JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gilligan, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gilligan, P. H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2004, p. 855-857, Vol. 42, No. 2
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.2.855-857.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Prevalence of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus in Prenatal Screening Cultures

Melissa B. Miller,1 Sonia L. Allen,1 Mary Ellen Mangum,1 Anastassia Doutova,1 and Peter H. Gilligan1,2*

Clinical Microbiology-Immunology Laboratories, University of North Carolina Hospitals,1 Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina2

Received 11 September 2003/ Returned for modification 8 October 2003/ Accepted 13 November 2003


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 References
 
Recommendations for the perinatal treatment of women colonized with Streptococcus agalactiae include vancomycin prophylaxis for those with severe penicillin allergies and antibiotic-resistant organisms. Because of potential postpartum infections due to vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and the possible spread of vancomycin resistance, the prevalence of VRE in prenatal screening cultures was determined.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 References
 
Enterococcus spp. are a component of the human intestinal flora and may be found naturally in the birth canals of women. These organisms are also a common cause of hospital-acquired urinary tract, wound, and bloodstream infections. Although Enterococcus is rarely reported to cause perinatally acquired neonatal infections, it is commonly isolated from women with postcesarean endometritis and wound infections (3, 18, 24, 29). Streptococcus agalactiae can also colonize the vaginas and/or recta of women and is a well-described neonatal pathogen that is transmitted perinatally. Vertical transmission of S. agalactiae is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in neonates due to pneumonia, sepsis, and meningitis (11, 17). Antimicrobial resistance is an increasing problem for both of these organisms. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are more refractory to treatment than their sensitive counterparts, and S. agalactiae is becoming increasingly resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin (1, 14-16, 23).

In 2002, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended that all pregnant women be screened for the presence of S. agalactiae (group B Streptococcus) and published guidelines for the treatment of colonized pregnant women (5). Penicillin is the drug of choice for the prophylactic treatment of S. agalactiae. For severely penicillin-allergic mothers, the alternative treatment is either erythromycin or clindamycin. However, antibiotic resistance among S. agalactiae isolates is increasing. At the University of North Carolina Hospitals, 31% of S. agalactiae isolates were found to be resistant to erythromycin and two-thirds of these isolates were also resistant to clindamycin (M. B. Miller, M. C. Jones, E. Rogers, V. Lang, and P. H. Gilligan, Abstr. 103rd Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol., abstr. C-124, 2003). Further, in some cases, in vitro susceptibility data may not be available for prenatal isolates. In these instances, vancomycin has been recommended for prophylaxis of perinatal S. agalactiae infection.

The use of vancomycin in penicillin-allergic women may precipitate an increase in the presence of VRE in this population, which raises at least two concerns. First, if postpartum infections develop in either the mother or the neonate, empirical therapy with vancomycin will not be effective. Second, since vancomycin resistance can be transferred between bacteria, the presence of VRE might promote an increase in vancomycin resistance in other vaginal or rectal gram-positive organisms (6, 12, 19). Therefore, to assess the potential for VRE-associated postpartum infections and the possible bacterial transfer of vancomycin resistance in this patient population, the prevalence of VRE in routine prenatal screening cultures was determined.

(A preliminary report of this work has been presented previously [S. L. Allen, M. E. Mangum, M. B. Miller, A. Doutova, and P. H. Gilligan, Abstr. 103rd Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol., abstr. C-413, 2003].)

Specimens (n = 447) received for prenatal S. agalactiae screening were inoculated into LIM enrichment broth and subsequently plated on sheep blood agar and Thayer-Martin (improved) medium (Remel, Lenexa, Kans.). Cultured sources included vaginal and rectal (197 specimens), vaginal (185 specimens), cervical (54 specimens), endocervical (5 specimens), rectal (5 specimens), and unspecified (1 specimen) sites. However, it should be noted that a chart review revealed that many of the swabs labeled as vaginal were, in fact, vaginal and rectal swabs. Growth on Thayer-Martin (improved) medium (3 µg of vancomycin/ml) was used as a first screen for the presence of Enterococcus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. Colonies consistent with Enterococcus were identified with Gram stain, catalase, bile esculin, and 6.5% NaCl media and by the pyrrolidonyl aminopeptidase test. Vancomycin MICs were determined by the Etest (Remel). All other susceptibility results were determined by disk diffusion (Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.) by using NCCLS interpretation guidelines. Isolates exhibiting resistance to vancomycin were further identified to species level on the basis of arabinose utilization, arginine decarboxylase activity, methyl-{alpha}-D-glucopyranoside acidification, motility, and pigmentation (4, 7, 9, 22, 30). Multiplex PCR for the van genes was performed with Enterococcus isolates as previously described (8, 10, 20). Genomic DNA for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was prepared, digested with SmaI or NotI, and then subjected to PFGE (CHEF-DR III system; Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.) as described previously (2, 8, 21). The resulting banding patterns were interpreted according to published recommendations (26).

