This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alvarez, J.
Right arrow Articles by Garaizar, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alvarez, J.
Right arrow Articles by Garaizar, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2004, p. 1734-1738, Vol. 42, No. 4
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.4.1734-1738.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Development of a Multiplex PCR Technique for Detection and Epidemiological Typing of Salmonella in Human Clinical Samples

Juan Alvarez,1 Mertxe Sota,2 Ana Belén Vivanco,1 Ildefonso Perales,3 Ramón Cisterna,1,2 Aitor Rementeria,1 and Javier Garaizar1*

Department of Immunology, Microbiology, and Parasitology, University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz,1 Clinical Microbiology Service, Basurto Hospital,2 Public Health Laboratory, Basque Government Health Department, Bilbao, Spain3

Received 29 September 2003/ Returned for modification 14 November 2003/ Accepted 9 January 2004


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
We have developed a multiplex PCR assay for Salmonella detection and epidemiological typing. Six sets of primers were designed to detect the major Salmonella serotypes and phage types in Spain. An internal amplification control was designed in order to detect PCR inhibition. The different amplification profiles obtained allowed us to detect Salmonella bacteria and to distinguish the clinically prevalent Salmonella enterica serotypes Enteritidis, Typhimurium and subspecies I serotype 4,5,12:i:–. Using this method, we could detect a specific band for DT104 and U302 phage types in Salmonella serotype Typhimurium. Salmonella enterica serotype Hadar and other C2 serogroup strains showed two specific band profiles. In the validation stage, the assay was reproducible for all serotypes studied, apart from some C2 serogroup strains. When the technique was applied to clinical stool specimens, the prevalent serotypes Enteritidis and Typhimurium were detected with a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 100%, and efficiency of 98%. Also, a low PCR inhibition rate (8%) was obtained. The overall agreement of the multiplex PCR with conventional culture-based techniques was 95% for Salmonella typing using Cohen's kappa index.


arrow
TEXT
 
Salmonella enterica is one of the major bacterial agents that cause foodborne infections in humans all over the world (4). In Spain, the most important serotypes causing disease are Salmonella enterica serotypes Enteritidis, Typhimurium, Hadar, and subsp. I serotype 4,5,12:i:– (18). Traditional Salmonella detection methods are based on cultures using selective media and characterization of suspicious colonies by biochemical and serological tests. These methods are generally time-consuming. Therefore, a rapid method is necessary for identification of Salmonella serotypes from clinical specimens. There are several PCR assays to detect Salmonella bacteria in feces, but diagnostic PCR is limited by the presence of inhibiting substances in complex biological samples (7, 11). These substances can interfere with cell lysis or inactivate the DNA polymerase, and DNA extraction procedures are usually necessary to remove them (2). The utility of multiplex PCR as a tool for pathogen detection in clinical and environmental samples is well documented (10, 15, 19).

The aim of this study was to develop a multiplex PCR assay able to detect Salmonella and simultaneously detect the five most important serotypes and phage types in Spain. This technique should be able to avoid the effect of the PCR inhibitors in clinical samples and had to be reliable, simple, and accurate.

We designed new PCR primers using previously described genetic targets (Table 1) and the Jellyfish primer design software (BioWare Corp., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada). The primer set (synthesized by Invitrogen, Paisley, United Kingdom) was chosen to amplify products with lengths similar to those of the 100-bp ladder (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, N.J.) bands. A total of six different sequences were amplified in each reaction mixture: a Salmonella genus-specific sequence (204 bp), a serotype Enteritidis-specific sequence (304 bp), a serotype Typhimurium-specific sequence (401 bp), a sequence specific for serotype Typhimurium DT104 and U302 (102 bp), a Salmonella C2 serogroup-specific sequence (502 bp), and a sequence specific for serotype 4,5,12:i:– (705 bp).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Primer sequences and sizes of PCR-amplified targets

An artificially created chimeric DNA was used as an internal control (IC) in every reaction mixture. This IC was used to detect inhibition in the PCR due to the presence of inhibitory substances in the clinical samples. The IC was designed according to a strategy previously described (6) slightly modified to obtain a 990-bp fragment and consisted of a fragment (948 bp) of a region of the lambda phage flanked by two of the primers used in the multiplex PCR (104F and ENTR).

