Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bogdanovich, T. Articles by Hoorfar, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bogdanovich, T. Articles by Hoorfar, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2004, p. 2261-2263, Vol. 42, No. 5
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.2261-2263.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Validated 5' Nuclease PCR Assay for Rapid Identification of the Genus Brucella

T. Bogdanovich,¹ M. Skurnik,² P. S. Lübeck,³ P. Ahrens,³ and J. Hoorfar^3*

University of Turku, Turku,¹ Haartman Institute, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland,² Danish Institute for Food and Veterinary Research, Copenhagen, Denmark³

Received 15 September 2003/ Returned for modification 7 January 2004/ Accepted 17 February 2004

Top Abstract Text References

 
A real-time, genus-specific 5' nuclease PCR assay for amplification of a 322-bp fragment of the per gene was developed for rapid (<2 h) identification of Brucella spp. from agar plates. The assay, including an internal amplification control (116 bp), identified Brucella strains (n = 23) and did not detect non-Brucella strains (n = 174), indicating its usefulness, particularly for laboratories with stringent quality assurance programs.

Top Abstract Text References

 
Owing to continuous efforts to control and eradicate brucellosis in domestic animals, the levels of brucellosis have been reduced in many countries (6). However, a natural reservoir of Brucella bacteria in wildlife, e.g., Brucella suis biovar 2 in hares in Denmark, can still pose a threat. Thus, the task of detection and identification remains challenging and requires reliable and sensitive diagnostics tools.

The diagnosis of brucellosis is based mainly on serological responses, which can be unspecific owing to cross-reaction or subsensitive reactions in samples from areas with a low or subclinical prevalence of brucellosis (5, 7, 9, 16). Culture-based verification of suspected cases, or pathological findings in clinical cases, can be time-consuming and also can impose a hazard to laboratory personal. Thus, numerous alternative verification methods, based mostly on amplification of universal genes in a conventional PCR, have been reported, although some have produced false-positive results (reviewed in reference 3).

The Brucella-specific perosamine synthetase (per) gene is highly conserved and present even in the naturally rough Brucella species B. ovis and B. canis and spontaneously rough strains of B. abortus and B. melitensis (4). The per gene is, with various degrees of similarity, present in a few other bacteria, including Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9, Vibrio cholerae O1, Escherichia coli O:157, some serovars of E. hermanni and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Salmonella group N (O:30) (14). To the best of our knowledge, the only real-time PCR work reported is based on hybridization probes used in three different assays for identification of three Brucella species (15). This report describes for the first time the development of a ready-to-go, nonproprietary, open-formula (thus possessing the potential for standardization), 5' hydrolysis probe-using real-time PCR assay including an internal amplification control (IAC) for direct verification of suspected Brucella colonies on agar plates.

The Brucella-specific primers were designed as previously described (11). The primer combination bruc1-bruc5 was found to be most selective (11). In the present study, three different TaqMan probes (6-carboxyfluorescein [FAM] labeled) were designed and compared in the assay: Bruc1, in close proximity to the 3' end of the forward primer; Bruc2, in the middle of the amplified fragment; and Bruc3, within a few nucleotides of the 3' end of the reverse primer (Table 1).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Primers and probes used for amplification and identification of Brucella spp. in a 5' nuclease real-time PCR

An artificially created chimerical DNA (12), a second set of primers, and a second TaqMan probe (VIC labeled) (12) were used for an IAC in every reaction mixture, except for the nontemplate control (Table 1). In addition, a negative control (nontarget DNA) and a nontemplate control containing water instead of any DNA were included in each run.

A typical 25-µl reaction mixture contained, in addition to the primers and probes (Table 1), each deoxynucleoside triphosphate at 0.3 mM, 2.5 µl of 10x reaction buffer (F-511, DyNAzyme II; Finnzymes, Espoo, Finland), 1.25 U of DyNAzyme II recombinant enzyme (Finnzymes), 5 mM MgCl₂, 1% glycerol, and 0.2 mg of bovine serum albumin per ml. Since it has been shown that polymerase choice is crucial in order to overcome PCR inhibitors (1), the DyNAzyme polymerase was chosen from among several tested (data not shown). All amplifications were performed with a RotorGene 3000 (Corbett Research, Mortlake, Australia) with the following thermocycler profile: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 s, annealing at 58°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s. Fluorescence was measured once every cycle after the annealing step: FAM on channel 1 (excitation at 470 nm, detection at 510 nm) and JOE (6-carboxy-dichloro-dimethoxyfluorescein) on channel 2 (excitation at 530 nm, detection at 555 nm). The normalized fluorescence data were converted to a log scale, and the threshold was determined to calculate the threshold cycle value (Ct; the cycle at which the threshold line crosses the amplification curve). In every run, the threshold was set above the background (0.01) normalized fluorescence value.

A total of 174 non-Brucella (8, 11) and 23 Brucella isolates and strains were used to evaluate the selectivity (a combination of inclusivity and exclusivity) and detection limit of the assay (Table 2). The Brucella isolates had the following strain no.: B. melitensis biovar 1 (16 M, n = 2), B. melitensis biovar 2 (86/8/59; n = 2), B. melitensis biovar 3 (Ether; 73862 Tgb. Nr. 126087), B. abortus biovar 1 (544, n = 2), B. abortus biovar 2 (86/8/59), B. abortus biovar 3 (Tulya; Tgb. No. 1766/98), B. abortus biovar 4 (292; Tgb. No. 292/85), B. abortus biovar 5 (B3196), B. abortus biovar 6 (870; Kuh 781), B. abortus biovar 7 (63/75), B. abortus biovar 9 (C68), B. suis biovar 1 (1330; n = 2), B. suis biovar 2 (Thomsen; 589 Tgb. No. 103707), B. suis biovar 3 (686), B. suis biovar 4 (40/67), B. suis biovar 5 (513), B. ovis (2604 f.PCR), B. canis (RM6/66), and B. neotomae (NCTC 10084). In addition, DNA samples of all known biovars of B. abortus, B. melitensis, and B. suis (n = 13) were obtained from the Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Weybridge, Surrey, United Kingdom. For the non-Brucella bacteria, 4 µl of template DNA was used from material extracted by a resin-based method (Chelex) as previously described (13). The final assay was evaluated directly on colonies from blood agar plates by placing one loopful of bacteria (= one small colony) into an Eppendorf tube containing 100 µl of double-distilled water and keeping it at 95°C for 10 min before centrifuging it for 5 min at 13,000 x g. A 3-µl supernatant was used as the template in the final PCR assay.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Bacterial strains used to test the selectivity of the Brucella real-time PCR assay

The detection limit was evaluated in triplicate with purified DNA samples serially diluted in Tris-EDTA buffer (with 0.1 mM EDTA). In addition, the amplicons from the real-time PCR were verified by gel electrophoresis (12).

Among the three FAM probes tested, Bruc1 showed Ct values as low as 11 (best result), in contrast to the Bruc2 probe, which was homologous to the middle part of the amplicon and showed Ct values higher than 40. A three-step profile was found to be more efficient than a two-step profile with combined annealing and extension steps, perhaps owing to the size of the amplicon (322 bp).

Purified DNAs from all of the Brucella strains tested, as well as crude DNA and lysate of B. suis biovar 2, produced Ct values (FAM) in the range of 11 to 20 (strongly positive), while the non-Brucella DNA produced Ct values (FAM) of >40 (negative). In addition, VIC Ct values (IAC) were all <30 (i.e., no PCR inhibition). Particularly bacteria containing the per gene, such as Y. enterocolitica O:9, E. coli O157 (strains 100, 120, 239, and 455), E. hermannii (strains CCUG 21202, CCUG 21152, CCUG 26042, and CCUG 26553), V. cholerae (strains 1083/30, 531D, C-230, VC-VN-182, and 1407), and S. maltophilia (strains CECT 112 and CECT 113), gave negative responses (FAM Ct of >40) in the Brucella PCR, which indicates the specificity of the target sequence selected. Interestingly, during gel electrophoresis of all of the real-time PCR products, two of the five V. cholerae O1 strains tested (531D and C-230) produced strong bands (but no positive-fluorescence Ct values) of similar sizes but approximately 50 bp longer than the positive control fragment of B. suis biovar 1 (strain 1330). The nucleotide sequences of the fragments revealed similarity to the mating pair stabilization protein gene of V. cholerae (accession no. AAL59755).

The detection limits of the assay varied from 200 fg (approximately 40 CFU) for B. neotomae (strain NCTC 10084) and B. ovis (strain 2604 f.PCR) to 2 pg (approximately 400 CFU) for B. melitensis biovar 1 (strain 16 M), B. abortus biovars 1 (strain 544) and 5 (strain B3196), and B. suis biovars 1 (strain 1330) and 2 (strain Thomsen). The observed differences in the detection limits could most likely be attributed to the quality of the DNA template used in the PCR since the DNA samples were obtained from different sources.

It was possible to use ready-to-go PCR mixtures stored for at least 2 months at –20°C (in the dark) containing all of the reagents except the sample DNA. In diagnostic laboratories with quality assurance programs, this timesaving exercise would reduce the risk of contamination and alleviate batch, pipetting, and personal variations.

The real-time PCR assay developed allows correct identification of all Brucella species and can simplify the procedure by testing presumptive Brucella colonies taken directly from agar plates. Use of the TaqMan probe offers a specificity higher than that of gel electrophoresis, as exemplified in this work by the two V. cholerae strains (531D and C-230) that produced slightly longer nonspecific amplicons in the PCR but gave no positive fluorescence signal. In addition, this real-time PCR can substantially decrease the risk of carryover contamination.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first ready-to-go real-time Brucella PCR assay that includes an IAC (which is mandatory for quality assurance [2]), has no need for sample treatment, and is thus able to directly differentiate true-negative results from false-negative results, which are usually caused by the presence of PCR inhibitors (1, 10). The inclusion of an IAC with an irrelevant set of primers (for a Campylobacter PCR assay) has the advantage of minimal competition with the Brucella target with regard to the detection limit. The assay described is currently being adapted for testing of relevant clinical samples, and the robustness of the DNA polymerase to PCR inhibitors is being investigated.

 
This research was supported by grant 115 from the Nordic Joint Committee for Agricultural Research (N.K.J.).

We thank N. R. Jacobsen, L. Christensen, K. Vestergaard, and S. Jensen for technical assistance and S. Giese for technical support and discussions. T. Murphy of the Veterinary Laboratories Agency (Weybridge, United Kingdom) kindly provided the Brucella DNA samples.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Danish Institute for Food and Veterinary Research (DFVF), Bülowsvej 27, DK-1790 Copenhagen V, Denmark. Phone: 45-72346251. Fax: 45-72346001. E-mail: jho{at}dfvf.dk.dk.

Top Abstract Text References

 

1
1. Abu Al-Soud, W., and P. Rådström. 1998. Capacity of nine thermostable DNA polymerases to mediate DNA amplification in the presence of PCR-inhibiting samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:3748-3753.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
2. Anonymous. 2002. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of foodborne pathogens—general method specific requirements, draft international standard ISO/DIS 22174. DIN, Berlin, Germany.
3
3. Bricker, B. J. 2002. PCR as a diagnostic tool for brucellosis. Vet. Microbiol. 90:435-446.[CrossRef][Medline]
4
4. Cloeckaert, A., M. Grayon, J.-M. Verger, J.-J. Letesson, and F. Godfroid. 2000. Conservation of seven genes involved in the biosynthesis of the lipopolysaccharide O-side chain in Brucella spp. Res. Microbiol. 151:209-216.[Medline]
5
5. Garin-Bastuji, B., N. Hummel, G. Gerbier, C. Cau, R. Pouillot, M. Da Costa, and J. J. Fontaine. 1999. Nonspecific serological reactions in the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: experimental oral infection of cattle with repeated doses of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9. Vet. Microbiol. 66:223-233.[CrossRef][Medline]
6
6. Godfroid, J., and A. Käsbohrer. 2002. Brucellosis in the European Union and Norway at the turn of the twenty-first century. Vet. Microbiol. 90:135-145.[CrossRef][Medline]
7
7. Godfroid, J., C. Saegerman, V. Wellemans, K. Walravens, J. J. Letesson, A. Tibor, A. McMillan, S. Spencer, M. Sanna, D. Bakker, R. Pouillot, and B. Garin-Bastuji. 2002. How to substantiate eradication of bovine brucellosis when aspecific serological reactions occur in the course of brucellosis testing. Vet. Microbiol. 90:461-477.[CrossRef][Medline]
8
8. Hoorfar, J., P. Ahrens, and P. Rådström. 2000. Automated 5' nuclease PCR assay for identification of Salmonella enterica. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3429-3435.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. Kittelberger, R., F. Hilbink, M. F. Hansen, G. P. Ross, M. A. Joyce, S. Fenwick, J. Heesemann, H. Wolf-Watz, and K. Nielsen. 1995. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9. Part II. The use of Yersinia outer proteins for the specific detection of Yersinia enterocolitica infections in ruminants. Vet. Microbiol. 47:271-280.[CrossRef][Medline]
10
10. Lantz, P. G., B. Hahn-Hägerdal, and P. Rådström. 1994. Sample preparation methods in PCR-based detection of food pathogens. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 5:384-389.
11
11. Lübeck P. S., M. Skurnik, P. Ahrens, and J. Hoorfar. 2003. A multiplex PCR-detection assay for Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 and Brucella spp. based on the perosamine synthetase gene, p. 451-453. In M. Skurnik, J. A. Bengoechea, and K. Granfors (ed.), The genus of Yersinia. Kluwer Plenum, New York, N.Y.
12
12. Lübeck, P. S., P. Wolffs, S. L. W. On, P. Ahrens, P. Rådström, and J. Hoorfar. 2003. Toward an international standard for PCR-based detection of food-borne thermotolerant campylobacters: assay development and analytical validation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:5664-5669.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13
13. Malorny, B., J. Hoorfar, M. Hugas, A. Heuvelink, P. Fach, L. Ellerbroek, C. Bunge, C. Dorn, and R. Helmuth. 2003. Inter-laboratory diagnostic accuracy of a Salmonella specific PCR-based method. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2796:1-9.
14
14. Moreno, E., A. Cloeckaert, and I. Moriyon. 2002. Brucella evolution and taxonomy. Vet. Microbiol. 90:209-227.
15
15. Redkar, R., S. Rose, Bricker, B., and V. DelVecchio. 2001. Real-time detection of Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis and Brucella suis. Mol. Cell. Probes 15:43-52.[CrossRef][Medline]
16
16. Weynants, V., A. Tibor, P. A. Denoel, C. Saegerman, J. Godfroid, P. Thiange, and J. J. Letesson. 1996. Infection of cattle with Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 a cause of the false positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis diagnostic tests. Vet. Microbiol. 48:101-112.[CrossRef][Medline]

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2004, p. 2261-2263, Vol. 42, No. 5
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.2261-2263.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Skurnik, M., Biedzka-Sarek, M., Lubeck, P. S., Blom, T., Bengoechea, J. A., Perez-Gutierrez, C., Ahrens, P., Hoorfar, J. (2007). Characterization and Biological Role of the O-Polysaccharide Gene Cluster of Yersinia enterocolitica Serotype O:9. J. Bacteriol. 189: 7244-7253 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mukherjee, F., Jain, J., Patel, V., Nair, M. (2007). Multiple genus-specific markers in PCR assays improve the specificity and sensitivity of diagnosis of brucellosis in field animals. J Med Microbiol 56: 1309-1316 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bogdanovich, T. Articles by Hoorfar, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bogdanovich, T. Articles by Hoorfar, J.