Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2004, p. 660-664, Vol. 42, No. 2
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.2.660-664.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Intestinal Disease Research Unit,1 Department of Laboratory and Molecular Medicine,2 Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton,3 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto,4 Department of Medicine,5 Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical and Research Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg,6 Departments of Medical Genetics and Microbiology and Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto ,7 Department of Pathology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada8
Received 5 May 2003/ Returned for modification 22 July 2003/ Accepted 17 October 2003
|
|
|---|
99% homology with H. pylori. These results indicate that a member of the Helicobacter species may be involved in some cases of ulcerative colitis. |
|
|---|
Gastric infection by Helicobacter pylori is a well-recognized cause of chronic active gastritis and gastric and duodenal ulcers and is linked to the development of gastric malignancies (14). Studies in mice have suggested that persistent intestinal infection by related organisms such as Helicobacter hepaticus and Helicobacter bilis is associated with the development of chronic inflammation and enterocolitis (6, 7, 12, 13, 18). These findings raise the possibility that intestinal infection by Helicobacter species may be involved in the pathogenesis of the intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. To date, no evidence is available that confirms a relationship between Helicobacter species and the development of human inflammatory bowel disease. In this report, primers which amplify Helicobacter species-specific sequences of ribosomal DNA were used for PCR analysis to search for the presence of Helicobacter DNA in endoscopically obtained biopsy tissue.
|
|
|---|
A population-based set of controls was developed from the Manitoba Health (MH) population registry. The Manitoba Health population registry contains demographic information on all persons registered with the Manitoba Health public health insurance system. The registry is regularly updated with vital registrations and information from medical and hospital transactions and closely matches population estimates derived from the Canadian census (Statistics Canada) (22). A random sample of registered persons was selected with stratification for age (5-year intervals) and gender to achieve balance with the case series for those two variables. With the specified stratification, Manitoba Health's Information Services generated a mailing list of eligible controls and sent an information package prepared by the investigators explaining the study and requesting participation. The investigators did not know the identity of the controls unless they received a mailed response. For a second control group we asked patients with inflammatory bowel disease to refer us to one or more siblings.
All cases and controls completed a questionnaire and consented to provide a blood sample. Controls were invited to participate in colonoscopy plus biopsies, and those agreeing were paid an honorarium. Approximately 10% of controls who were enrolled in our study collecting questionnaire data and blood agreed to participate in the colonoscopy plus biopsy study. Cases were asked to contact the study personnel when they were to undergo their next colonoscopy for clinical reasons. All patients who were to undergo colonoscopies consented to providing extra biopsy tissue for study purposes.
Each of the cases and controls provided eight biopsy samples from the cecum and eight biopsy samples from the rectum at colonoscopy. In subjects with a previous cecal resection, biopsy samples were obtained from the right colon distal to the ileocolonic anastomosis. All biopsy samples were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70°C. These studies were approved by the research ethics board of the University of Manitoba
Nucleic acid purification and amplification. Nucleic acids were extracted from tissue samples essentially as previously described (16), except that tissues were homogenized in only 1 ml of lysis buffer in 10-ml polypropylene snap cap tubes. The tissue lysis buffer that was used in this study is a modification (16) of the commonly used Chomczynski lysis buffer (9). Specifically, 0.2 M sodium acetate was used at pH 7.0 instead of at pH 4.0. DNA was quantified by spectrophotometry at 260 nm.
The Helicobacter genus-specific primers 5'TATGACGGGTATCC GGC-3' and 5'-ATTCCACCTACCTCCTCCCA-3' were designed to amplify a 375-bp sequence within an area of the 16S rRNA gene conserved among members of the Helicobacter genus (2). An NCBI BLAST analysis confirmed that these primers identify the target sequence within the genome of known Helicobacter species including H. pylori, H. felis, H. muridarum, H. bilis, and H. hepaticus strains. PCR primers were constructed at the Institute for Molecular Biology and Medicine (Mobix Laboratory, McMaster University, Hamilton).
