This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bruisten, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schirm, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bruisten, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schirm, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2004, p. 4332-4334, Vol. 42, No. 9
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.9.4332-4334.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Multicenter Validation of the cppB Gene as a PCR Target for Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae

S. M. Bruisten,1* G. T. Noordhoek,2 A. J. C. van den Brule,3 B. Duim,4 C. H. E. Boel,3 K. El-Faouzi,1 R. du Maine,4 S. Mulder,2 D. Luijt,5 and J. Schirm5

Municipal Health Service, GG&GD,1 Department of Medical Microbiology, AMC, Amsterdam,4 Public Health Laboratory Friesland, LVF, Leeuwarden,2 Laboratory for Pathology and Microbiology, PAMM, Veldhoven,3 Regional Public Health Laboratory, SLGD, Groningen, The Netherlands5

Received 19 February 2004/ Returned for modification 29 March 2004/ Accepted 18 May 2004


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
The cppB gene is often used as a target for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae by PCR. Using a coded panel of 500 DNA samples, we determined that the cppB gene is missing in 5.8% of N. gonorrhoeae strains, and therefore we consider the cppB gene to be an unsuitable target.


arrow
TEXT
 
The laboratory diagnosis of gonorrhea depends on identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urogenital samples. Amplification using the Roche COBAS AMPLICOR (CA) assay has been found highly suitable for screening asymptomatic subjects as well as diagnosing gonorrhea in populations with a high prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) (4, 6). Specimens containing other species of the Neisseriaceae, probably members of the normal pharyngeal flora, but also non-Neisseria bacterial strains, were reported to produce false-positive results in the CA PCR test, which targets the cytosine DNA methyltransferase gene (4, 8, 12).

Confirmatory tests using the 16S rRNA genes and the cppB gene have been reported (2, 5, 13, 14); however, the cryptic plasmid on which the cppB gene is located is suspected to be missing in some clinical isolates (11). Therefore, we determined the frequency of the cppB gene in well-characterized N. gonorrhoeae strains cultured from STI patients by using real-time PCR technologies as developed in different diagnostic laboratories in The Netherlands (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Real-time PCR systems used for analysis

From September 2002 to April 2003, patients with complaints indicative of gonorrhea visited the STI clinic in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, where clinical and epidemiological data were registered and samples were taken. Urethral, cervical, rectal, or tonsil specimens were used to inoculate GC-Lect agar plates (Becton Dickinson) at the Gemeentelijke Geneeskundige en Gezondheidsdienst (GG&GD). Culture conditions and biochemical determination of N. gonorrhoeae were as described previously (1), including Gram staining, positive catalase reaction, cytochrome c oxidase, and sugar metabolism tests. DNA was isolated from a few colonies by isopropanol precipitation, and the pellet was dissolved in 50 µl of T10 buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) (9). In the context of a communal epidemiology study, we typed these N. gonorrhoeae strains by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the opa and por genes, confirming further that true N. gonorrhoeae strains were used for DNA isolation (7, 10). A coded panel of 500 samples was composed by distributing 50 negative samples randomly among 450 DNA preparations of confirmed N. gonorrhoeae strains. The N. gonorrhoeae-positive samples were prepared by dilution of the original DNA solution to ensure an easily detectable target load. The 50 negative controls consisted of 26 samples containing different buffers, namely, 10x T10 buffer, 5x H2O, 5x phosphate-buffered saline, and 6x AMPLICOR resuspension buffer; 20 samples containing bacterial DNAs derived from non-Neisseria species; and 4 DNA samples from the nongonococcal species N. meningitidis, N. mucosa, N. lactamica, and N. subflava. For each diluted DNA and control sample, five aliquots of 200 µl were prepared and distributed to the participating laboratories by regular mail at room temperature. The samples were analyzed by real-time PCR tests targeting the cppB or the 16S rRNA genes by use of an input of 5 µl of the DNA solution, along with primers, probes, and hardware as outlined in Table 1. The Academisch Medisch Centrum (AMC) performed discrepancy analysis (see below).

After submission of all test results that were obtained in a blinded fashion to the GG&GD, the codes were broken and reported back to the participating laboratories. Each laboratory reset the values for cycle threshold (CT) (for the ABI and RotorGene hardware) and crossing point (Cp) (for the LightCycler), with the results of the negative control samples taken into account. Initially, 459 of 500 (91.8%) results were fully concordant and consisted of 48 negative and 411 N. gonorrhoeae-positive samples. The 41 samples with discordant test results plus 7 negative controls were tested by the AMC to establish whether a sample was truly lacking the cppB gene. If both 16S rRNA tests were positive for a sample but at least three of the four cppB tests were negative, this was taken as proof that the cppB target was lacking.

