Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2004, p. 3306-3308, Vol. 42, No. 7
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.7.3306-3308.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Serotypes and Genotypes of Erythromycin-Resistant Group B Streptococci in Korea
Young Uh,1* In Ho Jang,1 Gyu Yel Hwang,1 Mi Kyung Lee,1 Kap Jun Yoon,1 and Hyo Youl Kim2
Department of Laboratory Medicine,1
Department of Infectious Disease, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, South Korea2
Received 6 January 2004/
Returned for modification 15 February 2004/
Accepted 26 March 2004

ABSTRACT
Among 78 erythromycin-resistant group B streptococcus (GBS)
isolates from Korea,
ermB was detected in 58 (74.4%),
mefA was
detected in 14 (17.9%), and
ermTR was detected in 6 (7.7%).
The most prevalent serotypes of erythromycin-resistant GBS were
V (detected in 34 isolates [43.6%]) and III (detected in 33
isolates [42.3%]). All serotype V erythromycin-resistant GBS
harbored the
ermB gene.

TEXT
Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococcus [GBS]) is a
well-known cause of invasive infections in neonates and pregnant
women. It has increasingly been recognized as a significant
pathogen in nonpregnant adults, particularly in elderly persons
and persons with significant underlying diseases (
9,
19). For
treatment or prevention of GBS infections, erythromycin and
clindamycin therapy are recommended alternatives for patients
who are allergic to ß-lactam agents (
3). In the past,
GBS was reported to be susceptible to erythromycin and clindamycin
(
2). However, recent studies have shown that changes in the
susceptibility of GBS to erythromycin and clindamycin have been
substantial, although rates of resistance to these agents have
differed according to geographical variation and different investigators
(
1,
3,
5,
15,
18,
22). Serotyping has been used as an epidemiological
tool to explain GBS infections because the distribution of GBS
serotypes is associated with patient type and the site of infection
and the prevalent serotype may also change with time (
4,
13,
14,
20). Over the past decade, several investigators have reported
that an increasing proportion of GBS disease is due to serotype
V (
1,
4,
8,
21). In addition, several reports have documented
an association between macrolide resistance and GBS serotype
V (
4,
7,
10,
20). The aim of this study was to elucidate the
relationship between genotypes and serotypes of macrolide-resistant
GBS isolates in a Korean population.
The GBS isolates used in this study were collected between January 1990 and December 2000 at Wonju Christian Hospital, a 1,000-bed teaching hospital in South Korea. Multiple isolates from the same patient were avoided. The isolates were identified by conventional methods and by latex agglutination assay (Streptex; Murex Biotech Ltd., Dartford, England). The strains were stored in brain heart infusion broth plus 20% glycerol at 70°C until they were studied. The frozen isolates of GBS were thawed, inoculated onto a 5% sheep blood agar plate, and incubated at 35°C overnight. Three hundred eight pure isolates of GBS obtained from three consecutive subcultures were subjected to susceptibility testing, serotyping, and PCR. Susceptibility to penicillin G, erythromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline, ce ftriaxone (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, Mo.), vancomycin (Daewoong Lilly, Seoul, Korea), and chloramphenicol (Chongkundang, Seoul, Korea) was tested by the agar dilution method (16). Serotyping was done with hemolytic streptococcus group B typing sera (Denka Seiken Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The typing sera used in this study were Ia, Ib, II, III, IV, and V. The presence of ermA, ermB, ermC, ermTR, and mefA resistance genes were determined as previously described (12, 17).
During the study period, neither the clindamycin-resistant GBS nor the erythromycin-resistant GBS existed until 1993 or 1995, respectively. Of the 78 erythromycin-resistant (intermediate or resistant) isolates of GBS, 65 (83.3%) were resistant to clindamycin. Of the 87 clindamycin-resistant (intermediate or resistant) isolates, 65 (74.7%) were also resistant to erythromycin. In the most recent studies performed in Western countries, the rate of resistance to erythromycin ranged from 4 to 25% and the rate of resistance to clindamycin was close to or less than that of resistance to erythromycin (1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 18, 19). Our results show resistance to clindamycin to be more common than resistance to erythromycin, and similar results were described in southern Taiwan (13). Although the reasons for such a discrepancy between different continents are not clear, the distribution of macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) resistance genes and the frequency of the isolation of serotypes of GBS may be major contributing factors.