PCRs were prepared with 2.8 µM each primer, 3 mM MgCl2, 200 µM each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 5 µl of Amplitaq Gold Buffer (Applied Biosystems), 1.25 µg of template DNA, and 1.6 U of Taq polymerase (Applied Biosystems) plus distilled water to a total volume of 50 µl. PCR mixtures were heated to 94°C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, primer annealing at 53°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 45 s, followed by 10 min at 72°C in a PTC 200 DNA Engine (MJ Research, Waltham, Mass.). PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide, and the size of the product was confirmed by using DNA molecular size standards.
The specificity of the PCR primers designed for these studies was evaluated. The primer set amplified DNA extracted from cultured H. pylori, H. hepaticus, and H. felis (data not shown). No bands were observed with these Helicobacter PCR primers with DNA extracts from Escherichia coli or Campylobacter jejuni. PCR analysis detected bands in mouse gastric tissue known to be infected with H. pylori (data not shown). To confirm that the method of extracting DNA allowed identification of bacteria adherent to the mucosa, human gastric tissue with histologically identifiable H. pylori infection was obtained; DNA extracted from this tissue had a strong positive band for Helicobacter DNA (data not shown).
To assess the sensitivity of the PCR for the detection of H. pylori DNA, serially diluted samples of H. pylori DNA were subjected to the PCR. Strong bands were detected in samples diluted down to 0.000125 µg of H. pylori DNA (data not shown)
To ensure that the DNA extraction method would allow extraction of bacterial DNA from tissue, tissue known to be negative for Helicobacter was combined with cultured H. pylori bacteria in decreasing amounts from 108 to 100 bacteria (±101 bacteria in each sample). After DNA extraction, PCR analysis of the DNA from the bacteria-spiked tissues detected H. pylori DNA with bacterial concentrations of between 10 and 100 bacteria per sample (Fig. 1).
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Assessment of tissue extraction efficiency for the detection of Helicobacter rRNA gene sequences. DNA extracts from tissues treated with serially diluted Helicobacter pylori bacteria were amplified with pan-Helicobacter species PCR primers, followed by electrophoresis of the PCR product on an ethidium bromide-containing agarose gel. Lane 1, 1-kb DNA ladder; lane 2, negative control; lane 3, positive control; lane 4, DNA from tissue with 10 ± 10 bacteria present; lane 5, DNA from tissue with 100 ± 10 bacteria present; lane 6, DNA from tissue with 1,000 ± 100 bacteria present; lane 7, DNA from tissue with 10,000 ± 1,000 bacteria present.
|
Fisher's exact test was used to compare proportions of positive results between cases and controls. Student's t test was used to compare clinical information between groups.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. Sequences M28, M36, M37, and M38 were submitted to GenBank and assigned accession numbers AY426557, AY426558, AY426559, and AY426560, respectively.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Clinical information for subjects undergoing biopsy
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Clinical information for patients with and without PCR evidence of Helicobacter DNA
|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Assessment of DNA extracted from endoscopic biopsy samples taken during evaluation of the intestines of patients with and without inflammatory bowel disease: PCR products obtained from amplification of DNA with pan-Helicobacter species PCR primers. Lanes: 1, 1-kb DNA ladder; 2, negative control; 3, positive control; 4, ulcerative colitis subject negative for extracted DNA; 5, ulcerative colitis subject from lane 4 with H. pylori DNA spike; 6, positive subject with ulcerative colitis; 7, positive subject with ulcerative colitis; 8, positive subject with active ulcerative colitis; 9, positive subject with active Crohn's disease; 10, positive subject with ulcerative colitis; 11, positive subject with ulcerative colitis.
|
95% identity. The remaining two PCR sequences also showed the highest match (85% identity) to H. pylori 16S rRNA gene sequences, but with the limited DNA obtained from the biopsy samples, we were unable to obtain a good clean sequence for submission to GenBank. The proportion of ulcerative colitis patients showing Helicobacter sp. DNA was greater than the proportion of controls (P < 0.04 by Fisher's exact test). The patients who tested positive were significantly older than the patients who were negative for Helicobacter DNA (mean age, 52 years, versus 39.8 years for the negative ulcerative colitis patients; P = 0.024) and had a significantly longer duration of disease (mean, 19.7 years, versus a mean of 11.8 for Helicobacter-negative patients; P = 0.025). Patients with ulcerative colitis who were positive for Helicobacter DNA also tended to have inactive disease (four of six positive patients), although this was not statistically significant.