Sixty-eight percent of the prenatal screening cultures grew Enterococcus (305 isolates). For 5.6% of the Enterococcus isolates, intermediate vancomycin MICs were 4 to 8 µg/ml (17 isolates). The 17 Enterococcus species identified included E. gallinarum (14 isolates) and E. casseliflavus (3 isolates), which are known to have low-level intrinsic resistance to vancomycin due to nontransferable van genes (vanC-1 and vanC-2, respectively). PCR was performed to confirm the van resistance determinants of these isolates. A multiplex PCR with vanA and vanB primers did not produce any PCR products for the 17 isolates in question, whereas the results of vanC-1 and vanC-2 multiplex PCR confirmed that all isolates identified as E. gallinarum harbored vanC-1 but that the isolates identified as E. casseliflavus contained vanC-2.

Susceptibilities to seven commonly tested drugs were determined for the 17 Enterococcus isolates that were recovered from prenatal screening cultures. All of the isolates were sensitive to ampicillin, high-concentration gentamicin, chloramphenicol, and linezolid. Two isolates were resistant to high-concentration streptomycin, and resistance to tetracycline was observed for four isolates. Interestingly, all of the isolates that exhibited reduced susceptibility to vancomycin also showed reduced susceptibility to quinupristin-dalfopristin (10 isolates were intermediate, and 7 were resistant). While intrinsic resistance to streptogramins is known for Enterococcus faecalis, previous reports have not indicated increased levels of resistance among E. casseliflavus and E. gallinarum isolates (13, 25). In addition, only two of the 17 enterococci isolated from prenatal cultures appeared to be genetically related as determined by PFGE.

The data presented suggest that there is little resistance among Enterococcus strains recovered from screened pregnant women. Of the prenatal cultures, 3.8% contained Enterococcus isolates with intermediate resistance to vancomycin. Previous reports have demonstrated rectal colonization rates of vanC-containing enterococci ranging from 5 to 12% in various populations (27, 28). The colonization rate observed for prenatal cultures is lower likely due to the screening of specimens that did not include a rectal component. However, there are no published data regarding the prevalence of these organisms in nonrectal sites. Although this study suggests a 2.7% vaginal colonization rate for vanC-containing enterococci, this rate may be a misrepresentation due to clerical errors with regard to site identification.

Since none of the Enterococcus strains isolated contained vanA or vanB, there does not presently seem to be a threat of vancomycin resistance genes being transferred to other gram-positive species found in the vaginal and rectal sites of the women involved in this study. However, as the number of S. agalactiae isolates that are resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin increases, the use of vancomycin to treat penicillin-allergic pregnant women who harbor S. agalactiae will also increase. Thus, the incidence of VRE in this patient population may also increase, leading to the failure of empirical treatment with vancomycin for postpartum infections and the possible transfer of vancomycin resistance genes to other gram-positive species.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of North Carolina School of Medicine.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Clinical Microbiology-Immunology Laboratories, UNC Hospitals, 101 Manning Dr., East Wing 1035, Chapel Hill, NC 27514. Phone: (919) 966-6313. Fax: (919) 966-0486. E-mail: pgilliga{at}unch.unc.edu. Back


