Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2004, p. 3272-3280, Vol. 42, No. 7
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.7.3272-3280.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Chang Jin Kim,2,
Suk Kyung Woo,1 Tae Seung Kim,3 Dong Jun Jeong,2 Myung Soon Kim,1 Sunwoo Lee,1 Hyun Sill Cho,1 and Sungwhan An1*
Research and Development, GenomicTree, Inc., Taejon,1 Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Chonan,2 Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea3
Received 22 September 2003/ Returned for modification 14 December 2003/ Accepted 15 March 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
At present, eight main strategies are used to detect and type various HPVs. All of these strategies have advantages and disadvantages, depending on their application (5, 10, 26). Several consensus PCR systems have been conveniently used in several large-scale epidemiological studies (9, 10, 19). However, consensus PCR products do not provide practical information for genotyping (26). Meanwhile, because it is difficult to design compatible multiple primer sets for genotype-specific PCR, the maximum number of HPVs detectable in a single assay is relatively limited (17). Although recent work has reported on HPV DNA microarray systems capable of typing multiple HPV genotypes (1, 4, 12, 16, 18), they still have technical limitations.
To overcome the existing limitations of the HPV detection and genotyping methodologies available, we report on an improved PCR-based HPV DNA microarray. The detection limit, reproducibility, and specificity of the HPV DNA microarray were estimated. To assess the applicability of the HPV DNA microarray in clinical practice, we performed DNA microarray hybridizations with samples from 39 Korean patients with tonsillar squamous carcinoma.
|
|
|---|
Construction of the HPV type-specific probes. Type-specific 30-bp sequences of probes specific for HPV types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 34, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 51, 52, 54, 56, and 58 were selected as reported previously (13). The DNA sequences of probes specific for HPV types 59, 62, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, and 72 were obtained from a public HPV sequence database (http://hpv-web.lanl.gov/stdgen/virus/hpv), and their probe sequences were designed by multiple-sequence alignment analysis with the CLUSTAL X (version 1.81) program. The 30-bp type-specific probe sequences are listed in Table 1.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. The 30-bp sequences of the HPV type-specific probes
|
180-bp positive control probe, the sequence of which corresponds to the L1 region that is highly conserved among most known types of genital HPVs, was amplified with primers MY11 and GP6+ from the genomic DNA of the Caski (HPV-16 positive) and HeLa (HPV-18 positive) cell lines and cloned into the pGEM T Easy vector.
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Protocol for HPV-specific probe synthesis by oligonucleotide shuffling (25). Oligonucleotides were synthesized by the standard phosphoramidite method. Equal amounts (5 µg each) of two complementary oligonucleotides corresponding to 27 HPV probes were combined and subsequently heated at 100°C for 3 min. The denatured oligonucleotides were left at room temperature for 1 h to allow annealing. Details are described in Materials and Methods.
|
550 bp of human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) cDNA, was amplified from the genomic DNA of Caski cells by reverse transcription-PCR with GAPDH-specific primers GAPDH-LEFT and GAPDH-RIGHT. To use GAPDH cDNA as an indicator of the adequacy of PCR for the amplification of HPV DNA by MYH-PCR, we added sequences specific for the MY09 and MY11 primers to both ends of the GAPDH cDNA. The GAPDH cDNA clone carrying the MY09 and MY11 primer sequences was cloned into the pGEM T Easy vector. A negative control probe (180 bp) carrying a partial Escherichia coli lacZ gene of the pGEM T Easy vector was amplified from the multiple-cloning site of the pGEM T Easy vector. The standard PCR for preparation of the HPV DNA microarray was simply performed with the pSP6 and pT7 primer sets. The PCR mixture (50 µl) contained 2.5 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, primers pSP6 and pT7 (25 pmol each), 1x PCR buffer, and 5 U of Taq polymerase (Solgent Co., Taejon, South Korea). The amplification steps were as follows: 95°C for 10 min and 30 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min. This was followed by a final extension for 10 min. PCR was performed in a Primus-HP thermal cycler (MWG Biotechnology, Ebersberg, Germany). All the primer sequences used for the PCR are listed in Table 2.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. PCR primers used in this study
|
Design of HPV DNA microarray. Twenty-seven HPV-specific probes, GAPDH cDNA-specific probes, HPV DNA-positive control probes, and negative control probes were printed on DNA microarray slides with a robotic microspotting microarrayer (OmniGrid II; GeneMachine, Ann Arbor, Mich.). All amplified probes were dissolved in 10 µl of 50% dimethyl sulfoxide (AMRESCO) at final concentrations of 200 to 240 ng/µl. As shown in Fig. 2, the average size of the spots was 250 µm. Amine-coated GAPS II slides (Corning Co., Corning, N.Y.) were used for the microarray.
