Ananda Sen,3 Carl F. Marrs,2 and Janet R. Gilsdorf1,2*
Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0244,1 Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2029,2 Center for Statistical Consultation and Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-10703
Received 27 October 2003/ Returned for modification 16 December 2003/ Accepted 14 March 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Irrespective of the presence or absence of the capsule, the first step in the pathogenesis of both respiratory and invasive H. influenzae infections is asymptomatic colonization of the nasopharynx. H. influenzae organisms are inhaled through the upper respiratory tract and, following initial interactions with respiratory mucus (21, 49), utilize a number of adhesins on the bacterial surface to adhere to respiratory epithelial cells. Both Hib and NTHi adhere to respiratory cells by means of hemagglutinating pili (15), P5 fimbriae (2), lipo-oligosaccharide (43), H. influenzae adherence and penetration protein (Hap) (39), opacity-associated protein (OapA) (32), and Haemophilus surface fibrils (Hsf) (38). In addition to these adhesins, NTHi organisms, which are more genetically diverse than Hib (30), possess additional epithelial cell adhesins, including the high-molecular-weight (HMW) proteins HMW1 and HMW2 (40) and H. influenzae adhesin (Hia) (41), which is an allele of the Hsf of Hib (38).
Among the most extensively studied of H. influenzae adhesins, hemagglutinating pili are peritrichous, hair-like polymeric structures that protrude from the H. influenzae outer membrane (15, 42) and mediate adherence to sialic acid-containing lactosylceramide structures on epithelial cell surfaces (45). Biosynthesis of pili requires the products of five genes, hifA through hifE, located in the pilus gene hif cluster (15, 24, 47, 50). Among NTHi strains, hifA (which encodes the pilus structural gene), hifD (which encodes a pilus terminal protein), and hifE (which encodes the pilus adhesin) show considerable strain-to-strain variation in their nucleotide sequences (9, 24, 34). Among Hib strains, hifA shows sequence diversity while hifD and hifE show sequence homogeneity (15). The nucleotide sequences of hifB (which encodes a chaperone-like protein) and hifC (which encodes an assembly platform [usher] protein) are highly conserved among all H. influenzae strains (15, 24).
Recent studies of many H. influenzae strains have documented dramatic genetic variation within the hif gene region, which is located between genes homologous to pepN and purE of Escherichia coli and is flanked by dyad repeat sequences (33) that may facilitate recombination. NTHi strains exhibit insertions, deletions, duplications, and rearrangements both within and flanking the hif cluster; in some strains the entire cluster is deleted (9, 13, 24, 27, 33, 34). A subset of NTHi strains associated with conjunctivitis, the so-called H. influenzae biogroup aegyptius strains, possess a second copy of the hif cluster, located between genes homologous to pmbA and hpt genes of E. coli.
Bacterial expression of hemagglutinating pili is altered through a process called phase variation, which is mediated by slipped-strand mispairing (15), suggesting a means by which H. influenzae may rapidly adapt to changing environments. By extension, this also suggests that the presence or absence of the pilus gene cluster is important to H. influenzae in its adaptation to the environment (29).
The HMW adhesins HMW1 (125 kDa) and HMW2 (120 kDa), members of the auto-transporter family of proteins, are encoded by genes present in two separate chromosomal loci, hmw1AC and hmw2AC. hmw1A and hmw2A, which encode the adhesive molecule, show 71% identity and 80% similarity (3, 40) among NTHi strains, suggesting that they may be alleles. Recombinant E. coli strains expressing either HMW1 or HMW2, however, exhibit different binding characteristics to several human cell lines (18); HMW1 binds to sialylated glycoproteins, whereas the receptor for HMW2 is undefined (37). Recent studies report that both HMW1 and HMW2 are glycosylated (16). hmwA genes are located immediately upstream of the accessory genes hmwB, which encodes an outer membrane protein responsible for translocation of HMW1 and HMW2 across the outer membrane, and hmwC, which encodes a cytoplasmic protein that stabilizes HMW1 and HMW2 (40). HMW1B and HMW2B are 99% identical, while HMW1C and HMW2C are 97% identical (4). Previous studies have shown that 75% of NTHi strains and a few type a, e, and f strains express proteins belonging to the HMW1 and HMW2 family (35, 41).
