Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Damborg, P. Articles by Guardabassi, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Damborg, P. Articles by Guardabassi, L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2004, p. 1363-1364, Vol. 42, No. 3
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.3.1363-1364.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Occurrence of Campylobacter jejuni in Pets Living with Human Patients Infected with C. jejuni

Peter Damborg,¹ Katharina E. P. Olsen,² Eva Møller Nielsen,² and Luca Guardabassi^1*

Department of Veterinary Microbiology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, 1870 Frederiksberg C,¹ Department of Gastrointestinal and Parasitic Infections, Statens Serum Institut, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark²

Received 14 October 2003/ Returned for modification 27 November 2003/ Accepted 6 December 2003

Top Abstract Introduction References

 
Campylobacter jejuni was recovered from four dogs (11%) and four cats (33%) living with Danish human patients infected with C. jejuni. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis revealed the occurrence of the same quinolone-resistant strain in a girl and her dog. C. jejuni isolates with closely related (>95% similarity) PFGE profiles occurred in humans and pets from different Danish counties.

Top Abstract Introduction References

 
Various risk analysis studies have shown evidence that pet ownership is a significant risk factor for Campylobacter infections in humans (1, 5, 6). Direct evidence of transmission of a Campylobacter jejuni strain between a human and a dog living in the same household was recently shown based on amplified fragment length polymorphism (12). However, the actual importance of pets as a source of Campylobacter infections in humans remains unclear.

In this study, the occurrence of Campylobacter spp. was investigated in pets (i.e., dogs and cats) living together with human patients infected with C. jejuni. Among 137 patients contacted, 54 (39%) were pet owners and 45 (33%) agreed to participate in the study. Fecal samples collected from pets living with these patients were cultured (48 h, 37°C) on mCCDA agar (SSI Diagnostika, Hilleroed, Denmark) under microaerobic conditions. Campylobacter was recovered from six dogs (16%) and five cats (42%). Based on phenotypic (hippurate hydrolysis, indoxyl acetate hydrolysis, and oxidase and catalase production) and multiplex PCR identification (13), C. jejuni was present in 8 of the 11 pets positive for Campylobacter, including four dogs (11%) and four cats (33%) (Table 1). The three remaining pets carried Campylobacter coli (n = 1) or Campylobacter lari (n = 2). The occurrence of C. jejuni was significantly higher in pets living with patients less than 17 years of age (37%) than in those living with older patients (4%) (Fisher exact test, P = 0,004). Although this study cannot explain the reason for this difference, a likely explanation is that either human-to-pet or pet-to-human transmission of C. jejuni occurs more frequently between young patients and their pets.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Description of the eight human-pet pairs where C. jejuni was found in both the human patient and the pet

The genetic relatedness of C. jejuni isolates from pets and humans was determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis with SmaI and KpnI (Medinova, Glostrup, Denmark) (8). A 2-year-old girl and her dog (pair 1) shared the same strain, as evidenced by the identical SmaI (Fig. 1) and KpnI profiles found in the human and the animal isolate (Table 1). The isolates from another young patient and his puppy (pair 3) had very similar SmaI profiles (Fig. 1) but distinct KpnI profiles (Table 1). In the remaining six cases, the PFGE profiles of animal and human isolates differed by one or more bands (data not shown). A cluster analysis including other canine strains previously isolated in Denmark (4) revealed the occurrence of closely related (>95% similarity) SmaI profiles in humans and pets from different Danish counties (data not shown). In addition to the two human isolates with the same SmaI profile as that of the corresponding pet isolates, a third human isolate showed an SmaI profile closely related to those of two canine isolates from a different geographical area. However, most strains with identical or closely related SmaI profiles showed distinct KpnI profiles, indicating that the detection of identical SmaI profiles does not necessarily reflect the occurrence of the same strain in different populations.

View larger version (102K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. PFGE profiles with SmaI of C. jejuni isolates from human patients and their pets. Lanes 1, 5, and 10, size-standard strain Salmonella enterica serovar Braenderup H9812; lanes 2 and 3, isolates from a 2-year-old girl and her dog (pair 1); lanes 4 and 6, strains isolated from a 16-year-old boy and his puppy (pair 3); lanes 7 and 8, isolates from an 8-year-old boy and his dog (pair 2); lane 9, human isolate that could not be typed with SmaI.

The strain isolated from the 2-year-old girl and her dog (pair 1) was resistant to nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin. The recovery of quinolone-resistant isolates from Danish patients is associated mainly with travel (2). However, the case reported in this study was not associated with travel, since the girl did not travel in the period preceding the manifestation of clinical symptoms. Both the girl and the dog had never been treated with quinolones, indicating that the strain was not selected by exposure of one of the two individuals to quinolones but rather was acquired from an external source. As an alternative to transmission, environmental exposure to contaminated sources (e.g., soil, water, etc.) could have caused the presence of the same strain in the two hosts. Even though the dog was fed a commercial diet, acquisition from a common food source was also possible, since the dog was occasionally given human food scraps.

This study shows that C. jejuni occurs frequently among pets living with human patients infected with C. jejuni, especially children. Transmission appears to be uncommon, since there was only one case among 45 cases studied (2%) where isolates from a patient and a pet living in the same household showed identical SmaI and KpnI profiles. However, the frequency of transmission could be underestimated due to a number of factors. First, some strains could be undetected in pets due to the time interval between the analyses of human and pet samples (4 to 30 days, 11 days on average). Second, the occurrence of mixed C. jejuni populations (4) could not be detected, as only one isolate was obtained from each positive sample. Finally, an epidemiological relationship could exist between human and pet isolates having indistinguishable SmaI profiles but different KpnI profiles (e.g., pair 3) or SmaI profiles differing by only one band (e.g., pair 6), since small genetic rearrangements may determine variations in the PFGE profiles of C. jejuni (7, 10, 11). It should be noted that, according to the criteria established by Tenover et al. for interpreting PFGE patterns (10), an epidemiological relationship could exist between isolates having up to six band differences. However, such criteria are not applicable in the present study, because PFGE profiles generally contained fewer than 10 distinct bands (Fig. 1).

