Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2004, p. 919-922, Vol. 42, No. 2
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.2.919-922.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Microbiology, The University of Hong Kong, University Pathology Building, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
Received 15 August 2003/ Returned for modification 10 October 2003/ Accepted 24 October 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Enterococcus cecorum, one of the 30 species of the genus Enterococcus, was first described in 1983 as Streptococcus cecorum (3). Since then, it has been identified as part of the intestinal floras of various animals, including pigs, cattle, chickens, ducks, cats, dogs, and canaries (4). In contrast to the common recovery of E. cecorum from animals, human infections associated with E. cecorum have been rarely reported, with only three cases described in the English literature (MEDLINE search [1996 to 2003]) (2, 6, 7). Phenotypically, E. cecorum is often described as more Streptococcus-like than other Enterococcus species in that it prefers incubation in atmospheric conditions with CO2 enrichment, fails to grow on Enterococcus-selective medium and in 6.5% NaCl, and grows poorly on bile-esculin agar (10). However, speciation of E. cecorum is difficult, especially when commercial kits are used. In the three cases of human infections, the three isolates were identified by whole-cell protein analysis, cellular fatty acid analysis, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and/or tRNA gene PCR and capillary electrophoresis in addition to the use of conventional phenotypic tests. In this article, we describe the first case of empyema thoracis associated with E. cecorum. The epidemiology of E. cecorum infections, as well as its susceptibility to cefotaxime in relation to its phylogenetic position as deduced by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, are discussed.
Clinical and microbiological data.
All clinical data were collected prospectively as described in a previous publication by Woo et al. (13). The bacterium was identified by standard conventional biochemical methods (9). Lancefield serogrouping was performed using Streptex (Murex Biotech Ltd., Dartford, United Kingdom). All tests were performed in triplicate with freshly prepared medium on separate occasions. In addition, a Vitek System (GPI) (bioMerieux Vitek, Hazelwood, Mo.), an API system (20 STREP) (bioMerieux Vitek), and an ATB expression system (ID32 STREP) were used for the identification of the bacterial isolate. Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212) was used as a control. The pleural fluid isolate was a gram-positive, non-spore-forming coccus arranged in chains. It grew on sheep blood agar as nonhemolytic, gray colonies 1 mm in diameter after 24 h of incubation at 37°C in 5% CO2 and pinpoint colonies after 24 h of incubation at 37°C in ambient air. It also grew well on chocolate and MacConkey agars and in an anaerobic environment but slowly in 40% bile, on bile esculin agar, or in 6.5% NaCl. It was catalase negative and resistant to optochin and bacitracin. It is nongroupable with Lancefield group A, B, C, D, F, or G antisera. It is nonmotile at both 25 and 37°C. The biochemical profile of the isolate is shown in Table 1. Positive results were obtained for a Voges-Proskauer test, alkaline phosphatase, ß-glucuronidase, and
-galactosidase and for utilization of trehalose, raffinose, maltose, ribose, cyclodextrin, methyl-ß-D-glucopyranoside, melibiose, melezitose, lactose, salicin, sucrose, inulin, cellobiose, D-mannose, starch, and tagatose. It did not produce pyrrolidonylarylamidase. Investigations using a Vitek system (GPI), an API system (20 STREP), and an ATB Expression system (ID32 STREP) yielded no identification.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Biochemical profile of the pleural fluid isolate by conventional biochemical tests and Vitek GPI, API 20 STREP, and ATB ID32 STREP systems
|
16S rRNA gene sequencing and phylogenetic characterization. PCR amplification and DNA sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene of the isolate were performed as previously described (15, 16). LPW55 (5'-AGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3') and LPW205 (5'-CTTGTTACGACTTCACCC-3') (Gibco BRL, Rockville, Md.) were used as the PCR and sequencing primers. E. faecalis (ATCC 29212) was used as a control. The sequences of the PCR products were compared with known GenBank 16S rRNA gene sequences by multiple sequence alignment using the CLUSTAL W program (11). Phylogenetic relationships of the isolate recovered from the patient with other Enterococcus species, other representative Streptococcus species (S. pyogenes, S. mitis, S. agalactiae, S. intermedius, S. mutans, and S. bovis), Granulicatella adiacens, and Abiotrophia defectiva were determined using PileUp and the neighbor-joining method with GrowTree (Genetics Computer Group, Inc.). A total of 1,235 nucleotide positions of the 16S rRNA genes were included in the analysis. PCR of the 16S rRNA gene of the pleural fluid isolate showed a band at about 1,460 bp. There were two (0.1%) base differences between the 16S rRNA gene sequence of the isolate and that of E. cecorum (GenBank accession no. AF061009), 33 (2.3%) base differences between the 16S rRNA gene sequence of the isolate and that of E. columbae (GenBank accession no. Y18275), and 55 (3.8%) base differences between the 16S rRNA gene sequence of the isolate and that of E. gallinarum (GenBank accession no. AF277567), indicating that the isolate was a strain of E. cecorum (Fig. 1).