Hia, found in NTHi strains and in some type a, e, and f strains (35), is an auto-transporter protein encoded by the 3.3-kb hia gene (5). Hia shows 72% amino acid identity and 81% similarity to the Hsf adhesins, expressed by Hib (38), suggesting they represent allelic variants. Previous studies revealed that a hia homolog is present in approximately 80% of HMW1/HMW2-deficient NTHi strains (5, 35).
To gain better understanding of the roles of H. influenzae adhesins in the pathogenesis of H. influenzae infections, we investigated the prevalences of the hifBC, hmw1A, hmw2A, hmwC, and hia genes in a collection of Hib and NTHi invasive and respiratory mucosal isolates. To assess the potential importance of these adhesins in mediating adherence to various body tissues, we stratified the strains by body site of isolation. These studies were predicated on the evolutionary principle that stochastic gain or loss of genetic material through recombination events provides a plastic population of bacteria whose members, because of their variability, are capable of rapidly adapting to environmental changes (17, 22).
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation of genomic DNA from H. influenzae. Genomic DNA was isolated from H. influenzae strains using the Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, Madison, Wis.) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
DNA gene probes. DNA probes were designed to detect conserved regions within hifB, hifC, hmwC, hmw1A, hmw 2A, hia, and pepN and are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1. All primers were synthesized at the University of Michigan Biomedical Research Core Facility and by Invitrogen (Carlsbad, Calif.). The final probes were confirmed by Southern hybridization using positive and negative controls.
|
|
PCR amplification for hifBC regions. In a standard 50-µl reaction mixture, 50 ng of H. influenzae strain Eagan genomic DNA was mixed with 20 pmol of hifB-F and hifC-R primers and 45 µl of PCR Supermix (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, Md.). The final PCR mixture contained 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM (each) deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP), and 1 U of recombinant Taq DNA polymerase along with the H. influenzae genomic DNA and primers. The amplification cycle consisted of an initial 1 min hold at 95°C followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 50°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min, followed by a final elongation step for 1 min at 72°C. The amplified PCR product of the hifBC intergenic region was digested with DraI, and the 1,191-bp fragment was used as the hifBC probe.
PCR amplification for hia, hmw1A, hmw2A, hmwC, and pepN region probes. Genomic DNA from NTHi strain 12 was used as a template for hmw1A, hmw2A, and hmwC; that from NTHi strain 11 was used as a template for hia; and that from strain Rd was used as a template for pepN. Using the PCR strategy described above, samples were incubated 5 min at 95°C for an initial denaturation step and were subjected to 30 cycles at 95°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min in a final 50-µl reaction mixture. All amplifications were performed with 1 µl of genomic DNA, a 10 mM concentration of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 5 mM MgCl2,4 U of platinum Taq polymerase, and 25 pmol of each forward and reverse primer.
PCR amplified DNA, generated using hmwC-F and hmwC-R primers, was purified using QIAquick Spin PCR purification kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, Calif.) and cloned into the plasmid TOPO vector 2.1 from Invitrogen. The recombinant plasmid DNA was prepared using a plasmid kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer's instruction and digested with EcoRI. The appropriate DNA fragment was used as a hmwC probe after gel purification.
Gel purification and labeling. Twenty microliters of the PCR products of hmw1A, hmw2A, hia, pepN, the DraI-digested region of hifBC, and the plasmid DNAs of hmwC were gel purified on 1% agarose gel with modified 1x TEA buffer (40 mM Tris-acetate, pH 8.0; 0.1 mM Na2-EDTA). Specific bands were excised and purified by using an Ultrafree-DA centrifugal filter device (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.), labeled with fluorescein, and used as DNA probes (ECF Random Prime Labeling Kit; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, N.J.).
Total DNA isolation and dot blot hybridization. Crude DNA was isolated from H. influenzae lysates and used for dot blot analysis as follows. One microliter of defrosted skim milk stock of each H. influenzae isolate was grown in microtiter plate wells in 800 µl of brain heart infusion broth supplemented with NAD and hemin by overnight incubation at 37°C (17). The microtiter plates were then centrifuged at 1,000 x g for 20 min (IEC HN-SII; International Equipment, Needham Height, Mass.). The supernatant was discarded and the pellets were suspended in 800 µl of lysis buffer (0.4 M NaOH, 10 mM EDTA). The plates were incubated at 70°C for 0.5 h and centrifuged again for 5 min. The final DNA concentrations were determined by spectrophotometry to confirm similar concentrations among DNA preparations. Eighty microliters of DNA lysate from each well was blotted onto Hybond N+ membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) with a Bio-Dot Microfiltration Apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.) and washed with 80 µl of 0.4 M NaOH. After air drying, DNA was cross-linked to the membranes by exposure to UV light for 3 min.
The dot blots were hybridized to fluorescein-labeled DNA fragments under stringent conditions (68°C). Following hybridization, membranes were washed 15 min at 68°C (2x SSC [1x SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate], 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate) and 15 min at 68°C (0.1x SSC, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate), reacted with a 1:7,000 dilution of antifluorescein antibody coupled to alkaline phosphatase to amplify the signal, and developed with ECF substrate (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) to detect chemiluminescence. Duplicate membranes were tested with each probe.
The DNA from appropriate positive and negative control H. influenzae strains were placed on each membrane. Hib strains Eagan, M43, and H. influenzae biogroup aegyptius (F3031) were used as positive controls for hifBC probes and as negative controls for hmw1A, hmw2A, hmwC, and hia probes, while NTHi strains AAr73 and AAr176 were used as negative controls for hifBC probes. NTHi strain 12, originally isolated from the middle ear fluid of a child with otitis media, is the prototype for the hmw1 and hmw2 clusters (3) and was used as a positive control for hmw1A, hmw2A, and hmwC and as a negative control for hia. NTHi strain 11, from which hia was cloned (3), was used as a positive control for hia and as negative control for hmw1A, hmw2A, and hmwC. H. influenzae strain Rd was used as a negative control for all genes examined in this study.
The signal intensity of each dot on the membranes was detected by using a STORM 860 Phosphor Imager (Storm System; Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, Calif.) and recorded in the form of intensity volume, expressed as a percentage of the positive controls after correcting for the background signal (51). Duplicate measurements were obtained on two different membranes for each probe. A strain with signal intensity above 50% of the positive control for at least one of the replicate measurements was classified as positive. Since all H. influenzae strains tested in our laboratory to date contain the pepN homolog, a pepN probe was used to normalize the quantity of DNA on the membranes. Strain samples giving intermediate or discrepant hybridization intensity results with each probe were confirmed by Southern blot hybridization or by PCR using the appropriate primers for the genes of interest (36).
Data analysis. The data presented in Table 2 were treated as counts corresponding to a three-way representation (isolate site versus strains versus presence or absence of hifBC genes). We thus performed a stratified analysis that examined the association between two variables while adjusting for the effects of others. To determine the difference in prevalence rates of hifBC genes between the Hib and NTHi strains, adjusting (stratifying) for the isolate site effect, we used Mantel-Haenszel tests for the overall prevalence both at the stratum level as well as for the combined table. Further, odds ratios were calculated at each isolate level and tested for significance. Finally, homogeneity of odds ratios across the isolates was tested. Exact P values were computed wherever appropriate.
|
|
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To examine the relative roles of H. influenzae genetic background (as determined by presence or absence of type b capsule) and environmental selection in fostering the presence of the pilus genes, we compared the hybridization of the hifBC probe to Hib and NTHi strains stratified by isolation from an otherwise sterile site (thus indicating bacterial invasion) or from the respiratory tract. Among the invasive H. influenzae isolates, the hifBC probe hybridized to 106 of the 166 (64%) type b strains and 4 of the 23 (17%) nontypeable strains. Fisher's exact test (equivalent to Mantel-Haenszel test in this case) showed P = 0.00003, indicating a highly significant difference between Hib and NTHi. Among the respiratory isolates, on the other hand, the difference between hifBC rates of hybridization to type b and nontypeable strains failed to reach significance at the 5% level (P value based on Fisher's exact test equaled 0.0922). Thus, the differences in prevalence of the hif cluster among Hib and NTHi strains appear to be related to the nature of type b organisms (which are known to be highly clonal) rather than to environmental selection. A combined Mantel-Haenszel test for the difference in prevalence of hifBC between the two strains adjusting for the isolate effect yielded a P value less than 0.0001. This overall significance is presumably attributed to the invasive isolate data which are more evenly balanced in the number of strains.