Every amplification profile was coded with a number obtained by the addition of the values corresponding to each amplified band (Table 1). The template DNA for multiplex PCR was prepared as previously described (12). All the PCRs were performed in a final volume of 25 µl in a Robocycler 96 Grad (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.). The optimized PCR mixture consisted of 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM each of the four deoxynucleoside triphosphates (Amersham Biosciences), 1 U of Taq polymerase (Amersham Biosciences), and 60 pmol of IC DNA per sample. Primer sequences and concentrations are given in Table 1. The PCR protocol consisted of the following steps: (i) an initial denaturation step of 2 min at 95°C; (ii) 30 cycles, with 1 cycle consisting of 1 min at 95°C, 1 min at 57°C, and 2 min at 72°C; and (iii) a final elongation step of 5 min at 72°C. The PCR products were electrophoresed in 2.5% (wt/vol) D-1 agarose (Pronadisa, Madrid, Spain), stained with 2 µg of ethidium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain) per ml, and photographed under UV light. In each PCR run, a nontemplate control was included to detect possible external DNA contamination.

A total of 138 microbial strains isolated from veterinary, environmental, food, and clinical sources from Spain, Denmark, and England were used for selectivity determination. These strains were well characterized in terms of genus, species, serotype, and phage type (Table 2). Figure 1 shows the amplification profiles and codes obtained in the technique validation stage. The detection limits of this multiplex PCR were 6,500 CFU of Salmonella serotype Typhimurium LT2 strain and 1 ng of DNA. In our validation study, all the tested Salmonella strains showed at least the 200-bp band (code of >=2) (Table 2), while none of the non-Salmonella strains showed this band (code of 0). The inclusivity and exclusivity were 100% (14), and the overall agreement (5) for Salmonella bacteria was therefore complete.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Strains tested and multiplex PCR results obtained in the optimization and validation experiments



View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Multiplex PCR amplification profiles. All the different multiplex PCR amplification profiles found in this study are shown. The type code is shown above the lanes. The M lanes contain the 100-bp molecular size ladder marker.

Analyzing the PCR profiles for epidemiological purposes, all the serotype Enteritidis strains showed the amplification profile code 6. The serotype Typhimurium strains showed the amplification profile code 10 or 11 (if DT104). The serogroup C2 strains showed profile code 18 or 26, depending on the presence of a band of 401 bp, which was not completely reproducible in some strains. Fortunately, all these strains also presented the serogroup C2-specific band. The serotype 4,5,12:i:– strains showed profile code 43. A serotype Lindenberg strain showed profile code 11. Serotype Lindenberg has the same antigenic formula as serotype Typhimurium, except it has C2 serogroup O antigens. Two serotype Typhimurium DT12 strains also presented profile code 11. In a previous pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing study (9), the pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profile of one of these isolates was identical to the profile of DT104 strains with three restriction enzymes. Also, a DT104 strain showed profile code 10. In the same study (9), the band pattern of this strain was different from the prevalent pattern of the DT104 isolates. Assay reproducibility was measured using independent strains replicated during the validation period of the technique and reached 91.5%. A 400-bp band was not always found for the Salmonella serogroup C2 strains.

Salmonella detection by both conventional culture and multiplex PCR methods was then performed on 120 consecutive human stool samples obtained at the Basurto Hospital, Bilbao, Spain. A swab soaked with human stool was used to inoculate selenite-cystine broth and allowed to grow overnight at 37°C for Salmonella detection by both techniques. In the conventional culture technique, XLD, MacConkey, and Hektoen agars were inoculated with the incubated broth. Suspicious Salmonella colonies were confirmed with triple sugar iron (TSI) agar, API 20E strips (BioMèrieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France), and serotyped according to the Kauffman-White scheme. For Salmonella detection by multiplex PCR, 100 µl of the incubated broth was diluted in 10 ml of fresh broth and incubated for 4 h at 37°C. The broth was then centrifuged at 4°C at 3,000 x g, and the pellet was washed with phosphate-buffered saline. The cells were centrifuged again and resuspended in 200 µl of water. The bacterial DNA was extracted by boiling as described previously (12). A 5-µl aliquot of the supernatant was used as template DNA in the multiplex PCR described above. In addition, a final concentration of 10% (wt/vol) polyethylene glycol (Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a PCR facilitator in the reaction mixture. One hundred seven of the samples gave coincident results by both techniques (Table 3). The multiplex PCR results for two samples were considered false-negative results, and one sample was detected as belonging to the Salmonella genus instead of serotype Enteritidis. In 10 samples (8%), PCR inhibition occurred, including one serotype Enteritidis strain that was isolated by culture. The sensitivity value of the technique was 93%, the specificity was 100%, and the efficiency was 98%. Cohen's kappa index was 0.95, which indicates high agreement between the two techniques.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3. Comparison of results obtained analyzing human stool samples by multiplex PCR and by culture and serotyping

In this article, we have described a multiplex PCR-based diagnosis method for Salmonella that is simple, inexpensive, and sensitive and enables the quick and precise detection of the most prevalent serotypes of Salmonella in human clinical samples. Although our results are preliminary, this PCR assay would offer an effective alternative to traditional typing methods for the identification and differentiation of the most clinically relevant Salmonella types.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported in part by Basque Government grant PI 1998/52,"Subvención general a Grupos de Investigación" UPV/EHU (2002-2005). Juan Alvarez and Ana Belén Vivanco were supported with a "Beca de Formación de Personal Investigador" from the Basque Government and a "Beca de Investigación Predoctoral" from the University of the Basque Country, respectively.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Immunology, Microbiology, and Parasitology, F. Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country, Paseo de la Universidad 7, 01006 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain. Phone: 34 945 013912. Fax: 34 945 013014. E-mail: oipgacaj{at}vc.ehu.es. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Agron, P. G., R. L. Walker, H. Kinde, S. J. Sawyer, D. C. Hayes, J. Wollard, and G. L. Andersen. 2001. Identification by subtractive hybridization of sequences specific for Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:4984-4991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    2. 2
  2. Al-Soud, W. A., and P. Radstrom. 2000. Effects of amplification facilitators on diagnostic PCR in the presence of blood, feces, and meat. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:4463-4470.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    3. 3
  3. Garaizar, J., S. Porwollik, A. Echeita, A. Rementeria, S. Herrera, R. M. Wong, J. Frye, M. A. Usera, and M. McClelland. 2002. DNA microarray-based typing of an atypical monophasic Salmonella enterica serotype. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2074-2078.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Herikstad, H., Y. Motarjemi, and R. V. Tauxe. 2002. Salmonella surveillance: a global survey of public health serotyping. Epidemiol. Infect. 129:1-8.[CrossRef][Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Hong, Y., M. E. Berrang, T. Liu, C. L. Hofacre, S. Sanchez, L. Wang, and J. J. Maurer. 2003. Rapid detection of Campylobacter coli, C. jejuni, and Salmonella enterica on poultry carcasses by using PCR-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:3492-3499.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Hoorfar, J., P. Ahrens, and P. Råsdström. 2000. Automated 5' nuclease assay for identification of Salmonella enterica. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3429-3435.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    7. 7
  7. Kongmuang, U., J. M. C. Luk, and A. A. Lindberg. 1994. Comparison of three stool-processing methods for detection of Salmonella serogroups B, C2, and D by PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:3072-3074.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    8. 8
  8. Kwang, J., E. T. Littledike, and J. E. Keen. 1996. Use of the polymerase chain reaction for Salmonella detection. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 22:46-51.[Medline]
    9. 9
  9. Laconcha, I. 2001. Evaluación de marcadores moleculares en la tipificación de Salmonella spp. Creación de un sistema de librerías informatizado para la vigilancia epidemiológica. Doctoral thesis. University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
    10. 10
  10. Lee, C. Y., G. Panicker, and A. K. Bej. 2003. Detection of pathogenic bacteria in shellfish using multiplex PCR followed by CovaLink NH microwell plate sandwich hybridization. J. Microbiol. Methods 53:199-209.[CrossRef][Medline]
    11. 11
  11. Lin, J. S., and H. Y. Tsen. 1999. Development and use of polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Salmonella Typhimurium in stool and food samples. J. Food Prot. 62:1103-1110.[Medline]
    12. 12
  12. López-Molina, N., I. Laconcha, A. Rementeria, A. Audicana, I. Perales, and J. Garaizar. 1998. Typing of Salmonella enteritidis of different phage types of PCR fingerprinting. J. Appl. Microbiol. 84:877-882.[CrossRef][Medline]
    13. 13
  13. Luk, J. M., U. Kongmuang, P. R. Reeves, and A. A. Lindberg. 1993. Selective amplification of abequose and paratose synthase genes (rfb) by polymerase chain reaction for identification of Salmonella major serogroups (A, B, C2, and D). J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:2118-2123.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    14. 14