![]() View larger version (46K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Microarray design for HPV genotyping. (A) Eight-well platform hybridization reaction chamber. Each well contains 84 probes corresponding to the PCR control, the HPV-positive control, the HPV-negative control, and type-specific probes. (B) Schematic diagram of the HPV DNA microarray probe positions. GAPDH cDNA, HPV-positive controls (P.C), and HPV-negative controls (N.C) were spotted on the center of the slide. Each HPV type-specific probe was printed on the both sides, as shown, and all probes were printed in duplicate.
|
To determine the HPV genotype, the HPV DNA microarray was imaged with an Axon 4000B scanner (Axon Instruments, Union City, Calif.) and image analysis was performed. The signal intensities were measured and analyzed by using GenePix Pro (version 4.0) software. The HPV genotype was determined by showing that a probe specific for a given HPV type displayed a reliable signal. We considered 55% pixels in a spot showing a signal 1.5-fold higher than that of the local background as a reliable signal.
Test of HPV DNA microarray specificity.
To test the specificities of the HPV DNA-specific probes, we performed HPV DNA microarray hybridizations with the type-specific probe clones labeled with fluorescent Cy5-dUTP. Twenty-seven HPV type-specific probes were cloned into a TA site of a different cloning vector, TOPO pCR2.1 (Invitrogen, Breda, The Netherlands). One nanogram (
2.33 x 108 copies) of each cloned HPV probe was amplified with primers TOPO-LEFT and TOPO-RIGHT, together with 10 pg of the plasmid containing the GAPDH cDNA-specific probe, in the presence of Cy5-dUTP. Each product was independently hybridized onto an array of the 27 immobilized HPV-specific probes, and the hybridization results were evaluated by scanning the microarrays.
Test of HPV DNA microarray reproducibility. To examine the consistency of MYH-PCR-mediated microarray hybridization, we performed a standard MYH-PCR in replicates in the presence of Cy5-dUTP using 1 ng of genomic DNA from a Caski cell (HPV-16 positive). Each 20% volume of the amplified products was hybridized on the HPV DNA microarray. Data are represented as the mean intensities of positive signals, with standard deviations, from three independent experiments.
Detection limit of HPV DNA microarray. To assess the detection limit of the HPV DNA microarray, we performed a serial dilution test with plasmid DNA containing cloned HPV-16. The plasmid copy numbers were calculated from optical density measurements, and dilution series containing 1011 to 100 copies of HPV DNA were made. The standard PCR mixture contained 10 pg of the plasmid with the GAPDH cDNA-specific probe, 2 ng of HPV-negative C33A genomic DNA, Cy5-dUTP, and a serial diluent of the plasmid with the probe for HPV-16 in order to mimic the complex nucleic acid environment present during amplification of genomic DNA. After amplification, each 20% volume of PCR product was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis and hybridization by the HPV DNA microarray.
Statistical analysis.
Pearson's
2 test was used to compare the correlation of the presence of HPV with the grade of differentiation, risk factors, and malignancy by the Excel program (Microsoft, Redmond, Wash.). Differences with P values of <0.01 were regarded as significant.
|
|
|---|
To evaluate the specificity of the HPV type-specific probes, we performed HPV DNA microarray hybridization with PCR amplicons from plasmids containing probes for the 27 HPV types. As shown in Fig. 3, all HPV-specific probes hybridized specifically to the corresponding targets of each of the HPV genotypes, and no cross-hybridization with other HPV types was observed. The hybridization signal intensities varied due to slight differences in probe sequences and amounts of PCR amplicons. Nonetheless, assignment to a genotype was not significantly affected.
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Specificities of the type-specific probes for the 27 HPV types amplified from plasmids. (A) Hybridization results with high-risk type-specific probes; (B) hybridization results with low-risk type-specific probes. Each HPV type is indicated at the bottom.
|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Detection limit and reproducibility of the HPV DNA microarray. (A) Agarose gel electrophoresis of the MYH-PCR products with a serial dilution of the plasmid with the HPV-16-specific probe. Ten microliters of each 50-µl PCR product was separated on a 1.0% agarose gel. The input copy numbers of the plasmid with the HPV-16-specific probe are as follows in the indicated lanes: M, 1-kb ladder; 1, 1010 copies; 2, 109 copies; 3, 108 copies; 4, 107 copies; 5, 106 copies; 6, 105 copies; 7, 104 copies; 8, 103 copies; 9, 102 copies; 10, 10 copies; 11, 1 copy. (B) HPV DNA microarray hybridization results with the amplicon obtained by MYH-PCR of the plasmid with the HPV-16-specific probe. Ten microliters of the 50-µl PCR products derived from 105 to 100 copies were hybridized with HPV DNA on the microarray for 2 h at 55°C. The starting plasmid copy number is shown at the bottom. (C) Standard curves of signal intensities for HPV-16 with serial dilutions of 106 to 100 copies. Linear regression was based on the titration series for the plasmid with the HPV-16-specific probe, and each curve is based on the average of three replicates. (D) Reproducibility of the HPV DNA microarray. Three independent experiments were performed with the genomic DNA of Caski cells. The mean ± standard deviation was calculated from the signal intensity of each probe at 635 nm. Each probe is indicated at the bottom: GAPDH, PCR control; Positive, HPV-positive control; HPV-16, HPV-16-specific probe.
|
HPV DNA microarray analysis with cell lines. To address the applicability of the HPV DNA microarray, we carried out HPV DNA microarray hybridization with HPV-positive and -negative cell lines. The most representative HPV-positive cell lines, SiHa (HPV-16 positive; 1 to 10 copies per cell), HeLa (HPV-18 positive; 10 to 50 copies/cell), and Caski (HPV-16 positive; 60 to 600 copies/cell) cells, were examined. The results of the PCR and hybridization images with these cell lines are shown in Fig. 5. The MYH-PCR was performed in the presence of 1 ng of each template DNA, and the 20% volumes of the PCR products were separated on an agarose gel (Fig. 5A). The HPV-negative A549 and C33A cell lines showed no HPV DNA on the gel. The amounts of the PCR products for the HeLa and Caski cell lines are dependent on the viral copy number, while we did not observe any significant PCR product from SiHa cells carrying HPV at low copy numbers. The same amounts of PCR products were hybridized with the HPV DNA microarray (Fig. 5B). Positive signals appeared for the PCR control, the positive control, and the type-specific probes, as expected. We found that the PCR products of the SiHa and Caski cell genomic DNAs specifically hybridized to the HPV-16-specific probes and the PCR product of the HeLa cell genomic DNA hybridized to the HPV-18-specific probes. Hybridization signals were recorded only for the PCR controls for HPV-negative cell lines. The signal intensities of the HPV type-specific probes were related to the HPV copy number present in the cell lines and closely matched the PCR results.
![]() View larger version (51K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. HPV genotyping results with the cell lines. (A) Agarose gel electrophoresis of the amplified products from the cell lines. Ten microliters of each 50-µl PCR product was separated on a 1.0% agarose gel. Lanes: M, 1-kb ladder; 1, A549 cells; 2, C33A cells; 3, SiHa cells; 4, HeLa cells; 5, Caski cells; 6, PCR control. (B) Ten microliters of each 50-µl PCR product was hybridized with the HPV DNA microarray at 55°C for 2 h. HPV-negative cell lines A549 and C33A showed hybridization signals with the PCR controls only. HPV-positive hybridization signals were shown with the SiHa (HPV-16 positive), HeLa (HPV-18 positive), and Caski (HPV-16 positive) cell lines. The cell lines are indicated at the top, and the HPV types are indicated at the bottom.
