Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2004, p. 5429-5431, Vol. 42, No. 11
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.11.5429-5431.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
| CASE REPORT |
Sections of Infectious Diseases,1 Clinical Microbiology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas2
Received 9 March 2004/ Returned for modification 6 April 2004/ Accepted 9 July 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Physical examination revealed a fever of 39.7°C with otherwise normal vital signs. A right subclavian central venous catheter (CVC) was in place, with no erythema or drainage surrounding the insertion site. The mastectomy site was notable for a large, thick, and brown eschar without evidence of infection. The remainder of the examination was normal. Her laboratory data revealed mild anemia, a normal white blood cell count and differential, and normal platelet count. Paired quantitative blood cultures were drawn from the CVC line and a peripheral vein. The patient was admitted to the hospital and was empirically treated with meropenem and vancomycin.
On the second day of admission the fever resolved. Three days later, a quantitative culture of the CVC blood (9) became positive for an acid-fast bacillus (strain MDA0695) with >1,000 colonies growing on sheep blood agar from the 10 ml of blood cultured (lysis centrifugation method with an Isolator tube; Wampole Laboratories, Princeton, N.J.). The simultaneous peripheral blood culture remained negative, however. The positive culture prompted CVC removal at day 7 of hospitalization, just before discharge. This bacterium was also isolated from the removed CVC tip (625 colonies from the 5-ml sonicate solution of the tip), suggesting its colonization to the catheter without being cleared by the antibiotics. After discharge, the patient was further treated with oral azithromycin (500 mg twice a day) and gatifloxacin (400 mg daily) for 3 weeks without relapse. No episodes of fever occurred during the follow-up for 6 months.
Microbiological studies. The growth rate of this acid-fast bacillus, strain MDA0695, suggested the likelihood of a rapidly growing mycobacterium (RGM). To identify this organism rapidly and accurately, a previously described method to analyze the sequences of the 16S rRNA gene was employed (2). Briefly, genomic DNA from culture colonies was extracted and subjected to amplification by PCR for a 1,066-bp fragment of the gene. A set of conserved bacterial primers, 5' GCGTGCTTAACACATGCAAGTC 3' and 5' CGCTCGTTGCGGGACTTAACC 3' (positions 42 to 1107 of GenBank accession no. J01859 of Escherichia coli), was used for the amplification. The amplicon was sequenced by two sets of primers using the dye terminator method in an ABI 377 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). The sequence analysis was performed through a GenBank BLAST query (GenBank; National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, Md.).
The sequencing result showed that this bacterium matched best with Mycobacterium brumae (99.6% identity, 847 of 850 base pairs) (AF480576) (4). Additionally, the organism formed flat, rough, and undulated colonies (Fig. 1), a morphological feature consistent with M. brumae (4). Thus, this identification of M. brumae was reached 4 days after isolation of the organism, or by the time of discharge of the patient. Routine biochemical tests (11), completed 28 days later, showed the organism to be scotochromagenic, positive for urease, and negative for niacin, tellurite, 68°C catalase, iron uptake, arylsulfatase, and Tween-80 hydrolysis (a nitrate reduction test was not performed). The organism grew well at 30 and 37°C incubations but not at 42°C or on MacConkey agar. The growth was retarded in the presence of 5% NaCl. Thus, most of the reactions were also compatible with M. brumae, except for chromagenicity and negative catalase and iron uptake. Overall, strain MDA0695 most likely represented a variant of M. brumae.
![]() View larger version (153K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Colony morphology and yellow pigmentation of a 10-day culture on Middlebrook 7H10 agar of the rapidly growing Mycobacterium sp. strain MDA0695, likely a variant of M. brumae. Grid, 10 mm.
|
0.5 µg/ml), tobromycin (MIC,
2 µg/ml), ciprofloxacin (MIC, 0.12 µg/ml), clarithromycin (MIC,
0.25 µg/ml), minocycline (MIC,
0.25 µg/ml), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (MIC of trimethoprim, 2 µg/ml; MIC of sulfamethoxazole, 38 µg/ml), but it was resistant to cefoxitin (MIC, >64 µg/ml) and imipenem (MIC, >32 µg/ml). Analysis. It has been realized in recent years that sequencing analysis of the 16S rRNA gene offers rapid and accurate identification of various bacteria, particularly mycobacteria that are fastidious (2, 10). Our laboratory routinely uses sequencing analysis of a portion of the 16S rRNA gene to provide quick and timely identification of all mycobacterial isolates (2). The sequencing method has also been used to identify rare bacterial species and establish new species (3).
The number of RGM has expanded significantly over the past decade or so, owing to better recognition and identification of these organisms. M. brumae is a nonchromogenic RGM species established in 1993 by Luquin et al. (4). The organism is rod shaped, gram positive, and acid-alcohol fast, and it is able to form clumps and cords. It grows within 4 to 5 days. Of the initial 11 strains studied, 8 were isolated from water samples from a river in Spain, 2 were from soil, and 1 was from human sputum of an asymptomatic individual. To our knowledge, no infections by this organism have been reported previously. It is likely that, in view of the limited experience with this organism, traditional biochemical tests may be unable to provide definitive identification of this organism. In our case, had the sequencing method not been used, the organism would have been misidentified.
RGM are being recognized as causing catheter-related infections, with an estimated incidence of 1% (1, 8). M. fortuitum, M. chelonae, and M. mucogenicum are the most frequent culprits in our experience (2, 7). Rare mycobacteria, such as the present case and others (14), have also been recognized in recent years. Like other CVC-related infections, the likely involvement of mycobacteria is probably related to the duration of catheter placement, the location of the site of insertion, and the type of catheters (5). The incidence also varies with geographic location: the southern coastal states, especially Texas and Florida, are areas where RGM infections are endemic (13). It is presently uncertain whether a specific underlying disease per se, such as breast cancer in our patient, may be an independent predisposing factor. A previous study (7) showed that 4 of 15 patients with catheter-related RGM bacteremias had breast cancer as the primary disease.
Our M. brumae strain was resistant to imipenem and cefoxitin but was susceptible to several other antibiotics. While there is no other data on M. brumae for comparison, this drug resistance pattern resembles those of M. chelonae and M. abscessus more than that of M. fortuitum. In a recent study of 75 strains of M. chelonae and M. abscessus (15), 40% were resistant to imipenem and 47% were resistant to cefoxitin. In contrast, M. fortuitum strains are rarely resistant to these two antibiotics (12). In our patient, despite the imipenem resistance the initial combination of antibiotics appeared effective in clearing the infection, because she defervesced rapidly. However, the antibiotics did not clear the catheter colonization by the organism. Therefore, catheter removal was the ultimate step to prevent potential relapse in this patient. This point has been realized earlier in catheter-related RGM infections (7).
This work was supported in part by a University Cancer Foundation grant (to X.Y.H.) from The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center and by an institutional core research grant (CA16672) from the National Institutes of Health for the Sequencing Core Facility.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»