Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2004, p. 5885-5888, Vol. 42, No. 12
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5885-5888.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
False-Positive Results in a Recombinant Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Associated Coronavirus (SARS-CoV) Nucleocapsid Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Due to HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-229E Rectified by Western Blotting with Recombinant SARS-CoV Spike Polypeptide
Patrick C. Y. Woo,1
Susanna K. P. Lau,1
Beatrice H. L. Wong,1
Kwok-Hung Chan,1
Wai-Ting Hui,1
Grace S. W. Kwan,1
J. S. Malik Peiris,1
Robert B. Couch,2 and
Kwok-Yung Yuen1*
Department of Microbiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong,1
Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas2
Received 29 March 2004/
Returned for modification 9 June 2004/
Accepted 21 August 2004

ABSTRACT
Using paired serum samples obtained from patients with illness
associated with increases in anti-human coronavirus OC43 (HCoV-OC43)
or anti-HCoV-229E antibodies, we examined the possibility of
false-positive results detected in a recombinant severe acute
respiratory syndrome (SARS)-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV)
nucleocapsid protein immunoglobulin G enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (ELISA). Three of the 21 and 1 of the 7 convalescent-phase
serum samples from persons with increases in antibodies against
HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-229E, respectively, tested positive by the
recombinant SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein-based ELISA. None
of these samples were found to contain a specific antibody in
the recombinant SARS-CoV spike polypeptide-based Western blot
assay.

TEXT
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), caused by SARS-associated
coronavirus (SARS-CoV), has affected 30 countries in five continents,
with more than 8,000 cases and 750 deaths (
7-
11). As for the
detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV, at the moment, the
most widely used methods are antibody detection in acute- and
convalescent-phase sera by indirect immunofluorescence assay
and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using cell culture
extracts (
4,
8,
10). However, antibody detection by these methods
may be less reproducible, more difficult to standardize, and
more labor-intensive than ELISA-based antibody detection tests
using recombinant antigens. Furthermore, producing the infected
cell lines for coating the ELISA plates and the slides for indirect
immunofluorescence requires cultivation of the SARS-CoV, for
which biosafety level 3 laboratory facilities are required.
Such facilities are not available in most clinical microbiology
laboratories.
ELISA-based antibody detection tests using recombinant antigens are well known to offer higher reproducibility and to be easier to standardize and less labor-intensive than antibody detection by indirect immunofluorescence assay and ELISA using cell culture extract, and they do not require cultivation of the SARS-CoV (1, 2, 14, 18). Recently, we have reported the use of recombinant SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein ELISA-based antibody tests for serodiagnosis of SARS-CoV pneumonia and the study of the seroprevalence of nonpneumonic SARS-CoV infections (15, 16). In addition, others have also reported the use of recombinant-protein-based immunoassays for serodiagnosis of SARS-CoV pneumonia (3, 17). However, in our studies, we have also shown that false-positive reactions were detected if the recombinant SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein-based ELISA was used alone for antibody detection (15). In this study, using paired serum samples obtained from patients with increases in anti-human CoV OC43 (HCoV-OC43) or anti-HCoV-229E antibodies, we examined the possibility of false-positive results detected by the recombinant SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein-based ELISA. The importance of using Western blot assays, with the nucleocapsid protein and spike polypeptide of SARS-CoV, for confirmation was also determined.
Paired serum samples collected from 21 and 7 patients with recent infections by HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-229E, respectively, were retrieved from the serum bank of the Respiratory Pathogens Research Unit of the Baylor College of Medicine. The paired serum samples were shown to exhibit significant increases in anti-HCoV-OC43 antibodies by immunoassay or in anti-HCoV-229E antibodies in microneutralization tests similar to those described previously (5, 6).
Cloning and purification of His6-tagged recombinant nucleocapsid protein and optimization of the ELISA for detection of immunoglobulin G (IgG) against SARS-CoV were as reported previously (15). ELISA was performed according to our previous publications (13, 14) using paired serum samples (diluted 1:40) positive for the anti-HCoV-OC43 or anti-HCoV-229E antibody. Cloning and purification of the His6-tagged recombinant spike polypeptide of SARS-CoV were as reported previously (15). Western blot analysis was performed according to our previous publications (14, 15, 18).
