Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2004, p. 1790-1793, Vol. 42, No. 4
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.4.1790-1793.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Research Center for Medical Mycology, Peking University, and Department of Dermatology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
Received 14 May 2003/ Returned for modification 15 July 2003/ Accepted 18 December 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
While methods for in vitro susceptibility testing were developed as new antifungal drugs were identified, the reproducibility of these assays among laboratories was varied (3). In 1997 the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) published the reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts (6). This reference assay resulted in the standardization of key variables such as inoculum size, medium, and temperature and duration of incubation and also established MIC endpoints for several antifungal drugs. Application of the M27-A method has minimized the variation among laboratories (8). However, this method requires a 48-h culture before endpoints are measured for Candida species, and the interpretation of endpoints can sometimes be subjective. Therefore, a more rapid and convenient method is required for routine antifungal susceptibility testing of clinical isolates in diagnostic laboratories.
In 2000, Riesselman et al. (9) described a novel rapid susceptibility assay (RSA) method that uses colorimetric measurement for the determination of MICs of antifungal agents against Candida species. The rationale behind the development of this assay is that inhibition of growth by antifungal drugs also results in decreased uptake of exogenously added substrates such as glucose. By measuring the amount of residual glucose in the medium of drug-treated cultures and of untreated control cultures, the susceptibility of a fungal isolate to an antifungal drug can be determined.
Li et al. (4) used a similar method to test amphotericin B, 5-flucytosine, itraconazole, and fluconazole against 106 isolates of Candida species. The MICs obtained by RSA were compared with those obtained with the NCCLS M27-A method. The results indicated that after incubation for 6 h, the agreement between the two methods for determination of the MIC for amphotericin B and 5-flucytosine was high (100 and 98%, respectively), but that for fluconazole and itraconazole was low (63 and 61%, respectively). In order to improve the agreement between the two methods for assay of the MIC, cells required 19 h of incubation with itraconazole or fluconazole.
In this study, we modified the RSA method so that cells required only 6 h of incubation with fluconazole and itraconazole. The MICs of fluconazole and itraconazole for 118 Candida isolates obtained by the modified RSA method were compared to those obtained by the NCCLS M27-A method.
A total of 118 Candida isolates were obtained from the Research Center of Medical Mycology, Peking University. Candida albicans (45 isolates), C. glabrata (22 isolates), C. krusei (10 isolates), C. tropicalis (17 isolates), and C. parapsilosis (24 isolates) were tested. C. krusei (ATCC 6258) and C. parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) were included for quality control. Isolates were cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar plates at 35°C and passaged twice at a 48-h interval before use. RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) containing 2 g of glucose per liter was used for the NCCLS M27-A method. Yeast nitrogen base (YNB; Difco, Kansas, Mo.) containing 0.12 g of glucose per liter as the sole carbohydrate was used for the modified RSA. Itraconazole and fluconazole were generously provided by Janssen Pharmaceutica and Shanghai Sanve Pharmaceutica, respectively. The colorimetric reagent used to detect residual glucose in the culture medium contained 100 mmol of sodium phosphate (pH 7.0) per liter, 13 mmol of 4-aminoantipyrine per liter, 30 mmol of phenol per liter, 6 U of horseradish peroxidase per ml, and 13 U of glucose oxidase per ml.
The NCCLS M27-A method of antifungal susceptibility testing was performed by following the NCCLS recommendations (6). Briefly, Candida cells were suspended in RPMI 1640 medium, and the turbidity was adjusted to a McFarland unit of 0.5 by using a Densimat spectrophotometer (bioMérieux Italia, S.p.A). The suspension was further diluted in RPMI 1640 medium to yield an inoculum concentration of approximately 1 x 103 to 5 x 103 cells/ml. One hundred microliters per well was inoculated into wells containing dilutions of each drug. The final concentration ranges after inoculation were 0.03 to 16 µg/ml for itraconazole and 0.125 to 64 µg/ml for fluconazole. Drug-free purity controls and growth controls were included for each preparation. The plates were incubated at 35°C, and the results were determined after 24 and 48 h by visual inspection. As recommended by the NCCLS (6), the MIC was defined as the lowest drug concentration at which the turbidity was 20% or less than that of the control without drug.
For the modified RSA in this study, Candida cells were suspended in YNB medium containing 0.12 g of glucose per liter to a turbidity of a McFarland unit of 0.5. The suspension was further diluted in YNB with 0.12 g of glucose per liter to yield an inoculation concentration of approximately 1.25 x 105 to 6.25 x 105 cells/ml. One hundred microliters of this suspension per well was inoculated into wells containing various dilutions of drug. The final concentration ranges after inoculation were 0.03 to 16 µg/ml for itraconazole and 0.125 to 64 µg/ml for fluconazole, and the final glucose concentration in YNB was 0.12 g per liter. After the plates were incubated at 35°C for 6 h, 80 µl of freshly prepared colorimetric reagent was added to each well. The plates were then incubated at room temperature for 15 min to allow color development. The optical density of each well was determined spectrophotometrically with a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.) at 490 nm. The optical density values, which reflect the residual glucose concentrations, were plotted against drug concentrations. The MIC was defined as the lowest drug concentration on the plateau preceding a 10% or greater drop in optical density. Controls included wells without drug but with a yeast strain (growth control) and wells without drug and without a yeast strain (blank control).
The MICs obtained by the two methods are shown in Table 1. The deviation of MICs obtained by the modified RSA method from those measured by the NCCLS M27-A method is presented as the change in MIC for the number of isolates (Table 2). The tested isolates were divided into susceptible, susceptible dose dependent, and resistant groups by MICs obtained with the modified RSA method and the NCCLS M27-A method. In Table 3, we compare the identities and differences between the two methods. From these data, we can see that the MICs obtained with the modified RSA method are in general compatible with those obtained from the NCCLS M27-A method both for the drugs and for most of the isolates tested.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. MIC determined by the NCCLS M27-A method and modified RSA method
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. MICs obtained by the modified RSA method that deviated from those measured by the NCCLS M27-A method
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Comparison of identities and differences determined by the modified RSA and NCCLS M27-A methodsa
|
In the RSA as well as other MIC assay methods, several factors, such as the density of inoculation, the growth rate of the strain, the period of incubation, and the antifungal mechanism of the drug used, influence the accuracy of the MIC in different ways. Specifically, the dependency on glucose and the consumption rate of glucose in different Candida species considerably affect the MIC obtained with the RSA method.
In the RSA method reported previously (4, 9), a higher concentration of glucose (0.5 g per liter) was used in the medium. At a higher concentration of glucose, passive diffusion of glucose into the cells may occur and is not driven by energy consumption. When the glucose concentration in the medium is low, as we used in this study, active transportation against the concentration gradient, which requires energy, may happen. Since energy production is compromised in susceptible cells cultured in medium containing the drug, MIC determination by the modified RSA method with a lower concentration of glucose should be more sensitive and can be performed in a relatively short period.
The inoculation density that we used was 1.25 x 105 to 6.25 x 105 CFU/ml, a concentration much higher than that used in the NCCLS M27-A method. The higher inoculation density will accelerate the utilization of glucose in the medium by the cells, so that the MIC can be measured after 6 h. Furthermore, a higher concentration is apparently needed for the slow-growing Candida species.
In this study, the optical densities at 490 nm of the wells containing Candida cells were measured directly after addition of the colorimetric reagent. To examine the impact of the cells in the wells on measurement of the MIC, MICs of fluconazole and itraconazole were measured for eight isolates of Candida in the modified RSA method. After incubation for 6 h, the optical densities at 490 nm were determined before addition of the colorimetric reagent as the blanks and after color development by addition of the colorimetric reagent. Optical densities subtracted from their respective blanks were obtained, and the calibrated MICs of the drugs against the isolates were calculated. As shown in Table 4, there were no differences between noncalibrated and calibrated MICs except those for an isolate of C. glabrata, for which the noncalibrated and calibrated MICs of itraconazole were 8 and 16 µg/ml, respectively. Therefore, optical density measurement with cells in wells is convenient and accurate enough for the MIC assay.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Noncalibrated and calibrated MICs for eight isolates
|
The resistance endpoints for fluconazole and itraconazole were clearly defined (6). Consequently, isolates can be divided into susceptible, susceptible dose dependent, and resistant groups by using the MICs from the modified RSA and the NCCLS M27-A methods. In Table 3, we compare the identities and differences in the results from the two methods. For C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. krusei, and C. tropicalis assessed by the two methods, most of the isolates tested showed identical results, and only a few isolates had very different results. These results indicate that the modified RSA is reliable in the assessment of susceptibility to fluconazole and itraconazole for these Candida species. For the 24 isolates of C. parapsilosis, however, only 6 isolates had identical results for fluconazole, and most of the different results were minor. C. parapsilosis grows slowly, and this may account for the inadequate results with the modified RSA method. Therefore, the modified RSA method used in this study may need to be further improved for Candida species that grow slowly, such as C. parapsilosis.
In conclusion, for most of the Candida species, the results for susceptibility to fluconazole and itraconazole obtained by the modified RSA method were in good compliance with those obtained by the NCCLS M27-A method, but the endpoints can be determined in 6 h when the former method is used, versus the 48 h necessary for the latter method. Susceptibility results provided in a short time may sometimes be very helpful in the treatment of critical patients infected with Candida species.
We thank Richard Calderone for help in reviewing the manuscript.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»