This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berrizbietia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berrizbietia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, B. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Chagas Disease

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2004, p. 1766-1769, Vol. 42, No. 4
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.4.1766-1769.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Development and Comparison of Enzyme Immunoassays for Diagnosis of Chagas' Disease Using Fixed Forms of Trypanosoma cruzi (Epimastigotes, Amastigotes, and Trypomastigotes) and Assessment of Antigen Stability for the Three Assays

Mariolga Berrizbietia,1,2 Momar Ndao,1 Marcelo Gottschalk,2 Alberto Aché,3 Fabio Vásquez,1 Sonia Lacouture,2 Mehudy Medina,3 and Brian J. Ward1*

National Reference Centre for Parasitology, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University,1 Faculté de Medicine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada,2 Ministerio de Salud y Desarrollo Social, Caracas, Venezuela3

Received 15 August 2003/ Returned for modification 2 November 2003/ Accepted 9 January 2004


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
Three enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for diagnosis of Chagas' disease were developed with fixed forms of Trypanosoma cruzi using a panel of 435 sera from the following groups: Venezuelan subjects positive by immunofluorescence (n = 70), Venezuelan healthy controls (n = 85), healthy Canadians (n = 166), and subjects with other parasitic diseases (n = 114). All assays achieved 100% sensitivity and reasonable specificity for amastigotes (97.6%), epimastigotes (98.3%), and trypomastigotes (99.3%). The fixed-trypomastigote assay was stable over 4 months at 4°C and room temperature. These data suggest that a fixed-trypomastigote EIA may be a suitable candidate for blood bank screening.


arrow
TEXT
 
American trypanosomiasis, or Chagas' disease, is caused by the protozoan flagellate Trypanosoma cruzi (8). It is estimated that 16 to 18 million people are infected by T. cruzi in Latin America (22, 33).

A major effort to interrupt transmission in rural South America during the last 2 to 3 decades has dramatically altered the epidemiology of Chagas' disease (1, 20, 23, 35). At the present time, the major route for transmission in many regions in which Chagas' disease was previously endemic is blood transfusion. The migration of large numbers of asymptomatically infected individuals in recent decades has extended the risk of transfusion-associated Chagas' disease to all parts of the developed world (15, 16, 18, 19, 25, 34). To our knowledge, no jurisdiction in the developed world routinely screens blood and blood products for Chagas' disease.

Although many screening methods have been evaluated, the enzyme immunoassay (EIA) format has significant attractions in terms of its simplicity, low cost, and potentially excellent sensitivity (37). During the last 30 years, many different EIA-based assays using a wide range of antigens have been developed (2, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12-14, 24, 27, 28, 31, 36). Several studies have reported particularly promising results with fixed whole organisms (i.e., integral antigens) (5, 6, 10, 13, 14, 21). However, theses studies have been relatively small and have focused on epimastigote-form antigens.

Since the human immune system is exposed almost exclusively to trypomastigote- and amastigote-form antigens, we sought to determine which integral antigen preparation of T. cruzi offered the best combination of sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of American trypanosomiasis. We also assessed the stability of the fixed-form EIA under conditions of possible use (i.e., long-term storage at various temperatures).

We used a panel of 435 sera to evaluate the candidate assays. The subjects included Venezuelan blood donors (n = 70) defined as positive by immunofluorescence, indirect hemagglutination, and EIA. Negative controls included 85 Venezuelan blood donors and 166 nontraveling Canadian residents. Specificity was assessed by using sera from 114 subjects with other parasitic diseases: leishmaniasis (n = 20), ascariasis (n = 6), facioliasis (n = 8), malaria (n = 23), toxoplasmosis (n = 17), trichinosis (n = 11), filariasis (n = 8), cysticercosis (n = 8), and schistosomiasis (n = 13).

T. cruzi antigens. Epimastigotes (Tulahuen and Brazil strains) were grown in LIT broth (11). Parasites were washed three times in 1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) and fixed in 2% formaldehyde (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, N.J.)-PBS (pH 7.4) for 1 h at 37°C. To obtain trypomastigote and amastigote forms, Vero cell monolayers (ATCC CCL-81) were infected with epimastigotes and supernatants were harvested at either 7 or 15 days, respectively (7, 21). Harvested amastigotes were placed in LIT medium at 37°C for a further 48 h. Final purification was achieved with a column (17) or gradient (4) before formaldehyde fixation (1.5% trypomastigotes and 2% amastigotes) as described above. Organisms were counted in a Neubauer chamber, and final antigen preparations were produced by mixing the Tulahuen and Brazil strains 50/50. Antigens were stored in aliquots at –20°C until used. Morphology (Giemsa-stained preparations) was used as the principal criterion for assessing antigen purity: epimastigotes, 100% (yield, 1 x 108 to 1 x 109 per ml); trypomastigotes, 97% (yield, 0.6 x 107 to 7 x 107 per ml), and amastigotes, 100% (1 x 108 to 1 x 109 per ml) (data not shown).

Polystyrene 96-well plates (Immulon 2; Thermo Labsystems, Franklin, Mass.) were coated overnight with (per well) 100 µl of fixed T. cruzi antigen (106 epimastigotes, 105 amastigotes, or 105 trypomastigotes per ml) at 4°C in 1 M sodium carbonate buffer (pH 9.6). Plates were incubated with blocking buffer (PBS-5% bovine serum albumin-0.1% Tween [Sigma]) for 1 h at 37°C. Sera were diluted 1:400 in blocking buffer, added in duplicate to wells (100 µl/well), and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. The assays were completed with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human immunoglobulin G for 30 min at 37°C (100 µl/well; Perkin-Elmer Life Science, Boston, Mass.) and then with 3,3', 5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (100 µl/well) for 10 min at room temperature. The reaction was stopped with IN sulfuric acid (H2SO4; 50 µl/ml) and read at 450 nm (Titertek Multiskan MCC/340; Labsystem and Row Laboratories, Finland). Results from the healthy control sera were used to establish cutoff values that yielded optimal sensitivity and specificity for each assay.

After assay optimization, negative control values were low and tightly clustered in all three fixed-organism EIAs. Mean optical density (OD) values for the Canadian negative control sera were 0.09 ± 0.07, 0.07 ± 0.03, and 0.09 ± 0.05 for the epimastigote, trypomastigote, and amastigote assays, respectively. Sera from Venezuelan negative controls had significantly higher background noise in the amastigote (P < 0.03), trypomastigote (P < 0.0001), and epimastigote (P < 0.0001) assays. Among the healthy control sera, a linear model indicated a significant difference among the three antigens (P < 0.0001). Tukey's post hoc tests revealed the following order from least to most reactive: trypomastigote < epimastigote = amastigote (Table 1). As expected, ODs for sera from subjects with other parasitic diseases were more variable: epimastigote, 0.09 ± 0.19; trypomastigote, 0.07 ± 0.17; and amastigote, 0.12 ± 0.21. For this group, the linear model indicated that the ODs did not differ among antigens (P = 0.14). The mean ODs for the known positive sera were 1.98 ± 0.32, 1.65 ± 0.42, and 1.79 ± 0.49 for the epimastigote, trypomastigote, and amastigote assays, respectively. Analysis of variance showed significant differences between the mean ODs among the three assays (P < 0.0001). Tukey's post hoc tests revealed the following order from most to least reactive: epimastigote > trypomastigote = amastigote (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. ODs and specificity estimates for serum groups in EIAs based on formalin-fixed T. cruzi amastigote, epimastigote, or trypomastigote forms

Cutoff values between ODs of 0.20 to 0.40 yielded excellent sensitivity (100%) with a range of specificities: epimastogote, 86.2 to 98.3%; amastigote, 84.8 to 97.6%; and typomastigote, 93.8 to 99.3% (Table 1). When specificity was assessed at a cutoff OD of 0.40, the trypomastigote-based assay performed best with both healthy patient sera (100%) and sera from patients with other parasitic diseases (98.2%). The presumed false-positive reactions (five, two, and seven false-positive results for the epimastigote, trypomastigote, and amastigote assays, respectively) occurred with sera from subjects with known protozoan or helminth infections and one healthy control (Table 1).

Our first hypothesis—that a simple EIA based upon fixed, whole organisms could be sensitive, specific, and practical for field application—proved to be correct. Using readily accessible materials and straightforward techniques, we were able to generate large numbers of essentially pure epimastigote, trypomastigote, and amastigote forms. These assays performed well with our panel of sera, confirming the earlier observations of several groups (5, 10, 13, 14). As noted above, these early studies focused almost exclusively on epimastigote antigens. Only Araujo and Guptill (6) tested amastigote forms using a small number of positive and negative sera, and no sera from subjects with other parasitic diseases were included.

The second of our initial hypotheses—that fixed amastigote or trypomastigote antigens would be superior to epimastigote antigens in the EIA format, proved to be largely incorrect. The trypomastigote-based assay was slightly better than the other two assays in terms of specificity, and this advantage was accentuated at lower arbitrary cutoff values (Table 1). These data suggest that there is extensive sharing of antigens among the three forms of the parasite (3). It is also possible that the in vitro culture systems used by us and by others do not generate the antigenic diversity that may exist in the different forms in natural infection (26, 32). We found it relatively simple to generate large numbers of morphologically homogeneous trypomastigote forms, and the diagnostic potential for trypomastigote antigens has not been well studied. Indeed, we could only find a single trial that used a crude trypomastigote extract antigen in an EIA format (7).

Since antigen stability and assay consistency are major concerns for many of the reported Chagas' disease assays, we sought to determine the stability of the fixed trypomastigote assay over time under realistic storage conditions. Half of the wells of EIA plates were precoated and stored with desiccant sachets at 4°C or room temperature for up to 4 months. At monthly intervals, the unused wells were coated with frozen stock trypomastigote antigen, and the EIA procedure outlined above was completed for precoated and freshly coated wells in parallel. Using multiple replicates of pooled negative and positive sera, we observed excellent maintenance of reactivity without upwards drift in the negative controls over the 4-month period. Indeed, the positive samples had generally higher absorbance values in the precoated wells than in the freshly coated wells on plates stored either at 4°C (2.39 ± 0.235 versus 1.52 ± 0.326, respectively; P < 0.006) or at room temperature (2.13 ± 0.169 versus 1.60 ± 0.234; P < 0.0001), respectively. Compared with the freshly coated wells, there was also less variation in the precoated wells stored at either 4°C (coefficient of variation [CV] for positives, 21.5 versus 9.8; CV for negatives, 87.0 versus 23.6) or room temperature (CV for positives, 14.6 versus 8; CV for negatives, 88.7 versus 19.4). Similar assay stability has recently been reported for up to 12 months and at temperatures up to 50°C by Rebeski et al. in a whole, fixed Trypanosoma congolense EIA (29, 30).

Several limitations of the present study should be acknowledged. Most important, the positive sera used were known to be reactive in a battery of other serodiagnostic tests. As a result, our estimates for assay sensitivity are almost certainly artificially high. This fact may also have contributed to the very high signal/noise ratios we observed. Although several of the presumed false-positive sera were obtained from subjects with cutaneous leishmaniasis, no visceral leishmaniasis samples were included in our panel of samples from subjects with other parasitic diseases. Finally, two different T. cruzi strains were used to generate the antigens we used, but all of the Chagas' disease-positive sera were obtained from a single geographic region.

In conclusion, we believe that formalin-fixed, whole-organism antigens have several advantages compared with most other antigen preparations reported to date for use in the EIA format. These include ease of preparation and quantification (e.g., hemocytometer) and stability for prolonged periods of time at a range of temperatures. We have shown that fixed, whole-organism EIAs based on epimastigote, trypomastigote, or amastigote forms of T. cruzi can have excellent sensitivities and specificities. These assays were reproducible and robust under various storage conditions. The trypomastigote-based test had advantages in terms of specificity in our initial evaluation. As with all novel assays for T. cruzi, the performance of these assays in the field will determine their eventual clinical utility.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by Health Canada grant HT070-010033. Doctoral scholarship support for M. Berrizbeitia was provided by the Universidad de Oriente (UDO), Venezuela, as well as the Research Institutes of Université de Montréal and the McGill University Health Center.

We thank Herbert Tanowitz (Einstein University of Medicine, New York, N.Y.) for providing the T. cruzi strains, Evelyn Kokoskin (McGill Centre for Tropical Diseases, McGill University, Montreal, Canada) for technical support, and Guy Beauchamp (Université de Montréal) for statistical support.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: McGill Center for Tropical Diseases, Montreal General Hospital, Room D7-153, Montreal, Quebec H3G IA4, Canada. Phone: (514) 937-6011, ext. 428 10. Fax: (514) 934-8347. E-mail: brian.ward{at}mcgill.ca. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Ache, A., and A. J. Matos. 2001. Interrupting Chagas disease transmission in Venezuela. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 43:37-43.[Medline]
    2. 2
  2. Almeida, I. C., D. T. Covas, L. M. Soussumi, and L. R. Travassos. 1997. A highly sensitive and specific chemiluminescent enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of active Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Transfusion 37:850-857.[CrossRef][Medline]
    3. 3
  3. Alves, M. J., G. Abuin, V. Y. Kuwajima, and W. Colli. 1986. Partial inhibition of trypomastigote entry into cultured mammalian cells by monoclonal antibodies against a surface glycoprotein of Trypanosoma cruzi. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 21:75-82.[CrossRef][Medline]
    4. 4
  4. Andrysiak, P. M., W. E. Collins, and G. H. Campbell. 1986. Concentration of Plasmodium ovale- and Plasmodium vivax-infected erythrocytes from nonhuman primate blood using Percoll gradients. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 35:251-254.
    5. 5
  5. Antas, P. R., E. N. Azevedo, M. R. Luz, N. Medrano-Mercado, A. C. Chaves, P. G. Vidigal, A. C. Volpini, A. J. Romanha, and T. C. Araujo-Jorge. 2000. A reliable and specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the capture of IgM from human chagasic sera using fixed epimastigotes of Trypanosoma cruzi. Parasitol. Res. 86:813-820.[CrossRef][Medline]
    6. 6
  6. Araujo, F. G., and D. Guptill. 1984. Use of antigen preparations of the amastigote stage of Trypanosoma cruzi in the serology of Chagas' disease. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 33:362-371.
    7. 7
  7. Aznar, C., P. Liegeard, C. Mariette, S. Lafon, M. J. Levin, and M. Hontebeyrie. 1997. A simple Trypanosoma cruzi enzyme-linked immunoassay for control of human infection in nonendemic areas. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 18:31-37.[CrossRef][Medline]
    8. 8
  8. Botero, D., and M. Restrepo. 1992. Parasitosis humanas, 2nd ed. Corporación Para Investigaciones Biológicas, Medellín, Colombia.
    9. 9
  9. Breniere, S. F., R. Carrasco, H. Miguez, J. L. Lemesre, and Y. Carlier. 1985. Comparisons of immunological tests for serodiagnosis of Chagas disease in Bolivian patients. Trop. Geogr. Med. 37:231-238.[Medline]
    10. 10
  10. Carbonetto, C. H., E. L. Malchiodi, M. G. Chiaramonte, N. W. Zwirner, and R. A. Margni. 1989. Use of formalinized epimastigotes for the detection of anti-Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies using immunoenzyme technics. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 21:79-83. (In Spanish.)[Medline]
    11. 11
  11. Castilla, M. M., M. Santos-Gomez, C. Guzman-Bracho, and C. R. Bautista-Garfias. 1988. A new method for diagnosis of Chagas' disease: diffusion-in-gel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J. Parasitol. 74:805-809.[CrossRef][Medline]
    12. 12
  12. Cuna, W. R., C. Rodriguez, F. Torrico, D. Afchain, M. Loyens, and P. Desjeux. 1989. Evaluation of a competitive antibody enzyme immunoassay for specific diagnosis of Chagas' disease. J. Parasitol. 75:357-359.[CrossRef][Medline]
    13. 13
  13. de Hubsch, R. M., N. Chiechie, G. Comach, R. R. Aldao, and R. D. Gusmao. 1989. The Dot immunoenzymatic assay on nitrocellulose (Dot-ELISA) in the diagnosis of Chagas disease. II. Seroepidemiologic study in 4 rural communities of Venezuela. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 84:401-408. (In Portuguese.)[Medline]
    14. 14
  14. de Hubsch, R. M., N. Chiechie, G. Comach, R. Rangel Aldao, and R. D. Gusmao. 1988. Immunoenzyme assay using micro Dot on nitrocellulose (Dot-ELISA) in the diagnosis of Chagas' disease. I. Comparative study of 2 antigenic preparations of Trypanosoma cruzi. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 83:277-285. (In Portuguese.)[Medline]
    15. 15
  15. Frank, M., B. Hegenscheid, K. Janitschke, and T. Weinke. 1997. Prevalence and epidemiological significance of Trypanosoma cruzi infection among Latin American immigrants in Berlin, Germany. Infection 25:355-358.[CrossRef][Medline]
    16. 16
  16. Grant, I. H., J. W. Gold, M. Wittner, H. B. Tanowitz, C. Nathan, K. Mayer, L. Reich, N. Wollner, L. Steinherz, F. Ghavimi, et al. 1989. Transfusion-associated acute Chagas disease acquired in the United States. Ann. Intern. Med. 111:849-851.
    17. 17
  17. Kanbara, H., and T. Nakabayashi. 1983. Improved method for separation on CM-cellulose of the trypomastigote form of Trypanosoma cruzi from forms grown in fibroblast cell cultures. Biken J. 26:63-65.[Medline]
    18. 18
  18. Leiby, D. A., R. M. Herron, Jr., E. J. Read, B. A. Lenes, and R. J. Stumpf. 2002. Trypanosoma cruzi in Los Angeles and Miami blood donors: impact of evolving donor demographics on seroprevalence and implications for transfusion transmission. Transfusion 42:549-555.[CrossRef][Medline]
    19. 19
  19. Leiby, D. A., E. J. Read, B. A. Lenes, A. J. Yund, R. J. Stumpf, L. V. Kirchhoff, and R. Y. Dodd. 1997. Seroepidemiology of Trypanosoma cruzi, etiologic agent of Chagas' disease, in US blood donors. J. Infect. Dis. 176:1047-1052.[Medline]
    20. 20
  20. Lorca, M., A. Garcia, M. I. Bahamonde, A. Fritz, and R. Tassara. 2001. Serological certification of the interruption of the vectorial transmission of Chagas disease in Chile. Rev. Med. Chile 129:264-269. (In Spanish.)[Medline]
    21. 21
  21. Matsumoto, T. K., S. Hoshino-Shimizu, P. M. Nakamura, H. F. Andrade, Jr., and E. S. Umezawa. 1993. High resolution of Trypanosoma cruzi amastigote antigen in serodiagnosis of different clinical forms of Chagas' disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:1486-1492.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    22. 22
  22. Moncayo, A. 1999. Progress towards interruption of transmission of Chagas disease. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 94:401-404.
    23. 23
  23. Moncayo, A. 1999. Progress towards the interruption of transmission of Chagas disease in the southern countries. Medicina (Buenos Aires) 59:120-124. (In Spanish.)
    24. 24
  24. Monteon, V. M., L. Guzman-Rojas, C. Negrete-Garcia, J. L. Rosales-Encina, and P. A. Lopez. 1997. Serodiagnosis of American trypanosomosis by using nonpathogenic trypanosomatid antigen. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:3316-3319.[Abstract]