A slightly different approach to the comparative analysis is provided by the odds ratio, which essentially estimates the likelihood (odds) of finding a hifBC gene in a given strain in comparison to the others. In the invasive isolates, the odds ratio is estimated to be 8.4, indicating that the hifBC gene is about eight times more likely to be present in Hib than in NTHi strains. The associated exact 95% confidence limit of the odds ratio is [2.6, 35.1]. The corresponding estimate of the odds ratio of the hifBC gene in the respiratory isolates is 6.9, with an associated exact 95% confidence interval of [0.53, 367.4]. The extreme width of the interval in the latter case is a reflection of low numbers of Hib respiratory strains. A homogeneity test of odds ratios across the isolates did not find any significant difference (P = 0.8828).
To assess the roles of pili in colonization and in otitis media, we compared the presence of the hif cluster among NTHi strains isolated from throats of children with its presence among NTHi isolates from the middle ears of children with otitis media. The hifBC probe hybridized significantly more frequently to throat (23 of 60 [38%]) than to middle ear (10 of 50 [20%]; exact P = 0.0398) isolates, suggesting that H. influenzae carrying the hif cluster has a selective advantage in the throat compared to the middle ear space.
Prevalence of hmw1A, hmw2A, hmwC, and hia genes among H. influenzae isolates. The hmw1A, hmw2A, and hmwC probes hybridized to none of the type b strains, consistent with results from previous studies (41). Furthermore, the hia probe did not hybridize with type b strains, even though the Hia adhesin of NTHi is a homologue to the Hsf adhesin found on Hib (38). Sequence analysis of our hia probe revealed 60% homology with hsf, thus explaining its failure to hybridize with type b strains. Overall, among the 162 nontypeable isolates, 83 (51%) hybridized with hmw1A and 38 (23%) hybridized with hmw2A (Table 3). Furthermore, 52 of 162 (32%) hybridized with hmw1A and not hmw2A, whereas 7 of 162 (4%) hybridized with hmw2A and not hmw1A. A total of 31 of 162 (19%) strains hybridized with both, and 72 of 162 (44%) hybridized with neither. In addition, 78 of 162 (48%) hybridized with hmwC, and 54 of 162 (33%) hybridized to the hia probe, a somewhat higher prevalence than described previously (41). Thus, considerable variability in the presence of these genes was seen among the nontypeable strains tested.
There was no difference between hybridization of hmw1A, hmw2A, hmwC, or hia probes to invasive NTHi isolates compared to that of NTHi respiratory isolates (exact P values ranging between 0.29 and 0.5), suggesting that H. influenzae expressing the HMW or Hia adhesins is not selected either for or against during systemic invasion.
To assess the roles of HMW and Hia adhesins in throat colonization and in otitis media, we compared the prevalences of these genes among H. influenzae throat isolates to middle ear isolates. hmw1A, hmw2A, and hmwC were significantly more prevalent in middle ear isolates (one-sided exact P values based on Fisher's test are 0.0001, 0.0099, and 0.0019, respectively). There is, however, no significant difference in distribution of hia genes between throat and middle ear isolates (P = 0.15). This suggests that the HMW adhesin provides a survival advantage in the middle ear space while Hia does not offer a survival advantage in either location.