The GBS serotypes, in order of decreasing frequency, were III (39.0%), Ib (26.3%), V (14.6%), Ia (8.8%), II (1.6%), and IV (1.3%). Of the 308 GBS isolates, 91.6% were typeable (Table 1). Serotypes V and IV did not exist before 1996 and 1999, respectively. The distribution of GBS serotypes has changed over time. The results of this study showed that the proportions of serotype IV, serotype V, and nontypeable (NT) strains were increasing, that the proportion of serotype Ib isolates was decreasing, and that the proportion of serotype III isolates remained unchanged. The rates of resistance to erythromycin found among our serotypes, in decreasing order, were 76% (V), 50% (IV), 28% (III), 20% (II), 19% (NT), 4% (Ia), and 2% (Ib). These results were consistent with those of other reports (11, 15, 21), suggesting a relationship between erythromycin resistance and serotype. In contrast, Ko et al. (13) reported that serotype Ib isolates had a lower rate of susceptibility to erythromycin than did serotype Ia, III, or V isolates. The clindamycin resistance rates of our serotype Ia and Ib isolates were higher than erythromycin resistance rates for these isolates, while erythromycin and clindamycin resistance rates were nearly equal for isolates of the other serotypes. The high rates of resistance to erythromycin, clindamycin, and tetracycline among GBS strains in this study has limited the value of these antibiotics as prophylaxes for high-risk populations or in treatment of GBS infections in Korea.
The distribution of MLS
B resistance genes of GBS is influenced
by geographical variation and serotypes (
3,
6,
11,
21). The
predominant MLS
B resistance gene of GBS was
ermB in Spain (
3),
France (
11), and Germany (
21), whereas
ermTR was prevalent in
Canada (
6). In United States, the
mefA and
ermB genes were detected
with equal frequencies (
7). Among the 78 erythromycin-resistant
strains examined in this study (Table
2),
ermB was detected
in 58 (74.4%),
mefA was detected in 14 (17.9%), and
ermTR was
detected in 6 (7.7%). The most prevalent serotypes of erythromycin-resistant
GBS isolates were V (detected in 34 isolates [43.6%]) and III
(detected in 33 isolates [42.3%]). Of special note, all serotype
V erythromycin-resistant isolates harbored the
ermB gene. There
was no significant change in genotype frequency during the study
period (Table
3).
Further molecular epidemiological studies are needed to determine
whether the increase in numbers of
ermB-positive isolates is
due to clonal spread or to an increased number of patients with
GBS or is the result of the introduction of polyclonal resistant
strains.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Ilsan-dong 162, Wonju, Kangwon-do, South Korea. Phone: 82-33-741-1592. Fax: 82-33-731-0506. E-mail:
u931018{at}wonju.yonsei.ac.kr.


REFERENCES
1 - Andrews, J. I., D. J. Diekema, S. K. Hunter, P. R. Rhomberg, M. A. Pfaller, R. N. Jones, and G. V. Doern. 2000. Group B streptococci causing neonatal blood stream infection: antimicrobial susceptibility and serotyping results from SENTRY centers in the Western Hemisphere. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 183:859-862.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Baker, C. J., B. J. Webb, and F. F. Barrett. 1976. Antimicrobial susceptibility of group B streptococci isolated from a variety of clinical sources. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 10:128-131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Betriu, C., E. Culebras, M. Gómez, I. Rodríguez-Avial, B. A. Sánchez, M. C. Ágreda, and J. J. Picazo. 2003. Erythromycin and clindamycin resistance and telithromycin susceptibility in Streptococcus agalactiae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1112-1114.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Blumberg, H. M., D. S. Stephens, M. Modansky, M. Erwin, J. Elliot, R. R. Facklam, A. Schuchat, W. Baughman, and M. M. Farley. 1996. Invasive group B streptococcal disease: the emergence of serotype V. J. Infect. Dis. 173:365-373.[Medline]
5 - Croak, A., G. Abate, K. Goodrum, and M. Modrzakowski. 2003. Predominance of serotype V and frequency of erythromycin resistance in Streptococcus agalactiae in Ohio. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 188:1148-1150.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - de Azavedo, J. C., M. McGavin, C. Duncan, D. E. Low, and A. McGeer. 2001. Prevalence and mechanisms of macrolide resistance in invasive and noninvasive group B streptococcus isolates from Ontario, Canada. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:3504-3508.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Diekema, D. J., J. I. Andrews, H. Huynh, P. R. Rhomberg, S. R. Doktor, J. Beyer, V. D. Shortridge, R. K. Flamm, R. N. Jones, and M. A. Pfaller. 2003. Molecular epidemiology of macrolide resistance in neonatal bloodstream isolates of group B streptococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:2659-2661.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Elliott, J. A., K. D. Farmer, and R. R. Facklam. 1998. Sudden increase in isolation of group B streptococci, serotype V, is not due to emergence of a new pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2115-2116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Farley, M. M. 2001. Group B streptococcal disease in nonpregnant adults. Clin. Infect. Dis. 33:556-561.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Fernandez, M., M. E. Hickman, and C. J. Baker. 1998. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of group B streptococci isolated between 1992 and 1996 from patients with bacteremia or meningitis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:1517-1519.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Fitoussi, F., C. Loukil, I. Gros, O. Clermont, P. Mariani, S. Bonacorsi, I. Le Thomas, D. Deforche, and E. Bingen. 2001. Mechanisms of macrolide resistance in clinical group B streptococci isolated in France. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1889-1891.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Kataja, J., P. Huovinen, M. Skurnik, the Finnish Study Group for Antimicrobial Resistance, and H. Seppälä. 1999. Erythromycin resistance genes in group A streptococci in Finland. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:48-52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Ko, W. C., H. C. Lee, L. R. Wang, C. T. Lee, A. J. Liu, and J. J. Wu. 2001. Serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility of group B Streptococcus over an eight-year period in southern Taiwan. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 20:334-339.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 - Lee, K., J. W. Shin, Y. Chong, and H. Mikamo. 2000. Trends in serotypes and antimicrobial susceptibility of group B streptococci isolated in Korea. J. Infect. Chemother. 6:93-97.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 - Lin, F.-Y., P. H. Azimi, L. E. Weisman, J. B. Philips, J. Regan, P. Clark, G. G. Rhoads, J. Clemens, J. Troendle, E. Pratt, R. A. Brenner, and V. Gill. 2000. Antibiotic susceptibility profiles for group B streptococci isolated from neonates, 1995-1998. Clin. Infect. Dis. 31:76-79.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 - National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2003. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testingthirteenth informational supplement. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
17 - Sutcliffe, J., T. Grebe, A. Tait-Kamradt, and L. Wondrack. 1996. Detection of erythromycin-resistant determinants by PCR. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2562-2566.[Abstract]
18 - Traub, W. H., and B. Leonhard. 1997. Comparative susceptibility of clinical group A, B, C, F, and G ß-hemolytic streptococcal isolates to 24 antimicrobial drugs. Chemotherapy 43:10-20.[Medline]
19 - Tyrrell, G. J., L. D. Senzilet, J. S. Spika, D. A. Kertesz, M. Alagaratnam, M. Lovgren, J. A. Talbot, and the Sentinel Health Unit Surveillance System Site Coordinators. 2000. Invasive disease due to group B streptococcal infection in adults: results from Canadian, population-based, active laboratory surveillance study1996. J. Infect. Dis. 182:168-173.[CrossRef][Medline]
20 - Uh, Y., I. H. Jang, G. Y. Hwang, K. J. Yoon, and W. Song. 2001. Emerging erythromycin resistance among group B streptococci in Korea. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 20:52-54.[CrossRef][Medline]
21 - von Both, U., M. Ruess, U. Mueller, K. Fluegge, A. Sander, and R. Berner. 2003. A serotype V clone is predominant among erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus agalactiae isolates in a southwestern region of Germany. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:2166-2169.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22 - Wu, J.-J., K.-Y. Lin, P.-R. Hsueh, J.-W. Liu, H.-I. Pan, and S.-M. Sheu. 1997. High incidence of erythromycin-resistant streptococci in Taiwan. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:844-846.[Abstract]
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2004, p. 3306-3308, Vol. 42, No. 7
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.7.3306-3308.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Gherardi, G., Imperi, M., Baldassarri, L., Pataracchia, M., Alfarone, G., Recchia, S., Orefici, G., Dicuonzo, G., Creti, R.
(2007). Molecular Epidemiology and Distribution of Serotypes, Surface Proteins, and Antibiotic Resistance among Group B Streptococci in Italy. J. Clin. Microbiol.
45: 2909-2916
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
von Both, U., Buerckstuemmer, A., Fluegge, K., Berner, R.
(2005). Heterogeneity of Genotype-Phenotype Correlation among Macrolide-Resistant Streptococcus agalactiae Isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
49: 3080-3082
[Abstract]
[Full Text]