JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michelow, I. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Michelow, I. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, R. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2004, p. 3339-3341, Vol. 42, No. 7
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.7.3339-3341.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Diagnostic Utility and Clinical Significance of Naso- and Oropharyngeal Samples Used in a PCR Assay To Diagnose Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infection in Children with Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Ian C. Michelow,1 Kurt Olsen,1 Juanita Lozano,1 Lynn B. Duffy,2 George H. McCracken,1 and R. Doug Hardy1*

Departments of Pediatrics and Internal Medicine (Divisions of Infectious Diseases), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas,1 Diagnostic Mycoplasma Laboratory, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama2

Received 29 December 2003/ Returned for modification 3 March 2004/ Accepted 1 April 2004


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Text
 References
 
PCR assays of naso- and oropharyngeal samples among hospitalized children appear equally effective for the diagnosis of serologically confirmed community-acquired mycoplasmal pneumonia. However, the combination of results from both sites yields optimal sensitivity (57%), specificity (98%), and positive (92%) and negative (82%) predictive values when compared with Mycoplasma pneumoniae enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.


   TEXT
Top
 Abstract
 Text
References
 
Controversy exists over the role of PCR assays performed on upper respiratory tract (URT) samples for the diagnosis of mycoplasmal pneumonia. It has been suggested that the most sensitive and prompt method of diagnosis in children is a combination of URT PCR and acute-phase serum immunoglobulin M (IgM) enzyme immunoassay (4, 11). However, concerns exist about the potential inability to distinguish between URT carriage of M. pneumoniae versus active disease in children with PCR-positive URT specimens in the setting of pneumonia (6). Furthermore, the optimal site and method of sampling the URT for the detection of M. pneumoniae by PCR are not established in children.

Patients. We report on 21 children with serologically proven M. pneumoniae infection and 42 approximately matched M. pneumoniae seronegative controls selected from 154 consecutively enrolled children hospitalized with clinically and radiologically confirmed lower respiratory infections, as described previously (8, 9). The Institutional Review Board of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas approved the protocol.

Laboratory detection of M. pneumoniae. M. pneumoniae enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) were performed by the Diagnostic Mycoplasma Laboratory at The University of Alabama at Birmingham. The assay was considered positive if the IgM was ≥1:10 or if there was ≥4-fold rise in IgG titer (1). Twenty-one of 154 children (13.6%) had serologically proven acute mycoplasmal pneumonia. Forty-two approximately matched M. pneumoniae seronegative control subjects were selected from the same study population.

Both nasopharyngeal (Np) and oropharyngeal (Op) swabs were obtained within 24 h of admission by using dacron-tipped swabs (Fisher Scientific). Swab tips were placed in 200-µl PCR buffer and stored at –70°C. Upon thawing, 25 µl of protease solution was added, and samples were lysed in Buffer AL (QIAamp blood kit; QIAGEN GmbH) and sonicated at 37°C. Bacterial DNA was extracted by centrifuge columns (QIAGEN GmbH). Single-step DNA amplification was performed with a programmable thermal cycler (GeneAmp PCR system 9600; Perkin-Elmer Cetus, Norwalk, Conn.), based on a method modified from that of Williamson et al. (7, 12 ). The 100-µl reaction mixture consisted of 40 µl of DNA eluent and 60 µl of HotStarTaq DNA polymerase master mix (QIAGEN GmbH). The published primer sequences targeted the highly conserved region of the 16S rDNA gene of M. pneumoniae and amplified a unique 290-bp region (12). A 10-µl volume of amplified product was separated by electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gel and visualized under UV light after ethidium bromide staining. We confirmed the identification of M. pneumoniae by means of real-time PCR assay targeting the P1 adhesion protein gene (6). M. pneumoniae DNA extract isolated from M. pneumoniae stock (ATCC 29342) and sterile distilled water were amplified with each assay as positive and negative controls, respectively. We demonstrated that the lower limit of detection of the PCR assay was <10 CFU/ml.

Statistics. Independent Student's t tests were used for normally distributed continuous data, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for nonparametric data. The Yates corrected chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used for categorical data where appropriate (two-tailed). A P value of less than 0.05 was defined as significant.

Twelve of the 21 (57%) children diagnosed with M. pneumoniae by serum ELISA had positive M. pneumoniae PCR assays from either Np or Op swabs; 9 out of the 12 were Np swabs and 9 out of the 12 were Op swabs (six children had positive Np and Op swabs). One of the 42 control children with pneumonia had positive PCR assays for M. pneumoniae from both Np and Op swabs. Because convalescent-phase serum from this patient was not available, we could not rule out acute mycoplasmal infection with certainty. The detection of M. pneumoniae by PCR was significantly greater for children with positive M. pneumoniae ELISA than for children with negative ELISA (odds ratio, 54.7; range, 5.9 to 1,279.3). Compared with M. pneumoniae ELISA as the diagnostic standard, PCR performed on Np and Op samples demonstrated a sensitivity of 57.1%, a specificity of 97.6%, a positive predictive value of 92.3%, and a negative predictive value of 82.0%. Table 1 presents characteristics of and comparisons among the children with positive M. pneumoniae serology by URT PCR status.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Comparison of 21 hospitalized children with pneumonia and positive M. pneumoniae ELISA by URT PCR status (Op- or Np sample)

 
Although URT PCR has been advocated for the diagnosis of M. pneumoniae pneumonia in children, the optimal site and method of sampling is not clear. We found that PCR assays of Np or Op dacron-tipped swabs appear equally effective for the detection of M. pneumoniae. However, combining test results from both sites provides the greatest diagnostic yield. In adults with symptoms of upper and/or lower respiratory tract infection, Gnarpe et al. found no significant difference between Np and Op swabs for the detection of M. pneumoniae by PCR (5). They also observed that sampling both sites gave the greatest yield. Reznikov et al. compared Np aspirates to Op swabs in children and found no significant difference in the detection of M. pneumoniae by PCR (10). They did note that Np aspirate specimens were significantly more likely to be rejected than Op swabs because of PCR inhibitors or lack of respiratory epithelial material. Based on the available data, no anatomic site or method is clearly superior for obtaining URT samples. Combining test results from more than one site does appear to improve diagnostic accuracy.

