Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2004, p. 906-908, Vol. 42, No. 2
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.2.906-908.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society of Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Novel Method Using a Laser Scanning Cytometer for Detection of Mycobacteria in Clinical Samples
Cidália Pina-Vaz,1,2,3* Sofia Costa-Oliveira,1,2 Acácio Gonçalves Rodrigues,1,2 and Alexandre Salvador2
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine,1
IPATIMUPInstitute of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, University of Porto,2
Department of Microbiology, Hospital S. João, Porto, Portugal3
Received 22 May 2003/
Returned for modification 19 August 2003/
Accepted 28 August 2003

ABSTRACT
In order to evaluate the capacity of laser scanning cytometry
(LSC) to detect acid-fast bacilli directly on clinical samples,
a comparison between Kinyoun-stained smears analyzed under light
microscopy and propidium iodide-auramine-stained smears analyzed
by LSC was performed. The results were compared with those for
culture on BACTEC MGIT 960. LSC is a new, reliable methodology
to detect
Mycobacteria.

INTRODUCTION
The worldwide incidence of tuberculosis increased dramatically
during the last decade, particularly in Southeast Asia and Africa,
mainly in association with the progression of infection by human
immunodeficiency virus (
5,
12). Rapid and accurate detection
of
Mycobacteria is essential for early treatment and reduction
of transmission. In low-resource countries, the detection of
acid-fast bacteria relies upon direct microscopy of smears.
Classical direct detection methods are easy to perform and inexpensive
but present low sensitivity. An additional drawback is the need
for a considerable amount of time for the observation of smears.
The long delays inherent in cultural methods also contribute
directly to the spread of tuberculosis in hospitals and other
care facilities and may have a negative impact on the care of
individual patients. Flow cytometry shows great potential for
application to clinical microbiology (
1,
8,
9,
10), but analyzed
cells must be suspended in a fluid at a relatively high concentration.
Laser scanning cytometry (LSC) is a microscope-based cytofluorometer
technology that combines the advantages of both flow and image
cytometry (
6). It allows multiparametric analysis performed
directly on a smear, rapidly measuring the fluorescence of individual
cells with an extremely high accuracy (
2). This technique may
offer increased sensitivity and specificity compared to traditional
microscopic techniques. To our knowledge, this paper describes
the first use of LSC in clinical microbiology.
Five hundred smears were prepared in duplicate on glass slides from concentrates of N-acetyl-L-cystein-NaOH and specimens (7) of different clinical products (sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, stool, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, pleural fluid, and gastric lavage fluid) from patients with suspected cases of Mycobacterium infection. The smears were heat fixed, and one set was stained according to the Kinyoun procedure (3). The other set of smears was stained according to our own modification of the classical auramine-staining procedure (11), involving a previous staining with propidium iodide (PI) (1 µg/ml in 30 min; Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) and rinsing with deionized water followed by staining with auramine (Auramine O and potassium permanganate from Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pa.) for 30 min (PI-Auramine O). Positive-control smears of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) were used each time a set of smears was stained. The slides stained by the Kinyoun method were analyzed under light bright-field microscopy (x1,000; Leica Laborlux K); three hundred microscope oil fields were observed before a smear was reported as negative for AFB (13). The slides stained with PI-Auramine O were maintained in the dark until LSC analysis. A laser scanning cytometer (LSC 101; Olympus Co., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a BX50 Olympus microscope and a 488-nm argon laser was used. The scanning was performed under a magnification of x200, and morphology was confirmed at x600 without immersion. The cells were randomly selected (gated) based on their position on the slide map with the coordinates x for green fluorescence versus y for the perimeter of the cell. The results were given as positive (Fig. 1) or negative (Fig. 2) for AFB. Before being reported as negative, the entire smear was scanned; one or two AFB were considered negative. Green fluorescent debris was rarely seen and could easily be differentiated from AFB at x600 magnification by visual inspection.
The results of both methodologies were afterwards compared with
the results of culture performed on a Bactec 960 system ("gold
standard") using
2 analysis. The isolates were identified with
Accuprobe (Gen-Probe Inc.) (
4). Culture results yielded
M. tuberculosis complex in 95.8% of cases,
M. intracellulare in 1% of cases,
M. avium complex in 3% of cases, and
M. gordonae in 0.2% of
cases. The numbers of false-positive and false-negative results,
sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive
values of the newly described method are shown in Table
1. The
results by specimen site are detailed in Table
2. For all biological
specimens, the new methodology resulted in increased diagnostic
sensitivity. LSC was considerably faster in performing the analysis
and didn't produce false-negative results. In contrast to other
heat-fixed bacterial or host cells, AFB do not stain with PI
(unpublished results), probably due to the lipid content of
the cell wall, thus staining green with Auramine O. Bacteria
other than AFB do not stain with Auramine O because, when this
stain is added, the cells are already red-stained by PI. The
red PI color vanishes during the washing step of auramine staining.
Thus, an increase in specificity in detection of AFB was achieved.
This new approach also showed a greater sensitivity than the
Kinyoun method, and no false-positive results were registered.
Apart from being automated, this method allows the possibility
of reanalysis of the smear (also visually), either at the moment
of scanning or later on, due to the inherently sophisticated
software (Winsyte 3.3). The intensity of fluorescence of the
AFB stained by PI-Auramine O remained stable over several days
(up to 5 days), providing the stained smears were kept protected
from light.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1. Results for 500 clinical specimens either stained by the Kinyoun method and analyzed by light microscopy or stained by the PI-Auramine O method and analyzed by LSC versus results for culture
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2. Results by specimen site for the presence of alcohol- and acid-resistant bacilli on Kinyoun-stained smears analyzed by light microscopy or smears stained by PI-Auramine O analyzed by LSC
|
Previous studies have shown aspects of the great potentiality
of flow cytometry when applied to microbiology (
8,
9,
10). In
the present paper, we have explored the potential of a different
cytometer, developed by Kamentsky and Kamentsky (
6). Our results
indicate that LSC/PI-Auramine O is an advantageous automated
method for evaluating the presence of
Mycobacteria in clinical
samples. While the analysis of Kinyoun-stained smears is too
observer dependent and time-consuming, this new staining method
combined with LSC analysis is an observer-independent method
that improves diagnostic sensitivity and specificity and saves
a considerable amount of time.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernani Monteiro, 4200 Porto, Portugal. Phone: 351 91 919358514. Fax: 351-22-9962096. E-mail:
micteam{at}clix.pt.


REFERENCES
1 - Ávarez-Barrientos, J. A., R. Cantón, C. Nombela, and M. Sánchez-Pérez. 2000. Applications of flow cytometry to clinical microbiology. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13:167-195.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Bedner, E., M. R. Melamed, and Z. Darzynkiewicz. 1998. Enzyme kinetic reactions and fluorochrome uptake rates measured in individual cells by laser scanning cytometer. Cytometry 33:1-9.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Bishop, P. J., and G. Neumann. 1970. The history of the Ziehl-Neelsen stain. Tubercle 51:196-206.[CrossRef][Medline]
4 - Drobniewski, F. A., M. Caws, A. Gibson, and D. Young. 2003. Modern laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 3:141-147.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 - Hayward, A. C., T. Darton, J. N. Van-Tam, J. M. Watson, R. Coker, and V. Schwoebel. 2003. Epidemiology and control of tuberculosis in Western European cities. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 7:751-757.[Medline]
6 - Kamentsky, L. A., and L. D. Kamentsky. 1991. Microscope-based multiparameter laser scanning cytometer yielding data comparable in flow cytometry. Cytometry 12:381-387.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 - Pfyffer, G. E., B. A. Brown-Elliot, and R. J. Wallace, Jr. 2003. Mycobacterium: general characteristics, isolation, and staining procedures, p. 532-559. In P. A. Murray (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 8th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
8 - Pina-Vaz, C., F. Sansonetty, A. G. Rodrigues, S. Costa-de-Oliveira, J. Martinez-de-Oliveira, and A. F. Fonseca. 2001. Cytometric approach for a rapid evaluation of susceptibility of Candida strains to antifungals. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 7:609-618.
9 - Pina-Vaz, C., F. Sansonetty, A. G. Rodrigues, J. Martinez-de-Oliveira, A. F. Fonseca, and P.-A. Mårdh. 2000. Antifungal activity of ibuprofen alone andin combination with fluconazole against Candida species. J. Med. Microbiol. 49:831-840.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Pina-Vaz, C., A. G. Rodrigues, F. Sansonetty, J. Martinez-de-Oliveira, A. F. Fonseca, and P.-A. Mårdh. 2000. Antifungal activity of local anesthetics against Candida species. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 8:124-137.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Richards, O. W., E. W. Kline, and R. E. Leach. 1941. Demonstration of tubercle bacilli by fluorescence microscopy. Am. Rev. Tuberc. 44:255-266.
12 - Schurmann, D., S. D. Nightingale, F. Bergmann, and B. Ruf. 1997. Tuberculosis and HIV infection: a review. Infection 25:274-280.[CrossRef][Medline]
13 - Somoskovi, Á., E. Jacquelin, B. S. Hotaling, M. Fitzgerald, D. O'Donnell, L. M. Parsons, and M. Salfinger. 2001. Lessons from a proficiency testing event for acid-fast microscopy. Chest 120:250-257.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2004, p. 906-908, Vol. 42, No. 2
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.2.906-908.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society of Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Barbosa, J., Rodrigues, A. G., Pina-Vaz, C.
(2009). Cytometric Approach for Detection of Encephalitozoon intestinalis, an Emergent Agent. CVI
16: 1021-1024
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shimomura, Y., Ohno, R., Kawai, F., Kimbara, K.
(2006). Method for assessment of viability and morphological changes of bacteria in the early stage of colony formation on a simulated natural environment.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
72: 5037-5042
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pina-Vaz, C, Costa-de-Oliveira, S, Rodrigues, A G
(2005). Safe susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by flow cytometry with the fluorescent nucleic acid stain SYTO 16. J Med Microbiol
54: 77-81
[Abstract]
[Full Text]