|
2 test (P < 0.01) to determine the correlation of HPV infection with malignancy, the grade of differentiation, and two risk factors (Table 3). The results revealed that the presence of HPV showed no significant correlation with histology (P = 0.603), smoking (P = 0.43), or drinking of alcohol (P = 0.04), while the presence of HPV was significantly correlated with malignancy (P = 0.001). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Correlation of HPV prevalence with clinical data in tonsillar carcinomasa
|
|
|
|---|
We chose the hypervariable region within the L1 genes of the 27 HPV types for use as type-specific probes for HPV genotyping and synthesized 30-bp oligonucleotides whose sequences were specific for the 27 types. All oligonucleotides selected contained more than six mismatches with the corresponding regions of the other HPVs. Although a high copy number, equal to 108 copies of the HPV-specific probe on the plasmid used as the template, was used for the PCR, a signal derived from cross-hybridization was not observed. This result indicates that even high yields of HPV DNA from clinical samples will not induce cross-hybridization. The chance of cross-hybridization in assays with cervical swab specimens and other types of clinical samples can thus be ignored. We also measured the detection limit of the HPV DNA microarray. HPV DNA microarray hybridization with the same amount of starting template showed a higher detection limit than MYH-PCR alone. In addition, we tested the reproducibilities of the HPV DNA microarray experiments. The relative standard deviations of positive signals for each probe were found to be within 10% of the mean values. This result indicates that the hybridization results showed a high degree of reproducibility.
The preclinical performance of the HPV DNA microarray was evaluated by testing the cell lines A549 (HPV negative), C33A (HPV negative), SiHa (HPV-16), HeLa (HPV-18 positive), and Caski (HPV-16 positive). In the microarray hybridization experiments with HPV-positive cell lines, hybridization signals appeared for each known type of HPV probe and HPV-positive controls, while HPV-negative cell lines did not show any positive hybridization signal with the type-specific probes. The signal intensities of the type-specific probes are related to the HPV copy number present in the cells. This result indicates that the HPV DNA microarray is able to determine the relative viral loads by the differences in hybridization signals.
On the basis of the results obtained with the HPV DNA microarray and the different cell lines, we examined the HPV DNA microarray in clinical practice. We performed HPV genotyping with 34 samples of nonmalignant tissues and 39 samples of malignant tissues from 39 Korean patients with tonsillar squamous carcinoma. It is known that the frequency of HPV identified in patients with head and neck cancer varies widely (2 to 76%), depending on clinical preparation of the patients, the materials and methods used for analysis, as well as the number of cases included (6, 20, 21, 24). In this work, HPV DNA was found in 25 (64.1%) of the 39 carcinoma tissue samples. Recently, an increasing number of reports have shown that among all head and neck carcinomas the high-risk HPV type HPV-16 is the most frequent HPV type detected in tonsillar carcinomas (45 to 70%) (20-22). Our data also showed that the most frequent HPV type in tonsillar carcinomas is HPV-16. In addition, we have analyzed the correlation of the HPV infection status with malignancy, the grade of differentiation, and two risk factors, including smoking and drinking. The results showed that the presence of HPV is not correlated with the grade of differentiation or risk factors, while it was closely correlated with malignancy, as shown in Table 3. Our results support the hypothesis that the presence of HPV is closely associated with tonsillar carcinomas. In the HPV DNA microarray hybridization experiments with clinical samples, we did not observe any false-positive or -negative signals compared with the results of detection by PCR under our experimental conditions. Because the use of an extremely sensitive and reliable method is required for the diagnosis of HPV infection in clinical practice, the use of the HPV DNA microarray technology has distinct advantages.
In conclusion, we developed a microarray-based system for HPV genotyping. Our data demonstrate that HPV DNA microarray analysis coupled with MYH-PCR can be applied to HPV detection and genotyping. This diagnostic tool will undoubtedly be useful for the clinical diagnosis of HPV infection and large-scale epidemiological studies.
T.O. and C.K. contributed equally to this work. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»