Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nadkarni, M. A. Articles by Hunter, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nadkarni, M. A. Articles by Hunter, N.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2004, p. 3873-3876, Vol. 42, No. 8
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3873-3876.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Distribution of Porphyromonas gingivalis Biotypes Defined by Alleles of the kgp (Lys-Gingipain) Gene

Mangala A. Nadkarni,^1* Ky-Anh Nguyen,¹ Cheryl C. Chapple,¹ Arthur A. DeCarlo,^2,3 Nicholas A. Jacques,¹ and Neil Hunter¹

Institute of Dental Research, Westmead Millennium Institute, and Westmead Centre for Oral Health,¹ United Dental Hospital, Sydney, Australia,² NSU Dental, Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida³

Received 12 November 2003/ Returned for modification 3 February 2004/ Accepted 28 April 2004

Top Abstract Text References

 
Paired subgingival plaque samples representing the most-diseased and least-diseased sites were collected from 34 adult patients with diagnosed chronic periodontitis. The percentage of Porphyromonas gingivalis relative to the total anaerobic and gram-negative bacterial load at each site was determined by real-time PCR. Based on variations in the noncatalytic C terminus of the Lys-gingipain (Kgp), it was reasoned that DNA sequence variation in the 3'-coding region of the kgp gene might determine functional biotypes. Perusal of the available sequence information in GenBank indicated three such forms of the kgp gene corresponding to P. gingivalis strains HG66, 381, and W83. Analysis of patient samples revealed the presence of a fourth genotype (W83v) that showed duplication of a sequence recognized by the W83 reverse primer. The four biotypes, HG66, 381, W83, and W83v, were present in the study group in the ratio 8:11:6:5, respectively. Each subject was colonized by one predominant biotype, and only three patients were colonized by a trace amount of a second biotype.

Top Abstract Text References

 
Although a variety of technologies have been employed to demonstrate the genetic diversity of Porphyromonas gingivalis, it remains unclear if there are virulent biotypes of this bacterium. While analysis by restriction fragment length polymorphism (1) indicated that the same ribotypes of P. gingivalis are found in subgingival plaque samples of periodontitis patients in different countries, data obtained by random amplified primer detection and multilocus enzyme electrophoresis methods (19, 21) suggested that multiple strains are associated with disease, leading to the conclusion that infection by this bacterium is largely opportunistic. There is no consensus from studies employing fimA genotyping, heteroduplex formation, and capsular antigen serotyping (2, 3, 8, 16).

Diversity in P. gingivalis appears to have arisen by genetic recombination rather than mutation (7, 15, 24). Accordingly, the structure and function of major virulence factors, such as the gingipain cysteine proteinases, provide key insights into the pathogenicity of different strains (17). The use of inactivation mutants (18, 26) and specific inhibitors (5) has demonstrated the important role of the Lys-gingipain, Kgp, in the acquisition of essential heme for growth in vitro and the virulence of P. gingivalis in animal models. The form and partitioning of Kgp between the cell and the extracellular milieu have been reported to show variations (28) that correlate with distinct changes in the functional properties of P. gingivalis strains (12, 22). Differences have also been observed in the pathogenic potential of laboratory strains, depending on the animal model (4, 13) or the in vitro assay employed (10, 11). The latter differences in virulence may be a function of the heterogeneity within virulence genes such as kgp.

The kgp gene codes for a protein composed of five domains: a propeptide, a catalytic domain, and three adhesin domains, Kgp39, HA2, and Kgp44. A variable region exists in the Kgp44 domain of different strains of P. gingivalis (Fig. 1). The DNA sequence of the 3'-hemagglutinin region of the kgp gene is also found in multiple copies in the hemagglutinin gene, hagA (9). On the basis of evidence currently available, the distribution of biotypes based on variation of Kgp structure in patients with periodontal disease appears to be important. The present study was therefore undertaken to explore the feasibility of detecting different biotypes of P. gingivalis based on sequence variation of the kgp gene as a basis for defining the distribution of these forms in clinical samples.

View larger version (10K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Location of kgp biotype-specific primers in the kgp gene of laboratory strains of P. gingivalis. Processed domains of expressed Kgp are labeled above the figure. The hemagglutinin region is shaded gray, and the variable region in the Kgp44 domain is shaded black. Primers used to amplify biotype-specific kgp amplicons are denoted by arrowheads, and the predicted sizes of the PCR amplicons are in parentheses. Biotype-specific sequences of kgp were obtained from GenBank, and their accession numbers are as follows: HG66, accession no. U54691; W83, accession no. AF017059; and 381, accession no. D83258. W83v was a variant observed in this study (accession no. AY559244).

Adult patients attending the periodontal clinics of the United Dental Hospital and Westmead Centre for Oral Health were selected on the basis of no history of systemic disease known to affect the periodontium, no periodontal therapy for the preceding 3 years and a diagnosis of generalized or localized periodontitis. After removal of supragingival plaque, subgingival plaque was obtained by curette sampling from the most diseased and least diseased sites of 34 patients (mean age, 51 ± 10 years; 18 males and 16 females). DNA was extracted from reference strains and from subgingival plaque samples by using the ATL buffer reagent (Qiagen, Victoria, Australia), which efficiently releases DNA from gram-negative bacteria as well as those cultured under anaerobic conditions (20, 23). Total bacterial and P. gingivalis loads were quantified in the subgingival plaque by real-time PCR on an ABI-PRISM 7700 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) using a universal primer and probe set and a P. gingivalis-specific primer and probe set, respectively, to detect 16S rRNA genes (20, 23). The amount of DNA in each sample was measured on a standard graph of P. gingivalis DNA (DNA range of 3.6 fg to 3.6 ng) and was converted to theoretical cell numbers based on the assumption that each cell contained 2.37 fg of DNA (20). The relative abundance of P. gingivalis was therefore expressed as a percentage of the total anaerobic plus gram-negative load determined by using a universal bacterial amplicon (20, 23). Thirty-one patients were positive for P. gingivalis, with the relative abundance of this organism varying from 0.003 to 38% of the total anaerobic and gram-negative load (see Fig. 3). The samples that were positive for P. gingivalis were further tested for different biotypes based on variations in the kgp gene.

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 3. Relationship between P. gingivalis and kgp biotype. Plaque from the least-diseased (open circles) and most-diseased (solid circles) sites from each patient was assayed for the percentage of the P. gingivalis population that belonged to a particular kgp biotype. The mean value for each group is represented by a solid bar, and statistical comparison between the groups was analyzed by the nonparametric, unpaired, two-tailed Mann-Whitney test with a 95% confidence interval. An asterisk denotes significance of P < 0.05.

In order to determine the feasibility of discriminating biotypes of P. gingivalis based on the kgp gene, DNA was first extracted from individual batch cultures (20) of the P. gingivalis strains HG66, 381, and W83, which express three different alleles of the kgp gene (27). To discriminate strains 381 and W83, a biotype-specific region of the kgp gene was amplified by PCR using the kgp-forward primer, kgpF, complementary to a region of identity in all strains, and either the strain-specific reverse primer 381R or W83R, which were complementary to unique DNA sequences within the 3'-variable region of the gene (Table 1 and Fig. 1). To further discriminate these two alleles from a third expressed by strain HG66, the HG66F primer, complementary to a DNA sequence within the region coding for the Kgp39 domain, and the HG66R primer, complementary to a DNA sequence coding for a region within the Kgp44 domain, were used (Table 1 and Fig. 1).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Strain-specific primers used in this studya

PCR was carried out with HotStarTaq Master Mix (Qiagen, Australia) with an initial enzyme activation at 95°C for 15 min followed by 40 cycles of 15 s of denaturation at 95°C and 5 min of annealing and extension at 60°C. The capacity of the primer sets to differentiate the three structural homologs of kgp was established (Fig. 2). The primer set HG66F and HG66R amplified an HG66-biotype-specific amplicon of 1.9 kb, the primer set kgpF and 381R amplified a 381-biotype-specific amplicon of 3.4 kb, and the primer set kgpF and W83R amplified a W83-biotype-specific amplicon of 3.6 kb. All three primer sets were strain specific (Fig. 2). Analysis of patient samples, however, revealed a further kgp allele, identified as a variant of the W83 type (designated W83v; GenBank accession no. AY559244). This allele possessed a duplication of a sequence complementary to that of the W83R primer in the Kgp39 domain (Fig. 1) that resulted in the amplification of a 2.2-kb amplicon by PCR (Fig. 2I, gel C, samples 6D and 10D; Fig. 2II, gel C, samples 25D, 26D, and 27D).

View larger version (159K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. Migration pattern of kgp biotype-specific PCR amplicons on ethidium bromide-stained 1% agarose gels. Amplicons were observed by using DNA from control batch cultures of P. gingivalis laboratory strains (HG66, gels Ia, Id, and IIa; 381, gels Ib, Ie, and IIb; and W83, gels Ic, If, and IIc), a no-template control (NTC), or DNA extracted from subgingival plaque samples of patients attending the United Dental Hospital, Sydney (I), and the Westmead Centre for Oral Health, Sydney (II). D, most-diseased site; H, least-diseased site. Molecular size standards in kilobases (MW) are listed to the left of gels a, b, and c in panels I and II.

Biotypes of P. gingivalis based on kgp heterogeneity were identified in the most-diseased sites of 27 patients (Fig. 2 and 3), in which the relative abundance of P. gingivalis exceeded 0.01% of total gram-negative and anaerobic bacterial load. This result indicated either that the detection of a specific biotype was less sensitive than bacterial detection based on the 16S rRNA gene or that samples with low levels of P. gingivalis contained an unknown biotype(s). P. gingivalis was detected in the least-diseased sites in 12 patients. In all patients in which P. gingivalis could be quantified at both sites, the same biotype(s) was detected (Fig. 2). Only three individuals carried more than one biotype: two harbored both the HG66 and W83v biotypes (Fig. 2I, 6D, and 2II, 25D), while one possessed a combination of P. gingivalis HG66 and 381 biotypes (Fig. 2I, 8D). The frequency of occurrence of biotype HG66 versus biotype 381 versus biotype W83 versus biotype W83v was 8:11:6:5.

Different alleles of kgp may be relevant to the virulence of P. gingivalis strains. First, the importance of Kgp in heme acquisition is evident from studies of kgp deletion mutants in P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 (kgp biotype 381) where the mutants are poorly pigmented in comparison with the wild type (29). This change in heme acquisition is reflected in the different biotypes that formed the basis of the current study, since colonies of P. gingivalis HG66 grown on blood agar are poorly pigmented. This phenomenon may be related to the observed release of gingipain moieties by strain HG66 compared with the primary retention of these complexes at the cell surface by strain 381 (28). Second, all biotypes (including W83v) possess a putative C-terminal membrane-anchoring peptide in the Kgp44 domain (30). A region of identity extends from this anchoring peptide for a further 30 residues towards the N terminus of the protein to a site where processing of the protein is considered to occur based on the analysis of the X-ray crystallographic structure of the processed protein, RgpB, which belongs to a related family of gingipains (6). The region N terminal to this processing site is identical in the Kgp of P. gingivalis strains HG66 and 381 but differs in strains W83 and W83v. Accordingly, Kgp in W83 and W83v may be processed differently. Third, a segment within the variable region of W83 and W83v shows 65% identity to a synthetic 20-amino-acid peptide that can inhibit hemagglutination (14). The same segment is not observed in other strains. Fourth, variations in immunological reactivity have been noted. The Kgp from P. gingivalis HG66 has two copies of an epitope: one in the Kgp39 adhesin domain and one in the variable region of the Kgp44 domain (25), while only one copy is to be found in the Kgp39 adhesin domain of other P. gingivalis strains. It is presently unknown if clinical isolates corresponding to the reference P. gingivalis Kgp-based biotypes described here have similar properties with respect to Kgp partitioning and functionality. Future expanded analysis of the relationship of the biotypes to the structure and stage of the periodontal lesion will provide a basis for evaluating the association of kgp alleles with the virulence of this bacterium.

 
We wish to thank Ann Progulske-Fox, University of Florida, for providing P. gingivalis strains 381 and W83 and Neil O'Brien-Simpson, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, for providing P. gingivalis strain HG66.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Dental Research, Westmead Centre for Oral Health, P.O. Box 533, Wentworthville, NSW 2145, Australia. Phone: 61 2 9845 7826. Fax: 61 2 9845 7599. E-mail: mnadkarni{at}dental.wsahs.nsw.gov.au.

Top Abstract Text References

 

1
1. Ali, R. W., L. Martin, A. D. Haffajee, and S. S. Socransky. 1997. Detection of identical ribotypes of Porphyromonas gingivalis in patients residing in the United States, Sudan, Romania and Norway. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 12:106-111.[Medline]
2
2. Amano, A., M. Kuboniwa, I. Nakagawa, S. Akiyama, I. Morisaki, and S. Hamada. 2000. Prevalence of specific genotypes of Porphyromonas gingivalis fimA and periodontal health status. J. Dent. Res. 79:1664-1668.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3
3. Amano, A., I. Nakagawa, K. Kataoka, I. Morisaki, and S. Hamada. 1999. Distribution of Porphyromonas gingivalis strains with fimA genotypes in periodontitis patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1426-1430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Baker, P. J., M. Dixon, R. T. Evans, and D. C. Roopenian. 2000. Heterogeneity of Porphyromonas gingivalis strains in the induction of alveolar bone loss in mice. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 15:27-32.[CrossRef][Medline]
5
5. Curtis, M. A., J. Aduse Opoku, M. Rangarajan, A. Gallagher, J. A. Sterne, C. R. Reid, H. E. A. Evans, and B. Samuelsson. 2002. Attenuation of the virulence of Porphyromonas gingivalis by using a specific synthetic Kgp protease inhibitor. Infect. Immun. 70:6968-6975.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Eichinger, A., H. G. Beisel, U. Jacob, R. Huber, F. J. Medrano, A. Banbula, J. Potempa, J. Travis, and W. Bode. 1999. Crystal structure of gingipain R: an Arg-specific bacterial cysteine proteinase with a caspase-like fold. EMBO J. 18:5453-5462.[CrossRef][Medline]
7
7. Frandsen, E. V. G., K. Poulsen, M. A. Curtis, and M. Kilian. 2001. Evidence of recombination in Porphyromonas gingivalis and random distribution of putative virulence markers. Infect. Immun. 69:4479-4485.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8
8. Griffen, A. L., S. R. Lyons, M. R. Becker, M. L. Moeschberger, and E. J. Leys. 1999. Porphyromonas gingivalis strain variability and periodontitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:4028-4033.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. Han, N., J. Whitlock, and A. Progulske-Fox. 1996. The hemagglutinin gene A (hagA) of Porphyromonas gingivalis 381 contains four large, contiguous, direct repeats. Infect. Immun. 64:4000-4007.[Abstract]
10
10. Hintermann, E., S. K. Haake, U. Christen, A. Sharabi, and V. Quaranta. 2002. Discrete proteolysis of focal contact and adherens junction components in Porphyromonas gingivalis-infected oral keratinocytes: a strategy for cell adhesion and migration disabling. Infect. Immun. 70:5846-5856.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11
11. Huang, G. T.-J., D. Kim, J. K.-H. Lee, H. K. Kuramitsu, and S. K. Haake. 2001. Interleukin-8 and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 regulation in oral epithelial cells by selected periodontal bacteria: multiple effects of Porphyromonas gingivalis via antagonistic mechanisms. Infect. Immun. 69:1364-1372.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12
12. Imamura, T., J. Potempa, R. N. Pike, and J. Travis. 1995. Dependence of vascular permeability enhancement on cysteine proteinases in vesicles of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Infect. Immun. 63:1999-2003.[Abstract]
13
13. Katz, J., D. C. Ward, and S. M. Michalek. 1996. Effect of host responses on the pathogenicity of strains of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 11:309-318.[Medline]
14
14. Kelly, C. G., V. Booth, H. Kendal, J. M. Slaney, M. A. Curtis, and T. Lehner. 1997. The relationship between colonization and haemagglutination inhibiting and B cell epitopes of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 110:285-291.[Medline]
15
15. Koehler, A., H. Karch, T. Beikler, T. F. Flemmig, S. Suerbaum, and H. Schmidt. 2003. Multilocus sequence analysis of Porphyromonas gingivalis indicates frequent recombination. Microbiology 149:2407-2415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16
16. Laine, M. L., B. J. Appelmelk, and A. J. van Winkelhoff. 1997. Prevalence and distribution of six capsular serotypes of Porphyromonas gingivalis in periodontitis patients. J. Dent. Res. 76:1840-1844.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17
17. Lamont, R. J., and H. F. Jenkinson. 1998. Life below the gum line: pathogenic mechanisms of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:1244-1263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18
18. Lewis, J. P., J. A. Dawson, J. C. Hannis, D. Muddiman, and F. L. Macrina. 1999. Hemoglobinase activity of the lysine gingipain protease (Kgp) of Porphyromonas gingivalis W83. J. Bacteriol. 181:4905-4913.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19
19. Loos, B. G., D. W. Dyer, T. S. Whittam, and R. K. Selander. 1993. Genetic structure of populations of Porphyromonas gingivalis associated with periodontitis and other oral infections. Infect. Immun. 61:204-212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20
20. Martin, F. E., M. A. Nadkarni, N. A. Jacques, and N. Hunter. 2002. Quantitative microbiological study of human carious dentine by culture and real-time PCR: association of anaerobes with histopathological changes in chronic pulpitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1698-1704.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21
21. Menard, C., and C. Mouton. 1995. Clonal diversity of the taxon Porphyromonas gingivalis assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting. Infect. Immun. 63:2522-2531.[Abstract]
22
22. Mikolajczyk-Pawlinska, J., J. Travis, and J. Potempa. 1998. Modulation of interleukin-8 activity by gingipains from Porphyromonas gingivalis: implications for pathogenicity of periodontal disease. FEBS Lett. 440:282-286.[CrossRef][Medline]
23
23. Nadkarni, M. A., F. E. Martin, N. A. Jacques, and N. Hunter. 2002. Determination of bacterial load by real-time PCR using a broad-range (universal) probe and primers set. Microbiology 148:257-266.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24
24. Nakayama, K. 1997. Domain-specific rearrangement between the two Arg-gingipain-encoding genes in Porphyromonas gingivalis: possible involvement of nonreciprocal recombination. Microbiol. Immunol. 41:185-196.[Medline]
25
25. O'Brien-Simpson, N. M., C. L. Black, P. S. Bhogal, S. M. Cleal, N. Slakeski, T. J. Higgins, and E. C. Reynolds. 2000. Serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgG subclass responses to the RgpA-Kgp proteinase-adhesin complex of Porphyromonas gingivalis in adult periodontitis. Infect. Immun. 68:2704-2712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26
26. O'Brien-Simpson, N. M., R. A. Paolini, B. Hoffmann, N. Slakeski, S. G. Dashper, and E. C. Reynolds. 2001. Role of RgpA, RgpB, and Kgp proteinases in virulence of Porphyromonas gingivalis W50 in a murine lesion model. Infect. Immun. 69:7527-7534.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27
27. Potempa, J., A. Banbula, and J. Travis. 2000. Role of bacterial proteinases in matrix destruction and modulation of host responses. Periodontol. 2000 24:153-192.[CrossRef]
28
28. Potempa, J., R. Pike, and J. Travis. 1995. The multiple forms of trypsin-like activity present in various strains of Porphyromonas gingivalis are due to the presence of either Arg-gingipain or Lys-gingipain. Infect. Immun. 63:1176-1182.[Abstract]
29
29. Shi, Y., D. B. Ratnayake, K. Okamoto, N. Abe, K. Yamamoto, and K. Nakayama. 1999. Genetic analyses of proteolysis, hemoglobin binding, and hemagglutination of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Construction of mutants with a combination of rgpA, rgpB, kgp, and hagA. J. Biol. Chem. 274:17955-17960.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30
30. Veith, P. D., G. H. Talbo, N. Slakeski, S. G. Dashper, C. Moore, R. A. Paolini, and E. C. Reynolds. 2002. Major outer membrane proteins and proteolytic processing of RgpA and Kgp of Porphyromonas gingivalis W50. Biochem. J. 363:105-115.[CrossRef][Medline]

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2004, p. 3873-3876, Vol. 42, No. 8
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3873-3876.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Nadkarni, M. A., Chhour, K.-L., Browne, G., Jacques, N. A., Hunter, N. (2009). Lysine Gingipain (kgp) Biovars of Porphyromonas gingivalis Exhibit Differential Distribution on Oral Mucosal Sites. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 3350-3352 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nadkarni, M. A. Articles by Hunter, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nadkarni, M. A. Articles by Hunter, N.