Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2004, p. 3374-3376, Vol. 42, No. 7
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.7.3374-3376.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
| CASE REPORT |
Department of Medicine,1 Medical Microbiology Laboratory, University of Alberta Hospitals, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada,2 R. M. Alden Research Laboratory, Santa Monica,3 School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California4
Received 23 February 2004/ Returned for modification 12 March 2004/ Accepted 23 March 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Laboratory data showed 14.1 g of hemoglobin/liter, 10.5 x 109 white blood cells/liter, and 9.1 x 109 neutrophil cells/liter. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 25 mm/h. C-reactive protein elevated at 109 mg/dl. Cultures eventually grew strains of Serratia fonticola, Serratia marcescens, Aeromonas hydrophila, Bacillus cereus, and Enterococcus durans. The gram-negative bacteria were all susceptible to cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and trimethroprim-sulfamethoxazole but resistant to ampicillin, cefazolin, and cefuroxime. The enterococcus was ampicillin and vancomycin susceptible. No anaerobes were isolated even though an anaerobic culture was obtained.
Postoperatively, the patient was started on 4.5 g of piperacillin-tazobactam intravenously every 8 h. Since the attack was unprovoked, the patient was given rabies vaccine and rabies immunoglobulin. The bear's brain was later examined for rabies virus and was found to be negative; consequently, subsequent doses of rabies vaccine were discontinued. The patient received 1 week of therapy with piperacillin-tazobactam and was subsequently given 875 mg of amoxicillin-clavulanate orally twice a day and 500 mg of ciprofloxacin orally twice a day for three additional weeks. There was a good clinical response.
As more North Americans enter wilderness areas for recreation and to build homes, the habitats of humans and wild animals begin to merge, and their interactions increase. Bear populations have increased, and bear and human encounters, including maulings and bites, have also become more common (1, 5, 6, 9, 12, 13).
It is estimated that there are approximately 1,000 grizzly bears and 39,000 black bears in Alberta (7). Black bears are the smallest of North American bears and weigh approximately 200 pounds and stand 5 feet tall. Grizzly bears weigh more than 350 pounds and stand 6 1/2 feet tall. Bears feed voraciously in the summer months on an omnivorous diet that consists of 90% plants (grass, horsetail shoots, bulbs, wild lilies, wild onions, cow parsnips, and huckleberries) and 10% animal matter (ground squirrels, insects including ants and beetles, and occasional deer and winter elk) (8, 10). In Alberta, from 1960 to 1998, 42 documented serious or fatal injuries were caused by bears with most (69%) caused by grizzly bears, even though they make up only 2.5% of the total bear population in Alberta (7). Only an estimated 17% of the 1,000 Alberta grizzly bears are located in the national parks in Alberta, but 72% of grizzly attacks occur in the national parks. It is thought that this is mostly due to the large number of people entering into the grizzly bear habitat. For example, Banff National Park, which is located on the western edge of the province of Alberta along the eastern side of the Canadian Rocky Mountains, has over 4.5 million visitors a year and only an estimated 60 to 80 grizzly bears. Ten of the 42 serious or fatal injuries caused by bears in Alberta from 1960 to 1998 occurred in Banff. Similarly, Glacier National Park is located in northern Montana near the Canadian (Alberta)-U.S. border and has an average of 2.1 million visitors annually. It was estimated in 1987 that approximately 500 black bears and 200 grizzly bears live in Glacier National Park (8). In the last 5 years at Glacier National Park, there has been one fatality and an additional 13 people injured in 10 encounters (Gary Moses, personal communication). There is no estimate as to the number of bear sightings. The Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee has a website which includes advice on how to prevent encounters and what to do in case of attack (http://www.fs.fed.us/r1/wildlife/igbc). They suggest that when in bear country, make noise to make your presence known. If a black bear approaches, try to scare it away by shouting, making noise, or throwing small stones. If a black bear attacks, fight back, whereas if a grizzly bear attacks, play dead; either curl up in a ball or lie face down, using your hands and arms to protect the back of your neck and face.
It has been reported (12) that the risk of infection following bear bite is "considerable," with 4 out of 9 (44%) survivors developing clinical infection. Most surviving bear bite victims receive a variety of therapies in the field, including cleansing of the wounds and early antimicrobial administration prior to hospitalization. However, the bacteriology of these wounds is limited by the absence of systematic study and the paucity of patients cultured, and cultures are not usually taken prior to, or even after the initiation of, antimicrobial therapy (12). Consequently, there are scant data regarding the bacteriology of bear bite wounds (12) or regarding the oral flora of wild bears (3, 11), and conclusions about the most appropriate antimicrobial therapy are moot.
Prior studies with dog and cat bites have shown that it is the oral flora of the biting animal that is usually isolated from bite wound infections and form the basis of empirical antimicrobial therapy (4). Goatcher et al. (3) reported a study of nasal, rectal, and preputial or vaginal swab cultures in black and grizzly bears in northwestern Alberta, Canada, and suggested that "the predominant microflora of both grizzly and black bears were transient and probably influenced by their foraging habits and surrounding environments." They did not specify which bacteria were isolated from individual sites.
Parry et al. (11) took mouth cultures of 31 brown and grizzly bears in several Alaska locales and reported general groupings of isolates with scant specific bacteriological identifications. They found that 21 oral samples from bears had mixed gram-positive and gram-negative flora. Nine had only gram-negative bacteria isolated and one had only gram-positive flora. Staphylococcus epidermidis was present in 14 out of 31 (45%), streptococci were present in 13 out of 31 (42%), Escherichia coli was present in 8 out of 20 (40%), diphtheroids were present in 18 out of 31 (58%), unidentifiable gram-negative rods were present in 8 out of 31 (26%), and pseudomonads were present in 3 out of 31 (10%) samples (Table 1) (5).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacteria most frequently isolated from grizzly and black bears
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Bacteriology of grizzly bear bite wounds in reported cases
|
No financial support was obtained from any entity.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»