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 References
 

  1. Betriu, C., E. Culebras, M. Gómez, I. Rodríguez-Avial, B. A. Sánchez, M. C. Ágreda, and J. J. Picazo. 2003. Erythromycin and clindamycin resistance and telithromycin susceptibility in Streptococcus agalactiae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1112-1114.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Biavasco, F., C. Paladini, C. Vignaroli, G. Foglia, E. Manso, and P. E. Varaldo. 2001. Recovery from a single blood culture of two Enterococcus gallinarum isolates carrying both vanC-1 and vanA cluster genes and differing in glycopeptide susceptibility. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 20:309-314.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Breton, J. R., V. Peset, F. Morcillo, J. Cano, A. Sarrion, C. Perez-Belles, and M. Gobernado. 2002. Neonatal meningitis due to Enterococcus spp.: presentation of four cases. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 20:443-447. (In Spanish.)[Medline]
  4. Carvalho, M. D. G. S., L. M. Teixeira, and R. R. Facklam. 1998. Use of tests for acidification of methyl-{alpha}-D-glucopyranoside and susceptibility to efrotomycin for differentiation of strains of Enterococcus and some related genera. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:1584-1587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2002. Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 51:1-28.[Medline]
  6. Chang, S., D. M. Sievert, J. C. Hageman, M. L. Boulton, F. C. Tenover, F. P. Downes, S. Shah, J. T. Rudrik, G. R. Pupp, W. J. Brown, D. Cardo, and S. K. Fridkin. 2003. Infection with vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus containing the vanA resistance gene. N. Engl. J. Med. 348:1342-1347.[Free Full Text]
  7. Chen, D. K., L. Pearce, A. McGeer, D. E. Low, and B. M. Willey. 2000. Evaluation of D-xylose and 1% methyl-{alpha}-D-glucopyranoside fermentation tests for distinguishing Enterococcus gallinarum from Enterococcus faecium. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3652-3655.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Clark, N. C., L. M. Teixeira, R. R. Facklam, and F. C. Tenover. 1998. Detection and differentiation of vanC-1, vanC-2, and vanC-3 glycopeptide resistance genes in enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2294-2297.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Devriese, L. A., B. Pot, K. Kersters, S. Lauwers, and F. Haesebrouck. 1996. Acidification of methyl-{alpha}-D-glucopyranoside: a useful test to differentiate Enterococcus casseliflavus and Enterococcus gallinarum from Enterococcus faecium species group and from Enterococcus faecalis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:2607-2608.[Abstract]
  10. Free, L., and D. F. Sahm. 1996. Detection of enterococcal vancomycin resistance by multiplex PCR, p. 150-155. In D. H. Persing (ed.), PCR protocols for emerging infectious diseases. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  11. Gotoff, S. P. 2002. Group B streptococcal infections. Pediatr. Rev. 23:381-386.[Free Full Text]
  12. Handwerger, S., and J. Skoble. 1995. Identification of chromosomal mobile element conferring high-level vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:2446-2453.[Abstract]
  13. Karlowsky, J. A., G. G. Zhanel, the Canadian VRE Surveillance Group, and D. J. Hoban. 1999. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) colonization of high-risk patients in tertiary care Canadian hospitals. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 35:1-7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Lin, F. Y., P. H. Azimi, L. E. Weisman, J. B. Philips III, J. Regan, P. Clark, G. G. Rhoads, J. Clemens, J. Troendle, E. Pratt, R. A. Brenner, and V. Gill. 2000. Antibiotic susceptibility profiles for group B streptococci isolated from neonates, 1995-1998. Clin. Infect. Dis. 31:76-79.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Linden, P. K. 2002. Treatment options for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections. Drugs 62:425-441.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Manning, S. D., B. Foxman, C. L. Pierson, P. Tallman, C. J. Baker, and M. D. Pearlman. 2003. Correlates of antibiotic-resistant group B Streptococcus isolated from pregnant women. Obstet. Gynecol. 101:74-79.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Mullaney, D. M. 2001. Group B streptococcal infections in newborns. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 30:649-658.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Newton, E. R., and P. A. Wallace. 1998. Effects of prophylactic antibiotics on endometrial flora in women with postcesarean endometritis. Obstet. Gynecol. 92:262-268.[Abstract]
  19. Paulsen, I. T., L. Banerjei, G. S. Myers, K. E. Nelson, R. Seshadri, T. D. Read, D. E. Fouts, J. A. Eisen, S. R. Gill, J. F. Heidelberg, H. Tettelin, R. J. Dodson, L. Umayam, L. Brinkac, M. Beanan, S. Daugherty, R. T. DeBoy, S. Durkin, J. Kolonay, R. Madupu, W. Nelson, J. Vamathevan, B. Tran, J. Upton, T. Hansen, J. Shetty, H. Khouri, T. Utterback, D. Radune, K. A. Ketchum, B. A. Dougherty, and C. M. Fraser. 2003. Role of mobile DNA in the evolution of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Science 299:2071-2074.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Perez-Hernandez, X., S. Mendez-Alvarez, and F. Claverie-Martin. 2002. A PCR assay for rapid detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 42:273-277.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Perlada, D. E., A. G. Smulian, and M. T. Cushion. 1997. Molecular epidemiology and antibiotic susceptibility of enterococci in Cincinnati, Ohio: a prospective citywide survey. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2342-2347.[Abstract]
  22. Ramotar, K., W. Woods, L. Larocque, and B. Toye. 2000. Comparison of phenotypic methods to identify enterococci intrinsically resistant to vancomycin (VanC VRE). Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 36:119-124.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Rice, L. B. 2001. Emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7:183-187.[Medline]
  24. Ruess, M., A. Sander, R. Hentschel, and R. Berner. 2002. Enterococcus casseliflavus septicaemia in a preterm neonate. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 34:471-472.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Swenson, J. M., and F. C. Tenover. 2002. In vitro activity of a new cephalosporin, RWJ-54428, against streptococci, enterococci and staphylococci, including glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 49:845-850.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Tenover, F. C., R. D. Arbeit, R. V. Goering, P. A. Mickelsen, B. E. Murray, D. H. Persing, and B. Swaminathan. 1995. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2233-2239.[Medline]
  27. Toye, B., J. Shymanski, M. Bobrowska, W. Woods, and K. Ramotar. 1997. Clinical and epidemiological significance of enterococci intrinsically resistant to vancomycin (possessing the vanC genotype). J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:3166-3170.[Abstract]
  28. Van Horn, K. G., and K. M. Rodney. 1998. Colonization and microbiology of the motile enterococci in a patient population. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 31:525-530.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Walmer, D., K. R. Walmer, and R. S. Gibbs. 1988. Enterococci in post-cesarean endometritis. Obstet. Gynecol. 71:159-162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Willey, B. M., R. N. Jones, A. McGeer, W. Witte, G. French, R. B. Roberts, S. G. Jenkins, H. Nadler, and D. E. Low. 1999. Practical approach to the identification of clinically relevant Enterococcus species. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 34:165-171.[CrossRef][Medline]


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2004, p. 855-857, Vol. 42, No. 2
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.2.855-857.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gilligan, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gilligan, P. H.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS