Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2004, p. 1491-1497, Vol. 42, No. 4
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.4.1491-1497.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Infectious Diseases Research and Diagnosis Laboratory,1 Cystic Fibrosis Center, Department of Pediatrics,5 Clinical Pathology, University of Genoa and Gaslini Children's Hospital, Genoa,2 Biotechnology Unit, C.R. Casaccia, ENEA, Rome, Italy,3 Laboratory for Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium4
Received 6 October 2003/ Returned for modification 20 November 2003/ Accepted 30 December 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Advances in the taxonomy of Bcc revealed that it comprises at least nine phenotypically similar species or genomovars, i.e., B. cepacia (genomovar I), B urkholderia multivorans (genomovar II), Burkholderia cenocepacia (genomovar III), Burkholderia stabilis (genomovar IV), Burkholderia vietnamiensis (genomovar V), Burkholderia dolosa (genomovar VI), Burkholderia ambifaria (genomovar VII), Burkholderia anthina (genomovar VIII), and Burkholderia pyrrocinia (genomovar IX), which can be differentiated on the basis of molecular and biochemical tests (4, 8, 17, 18, 19). The taxonomic complexity of Bcc raises many questions about the clinical significance of each species belonging to the complex; so far, the risk attributable to infection with the different genomovars is not well understood. Understanding this risk is vital for CF treatment centers to improve infection control policies and therapeutic approaches for Bcc-infected individuals. Several studies (9, 12, 14) pointed out that B. multivorans and B. cenocepacia account for the majority of isolates from CF patients. In particular, it has been observed that B. cenocepacia comprises the most virulent and transmissible bacterial clones; in fact, certain strains belonging to this species are associated with a poor clinical course and high mortality among CF patients (12).
Recent works showed that B. cenocepacia is genetically highly heterogeneous, being composed of at least four phylogenetic lineages (IIIA, IIIB, IIIC, and IIID) based on the polymorphism of the recA gene (11, 18). So far, recA lineages IIIA and IIID have been detected exclusively in clinical specimens (11, 18), whereas recA lineage IIIC has been recovered only from soil (18). Only recA lineage IIIB has been found in both clinical specimens and natural habitats (11, 18; S. Tabacchioni, A. Bevivino, C. Dalmastri, and L. Chiarini, unpublished data), where it can be recovered in high numbers (5). At present, of the three lineages found among CF patients, limited knowledge is available about the prevalence and epidemiology of lineages IIIA and IIIB (1, 12, 14) and no epidemiological and clinical data are available for recA lineage IIID.
The purpose of this study was to characterize the natural history of infection with strains of the different species and genomovars of Bcc among patients attending the Genoa CF Center of Gaslini Children's Hospital in Genoa, Italy, and to determine if there is genomovar-specific disparity in the transmission and clinical outcome for infected patients, with particular attention to the strains belonging to the different recA lineages of B. cenocepacia. We have collected all Bcc isolates from patients with CF who have attended our center since 1984. All isolates were evaluated for genomovar status by recA gene polymorphism and, subsequently, randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fingerprinting to (i) assess the prevalence of Bcc species and genomovars in CF patients and (ii) study the clinical, epidemiological, and genetic relatedness of Bcc isolates in light of the most recent taxonomic developments. Mortality, lung function, and body weight changes of patients infected with strains belonging to different recA lineages of B. cenocepacia were also investigated.
|
|
|---|
RAPD typing.
Each Bcc isolate was genetically typed by RAPD analysis as described by Mahenthiralingam et al. (10). RAPD fingerprints were compared by eye and computer software (one-dimensional image analysis software; Kodak, Rochester, N.Y.). Reproducibility was verified by RAPD fingerprinting of each isolate at least four times in independent experiments. The following criteria were used to define a strain or a subtype: isolates were considered unrelated (distinct strains) if there were more than six fragment (band) differences between RAPD profiles; isolates were considered related (subtypes of a common strain) if there were only three to six band differences between RAPD profiles; isolates were considered closely related, and thus belonging to the same strain, if there were no more than two band differences between RAPD profiles. A numerical strain type was assigned to
2 isolates that were grouped by fingerprint analysis. Isolates producing genetic fingerprints that did not match others within the strain collection were designated as unique.
Genomovar analysis. The genomovar status of each isolate was determined by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the recA gene and confirmed by means of PCR of the recA gene performed with genomovar-specific primers when available, according to the procedures previously described (2, 11, 17, 18).
PCR amplification of esmR and cblA genes. The 1.4-kb esmR sequence coding for the B. cepacia epidemic strain marker (BCESM) was amplified with the specific primers BCESM 1 and BCESM 2 by following the procedure described by Mahenthiralingam et al. (10). The 664-bp cblA DNA coding for the cable pilus was amplified with the primers CBL1 and CBL2 according to the procedure described by Clode et al. (3).
Comparison of clinical courses of patients infected with recA lineages IIIA and IIID. A subset of IIIA-infected patients was matched to a subset of IIID-infected patients according to age (±1 year), infection with P. aeruginosa at Bcc acquisition, and gender. Changes in lung function (FEV1) and body weight in the 2-year postacquisition period and mortality in the long-term period of the two subsets were compared. Spirometry (FEV1) and body weight measurements performed during stable outpatient clinic visits were collected for each patient of the two subsets.
Statistical analysis. Comparison of the mean age of patients at the time of Bcc acquisition and mean duration of colonization was performed by one-way analysis of variance. Comparison of mortality of the Bcc-positive and Bcc-negative CF population as well as within matched patient pairs infected with either IIIA or IIID strains was performed by using the chi-square test. Changes in the percentage of predicted FEV1 and body weight in IIIA- and IIID-matched patients were compared by the Wilcoxon signed rank test. All analyses were carried out with GraphPad Prism software.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Incidence and prevalence rates of Bcc respiratory infections among CF patients over the study perioda
|
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Prevalence of infection with each Bcc species among CF patients over the study period. Patients newly infected with strains belonging to B. cenocepacia IIIA (column A), B. cenocepacia IIIB (column B), B. cenocepacia IIID (column D), strain type 04 (column III), B. stabilis (column IV), B. cepacia genomovar I (column I), and B. pyrrocinia (column IX) are plotted by 4- to 5-year blocks. Bars denoting patients infected with a strain shared by two or more patients are white to indicate the occurrences of patient-to-patient transmission.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. RAPD strain types and unique genetic fingerprints of B. cenocepacia and B. stabilis and their characterizationd
|
![]() View larger version (55K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. RAPD fingerprints of B. cenocepacia IIIA strain type 01 (I), B. cenocepacia IIIB strain type 02 and unique fingerprints (II), B. cenocepacia IIID strain type 03 subtypes A and B (III), B. cenocepacia strain type 04 (IV), and B. stabilis strain type 05 and unique fingerprints (V). Lane M, 123-bp molecular size marker ladder; ST, strain type.
|
recA lineage IIIB isolates were recovered from 7 patients, 5 of which were infected with genetically distinct strains that did not spread to other patients during the study period. The remaining two patients were infected by the same strain type 02. RAPD profiles of strain type 02 and unique fingerprints are shown in Fig. 2. Four of the 7 isolates harbored the BCESM marker, and all isolates were cblA negative. Strain type 02 lacked BCESM.
All recA lineage IIID isolates, which were recovered from 34 patients, belonged to the same strain type 03. Within this strain type, two subtypes, named A and B, could be recognized (Fig. 2). Subtypes A and B infected 7 and 27 patients, respectively, and were presumed to have spread from patient to patient. All isolates were cblA and esmR negative (Table 2).
Three patients were infected with the same strain type 04 (Fig. 2). Isolates belonging to this strain type could not be assigned to any recA lineage of B. cenocepacia. All isolates were cblA and esmR negative (Table 2).
To assess whether patients could be infected with different strains (genotypes) or subtypes of the same recA lineage, at least two isolates were typed (first and last available isolates) for all B. cenocepacia-infected patients and as many as 5 to 6 isolates recovered at 0.5- to 1.5-year intervals covering the entire infection period were typed for a subset of patients (five IIIA-, three IIIB-, and five IIID-infected patients). Results showed that all patients were infected by only one genotype or subtype per recA lineage (data not shown).
Using the genomovar status of each strain, a correlation between the risk of patient-to-patient cross-infection (number of cases associated with strains belonging to a particular recA lineage compared to remaining cases associated with strains belonging to the other recA lineages of B. cenocepacia) and genomovar status was made (1). The highest relative risk of cross-infection was associated with IIID isolates (1.13), whereas the risk associated with IIIA isolates was slightly lower (0.78); in contrast, the risk of cross-infection associated with IIIB isolates was extremely low (0.05).
Segregation (separate rooms and treatment areas) and intensive education of Bcc-infected patients with CF and caregivers were introduced in September 1993. After that date, new acquisitions of transmissible IIIA strain type 01 were limited to a single case (Fig. 1); other acquisitions concerned isolates representing unique genetic fingerprints. A reduction in the number of new acquisitions, although not so marked as that of IIIA strain type 01, was also observed for the transmissible IIID strain type 03 (Fig. 1). In the case of recA lineage IIIB, acquisitions of bacteria with unique genetic fingerprints occurred all throughout the study period, whereas the unique case of cross-infection was observed after September 1993. Also, patients harboring strain type 04 were infected after September 1993. However, it has to be noted that after the introduction of segregation measures no evidence for overlapping hospitalizations, clinic visits, and hospital services of patients involved in cross-infection cases was found.
Molecular epidemiology of B. stabilis. One strain type (05) and two unique genetic fingerprints were found among the five patients with CF who were infected with B. stabilis (Table 2). The strain type 05 was recovered from three patients. Due to the transience of infection in these patients, only two patients infected with strain type 05 had overlapping infection periods; however, no overlapping hospitalizations and clinic visits for these two patients occurred. Moreover, the first cultures positive for B. stabilis were obtained after the introduction of segregation measures. The RAPD profiles of strain type 05 and the unique genetic fingerprints are shown in Fig. 2. All isolates were cblA and esmR negative (Table 2).
Clinical course of patients infected with B. cenocepacia. A summary of the epidemiological characteristics of CF patients infected with strains belonging to the different recA lineages of B. cenocepacia is presented in Table 3. Patients infected with IIIA isolates were generally younger at the time of acquisition than those infected with IIIB and IIID isolates. The mean duration of infection recorded within the study period was not statistically different for the three groups of patients. Most bacterial isolates caused chronic infection, although the percentage of patients transiently infected with IIID and IIIB isolates was higher than that of patients transiently infected with IIIA isolates. Isolates belonging to strain type 04, which has not been assigned to any recA lineage, caused the chronic infection of one patient and the transient infection of two other patients.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Summary of epidemiological characteristics of CF patients infected with B. cenocepacia (IIIA, IIIB, and IIID strains) and B. stabilis
|
Since the mean age of patients infected with isolates belonging to the two major recA lineages IIIA and IIID was significantly different, 15 patients infected with IIIA strain type 01 were matched to 15 patients infected with IIID strain type 03 subtypes A and B according to gender, age, and infection with P. aeruginosa at Bcc acquisition (Table 4). Within pairs, the mean difference between birth dates was 3.07 ± 2.19 years. In this way, lung function and body weight changes as well as mortality were compared within each pair. Patients infected with IIID strain type 03 showed slightly lower postacquisition mortality than patients infected with IIIA strain type 01 (73.31 and 93.34%, respectively; P = 0.22) (Table 4). No significant differences concerning changes in pulmonary function and body weight in the 2-year postacquisition period between the two groups of patients were observed (P = 0.19 and 0.48, respectively) (Table 4).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Matched variables and changes in lung function, body weight, and mortality of two subsets of IIIA- and IIID-infected patientsa
|
Clinical course of patients infected with B. stabilis, B. pyrrocinia, and B. cepacia (genomovar I). All patients from which B. stabilis was recovered were only transiently infected with this species; no deaths have occurred among these patients. One patient was chronically infected with B. pyrrocinia; another one, infected with B. cepacia genomovar I, died 3 years after being infected.
|
|
|---|
Of the four recA lineages comprising B. cenocepacia, most patients harbored one of two epidemic strains belonging to lineages IIIA or IIID, whereas few patients were infected with recA lineage IIIB. The presence of these epidemic strains explains why recA lineages IIIA and IIID are dominant at the Genoa CF Center. It is worth noting that the epidemic IIIA strain as well as the other IIIA strains with unique genetic fingerprints are not genetically related to the highly transmissible ET12 lineage (data not shown). The high prevalence of recA lineage IIIA and low prevalence of recA lineage IIIB among CF patients seem to be characteristic of the Italian CF centers (1). A similar distribution of the two recA lineages has been observed also in Canada (12). In contrast, in the United States, recA lineage IIIB is by far the most prevalent lineage among CF patients (9). Few data are available about the prevalence of recA lineage IIID in other CF centers. Data presented by Vandamme et al. (18) suggest a geographically limited diffusion of this recA lineage, in contrast with the broader diffusion of recA lineages IIIA and IIIB; in fact, so far IIID strains have been isolated only in Sweden, Argentina, and Italy. In Italy, the presence of IIID strains is not limited to the Genoa CF Center, as it has also been detected at other CF centers (1, 18).
The presence of strains common to multiple patients strongly suggests person-to-person transmission, as indicated by the decreased incidence after the introduction of increased infection control (see below). However, acquisition from a common source cannot be ruled out. This probable person-to-person transmission of Bcc among patients attending the Genoa CF Center was mostly associated with B. cenocepacia strains, particularly with the recA lineages IIIA and IIID. Before cohorts of Bcc-infected patients were introduced in 1993, the two highly transmissible IIIA and IIID strains, i.e., strain types 01 and 03, infected more than 80% of Bcc-infected patients. In contrast, all IIIB isolates showed unique genetic fingerprints, except one isolate which was shared by two patients. The transmissibility of B. cenocepacia has been often associated with the presence of the BCESM marker (10). In this study, we found that the epidemic IIIA strain possessed the BCESM marker, whereas the epidemic IIID strain lacked it. These findings confirm that the BCESM marker is not a very reliable marker for transmissibility within B. cenocepacia, as already suggested by LiPuma et al. (9). It is worth noting that the other marker commonly associated with virulence, particularly with recA lineage IIIA strains, i.e., the cable pilus, was absent in all B. cenocepacia strains.
The introduction of segregation measures in 1993 proved effective in limiting the spread of the transmissible strains among the patients attending the Genoa CF Center. Nowadays, the incidence of Bcc and, in particular, of B. cenocepacia is highly reduced, and new acquisitions mainly concern bacteria with unique genetic fingerprints. Nonetheless, several apparent cross-infection cases concerning B. cenocepacia and B. stabilis strains occurred after infection control measures had been introduced in 1993. Because of the stringency of the adopted infection control measures, it is conceivable that these cases occurred outside the CF center. As far as B. stabilis is concerned, Vandamme et al. (16) observed that this species is characterized by a remarkable genomic stability such that epidemiologically unrelated isolates may show very similar genetic fingerprints; therefore, it is difficult to establish whether the Genoa strain type 05 has really spread somehow from one patient to another or whether independent infection of three patients by genetically similar but epidemiologically unrelated strains has occurred.
The mortality of CF patients infected with Bcc was significantly higher than mortality among CF patients not infected with Bcc at the Genoa CF Center. In our study, most deaths of Bcc-infected patients were associated with the presence of epidemic B. cenocepacia strains. These observations suggest that certain strains with the potential to spread may represent a greater hazard to humans than others. The clinical course of patients infected with epidemic IIIA or IIID strains (strain types 01 and 03) was further investigated to get a better understanding of the clinical significance of these two groups of bacteria, present in high numbers at the Genoa CF Center. Since the mean age in the two whole groups of patients was quite different, two subsets of IIIA- and IIID-infected patients, matched according to gender, age, and infection with P. aeruginosa at Bcc acquisition, were compared to each other as far as lung function, body weight, and mortality were concerned. According to our data, the two strains had a similar effect on the clinical course of infected patients.
In conclusion, our study confirms the prevalence of B. cenocepacia among Bcc-infected CF patients and the high percentage of mortality associated with this species. The major role of an epidemic strain belonging to the recently identified recA lineage IIID in spreading Bcc infection among CF patients has been recognized for the first time.
We are greatly indebted to Cristina Cantale and Gabriella Seri for statistical and technical assistance, respectively. We also thank Mario Cruciani (Center of Preventive Medicine, USL 20, Verona, Italy) for critically reading the manuscript.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»