Three of the 21 convalescent-phase serum samples, but none of the acute-phase serum samples, from patients with recent HCoV-OC43 infections were positive by the recombinant SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein-based ELISA for IgG antibody detection, with optical density at 450 nm (OD450) values of 0.337, 0.365, and 0.478 (Fig. 1). Although two serum samples produced very faint bands in the recombinant SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein-based Western blot assay, none of them were found to contain the specific antibody by the recombinant SARS-CoV spike polypeptide-based Western blot assay (Fig. 2). There was no relationship between the convalescent-phase sample titer or magnitude of the increase in the HCoV-OC43 ELISA and a positive result in the recombinant SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein-based ELISA.
One of the seven convalescent-phase serum samples, but none
of the acute-phase serum samples, from patients with recent
HCoV-229E infection was positive by the recombinant SARS-CoV
nucleocapsid protein-based ELISA for IgG detection, with an
OD
450 value of 0.405 (Fig.
1). Although the serum sample produced
a very faint band in the recombinant SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein-based
Western blot assay, it did not contain the specific antibody
according to the recombinant SARS-CoV spike polypeptide-based
Western blot assay (Fig.
2). The convalescent-phase serum positive
in the recombinant SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein-based ELISA
was from the serum pair with the greatest rise in titer (eightfold)
and had the highest neutralizing-antibody titer.
The present study showed evidence that cross-reactivity in the recombinant SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein-based ELISA between the SARS-CoV and serum samples positive for antibodies against HCoV-229E or HCoV-OC43 is possible. In our previous study on the optimization of the SARS-CoV recombinant nucleocapsid protein-based ELISA for IgG antibody detection, seven of the serum samples obtained from 149 healthy blood donors who donated blood in 2000 had OD450s greater than the cutoff value (15). However, none of them were found to contain the specific antibody by both the nucleocapsid protein- and spike polypeptide-based Western blot assays. Furthermore, when this ELISA was used to screen healthy blood donors who donated blood during the SARS outbreak in Hong Kong (March to May 2003), nonpneumonic hospitalized patients, and asymptomatic health care workers, 33 (4%) of the 828 serum samples screened were positive for IgG antibodies (15). However, only 4 (12%) of the 33 serum samples were confirmed to contain specific SARS-CoV antibodies by both nucleocapsid protein- and spike polypeptide-based Western blot assays. We speculated that the false-positive results could be due to cross-reactivity between the nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV and serum samples positive for antibodies against HCoV-229E, HCoV-OC43, or other undiscovered human coronaviruses, as there is significant homology between the nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV and those of HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-229E. In the present study, we showed that cross-reactivity between the nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV and serum samples positive for antibodies against HCoV-229E or HCoV-OC43 is indeed possible. For about 14% of the HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-229E infections detected by serum antibody increases, an antibody increase was detected by the SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein-based ELISA. The cross-reactive serum from an HCoV-229E infection had the highest convalescent-phase sample titer and greatest increase in titer, but no relationship between the HCoV-OC43 ELISA titers and detection of antibody in the SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein-based ELISA was observed. Patients with a positive SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein-based ELISA result tended to be younger than those with negative tests, but clinical characteristics of the illnesses for these two groups were the same (data not shown). For the two HCoV-OC43 antibody-positive serum samples that produced bands when they were tested by the nucleocapsid protein-based Western blot assay, the bands were stronger than that produced by the HCoV-229E antibody-positive serum sample that tested positive by the nucleocapsid protein-based ELISA (Fig. 2). This is probably because the percentage of amino acid identity between the nucleocapsid protein of HCoV-OC43 and that of SARS-CoV (33%) is higher than the amino acid identity between the nucleocapsid protein of HCoV-OC43 and that of SARS-CoV (21%). Cross-reactivity with HCoV-OC43, HCoV-229E, and other coronaviruses remains an important issue for future studies on SARS-CoV serology. The use of synthetic peptides, instead of the whole protein, for antibody detection could be a solution to cross-reactivity with proteins of other CoVs (13).
The present study confirmed the high specificity of the recombinant SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein-based ELISA, with positive results confirmed by Western blot assays using the recombinant nucleocapsid protein and recombinant spike polypeptide of SARS-CoV. It is well known that, in the presence of possible cross-reactions, the positive predictive values of serological assays depend on the prevalence of the infection in a particular locality at a particular moment. In the present study the four false-positive results were rectified by considering Western blot positivity for both the recombinant nucleocapsid protein and spike polypeptide a genuinely positive result. As the present ELISA produces a small proportion of false-positive reactions, all positive results, especially those obtained in the context of a low disease prevalence or from clinically incompatible cases, need confirmation by Western blot analysis using the recombinant nucleocapsid protein and spike polypeptide of SARS-CoV. Tan et al. recently demonstrated the high sensitivity and specificity of recombinant nucleocapsid protein-based Western blot analysis and recombinant spike protein-based immunofluorescence assay for the serodiagnosis of SARS-CoV infection (12). As ELISA is less labor-intensive and tedious to perform than Western blot assays, Western blot confirmation of positive ELISA results is probably a better choice for routine use in clinical microbiology laboratories. The Western blot assay for the spike polypeptide may appear more specific than that for the nucleocapsid protein because of possibly lower antibody titer of and/or avidity for recombinant nonglycosylated protein. Further studies could be performed to see whether Western blot analysis using only the spike polypeptide, instead of using both the nucleocapsid protein and spike polypeptide, would be able to screen out all the false-positive results.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported by a Research Grant Council grant (HKU
7532/03 M), the Research Fund for the Control of Infectious
Diseases, the Kai Cheong Tong SARS Research Fund, and NIH grant
NO1-AI-65298 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology, The University of Hong Kong, University Pathology Building, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong. Phone: (852) 28554892. Fax: (852) 28551241. E-mail:
hkumicro{at}hkucc.hku.hk.


REFERENCES
1 - Briese, T., C. G. Hatalski, S. Kliche, Y. S. Park, and W. I. Lipkin. 1995. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detecting antibodies to Borne disease virus-specific proteins. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:348-351.[Abstract]
2 - Chan, C. M., P. C. Y. Woo, A. S. P. Leung, S. K. P. Lau, X. Y. Che, L. Cao, and K. Y. Yuen. 2002. Detection of specific antibodies to an antigenic cell wall galactomannoprotein for serodiagnosis of Aspergillus fumigatus aspergillosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2041-2045.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Chang, M. S., Y. T. Lu, S. T. Ho, C. C. Wu, T. Y. Wei, C. J. Chen, Y. T. Hsu, P. C. Chu, C. H. Chen, J. M. Chu, Y. L. Jan, C. C. Hung, C. C. Fan, and Y. C. Yang. 2004. Antibody detection of SARS-CoV spike and nucleocapsid protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 314:931-936.[CrossRef][Medline]
4 - Chen, X., B. Zhou, M. Li, X. Liang, H. Wang, G. Yang, H. Wang, and X. Le. 2004. Serology of severe acute respiratory syndrome: implications for survival and outcome. J. Infect. Dis. 189:1158-1163.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 - Frank, A. L., J. Puck, B. J. Hughes, and T. R. Cate. 1980. Microneutralization test for influenza A and B and parainfluenza 1 and 2 viruses that uses continuous cell lines and fresh serum enhancement. J. Clin. Microbiol. 12:426-432.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Gill, E. P., E. A. Dominguez, S. B. Greenberg, R. L. Atmar, B. G. Hogue, B. D. Baxter, and R. B. Couch. 1994. Development and application of an enzyme immunoassay for coronavirus OC43 antibody in acute respiratory illness. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:2372-2376.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Guan, Y., B. J. Zheng, Y. Q. He, X. L. Liu, Z. X. Zhuang, C. L. Cheung, S. W. Luo, P. H. Li, L. J. Zhang, Y. J. Guan, K. M. Butt, K. L. Wong, K. W. Chan, W. Lim, K. F. Shortridge, K. Y. Yuen, J. S. Peiris, and L. L. Poon. 2003. Isolation and characterization of viruses related to the SARS coronavirus from animals in southern China. Science 302:276-278.