Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2004, p. 1270-1273, Vol. 42, No. 3
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.3.1270-1273.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Microbiology,1 Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine,2 Department of Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Chungju, Chungchungbuk-Do 380-701,3 Department of Microbiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110-799, Korea4
Received 22 July 2003/ Returned for modification 13 November 2003/ Accepted 21 November 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Twelve Borrelia strains were recently isolated from Ixodes granulatus, Ixodes nipponensis (tick vectors for Lyme spirochetes in rare cases), and Ixodes persulcatus, and 11 strains were isolated from Apodemus agrarius (8, 10). In previous studies, they were characterized as Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, and unclassified Haenam strains (8, 10). In the present study, a comparative sequence analysis of the groEL gene from Korean isolates was performed to determine their relationships with the known species of the genus Borrelia.
Twenty-two reference strains (Table 1) and 23 Korean isolates of the genus Borrelia were used in this study. The strains were cultivated at 32°C in Barbour-Stoenner-Kelly II (BSKII) medium. DNA was extracted by a modified version of a previously described method (4). The groEL genes of 22 reference strains and 23 Korean isolates and the flagellin genes and the 16S rRNA genes of 22 reference strains were amplified as presented in Table 2. The nucleotide sequences of the recombinant DNA were determined using the CEQ L DNA Analysis System and the CEQ 2000 Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit (Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, Calif.) with forward and reverse sequencing primers (M13) and sequencing primers (Table 2). The multiple-alignment algorithm in the MegAlign software package (Windows version 3.12e; DNASTAR, Madison, Wis.) was used to align the sequences. All positions with alignment gaps were excluded from the pairwise sequence comparison. Phylogenetic trees were constructed by the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic averages using the MEGA program (7). A bootstrap analysis (100 replicates) was performed to evaluate the topology of the phylogenetic tree.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Borrelia reference strains used in this study
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Sequences of primers and PCR conditions
|
groEL gene analysis has several characteristics different from those of analyses of other genes. Compared with the 16S rRNA genes, groEL sequences have higher divergence for strains of B. burgdorferi sensu lato. More than 91.6% similarity of the groEL gene sequences was observed among strains of B. burgdorferi sensu lato. On the other hand, more than 95.4% similarity of the 16S rRNA gene sequences was observed among strains of B. burgdorferi sensu lato (data not shown). The groEL gene sequence similarities in B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, and B. garinii strains were 99.7 to 100%, 99.0 to 99.4%, and 96.8 to 100%, respectively (Table 3). On the other hand, the 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities in B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, and B. garinii strains were 99.6 to 100%, 99.6 to 100%, and 99.1 to 100%, respectively (Table 3). These results showed that the groEL gene is more heterogeneous than the 16S rRNA gene and is useful in intraspecies differentiation. Compared with the flagellin gene analysis, more than 92.0% similarity of the flagellin gene sequences was observed in strains of B. burgdorferi sensu lato (data not shown). The groEL gene sequence similarities in B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, and B. garinii strains were 99.7 to 100%, 99.0 to 99.4%, and 96.8 to 100%, respectively, whereas the flagellin gene sequence similarities in B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, and B. garinii strains were 99.0 to 99.8%, 99.6 to 100%, and 98.0 to 100%, respectively (Table 3). These results showed that the groEL gene is more heterogeneous than the flagellin gene in B. afzelii and B. garinii, whereas the flagellin gene is more heterogeneous than the groEL gene in B. burgdorferi.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Intraspecies variation in the groEL, flagellin, and 16S rRNA gene sequences of Borrelia strains
|
Twenty-three Korean isolates were characterized by phylogenetic analysis based on groEL gene sequences. Eleven strains (KK1, KK2, KK5, KM4, KM10, CJ1, CJ2, CJ3, CJ21, HN9, and HN17), identified as B. afzelii through PCR-RFLP analyses of the ospC gene and the rrf-rrl intergenic spacer in a previous study (10), were also identified as B. afzelii by groEL gene analysis (Fig. 1). The nucleotide sequence of strain KW3 was identical to that of B. garinii IP89 (Fig. 1), and KW3 also showed the same restriction pattern as B. garinii IP89 in RFLP analysis of the 5S-23S intergenic spacer amplicons (data not shown). Eleven Haenam strains formed a distinctive cluster, separated from other strains of B. burgdorferi sensu lato in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1). The sequence similarities among 11 Haenam strains (HN6, HN7, HN8, HN11, HN12, HN13, HN14, HN15, HN16, HN18, and HN19) were 98.7 to 100%. In general, they showed 89.7 to 94.8% similarity with other strains of B. burgdorferi sensu lato. The MseI and DraI restriction patterns of the 5S-23S intergenic spacer amplicons of Haenam strains differed from those of other strains of B. burgdorferi sensu lato. Furthermore, in the phylogenetic tree based on 16S ribosomal DNA sequences, Haenam strains also formed a distinctive cluster (8).
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Phylogenetic tree based on groEL gene sequences of Borrelia strains. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic averages using MEGA software. Bootstrap analysis was performed with 100 replicates. The GenBank accession numbers are shown in parentheses.
|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»