  14. Malorny, B., J. Hoorfar, C. Bunge, and R. Helmuth. 2003. Multicenter validation of the analytical accuracy of Salmonella PCR: towards an international standard. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:290-296.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Mason, W. J., J. S. Blevins, K. Beenken, N. Wibowo, N. Ojha, and M. S. Smeltzer. 2001. Multiplex PCR protocol for the diagnosis of staphylococcal infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3332-3338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    16. 16
  16. Olsen, J. E., S. Aabo, O. F. Rasmussen, and L. Rossen. 1995. Oligonucleotide probes specific for the genus Salmonella and for Salm. typhimurium. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 20:160-163.[Medline]
    17. 17
  17. Pritchett, L. C., M. E. Konkel, J. M. Gay, and T. E. Besser. 2000. Identification of DT104 and U302 phage types among Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium isolates by PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3484-3488.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    18. 18
  18. Usera, M. A., A. Aladueña, R. Díaz, M. de la Fuente, R. Gutiérrez, P. Cerdán, M. Arroyo, R. González, and A. Echeita. 2001. Análisis de las cepas de Salmonella spp. aisladas de muestras clínicas de origen humano en España en el año 2000 (I). Bol. Epidemiol. Sem. 9:221-224.
    19. 19
  19. Wang, G., C. G. Clark, and F. G. Rodgers. 2002. Detection in Escherichia coli of the genes encoding the major virulence factors, the genes defining the O157:H7 serotype, and components of the type 2 Shiga toxin family by multiplex PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:3613-3619.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2004, p. 1734-1738, Vol. 42, No. 4
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.4.1734-1738.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Soyer, Y., Moreno Switt, A., Davis, M. A., Maurer, J., McDonough, P. L., Schoonmaker-Bopp, D. J., Dumas, N. B., Root, T., Warnick, L. D., Grohn, Y. T., Wiedmann, M. (2009). Salmonella enterica Serotype 4,5,12:i:-, an Emerging Salmonella Serotype That Represents Multiple Distinct Clones. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 3546-3556 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Choi, J.-G., Kang, O.-H., Lee, Y.-S., Chae, H.-S., Oh, Y.-C., Brice, O.-O., Kim, M.-S., Sohn, D.-H., Kim, H.-S., Park, H., Shin, D.-W., Rho, J.-R., Kwon, D.-Y. (2009). In vitro and In vivo Antibacterial Activity of Punica granatum Peel Ethanol Extract Against Salmonella. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 0: nep105v1-nep105 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Leader, B. T., Frye, J. G., Hu, J., Fedorka-Cray, P. J., Boyle, D. S. (2009). High-Throughput Molecular Determination of Salmonella enterica Serovars by Use of Multiplex PCR and Capillary Electrophoresis Analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 1290-1299 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wattiau, P., Van Hessche, M., Schlicker, C., Vander Veken, H., Imberechts, H. (2008). Comparison of Classical Serotyping and PremiTest Assay for Routine Identification of Common Salmonella enterica Serovars. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 4037-4040 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kim, S., Frye, J. G., Hu, J., Fedorka-Cray, P. J., Gautom, R., Boyle, D. S. (2006). Multiplex PCR-Based Method for Identification of Common Clinical Serotypes of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 3608-3615 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Desjardins, M., Guibord, C., Lalonde, B., Toye, B., Ramotar, K. (2006). Evaluation of the IDI-MRSA Assay for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Nasal and Rectal Specimens Pooled in a Selective Broth. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 1219-1223 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • de la Torre, E., Tello, M., Mateu, E. M., Torre, E. (2005). Use of Biochemical Kinetic Data To Determine Strain Relatedness among Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 5419-5424 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alvarez, J.
Right arrow Articles by Garaizar, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alvarez, J.
Right arrow Articles by Garaizar, J.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»