Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2004, p. 1294-1295, Vol. 42, No. 3
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.3.1294-1295.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Anthony Thompson,5 Glenn Morlock,6 and John C. Ridderhof1
Division of Laboratory Systems, Public Health Practice Program Office,1 National Center for HIV, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease ControlPrevention, Atlanta, Georgia,6 Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Sparks, Maryland 21152,2 National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, Colorado 80206,3 VA TB Reference Laboratory, West Haven, Connecticut 06516,4 Laboratory Corporation of America, Burlington, North Carolina 272155
Received 1 August 2003/ Returned for modification 27 October 2003/ Accepted 17 November 2003
|
|
|---|
T in the inhA promoter region, and gave consistent susceptibility test results in 141 laboratories. |
|
|---|
Three low-level INH-monoresistant M. tuberculosis clinical isolates (A, B, and C) were selected from the CDC M. tuberculosis Drug Susceptibility Testing Performance Evaluation Program (PEP) and subcultured on Middlebrook 7H10 agar to obtain isolated colonies. To purify one low-level INH-resistant isolate from each subculture, the selected colonies were tested for MICs with twofold dilutions of INH, starting with 0.05 µg/ml, in 7H12 BACTEC broth and by agar dilution method. The selected low-level INH-resistant subcultures from each strain were inoculated into Middlebrook 7H9 broth and then subcultured on Lowenstein-Jensen slants. These cultures were sent to two laboratories for confirmation by MIC testing using agar dilution and broth dilution (7H12 BACTEC broth) methods (1, 2). The MICs for the three strains ranged from 0.1 to 0.4 µg/ml in BACTEC 7H12 broth and from 0.2 to 0.8 µg/ml by the agar dilution method. The MIC for the susceptible control strain H37Rv tested at the same time was 0.1 µg/ml, and the MIC for the resistant control strain ATCC 35822 was
1.0 µg/ml by the agar dilution method (7H10 Middlebrook agar).
Strains A, B, C, and D (a fully susceptible strain) were sequenced for detecting genes associated with INH resistance. Three laboratories performed studies on the stability of low-level INH resistance with all four cultures. Susceptibility testing was performed using a bacterial suspension made from a freshly grown culture. The bacterial suspension was then frozen at -70 ± 10°C, thawed a few days later, subcultured again, and tested for susceptibility to INH. This cycle of freezing, thawing, subculturing, and testing was repeated three times for each culture at each of the three sites. Routine BACTEC 460TB susceptibility testing (S. Siddiqi, BACTEC 460TB system product and procedure manual, Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Instrument Systems, Inc., Sparks, Md.) at concentrations of 0.1 and 0.4 µg of INH/ml was performed after each cycle. Additionally, one laboratory also performed susceptibility testing to 0.2 and 1.0 µg of INH/ml by the agar proportion (AP) method (2, 4). Strain D (the susceptible control) was tested concurrently with the resistant strains. Strains A, B, and C and a susceptible control D strain were sent to 141 laboratories under the CDC-PEP (shipment 2002-06).
The results we obtained indicated that the MICs of INH for the three strains ranged from
0.1 to 0.4 µg/ml when tested in the BACTEC 7H12 broth and from 0.2 to 0.8 µg/ml by the agar dilution method. The MIC for strain D, the susceptible control, was 0.1 µg/ml. All three laboratories reported stable results of resistance for strains A, B, and C to 0.1 µg of INH/ml in BACTEC 460TB broth through three cycles of freezing, thawing, and subculturing. However, strains B and C were unstable after the freeze-thaw-subculture cycles to the higher concentrations of INH, as determined by the BACTEC 460TB and AP methods. Only strain A was consistently susceptible to the higher INH concentrations by both the BACTEC 460TB and AP methods. Control strain H37Rv was stable through the freeze-thaw-subculture cycles with both low and high concentrations of INH. In some instances, growth indices in both control and INH test vials were lower than expected in BACTEC 460TB, which was possibly due to the effect of repeated freeze-thaw-subculture cycles.
Testing in 141 laboratories under the CDC-PEP showed that 99% of the laboratories detected low-level INH resistance in strain A by the BACTEC 460TB method, while only 75 and 73% of laboratories detected this level of resistance in strains B and C, respectively. All laboratories reported control strain D as susceptible to the low INH concentration by both methods. Strain A has a C (-15)
T mutation in the inhA promoter (5), while strain B has a Ser 302
Arg mutation, which has not been reported previously (3, 7). INH resistance mutations were not detected in strain C (Table 1).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. DNA sequence results for M. tuberculosis low-level INH-resistant strainsa
|
T mutation in the inhA promoter, which is a well-established mechanism of low-level INH resistance (5). On the other hand, variable results for strains B and C were revealed by the participants in the CDC-PEP study. Strain A may be used to monitor detection of low-level INH resistance in M. tuberculosis susceptibility testing procedures and for QC of new lots of INH or the test medium. Strain A is available from the American Type Culture Collection as M. tuberculosis ATCC BAA-812. It should be stored by preparing a homogenous suspension from a freshly grown culture on solid culture medium (i.e., Lowenstein-Jensen or Middlebrook), adjusted to the optical density of a McFarland no.1 standard, and frozen in small (1.0- to 1.5-ml) aliquots at -70°C (4). As with other QC strains, refreezing after thawing is not recommended (BACTEC 460TB system product and procedure manual, Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Instrument Systems, Inc.).
Present address: Bureau of Laboratories, Pennsylvania Department of Health, Lionville, Pa. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»