This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fonsale, N.
Right arrow Articles by Freydiere, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fonsale, N.
Right arrow Articles by Freydiere, A. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2004, p. 1962-1964, Vol. 42, No. 5
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.1962-1964.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Specific Identification of Staphylococcus aureus by Staphychrom II, a Rapid Chromogenic Staphylocoagulase Test

Nathalie Fonsale,1 Michèle Bes,2 Isabelle Verdier,3 Anne Carricajo,1 Christine Ploton,3 Gérald Aubert,1 Jerome Etienne,2 François Vandenesch,3 and Anne Marie Freydiere3*

Hôpital de Bellevue, F-42055 Saint Etienne,1 CNR des Staphylocoques, INSERM E-0230, Faculté de Médecine Laennec, F-69372 Lyon cedex 8,2 Hôpital Debrousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, F-69322 Lyon cedex 5, France3

Received 29 October 2003/ Returned for modification 18 December 2003/ Accepted 31 January 2004


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
We compared the performance of Staphychrom II (International Microbio, Signes, France), a rapid (2-h) chromogenic staphylocoagulase test that uses human prothrombin and protease inhibitors, with those of the reference tube coagulase test (TCT) and the latex agglutination test (LAT) Slidex Staph Plus for the rapid identification of S. aureus. Prospective evaluation with 293 fresh clinical isolates yielded sensitivities, specificities, and predictive and negative predictive values of 98.1, 100, 100, and 95.1%, respectively, for the Staphychrom II test; 98.6, 98.7, 99.6, and 96.3%, respectively, for LAT; and 97.6, 98.7, 99.5, and 93.9%, respectively, for TCT. The perfect specificity of the Staphychrom II test was confirmed by testing 193 collection strains selected because of their potential testing pitfalls. The Staphychrom II test was positive for 90% of the 215 S. aureus strains tested after only 1 h of incubation. The Staphychrom II test was as sensitive as the reference TCT and was 100% specific.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
Rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus is a major priority for clinical microbiologists. The tube coagulase test (TCT) is the reference method for distinguishing S. aureus and rare coagulase-positive non-S. aureus staphylococci (e.g., S. intermedius) from coagulase-negative staphylococci. However, this test requires 18 to 24 h of incubation and is not perfectly reliable (1, 13, 16, 18). Agglutination tests with either erythrocytes or latex particles coated with various ligands may lack sensitivity, notably, for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and may also lack specificity for non-S. aureus staphylococci, such as S. lugdunensis, S. schleiferi, and S. intermedius (3, 8, 14, 15).

In the present study we evaluated Staphychrom II (International Microbio, Signes, France), a rapid (2-h) chromogenic staphylocoagulase test which specifically detects S. aureus, and compared the results obtained with those obtained by a reference TCT (Becton Dickinson, Le Pont de Claix, France) and the latex agglutination test (LAT) Slidex Staph Plus (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). The tests were compared prospectively with 293 clinical isolates in two clinical laboratories and retrospectively with 193 typical and atypical collection strains chosen because of their potential testing pitfalls.


arrow
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 
Test organisms. From March 2002 to May 2002, a total of 293 Staphylococcus isolates were prospectively tested at Bellevue Hospital, Saint Etienne, France (n = 149) or Debrousse Hospital, Lyon, France (n = 144). They comprised 215 S. aureus isolates (43 MRSA strains and 172 methicillin-susceptible strains) and 78 non-S. aureus staphylococci. The 78 non-S. aureus isolates comprised S. capitis (n = 14), S. caprae (n = 3), S. cohnii (n = 1), S. epidermidis (n = 49), S. haemolyticus (n = 3), S. hominis (n = 4), S. simulans (n = 2), and S. warneri (n = 2). The strains were isolated from the following clinical specimens: pus (n = 85), respiratory tract (n = 83), nose (n = 32), blood (n = 26), catheter (n = 22), urine (n = 13), stool (n = 12), eye (n = 7), ear (n = 5), throat (n = 5), and cerebrospinal fluid (n = 3).

The 193 collection strains (French National Reference Center for Staphylococci) comprised 99 strains of S. aureus originating from 25 different French towns (n = 59) or from England (n = 40) and 94 non-S. aureus staphylococci, as follows: S. auricularis (n = 3), S. capitis subsp. capitis (n = 5), S. capitis subsp. ureolyticus (n = 3), S. caprae (n = 6), S. cohnii (n = 5), S. epidermidis (n = 11), S. haemolyticus (n = 7), S. hominis subsp. hominis (n = 2), S. hominis subsp. novobiosepticus (n = 3), S. intermedius (n = 8), S. lugdunensis (n = 5), S. pasteuri (n = 4), S. saprophyticus subsp. saprophyticus (n = 6), S. schleiferi subsp. coagulans (n = 2), S. schleiferi subsp. schleiferi (n = 7), S. sciuri subsp. rodentium (n = 2), S. sciuri subsp. sciuri (n = 3), S. simulans (n = 5), S. warneri (n = 5), and S. xylosus (n = 2).

Some of the Staphylococcus species listed above were selected to evaluate the specificity of the Staphychrom II test, as they are known either to produce coagulase, pseudocoagulase, or agglutination factors or to possess biochemical characteristics close to those of S. aureus (1, 5, 14, 17). Eleven strains were selected for their atypical phenotypic or genetic characteristics. They comprised six S. aureus strains and five S. epidermidis strains. Among the atypical S. aureus strains, one was negative for lactose, trehalose, and mannitol acidification; one was negative by latex agglutination with several reagents; two were negative by TCT (19); and two were negative by the catalase test (A. Le Coustumier, Y. Brun, M. Bes, A. Le Coustumier, J. Fleurette, and J. Etienne, Abstr. 8th Int. Symp. Staphylococci Staphylococcal Infect., abstr. P288, p. 260). The five atypical S. epidermidis strains were positive for mannitol acidification.

Conventional identification. All primary isolates were identified on the basis of their morphology, Gram staining, and catalase positivity. Catalase-positive colonies and gram-positive cocci were agglutinated by the Slidex Staph Plus LAT, and coagulase production was detected by the reference TCT described below. All coagulase-negative isolates were identified by using the ID32 Staph gallery (bioMérieux).

Reagents and methodologies. (i) Slidex Staph Plus LAT. The Slidex Staph Plus test (bioMérieux) is an LAT that simultaneously detects clumping factor, protein A, and capsular polysaccharides on the S. aureus cell surface (20). It was used according to the recommendations of the manufacturer.

(ii) Reference TCT. For TCT (9), strains were incubated overnight at 37°C in staphylocoagulase broth (Bio-Rad, Marnes la Coquette, France). A 0.05-ml aliquot of broth was then mixed with 0.5 ml of rabbit plasma containing EDTA (Becton Dickinson). The tubes were incubated at 37°C and examined at 4 and 24 h.

(iii) Staphychrom II test. Staphychrom II (International Microbio) is a 2-h staphylocoagulase test based on a chromogenic substrate, human prothrombin, and protease inhibitors [6, 11; A. M. Freydière, M. Bes, M. A. Charveriat, A. Carricajo, and C. Ploton, Program Abstr. 12th Eur. Congr. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., abstr. P392, 2002, Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 8(Suppl. 1):57, 2002]. The kit consists of a panel of eight wells containing dehydrated medium suitable for staphylococci and a chromogenic substrate for staphylocoagulase. A freeze-dried coagulase reagent (COAG) containing human prothrombin is extemporaneously reconstituted with 2 ml of sterile distilled water. Two wells are used per test: the control well is filled with the COAG reagent, and the test well is filled with the COAG reagent and the test microorganism.

Two colonies with an identical appearance on the isolation agar were directly inoculated (Presto ABG Inoculator; International Microbio) in the test well containing 0.1 ml (2 drops) of the COAG reagent. After incubation at 37°C for 1 to 2 h, the color was read with the naked eye. The result is valid only if the control well shows no yellow color. Any yellow color of the test well identifies the isolate as S. aureus, while a total lack of yellow color after 2 h identifies a non-S. aureus staphylococcal species.

(iv) Definite identification. When the results of the three tests disagreed, the isolate was formally identified by using the ID32 Staph gallery (bioMérieux) and/or the Accuprobe test (bioMérieux), which detects rRNA sequences specific to S. aureus.

Statistical analysis. Fisher's exact test was used for analysis of the categorical variables. Differences between groups were considered significant for variables with P values <0.05.


arrow
RESULTS
 
The Staphychrom II test was tested with a total of 486 staphylococci, comprising 293 fresh clinical isolates and 193 collection strains.

With the 293 fresh clinical isolates (Table 1), the sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values were 98.1, 100, 100, and 95.1%, respectively, by the Staphychrom II test; 98.6, 98.7, 99.6 and 96.3%, respectively, by LAT; and 97.7, 98.7, 99.5, and 93.9%, respectively, by TCT. Statistical analysis of the sensitivity and specificity results showed that the differences between the three methods were not statistically significant (P = 0.5). The Staphychrom II test was positive for 90% of the 215 S. aureus strains after only 1 h of incubation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Performances of the three methods for S. aureus identification with 293 clinical isolatesa

Nine of the 215 S. aureus strains yielded false-negative results by one of the tests (4 by the Staphychrom II test, 3 by LAT, and 5 by TCT) (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Comparison of the Staphychrom II test with an LAT (Slidex Staph Plus) and a conventional TCT with 293 clinical isolates

The 78 non-S. aureus isolates yielded a negative result by the Staphychrom II test (specificity, 100%). A positive reaction was observed by TCT with one S. simulans strain and by LAT with one S. hominis strain (Table 2).

The results for the 193 collection strains are summarized in Table 3. Among the 99 S. aureus strains tested (including 6 atypical strains), 6 yielded a false-negative reaction by one or more of the three tests (Table 3). Four S. aureus strains yielded a false-negative result by the Staphychrom II test: two of them were very weakly positive by TCT after 24 h of incubation, while the other two were TCT negative. The Staphychrom II test was positive for the other four atypical S. aureus strains (one was negative for lactose, trehalose, and mannitol acidification; one was negative for latex agglutination with several reagents; and two were catalase negative).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3. Comparison of the Staphychrom II test with LAT (Slidex Staph Plus) and a conventional TCT with 193 collection strains

The 94 non-S. aureus collection strains were all negative by the Staphychrom II test, yielding a specificity of 100%. In contrast, 8 strains were positive by TCT and 10 strains were positive by LAT (Table 3).


arrow
DISCUSSION
 
We prospectively evaluated the Staphychrom II test with fresh clinical isolates under real conditions of use in two clinical laboratories. The test was also evaluated with a panel of collection strains from the French National Reference Center for Staphylococci. The prospective evaluation involved staphylococcal isolates of various origins that corresponded to the usual epidemiological patterns seen in the two participating laboratories.

With the 293 fresh clinical isolates, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the Staphychrom II test (98.1, 100, 100, and 95.1%, respectively) were superior to those obtained by TCT (97.7, 98.7, 99.5, and 93.9%, respectively). The Staphychrom II test was also more rapid than TCT (incubation times, 1 to 2 h and 4 to 24 h, respectively).

All 94 non-S. aureus staphylococci among the collection strains were negative by the Staphychrom II test, which was therefore perfectly specific. A large proportion of these strains (S. intermedius, S. lugdunensis, S. schleiferi, etc.) were chosen because they expressed coagulase, pseudocoagulase, or surface proteins known to produce false-positive results with several LAT kits. Although S. intermedius and S. schleiferi are not commonly encountered in clinical samples, several investigators (2, 4, 7, 10, 12, 17) have underlined the need to accurately identify these species in some clinical situations. The excellent specificity of the Staphychrom II test had previously been demonstrated with S. delphini and S. hyicus [11; Freydière et al., Program Abstr. 12th Eur. Congr. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., abstr. P392, 2002, Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 8(Suppl. 1):57, 2002].

Among the 99 S. aureus collection strains, two "typical" isolates from patients admitted to the same unit of an English hospital gave negative results by the Staphychrom II test. These two strains showed the same pulsed-field gel electrophoresis restriction pattern and belonged to the same epidemic clone. They were weakly coagulase positive by the TCT method after 24 h of incubation, suggesting that the quantity of coagulase produced in 2 h might have been too small to be detected by the Staphychrom II test. Only two atypical S. aureus collection strains were falsely negative by the Staphychrom II test. These two strains possess the coagulase gene but do not produce coagulase (19).

As the TCT method is known to lack sensitivity and specificity, the use of TCT in combination with an LAT has been strongly recommended. This has the dual advantages of improving specificity and yielding more rapid S. aureus identification. In our study, the Staphychrom II test was 100% specific, relatively rapid, and as sensitive as LAT, suggesting that it could serve as a stand-alone test for accurate S. aureus identification.

The Staphychrom II test is more expensive than TCT, but it is less time-consuming and does not require additional consumables. It might thus be cost-effective in industrialized countries where technician time is expensive. The Staphychrom II test is clearly cost-effective compared with the cost of the combination of TCT and LAT.

In conclusion, this study, performed with a broad range of staphylococcal species, confirms previous reports that the Staphychrom II test is rapid, reliable, and easy to use. Its perfect specificity makes it suitable as a stand-alone test for accurate S. aureus identification in the clinical laboratory.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We are grateful to the technicians of the participating laboratories and to David Young for editorial assistance.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Hôpital Debrousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 29 rue Soeur Bouvier, F-69322 Lyon cedex 5, France. Phone: (33) 4 7238 5816. Fax: (33) 4 7238 5535. E-mail: am.freydiere{at}chu-lyon.fr. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Barry, A. L., R. V. F. Lachica, and F. W. Atchison. 1973. Identification of Staphylococcus aureus by simultaneous use of tube coagulase and thermonuclease tests. Appl. Microbiol. 25:496-497.[Medline]
    2. 2
  2. Becker, K., B. Keller, C. von Eiff, M. Brück, G. Lubritz, J. Etienne, and G. Peteers. 2001. Enterotoxigenic potential of Staphylococcus intermedius. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:5551-5557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    3. 3
  3. Blake, J. A., and M. A. Metcalfe. 2001. A shared noncapsular antigen is responsible for false-positive reactions by Staphylococcus epidermidis in commercial agglutination tests for Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:544-550.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Blanc, V., J. Picaud, E. Legros, M. Bes, J. Etienne, D. Moatti, and M. F. Raynaud. 1999. Infection sur prothèse totale de hanche à Staphylococcus caprae. Cas clinique et revue de la littérature. Pathol. Biol. 47:409-413.[Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Calvo, J., J. L. Hernandez, M. C. Farinas, J. D. Garcia-Palomo, and J. Agüero. 2000. Osteomyelitis caused by Staphylococcus schleiferi, and evidence of misidentification of this Staphylococcus species by an automated bacterial identification system. J. Clin. Microbiol. 10:3887-3889.
    6. 6
  6. Carricajo, A., A. Treny, N. Fonsale, M. Bes, M.-E. Reverdy, Y. Gille, G. Aubert, and A. M. Freydière. 2001. Performance of the chromogenic medium CHROMagar Staph aureus and the Staphychrom coagulase test in the detection and identification of Staphylococcus aureus in clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2581-2583.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    7. 7
  7. Célard, M., F. Vandenesch, H. Darbas, J. Grando, H. Jean-Pierre, G. Kirkorian, and J. Etienne. 1997. Pacemaker infection caused by Staphylococcus schleiferi, a member of the human preaxillary flora: four case reports. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24:1014-1015.[Medline]
    8. 8
  8. Fleurette, J., M. Bes, I. Brun, J. Freney, F. Forey, M. Coulet, M. E. Reverdy, and J. Etienne. 1989. Clinical isolates of Staphylococcus lugdunensis and S. schleiferi: bacteriological characteristics and susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. Res. Microbiol. 140:107-118.[Medline]
    9. 9
  9. Kloos, W. E., and T. L. Bannerman. 1995. Staphylococcus and Micrococcus, p. 282-298. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
    10. 10
  10. Kluytmans, J., H. Berg, P. Steegh, F. Vandenesch, J. Etienne, and A. Van Belkum. 1998. Outbreak of Staphylococcus schleiferi wound infections: strain characterization by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis, PCR ribotyping, conventional ribotyping, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2214-2219.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 11
  11. Langlet, S., G. Quentin, G. Contant, and J. C. Ghnassia. 1999. Méthode chromogénique d'identification rapide de Staphylococcus aureus. Ann. Biol. Clin. 57:191-196.
    12. 12
  12. Leung, M. J., N. Nuttall, M. Mazur, T. L. Taddei, M. McComish, and J. W. Pearman. 1999. Case of Staphylococcus schleiferi endocarditis and a simple scheme to identify clumping factor-positive staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:3353-3356.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. Mahoudeau, I., X. Delabranche, G. Prevost, H. Monteil, and Y. Piemont. 1997. Frequency of isolation of Staphylococcus intermedius from humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2153-2154.[Abstract]
    14. 14
  14. Peacock, S. J., G. Lina, J. Etienne, and T. J. Foster. 1999. Staphylococcus schleiferi subsp. schleiferi expresses a fibronectin-binding protein. J. Clin. Microbiol. 67:4272-4275.
    15. 15
  15. Personne, P., M. Bès, G. Lina, F. Vandenesch, I. Brun, and J. Etienne. 1997. Comparative performances of six agglutination kits assessed by using typical and atypical strains of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1138-1140.[Abstract]
    16. 16
  16. Sperber, W. H., and S. R. Tatini. 1975. Interpretation of the tube coagulase test for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. Appl. Microbiol. 29:502-505.[Medline]
    17. 17
  17. Vandenesch, F., M. Célard, D. Arpin, M. Bes, T. Greenland, and J. Etienne. 1995. Catheter-related bacteremia associated with coagulase-positive Staphylococcus intermedius. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2508-2510.[Abstract]
    18. 18
  18. Vandenesch, F., C. Lebeau, M. Bes, G. Lina, B. Lina, T. Greenland, Y. Benito, Y. Brun, J. Fleurette, and J. Etienne. 1994. Clotting activity in Staphylococcus schleiferi subspecies from human patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:388-392.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    19. 19
  19. Vandenesch, F., C. Lebeau, M. Bes, D. McDevitt, T. Greenland, R. P. Novick, and J. Etienne. 1994. Coagulase deficiency in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus involves both transcriptional and post-transcriptional defects. J. Med. Microbiol. 40:344-349.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    20. 20
  20. Van Griethuysen, A., M. Bes, J. Etienne, R. Zbinden, and J. Kluytmans. 2001. International multicenter evaluation of latex agglutination tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:86-89.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2004, p. 1962-1964, Vol. 42, No. 5
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.1962-1964.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Cherkaoui, A., Renzi, G., Francois, P., Schrenzel, J. (2007). Comparison of four chromogenic media for culture-based screening of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Med Microbiol 56: 500-503 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Brown, D. F. J., Edwards, D. I., Hawkey, P. M., Morrison, D., Ridgway, G. L., Towner, K. J., Wren, M. W. D., on behalf of the Joint Working Party of the Britis, (2005). Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J Antimicrob Chemother 56: 1000-1018 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fonsale, N.
Right arrow Articles by Freydiere, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fonsale, N.
Right arrow Articles by Freydiere, A. M.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»