![]() View larger version (51K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Phylogenetic tree showing the relationships of the pleural fluid isolate species to other Enterococcus species, other representative Streptococcus species (S. pyogenes, S. mitis, S. agalactiae, S. intermedius, S. mutans, and S. bovis), G. adiacens, and A. defectiva. The tree was inferred from 16S rRNA data by the neighbor-joining method and rooted using the 16S rRNA gene sequence of S. aureus. Bootstrap values were calculated from 1,000 trees. The scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per 50 bases (estimated using the Jukes-Cantor correction). Names and accession numbers are given as cited in the GenBank database.
|
The portal of entry for E. cecorum in the present case, as well as in the cases of the other two patients with E. cecorum peritonitis, was probably the gastrointestinal tract. It is well known that decompensated liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension and ascites is associated with the presence of intestinal mucosal edema and local immunosuppression secondary to portal venous congestive vasculopathy. Therefore, the gastrointestinal tracts of patients with liver cirrhosis are often the primary site of infection or the portal of entry for extraintestinal infections. According to one recently published article on spontaneous bacterial empyema in cirrhotic patients, 13 of the 18 patients with positive cultures from pleural fluid had pathogens (Escherichia coli in eight patients, Enterococcus species in three, and Klebsiella pneumoniae in two) that likely originated from the gastrointestinal tract (17). None of these bacteria are conventional pathogens causing pneumonia, bone and joint infections, or skin and soft tissue infections. Interestingly, Laribacter hongkongensis, a recently described organism which has been recovered from fecal specimens of patients with gastroenteritis, was also originally discovered in the blood and empyema pus cultures of a patient with alcoholic liver cirrhosis (8, 14, 18).
Sensitivity of E. cecorum to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins could be due to its production of types of penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) different from those produced by other Enterococcus species but similar to the PBPs produced by other Streptococcus species. Enterococci, as opposed to streptococci, are intrinsically resistant to the cephalosporins. This differential susceptibility to cephalosporins in these two closely related genera is related to the production of different types of PBPs, of which PBP 5, the major PBP in E. faecalis and E. faecium, is demonstrated to have a low affinity to cephalosporins (1, 5, 12). However, in the present case and in another case reported in the literature (2), E. cecorum has been noted to be susceptible to cefotaxime and ceftriaxone. We speculate that this unexpected finding was due to the presence of types of PBPs in E. cecorum different from those found with E. faecalis and E. faecium. In fact, E. cecorum and E. columbae, with their 16S rRNA gene sequences making up the first branch in the phylogenetic tree among the Enterococcus species (Fig. 1), are probably the ancestors of the other Enterococcus species and are also more closely related to the Streptococcus species than the other Enterococcus species. This is in line with the more Streptococcus-like culture characteristics of E. cecorum (10). Therefore, it is not surprising that the PBPs of E. cecorum, which render E. cecorum susceptible to cefotaxime and ceftriaxone, might be closely related to those of the Streptococcus species.
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of the isolate has been deposited in GenBank (accession no. AY365054).
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»