Table 4 shows the associations of the adhesin genes with each other. Ten of 162 (6%) NTHi isolates and 61 of 170 (38%) Hib isolates did not hybridize with any of the probes. The most common patterns seen with the hmw genes was hmw 1A and C positive (37 strains) and hmw1A, hmw2A, and hmwC positive (29 strains); only 7 strains had hmw2A without hmw1A, five of which did not carry hmwC and, thus, would be incapable of expressing functional HMW (4). Because the hmwC probe would be expected to hybridize to all hmw genes, our dot blot technique didn't allow us to assess the presence of complete hmw gene clusters or to localize these genes in the H. influenzae chromosome. More than a third (68 of 162, 42%) of NTHi gave evidence of hmwA and hmwC genes, suggesting the presence of a complete hmw cluster, whereas 62 of 162 (38%) had neither hmwA nor hmwC genes, suggesting the lack of a hmw cluster. Of the 62 NTHi isolates without evidence of an hmw cluster, 49 (79%) hybridized with the hia probe. A total of 13 of the 162 (8%) NTHi isolates hybridized with neither hia nor one of the hmw genes, whereas 5 (3%) hybridized with hia and at least one of the hmw genes, which contradicts previous studies that suggest hia and hmw are mutually exclusive (35, 41).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies have demonstrated the genetic variability of the H. influenzae hif gene region, which contains the hif cluster that encodes H. influenzae hemagglutinating pili. Geluk et al. (13) used Southern blotting to identify hifA, hifB, hifD, and hifE and PCR amplification to identify hifC in 83 NTHi respiratory isolates. Only 18% of the strains contained homologues of the entire hif region; the remaining genomes contained none of the hif genes. This all-or-none dichotomy was not substantiated in the study of Mhlanga-Mutangadura et al. (27), who analyzed the nucleotide sequences of the hif region PCR products from 14 H. influenzae strains. All four of the type b strains had intact hif regions, while 8 of the 10 nontypeable strains contained no hif genes; one nontypeable strain and one type f strain contained pseudo-hifA genes; a deletion of the entire hifB; and deletions in hifC, hifD, and hifE, as well as additional individual mutations. Furthermore, Read et al. (34) demonstrated the presence of hifA and hifE homologues by PCR amplification in two of five nontypeable respiratory strains. One of the five also showed a second copy of hifA, which was similar in size to the PCR product of the hifA1 that is found in a second copy of the hif cluster described in H. influenzae biogroup aegyptius strains associated with conjunctivitis and Brazilian purpuric fever. Finally, Rodriguez et al. (35) showed that 37% of type a H. influenzae strains and 8% of type e H. influenzae strains hybridized to hifA, hifB, hifC, hifD, and hifE probes and 82% of type f H. influenzae strains hybridized with hifA, hifC, hifD, and hifE probes, but none hybridized with the hifB probe, demonstrating the genetic conservation described previously with type f strains (7, 9, 26, 31). Thus, the hif gene region is highly variable, particularly among nontypeable strains and the hif gene cluster, when present, is not intact in some H. influenzae strains.
To determine the presence of the hif cluster among a large number of Hib and NTHi isolates, we performed dot blot hybridization studies utilizing a probe that spanned the highly conserved hifB and hifC genes of this cluster. Our results show that the hifBC region is significantly more prevalent among type b strains than nontypeable strains, irrespective of whether these strains were isolated from respiratory samples or from invasive samples, suggesting that the high prevalence of pilus genes in type b strains is related to their clonal population structure (30) rather than to environmentally induced selection (28) during invasion. In addition to these studies of the hif genes, other studies have shown that pili are expressed more commonly in colonizing Hib isolates than invasive isolates (23, 42), demonstrating the known phase variation of pilus expression (14). In the systemic circulation, Hib expressing pili may be selected against by virtue of their increased susceptibility to phagocytosis (44).
Our results also show increased prevalence of hifBC among NTHi isolated from throat samples compared to those from the middle ears of children with otitis media, consistent with a model of hemagglutinating pili playing a larger role in H. influenzae nasopharyngeal colonization than in the establishment of infection in the middle ear and corroborate the findings of Krasan et al. (20). These findings differ from the results of Geluk et al. (13), who showed no difference in presence of the pilus gene cluster among H. influenzae isolates from patients with otitis media and from healthy carriers. The study by Geluk et al. (13), however, was compromised by small numbers of H. influenzae isolates, and the carrier strains were isolated from healthy adults. Our study tested a much larger number of isolates, and the carrier strains were isolated from throat samples from both healthy children and individuals with a respiratory infection.
It is possible that some of our strains contained hifA, hifD, or hifE genes, or their fragments, in the absence of hifB and hifC; if such were the case, our estimates of the prevalence of any hif gene would be artificially low. Such organisms, however, would not be capable of expressing functional pili (25, 46, 50) and, thus, would be similar to strains lacking the hif cluster in their susceptibility to natural selection. Likewise, the dot blot hybridization we employed could not distinguish between the presence of complete or partial hifB and hifC. Based on the findings of other investigators (13, 27), the probability that hifBC positive strains represent incomplete hif clusters is relatively small.
Prevalence studies of hmw and hia genes have shown their presence in 80 and 20%, respectively, of nontypeable strains (41). Neither of these genes have been reported in type b strains (3), but hmw was seen in 26% of type a strains, 8% of type e strains, and 5% of type f strains, while hia was seen in 74% of type a, 92% of type e, and 95% of type f strains (35).
