Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2004, p. 1257-1259, Vol. 42, No. 3
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.3.1257-1259.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
VCU Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia,1 Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain2
Received 6 August 2003/ Returned for modification 27 October 2003/ Accepted 8 November 2003
|
|
|---|
-130°C in liquid nitrogen and at -70°C in a freezer. All of the isolates, with the exception of 45 yeasts and 15 dermatophytes, were recovered from both storage temperatures. Good reproducibility was demonstrated for amphotericin B, fluconazole, and voriconazole MICs determined for random isolates. |
|
|---|
-130°C) is a more convenient and less expensive alternative for long-term storage of living cells. Storage above the liquid nitrogen prevents leakage of the liquid nitrogen into the vials.
The Microbank system (Prolab Diagnostics, Austin, Tex.) consists of sterile vials that contain 25 porous, colored beads and a cryopreservative fluid; this system was originally developed for storage of bacterial cells (8). The beads are acid washed, and their porous nature allows the cells to adhere to the bead surface; the beads serve as carriers for the cells being stored (Microbank package insert). When an isolate is stored in this way, 25 or more identical cultures can be preserved. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the preservation in Microbank sterile vials of yeast and mold clinical isolates that were received from 1994 to the end of 2002 at the VCU Medical Center (Richmond, Va.) and the Valme University Hospital (Seville, Spain). Two temperatures (
-130°C [liquid nitrogen vapor] and -70°C [freezer]) were evaluated.
Fresh, pure cultures of 6,198 yeast and yeast-like organisms and 391 molds (Table 1) were grown on either Sabouraud dextrose agar (for yeasts) or potato dextrose agar (for molds) at 35°C; some isolates of dermatophytes, Histoplasma capsulatum, Blastomyces dermatitidis, and Alternaria spp. were incubated at 30°C. Yeast and yeast-like isolates were incubated for 48 to 72 h, and molds were incubated for 7 to 15 days. Each isolate was stored in accordance with the directions of the manufacturer. For each isolate, the cryogenic fluid of two Microbank vials was inoculated with the fungal growth to a density approximately equivalent to a McFarland standard of 3 or 4. The inoculated fluid was mixed four or five times to emulsify the suspension and to bind the cells to the beads. The extraneous cryogenic fluid was then removed, leaving the inoculated beads as free of liquid as possible to prevent the beads from sticking together during freezing but allowing a thin layer of suspension to stay at the bottom of the vial. The vials were then held overnight at -70°C. After overnight freezing, one of the vials was stored in liquid nitrogen vapor (
-130°C) and the other was left at -70°C.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Fungal isolates preserved between 1994 and 2002
|
Each mold isolate was considered viable if the rate of growth present was the same as that of the original culture and if the morphology and color of the colony matched the fungal identification documented for each strain. All of the mold strains, with the exception of 15 (of 61) dermatophyte isolates, were recovered each time from both storage temperatures and showed the initial colony characteristics, growth rates, and morphologies (Table 1). Only isolates of B. dermatitidis, H. capsulatum, and Alternaria spp. required more than one bead for harvesting; they required two to four beads. These results are in agreement with those described by Chandler (6), who preserved 50 uncommon molds for 18 months in Microbank vials and found that only one bead was necessary for the recovery of most isolates. Each yeast strain was considered viable if growth was present; the identification and purity of yeasts were also randomly validated on CHROMagar medium. A very small percentage of yeasts (0.7%) were not recovered; Candida dubliniensis had the lowest recovery rate (33%; 28 of the 42 isolates were not recovered). The stability was validated by determining the antifungal susceptibilities of random samples of yeasts (200 isolates) and molds (50 isolates) stored at both temperatures. Amphotericin B, fluconazole, and voriconazole MICs were determined by following NCCLS guidelines (documents M27-A2 [for yeasts] and M38-A [for molds]) (12, 13) before storage and 6 months and 4 years after preservation. MICs for the isolates after storage were either the same as, or within three dilutions of, the MICs before storage, which is the criterion used in NCCLS studies to obtain percentages of intra- and interlaboratory reproducibilities as well as for establishing quality control MIC ranges (12, 13). In general, the effects of both storage temperatures on the stability and viability of stored isolates were similar, which is fortunate because most laboratories have a -70°C freezer.
The advantage of using the Microbank system over other cryogenic systems (4, 7, 9, 11, 14, 16) is its commercial availability. The time-consuming procedure of preparing other preservative devices such as drinking straws (16) or cryogenic fluid is avoided; Microbank vials are stored at room temperature prior to use. The harvesting of individual isolates is easier than that described by Pasarell and McGinnis (14), in which a portion of the frozen culture is chipped and subcultured. Because vials should not be outside the low-temperature device for more than 3 min to avoid thawing, it is recommended that the frozen vials be placed in an insulated cryoblock during harvesting.
In conclusion, the Microbank system appears to be an easy, convenient, economical, and effective tool for the preservation of fungal isolates other than dermatophyte and C. dubliniensis strains. Longer monitoring of isolates and storage of other species would further validate the reliability of this system for the cryogenic preservation of yeast and mold strains. Also, the stability of fungal cells should be further assessed by molecular parameters.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»