    25. 25
  25. Nickerson, P., P. Orr, M. L. Schroeder, L. Sekla, and J. B. Johnston. 1989. Transfusion-associated Trypanosoma cruzi infection in a non-endemic area. Ann. Intern. Med. 111:851-853.
    26. 26
  26. Oelemann, W. M., M. D. G. M. Teixeira, G. C. Verissimo Da Costa, J. Borges-Pereira, J. A. De Castro, J. R. Coura, and J. M. Peralta. 1998. Evaluation of three commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for diagnosis of Chagas' disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2423-2427.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    27. 27
  27. Partel, C. D., and C. L. Rossi. 1998. A rapid, quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the immunodiagnosis of Chagas' disease. Immunol. Investig. 27:89-96.
    28. 28
  28. Pinho, R. T., R. C. Pedrosa, P. Costa-Martins, and L. R. Castello-Branco. 1999. Saliva ELISA: a method for the diagnosis of chronic Chagas disease in endemic areas. Acta Trop. 72:31-38.[CrossRef][Medline]
    29. 29
  29. Rebeski, D. E., E. M. Winger, H. Okoro, S. Kowalik, H. J. Burger, D. E. Walters, M. M. Robinson, R. H. Dwinger, and J. R. Crowther. 2000. Detection of Trypanosoma congolense antibodies with indirect ELISAs using antigen-precoated microtitre plates. Vet. Parasitol. 89:187-198.[CrossRef][Medline]
    30. 30
  30. Rebeski, D. E., E. M. Winger, M. M. Robinson, C. M. Gabler, R. H. Dwinger, and J. R. Crowther. 2000. Evaluation of antigen-coating procedures of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method for detection of trypanosomal antibodies. Vet. Parasitol. 90:1-13.[CrossRef][Medline]
    31. 31
  31. Schechter, M. 1987. Evaluation of a monoclonal antibody affinity purified antigen for zymodeme specific serological diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 82:81-85.[Medline]
    32. 32
  32. Schechter, M., and N. Nogueira. 1988. Variations induced by different methodologies in Trypanosoma cruzi surface antigen profiles. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 29:37-45.[CrossRef][Medline]
    33. 33
  33. Schmidt, G. D., and L. S. Roberts. 2000. Foundations of parasitology, 6th ed. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York, N.Y.
    34. 34
  34. Schmunis, G. A. 1991. Trypanosoma cruzi, the etiologic agent of Chagas' disease: status in the blood supply in endemic and nonendemic countries. Transfusion 31:547-557.[CrossRef][Medline]
    35. 35
  35. Silveira, A. C., and M. C. Vinhaes. 1999. Elimination of vectorial transmission of Chagas disease in Brazil. Medicina (Buenos Aires) 59:97-102. (In Spanish.)
    36. 36
  36. Solana, M. E., A. M. Katzin, E. S. Umezawa, and C. S. Miatello. 1995. High specificity of Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigote ribonucleoprotein as antigen in serodiagnosis of Chagas' disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1456-1460.[Abstract]
    37. 37
  37. Spencer, H. C., D. S. Allain, A. J. Sulzer, and W. E. Collins. 1980. Evaluation of the micro enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 29:179-182.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2004, p. 1766-1769, Vol. 42, No. 4
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.4.1766-1769.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Berrizbeitia, M., Ndao, M., Bubis, J., Gottschalk, M., Ache, A., Lacouture, S., Medina, M., Ward, B. J. (2006). Purified Excreted-Secreted Antigens from Trypanosoma cruzi Trypomastigotes as Tools for Diagnosis of Chagas' Disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 291-296 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berrizbietia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berrizbietia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, B. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Chagas Disease

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»