In addition to the possible transmission of C. jejuni by direct contact, pet animals can contribute to the dissemination of this pathogen in the environment. Pets can shed Campylobacter for long periods (over 1 year) (4) and usually do not show clinical symptoms (3, 9). In this study, five out of eight pets carrying C. jejuni did not show signs of diarrhea, and one dog appeared to be colonized by the same strain for at least 27 days (data not shown). Accordingly, pets could play an important role in the propagation of this pathogen, especially in urban areas, where direct pet-to-pet contact or exposure to feces from other pets is likely to occur.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Veterinary Microbiology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Stigbøjlen 4, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark. Phone: 45-35282745. Fax: 45-35282755. E-mail: lg{at}kvl.dk.

Top Abstract Introduction References

 

1
1. Adak, G. K., J. M. Cowden, S. Nicholas, and H. S. Evan. 1995. The public-health laboratory service national case-control study of primary indigenous sporadic cases of Campylobacter infection. Epidemiol. Infect. 115:15-22.[Medline]
2
2. Emborg, H.-D., and O. E. Heuer (ed.). 2003. DANMAP 2002: use of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from food animals, foods and humans in Denmark. Danish Veterinary Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
3
3. Gondrosen, B., T. Knaevelsrud, and K. Dommarsnes. 1985. Isolation of thermophilic campylobacters from Norwegian dogs and cats. Acta Vet. Scand. 26:81-90.[Medline]
4
4. Hald, B., K. Pedersen, M. Wainø, and M. Madsen. Longitudinal study of the excretion patterns of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in young pet dogs in Denmark. J. Clin. Microbiol., in press.
5
5. Kapperud, G., E. Skjerve, N. H. Bean, S. M. Ostroff, and J. Lassen. 1992. Risk factors for sporadic Campylobacter infections: results of a case-control study in southeastern Norway. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:3117-3121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Neimann, J., J. Engberg, K. Mølbak, and H. C. Wegener. 2003. A case-control study of risk factors for sporadic campylobacter infections in Denmark. Epidemiol. Infect. 130:353-366.[Medline]
7
7. On, S. L. W., E. M. Nielsen, J. Engberg, and M. Madsen. 1998. Validity of SmaI-defined genotypes of Campylobacter jejuni examined by SalI, KpnI, and BamHI polymorphisms: evidence of identical clones infecting humans, poultry, and cattle. Epidemiol. Infect. 120:231-237.[CrossRef][Medline]
8
8. Ribot, E. M., C. Fitzgerald, K. Kubota, B. Swaminathan, and T. J. Barrett. 2001. Rapid pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocol for subtyping of Campylobacter jejuni. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:1889-1894.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. Skirrow, M. B. 1981. Campylobacter enteritis in dogs and cats—a new zoonosis. Vet. Res. Commun. 5:13-19.[CrossRef][Medline]
10
10. Tenover, F. C., R. D. Arbeit, R. V. Goering, P. A. Mickelsen, B. E. Murray, D. H. Persing, and B. Swaminathan. 1995. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2233-2239.[Medline]
11
11. Wassenaar, T. M., B. Geilhausen, and D. G. Newell. 1998. Evidence of genomic instability in Campylobacter jejuni isolated from poultry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:1816-1821.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12
12. Wolfs, T. F. W., B. Duim, S. P. M. Geelen, A. Rigter, F. Thomson-Carter, A. Fleer, and J. A. Wagenaar. 2001. Neonatal sepsis by Campylobacter jejuni: genetically proven transmission from a household puppy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 32:E97-E99.[CrossRef][Medline]
13
13. Zorman, T., and S. S. Mozina. 2002. Classical and molecular identification of thermotolerant campylobacters from poultry meat. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 40:177-184.

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2004, p. 1363-1364, Vol. 42, No. 3
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.3.1363-1364.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Parsons, B. N., Cody, A. J., Porter, C. J., Stavisky, J. H., Smith, J. L., Williams, N. J., Leatherbarrow, A. J. H., Hart, C. A., Gaskell, R. M., Dingle, K. E., Dawson, S. (2009). Typing of Campylobacter jejuni Isolates from Dogs by Use of Multilocus Sequence Typing and Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 3466-3471 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ragimbeau, C., Schneider, F., Losch, S., Even, J., Mossong, J. (2008). Multilocus Sequence Typing, Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis, and fla Short Variable Region Typing of Clonal Complexes of Campylobacter jejuni Strains of Human, Bovine, and Poultry Origins in Luxembourg. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 7715-7722 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kawasaki, S., Fratamico, P. M., Wesley, I. V., Kawamoto, S. (2008). Species-Specific Identification of Campylobacters by PCR-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism and PCR Targeting of the Gyrase B Gene. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 2529-2533 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Malik, S., Peng, H., Barton, M. D. (2006). Partial Nucleotide Sequencing of the mecA Genes of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Cats and Dogs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 413-416 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Guardabassi, L., Schwarz, S., Lloyd, D. H. (2004). Pet animals as reservoirs of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria: Review. J Antimicrob Chemother 54: 321-332 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Damborg, P. Articles by Guardabassi, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Damborg, P. Articles by Guardabassi, L.