[13C]urea breath testing and serology for Helicobacter were not performed at the time the biopsy samples were taken: after these results were obtained, the patients who tested positive for Helicobacter DNA were contacted and requested to undergo further testing. Five of the six patients (all of the ulcerative colitis patients) agreed to urea breath testing, which was performed approximately 1 year postendoscopy. Only one of these patients tested positive, suggesting active gastric H. pylori infection.
|
|
|---|
One previous study searched for microbial agents such as Helicobacter in biopsy samples taken from normal or inflamed mucosa of 11 patients with Crohn's disease. Of the five biopsy samples from inflamed mucosa, three contained numerous bacteria, including Helicobacter, as assessed by broad-range and genus-specific hybridization analysis of the PCR products obtained by amplification of fragments of the 16S rRNA gene (27). However, species-specific primers were unsuccessful at identifying which members of the extracted genus were present. The authors suggested that, considering the mixture of bacterial species present in inflamed tissue, it was unlikely that Helicobacter as a single agent would be responsible for Crohn's disease in these patients. However, their failure to confirm the presence of Helicobacter extracted by species-specific primers raises questions about the specificity of the original genus-specific primer set. It is possible that the primers were detecting a closely related bacterium such as Campylobacter. It should be noted that none of the patients included in this study had ulcerative colitis.
We examined biopsy samples from a more extensive population-based cohort of patients with both active and inactive inflammatory bowel disease. For this study, we used a PCR primer set designed to amplify an area of the 16S rRNA gene common to Helicobacter species identified on Blast search. We defined precisely the specificity and sensitivity of this primer set to ensure that the PCR amplification method would detect only Helicobacter species and that DNA from as few as 10 helicobacters in 100 µg of tissue was detectible. We also tested each sample for inhibitors that might interfere with PCR amplification, to ensure that each negative was truly devoid of Helicobacter DNA.
The lack of Helicobacter sp. DNA in the control patient groups is of interest. Considering the age of the control population, a proportion (approximately 20%) of these patients might be expected to have gastric infection with H. pylori (23), which might have been detectable by PCR testing of feces. However, patients undergoing colonoscopy have a bowel cleansing preparation prior to endoscopy, and this would minimize fecal material in the biopsy samples taken for DNA isolation. It may be that this would prevent detection of any Helicobacter species not adherent to the mucosa.
Our studies identified six patients who had Helicobacter DNA present in their colonic biopsy samples. Five of these had ulcerative colitis and one had Crohn's disease. Statistically, there was a significant difference between the ulcerative colitis group and controls (P < 0.04). Though the sequencing of the amplified fragments from the inflammatory bowel disease patients showed homology with H. pylori, this does not rule out the possibility of the presence of a member of the Helicobacter family with significant sequence homology to H. pylori. Gastric H. pylori status for all subjects at the time of colonoscopy was not known. However, only one of the ulcerative colitis patients whose tissue contained Helicobacter DNA had a positive urea breath test approximately 1 year postendoscopy, suggesting that the presence of gastric Helicobacter pylori was not a significant factor in these patients.
In conclusion, H. pylori-like DNA sequences were identified in biopsy samples from 5 of 33 patients with ulcerative colitis and in 1 of 25 with Crohn's disease, while all 29 age-matched controls were negative. These patients with positive findings had a longer history of disease and tended to have inactive disease. Though sequencing of the PCR product indicated the DNA detected showed homology to H. pylori, it remains entirely possible that this organism is distinct from gastric H. pylori. While the DNA in these tissues may be due to bacteria or bacterial DNA in transit from the stomach, these results raise the possibility that a proportion of inflammatory bowel disease patients, particularly those with ulcerative colitis, have transient infection or colonization of the lower gastrointestinal tract with a Helicobacter sp. which may contribute to the persistence of colonic inflammation.
This work was funded in part by the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of Canada. Cathy Streutker was supported by a CAG/Abbott/CIHR fellowship award. Charles Bernstein is the recipient of a Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of Canada Research Scientist Award and a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Investigator Award. Kenneth Croitoru is the recipient of a Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of Canada Research Scientist Award.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»