In this investigation of children hospitalized with acute community-acquired pneumonia, PCR of Np and Op swabs had a high positive predictive value (92.3%) and specificity (97.6%) for the diagnosis of M. pneumoniae compared with acute and convalescent ELISA. Dorigo-Zetsma et al. tested 74 control children without signs of respiratory infection or recent antibiotic treatment and found no samples to be PCR positive for M. pneumoniae on Op sampling, while 8% of children with signs of respiratory infection had URT specimens that were PCR positive (3). The combination of these findings indicates a low false-positive rate when URT samples from children are tested for M. pneumoniae DNA. A positive URT M. pneumoniae PCR for a child with community-acquired pneumonia is suggestive of M. pneumoniae pneumonia rather than respiratory carriage.

URT PCR status was examined in relation to clinical manifestations of M. pneumoniae pneumonia in children diagnosed by acute and convalescent ELISA. The duration of oxygen therapy was found to be significantly longer in PCR-positive specimens than in PCR-negative specimens. Therefore, a positive URT PCR assay may signify a greater severity of pneumonia. In support of our findings, Dorigo-Zetsma et al., utilizing semiquantitative M. pneumoniae PCR on Op swabs, documented a significant relationship between M. pneumoniae DNA load and severity of disease in hospitalized, nonhospitalized, and asymptomatic contacts (2).


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Departments of Pediatrics and Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, Texas 75390-9063. Phone: (214) 648-3720. Fax: (214) 648-2961. E-mail: robert.hardy{at}utsouthwestern.edu. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Text
 References
 

  1. Cassell, G. H., G. Gambill, and L. Duffy. 1996. ELISA in respiratory infections in humans, p. 123-136, In J. Tully and S. Razin (ed.), Molecular and diagnostic procedures in mycoplasmology, vol. 2. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
  2. Dorigo-Zetsma, J. W., S. A. Zaat, A. J. Vriesema, and J. Dankert. 1999. Demonstration by a nested PCR for Mycoplasma pneumoniae that M. pneumoniae load in the throat is higher in patients hospitalised for M. pneumoniae infection than in non-hospitalised subjects. J. Med. Microbiol. 48:1115-1122.[Abstract]
  3. Dorigo-Zetsma, J. W., S. A. Zaat, P. M. Wertheim-van Dillen, L. Spanjaard, J. Rijntjes, G. van Waveren, J. S. Jensen, A. F. Angulo, and J. Dankert. 1999. Comparison of PCR, culture, and serological tests for diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae respiratory tract infection in children. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:14-17.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Ferwerda, A., H. A. Moll, and R. de Groot. 2001. Respiratory tract infections by Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children: a review of diagnostic and therapeutic measures. Eur. J. Pediatr. 160:483-491.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Gnarpe, J., A. Lundback, H. Gnarpe, and B. Sundelof. 1997. Comparison of nasopharyngeal and throat swabs for the detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae by polymerase chain reaction. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. Suppl. 104:11-12.[Medline]
  6. Hardegger, D., D. Nadal, W. Bossart, M. Altwegg, and F. Dutly. 2000. Rapid detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in clinical samples by real-time PCR. J. Microbiol. Methods 41:45-51.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Kwok, S., and R. Higuchi. 1989. Avoiding false positives with PCR. Nature 339:237-238.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Michelow, I. C., J. Lozano, K. Olsen, C. Goto, N. K. Rollins, F. Ghaffar, V. Rodriguez-Cerrato, M. Leinonen, and G. H. McCracken, Jr. 2002. Diagnosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae lower respiratory infection in hospitalized children by culture, polymerase chain reaction, serological testing, and urinary antigen detection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 34:E1-E11.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Michelow, I. C., K. Olsen, J. Lozano, N. K. Rollins, L. B. Duffy, T. Ziegler, J. Kauppila, M. Leinonen, and G. H. McCracken, Jr. 2004. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized children. Pediatrics 113:701-707.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Reznikov, M., T. K. Blackmore, J. J. Finlay-Jones, and D. L. Gordon. 1995. Comparison of nasopharyngeal aspirates and throat swab specimens in a polymerase chain reaction-based test for Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 14:58-61.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Waris, M. E., P. Toikka, T. Saarinen, S. Nikkari, O. Meurman, R. Vainionpaa, J. Mertsola, and O. Ruuskanen. 1998. Diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:3155-3159.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Williamson, J., B. P. Marmion, D. A. Worswick, T. W. Kok, G. Tannock, R. Herd, and R. J. Harris. 1992. Laboratory diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. 4. Antigen capture and PCR-gene amplification for detection of the Mycoplasma: problems of clinical correlation. Epidemiol. Infect. 109:519-537.[Medline]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2004, p. 3339-3341, Vol. 42, No. 7
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.7.3339-3341.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michelow, I. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Michelow, I. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, R. D.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS