M. (2006). Rapid cost-effective subtyping of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by denaturing HPLC.. J Med Microbiol 55: 1053-1060 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • McClure, J.-A., Conly, J. M., Lau, V., Elsayed, S., Louie, T., Hutchins, W., Zhang, K. (2006). Novel multiplex PCR assay for detection of the staphylococcal virulence marker panton-valentine leukocidin genes and simultaneous discrimination of methicillin-susceptible from -resistant staphylococci.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 1141-1144 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zhang, K., McClure, J.-A., Elsayed, S., Louie, T., Conly, J. M. (2005). Novel Multiplex PCR Assay for Characterization and Concomitant Subtyping of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec Types I to V in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 5026-5033 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, K.
Right arrow Articles by Conly, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, K.
Right arrow Articles by Conly, J. M.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»