In testing hmw prevalence among NTHi strains, St. Geme et al. (41) used a probe from the 5' region of hmw1A which is highly conserved with, and cross-hybridizes with, hmw2A. In contrast, our study used hmw1A and hmw2A probes from the highly diverse 3' regions and did not demonstrate cross-hybridization (data not shown). In addition, we used a probe from hmwC, which is highly conserved (96%) between hmw1 and hmw2. Our results describe variability in the presence of these genes, with NTHi possessing either hmw1 or hmw2 or both or neither.
The prevalence of hmw1 and hmw2 among nontypeable strains in our study (56%) was somewhat lower than that described in the study by St. Geme (79.7%) (41). This difference may reflect the source of the strains, as our study used primarily NTHi strains from middle ear and throat cultures, while the study of St. Geme used primarily invasive nontypeable strains. We were, however, unable to detect a difference in the prevalences of hmw1 and/or hmw2 among NTHi invasive (48%) and noninvasive (55%) strains.
An advantage of the probes used in our study is their ability to distinguish between the prevalence of hmw1A and hmw2A genes, which appear to be alleles; about half of the nontypeable strains hybridized with the hmw1A probe, and a quarter hybridized with the hmw2A probe; about a fifth of strains hybridized with both; and almost half hybridized with neither. In addition, a third of the NTHi strains hybridized with hmw1 but not hmw2, and very few hybridized with hmw2 but not hmw1. These results suggest duplication and heterogeneity of hmw genes that is reminiscent of the situation with the pilus gene cluster in H. influenzae biogroup aegyptius strains (as well as a few other NTHi strains) in which two copies of the hif gene clusters may be present, although neither copy is necessarily complete (34). Duplication of hmwA may provide a survival advantage to the organisms, although the low number of strains carrying hmw2A without hmw1A raises the question of the function of HMW2A. HMW1 mediates binding to a sialic acid containing glycoprotein (37), and the receptor characteristics of HMW2 are unknown, although RGD-mediated adherence to the integrin CR3 has been suggested (48). H. influenzae strains carrying a duplication of hif clusters (which we were unable to detect with the methods used in this study), each with a phase variable hifA, assures a higher probability of pilus expression, since nonexpression would require both hifA genes to be in the "off" configuration. The hmw1A and hmw2A genes, on the other hand, appear to differ in function (18). While hmw1A and hmw2A contain a series of seven base pair repeats (11) that allows phase variation of their expression from weak to strong, the effect of this variation on adherence is unclear, as H. influenzae organisms that carry the hmw genes but do not exhibit hmw-mediated adherence have not been widely described (35).
Of the 52 strains that hybridized with neither hmw1A nor hmw2A, 10 hybridized with hifC. This suggests that these strains possess hmw1A or hmw2A with deletions in the variable regions, do not possess these genes at all, or may possess hmwA genes that are variable enough from either hmw1A or hmw2A that they do not hybridize with the probes. Ongoing studies in our laboratory will address this question. van Schilfgaarde (48) et al. describe an H. influenzae strain that carries an allele of hmw whose genetic sequences and gene product antigenicity differ from those of hmw1A and hmw2A. The full scope of genetic differences in hmwA genes in H. influenzae awaits sequence analyses of these genes from a variety of strains.
Previous studies have found that the presence of hia and the hmw genes are mutually exclusive in both NTHi (41) and type a, e, and f strains (35), although an otitis media strain has been reported to carry both hmw and hia genes (20). In our study, we identified a small number of NTHi strains (5 of 162 [3%]) that hybridized to the hia probe and to at least one of the hmw region probes. These findings, along with the variability in presence of hmw1A, hmw2A, and hmwC and the genetic variability of the hif cluster (13, 27, 34), underscore the high genetic variability of Hia genes.
In summary, the results of this study repeat the growing theme of significant genetic variability in H. influenzae virulence genes, particularly among NTHi strains, which are less clonal in their population structure than type b strains. This variability, facilitated by genetic recombination, appears to allow H. influenzae to survive in various environmental niches. In addition, these results suggest that hemagglutinating pili play a more important role in H. influenzae nasopharyngeal colonization than in acute otitis media, whereas the HMW adhesins may be virulence factors for acute otitis media.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Present address: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8034. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|