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Ksiazek, T. G., D. Erdman, C. S. Goldsmith, S. R. Zaki, T. Peret, S. Emery, S. Tong, C. Urbani, J. A. Comer, W. Lim, P. E. Rollin, S. F. Dowell, A. E. Ling, C. D. Humphrey, W. J. Shieh, J. Guarner, C. D. Paddock, P. Rota, B. Fields, J. DeRisi, J. Y. Yang, N. Cox, J. M. Hughes, J. W. LeDuc, W. J. Bellini, L. J. Anderson, and the SARS Working Group. 2003. A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 348:1953-1966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Peiris, J. S. M., C. M. Chu, V. C. C. Cheng, K. S. Chan, I. F. N. Hung, L. L. M. Poon, K. I. Law, B. S. F. Tang, T. Y. W. Hon, C. S. Chan, K. H. Chan, J. S. C. Ng, B. J. Zheng, W. L. Ng, R. W. M. Lai, Y. Guan, K. Y. Yuen, and the HKU/UCH SARS Study Group. 2003. Clinical progression and viral load in a community outbreak of coronavirus-associated SARS pneumoniaa prospective study. Lancet 361:1767-1772.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Peiris, J. S. M., S. T. Lai, L. L. M. Poon, Y. Guan, L. Y. C. Yam, W. Lim, J. Nicholls, W. K. S. Yee, W. W. Yan, M. T. Cheung, V. C. C. Cheng, K. H. Chan, D. N. C. Tsang, R. W. H. Yung, T. K. Ng, K. Y. Yuen, and the SARS Study Group. 2003. Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet 361:1319-1325.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Peiris, J. S. M., K. Y. Yuen, A. D. Osterhaus, and K. Stohr. 2003. The severe acute respiratory syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 349:2431-2441.[Free Full Text]
12 - Tan, Y. J., P. Y. Goh, B. C. Fielding, S. Shen, C. F. Chou, J. L. Fu, H. N. Leong, Y. S. Leo, E. E. Ooi, A. E. Ling, S. G. Lim, and W. Hong. 2004. Profiles of antibody responses against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus recombinant proteins and their potential use as diagnostic markers. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 11:362-371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Wang, J., J. Wen, J. Li, J. Yin, Q. Zhu, H. Wang, Y. Yang, E. Qin, B. You, W. Li, X. Li, S. Huang, R. Yang, X. Zhang, L. Yang, T. Zhang, Y. Yin, X. Cui, X. Tang, L. Wang, B. He, L. Ma, T. Lei, C. Zeng, J. Fang, J. Yu, J. Wang, H. Yang, M. B. West, A. Bhatnagar, Y. Lu, N. Xu, and S. Liu. 2003. Assessment of immunoreactive synthetic peptides from the structural proteins of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Clin. Chem. 49:1989-1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Woo, P. C. Y., K. T. K. Chong, A. S. P. Leung, S. S. Y. Wong, S. K. P. Lau, and K. Y. Yuen. 2003. AFLMP1 encodes an antigenic cell wall protein in Aspergillus flavus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:845-850.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Woo, P. C. Y., S. K. P. Lau, H. W. Tsoi, K. H. Chan, B. H. L. Wong, X. Y. Che, V. K. P. Tam, S. C. F. Tam, V. C. C. Cheng, I. F. N. Hung, S. S. Y. Wong, B. J. Zheng, Y. Guan, and K. Y. Yuen. 2004. Relative rates of non-pneumonic SARS coronavirus infection and SARS coronavirus pneumonia. Lancet 363:841-845.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 - Woo, P. C. Y., S. K. P. Lau, B. H. L. Wong, H. W. Tsoi, A. M. Y. Fung, K. H. Chan, V. K. P. Tam, J. S. M. Peiris, and K. Y. Yuen. 2004. Detection of specific antibodies to SARS coronavirus nucleocapsid protein for serodiagnosis of SARS coronavirus pneumonia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:2306-2309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Wu, H. S., Y. C. Hsieh, I. J. Su, T. H. Lin, S. C. Chiu, Y. F. Hsu, J. H. Lin, M. C. Wang, J. Y. Chen, P. W. Hsiao, G. D. Chang, A. H. Wang, H. W. Ting, C. M. Chou, and C. J. Huang. 2004. Early detection of antibodies against various structural proteins of the SARS-associated coronavirus in SARS patients. J. Biomed. Sci. 11:117-126.[Medline]
18 - Yuen, K. Y., C. M. Chan, K. M. Chan, P. C. Y. Woo, X. Y. Che, A. S. P. Leung, and L. Cao. 2001. Characterization of AFMP1: a novel target for serodiagnosis of aspergillosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3830-3837.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2004, p. 5885-5888, Vol. 42, No. 12
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5885-5888.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Chan, C.-M., Woo, P. C. Y., Lau, S. K. P., Tse, H., Chen, H.-L., Li, F., Zheng, B.-J., Chen, L., Huang, J.-D., Yuen, K.-Y.
(2008). Spike Protein, S, of Human Coronavirus HKU1: Role in Viral Life Cycle and Application in Antibody Detection. Exp. Biol. Med.
233: 1527-1536
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cheng, V. C. C., Lau, S. K. P., Woo, P. C. Y., Yuen, K. Y.
(2007). Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus as an Agent of Emerging and Reemerging Infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
20: 660-694
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Haynes, L. M., Miao, C., Harcourt, J. L., Montgomery, J. M., Le, M. Q., Dryga, S. A., Kamrud, K. I., Rivers, B., Babcock, G. J., Oliver, J. B., Comer, J. A., Reynolds, M., Uyeki, T. M., Bausch, D., Ksiazek, T., Thomas, W., Alterson, H., Smith, J., Ambrosino, D. M., Anderson, L. J.
(2007). Recombinant Protein-Based Assays for Detection of Antibodies to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike and Nucleocapsid Proteins. CVI
14: 331-333
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yip, C. W., Hon, C. C., Zeng, F., Chow, K. Y. C., Chan, K. H., Peiris, J. S. M., Leung, F. C. C.
(2007). Naturally Occurring Anti-Escherichia coli Protein Antibodies in the Sera of Healthy Humans Cause Analytical Interference in a Recombinant Nucleocapsid Protein-Based Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Serodiagnosis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. CVI
14: 99-101
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Leung, D. T. M., van Maren, W. W. C., Chan, F. K. L., Chan, W. S., Lo, A. W. I., Ma, C. H., Tam, F. C. H., To, K. F., Chan, P. K. S., Sung, J. J. Y., Lim, P. L.
(2006). Extremely Low Exposure of a Community to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus: False Seropositivity due to Use of Bacterially Derived Antigens.. J. Virol.
80: 8920-8928
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Maache, M., Komurian-Pradel, F., Rajoharison, A., Perret, M., Berland, J.-L., Pouzol, S., Bagnaud, A., Duverger, B., Xu, J., Osuna, A., Paranhos-Baccala, G.
(2006). False-Positive Results in a Recombinant Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Associated Coronavirus (SARS-CoV) Nucleocapsid-Based Western Blot Assay Were Rectified by the Use of Two Subunits (S1 and S2) of Spike for Detection of Antibody to SARS-CoV.. CVI
13: 409-414
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chan, K. H., Cheng, V. C. C., Woo, P. C. Y., Lau, S. K. P., Poon, L. L. M., Guan, Y., Seto, W. H., Yuen, K. Y., Peiris, J. S. M.
(2005). Serological Responses in Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection and Cross-Reactivity with Human Coronaviruses 229E, OC43, and NL63. CVI
12: 1317-1321
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lau, S. K. P., Woo, P. C. Y., Li, K. S. M., Huang, Y., Tsoi, H.-W., Wong, B. H. L., Wong, S. S. Y., Leung, S.-Y., Chan, K.-H., Yuen, K.-Y.
(2005). Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-like virus in Chinese horseshoe bats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
102: 14040-14045
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
He, Y., Zhou, Y., Siddiqui, P., Niu, J., Jiang, S.
(2005). Identification of Immunodominant Epitopes on the Membrane Protein of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Associated Coronavirus. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 3718-3726
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Liang, Y., Wan, Y., Qiu, L.-w., Zhou, J., Ni, B., Guo, B., Zou, Q., Zou, L., Zhou, W., Jia, Z., Che, X.-y., Wu, Y.
(2005). Comprehensive Antibody Epitope Mapping of the Nucleocapsid Protein of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus: Insight into the Humoral Immunity of SARS. Clin. Chem.
51: 1382-1396
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yu, F., Le, M. Q., Inoue, S., Thai, H. T. C., Hasebe, F., del Carmen Parquet, M., Morita, K.
(2005). Evaluation of Inapparent Nosocomial Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection in Vietnam by Use of Highly Specific Recombinant Truncated Nucleocapsid Protein-Based Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. CVI
12: 848-854
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Woo, P. C. Y., Lau, S. K. P., Wong, B. H. L., Tsoi, H.-w., Fung, A. M. Y., Kao, R. Y. T., Chan, K.-h., Peiris, J. S. M., Yuen, K.-y.
(2005). Differential Sensitivities of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus Spike Polypeptide Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and SARS Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Protein ELISA for Serodiagnosis of SARS Coronavirus Pneumonia. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 3054-3058
[Abstract]
[Full Text]