Two N. gonorrhoeae DNA samples proved to be negative in all tests, probably because they were diluted excessively and were counted as negatives in addition to the 50 negative samples. The SLGD reported two false-positive 16S rRNA test results for the N. meningitidis and N. lactamica samples, yielding 96% specificity. However, when the two samples were retested in the CA test at the Streeklaboratorium voor de Volksgezondheid in Groningen en Drenthe (SLGD), they proved to be negative. Laboratorium voor Pathologie en Medische Microbiologie (PAMM) also reported low Cp values (less than 30) in the 16S rRNA test for these strains, suggesting positivity, but melting-curve analysis with fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET) probes showed that these samples were not N. gonorrhoeae. The specificity was 100% for all other tests. The number of discrepant N. gonorrhoeae samples was thus reduced from 41 to 37 (41 minus 2 minus 2) for the six tests (Table 2). For 11 of these 37 samples, a negative result was reported by the 16S rRNA assays and/or by one or two cppB assays, suggesting either a low DNA load or a false-negative result. Thus, for these 11 samples, two to four cppB tests were positive, indicating the presence of a cppB gene. In contrast, in the other 26 N. gonorrhoeae samples, the 16S rRNA assays were positive at both laboratories. In 3 of these 26, only one positive cppB gene result was reported with CT values just below the cutoff, and in the other 23, all four cppB gene tests were negative. These 26 samples were thus discovered to be cppB-lacking N. gonorrhoeae strains, resulting in a proportion of 5.8% (26 of 448) of the N. gonorrhoeae strains tested.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Samples with discrepant test results (n = 37)

The clinical sensitivities were 98.9 and 99.6% for the 16S rRNA targets at the SLGD and PAMM laboratories, respectively. For the cppB assays, the sensitivities without correction for identifying strains lacking the cppB gene were 92.4, 93.7, and 93.9% at the GG&GD, Laboratorium voor de Volksgezondheid in Friesland (LVF), and SLGD laboratories, respectively, and are thus obviously affected by the lack of a cppB gene in 5.8% of the strains. In a recent CA PCR study in The Netherlands performed directly with clinical samples, a similar proportion of 6% of N. gonorrhoeae strains lacking cppB was found (D. S. Luijt, P. A. J. Bos, A. A. van Zwet, P. C. van Voorst Vader, and J. Schirm, submitted for publication). The present study quantified for the first time the frequency of the cppB gene in a well-defined group of N. gonorrhoeae strains. This gene was found on the cryptic plasmid but may also be present chromosomally in the N. gonorrhoeae genome in cases where the plasmid is integrated. The cryptic plasmid was found to be missing in 4% of N. gonorrhoeae strains collected 25 years ago in the United States and Europe (11) and appeared to be correlated to the PA°U auxotype (3, 8).

Since the sensitivity of a PCR test targeting the cppB gene can never surpass 94%, we conclude that either assays targeting 16S rRNA or alternative PCR assays for detection of N. gonorrhoeae that targets, for example, the highly specific opa genes need to be evaluated in future studies.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank A. Koek and M. Dierdorp for preparation and characterization of all N. gonorrhoeae DNA samples and M. Kolader and colleagues for including the STI patients.

Partial financial support was supplied by Roche Diagnostics, Almere, The Netherlands.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: GG&GD Municipal Health Service, Public Health Laboratory, Nieuwe Achtergracht 100, 1018 WT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-20-555.5376. Fax: 31-20-555.5629. E-mail: sbruisten{at}gggd.amsterdam.nl. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Buimer, M., G. J. J. van Doornum, S. Ching, P. G. H. Peerbooms, P. K. Plier, D. Ram, and H. H. Lee. 1996. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by ligase chain reaction-based assays with clinical specimens from various sites: implications for diagnostic testing and screening. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:2395-2400.[Abstract]
    2. 2
  2. Diemert, D. J., M. D. Libman, and P. Lebel. 2002. Confirmation by 16S rRNA PCR of the COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG test for diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in a low-prevalence population. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:4056-4059.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    3. 3
  3. Dillon, J. R., and M. Pauzé. 1981. Relationship between plasmid content and auxotype in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates. Infect. Immun. 33:625-628.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Farrell, D. J. 1999. Evaluation of AMPLICOR Neisseria gonorrhoeae PCR using cppB nested PCR and 16S rRNA PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:386-390.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    5. 5
  5. Ho, B. S., W. G. Feng, B. K. Wong, and S. I. Egglestone. 1992. Polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in clinical samples. J. Clin. Pathol. 45:439-442.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Martin, D. H., C. Cammarata, B. Van Der Pol, R. B. Jones, T. C. Quinn, C. A. Gaydos, K. Crotchfelt, J. Schachter, J. Moncada, D. Jungkind, B. Turner, and C. Peyton. 2000. Multicenter evaluation of AMPLICOR and automated COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3544-3549.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    7. 7
  7. O'Rourke, M., C. A. Ison, A. M. Renton, and B. G. Spratt. 1995. Opa-typing: a high-resolution tool for studying the epidemiology of gonorrhoea. Mol. Microbiol. 17:865-875.[CrossRef][Medline]
    8. 8
  8. Palmer, H. M., H. Mallinson, R. L. Wood, and A. J. Herring. 2003. Evaluation of the specificities of five DNA amplification methods for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:835-837.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    9. 9
  9. Peerbooms, P. G. H., M. N. Engelen, D. A. J. Stokman, B. H. B. van Benthem, M.-L. van Weert, S. M. Bruisten, A. van Belkum, and R. A. Coutinho. 2002. Nasopharyngeal carriage of potential bacterial pathogens related to day care attendance, with special reference to the molecular epidemiology of Haemophilus influenzae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2832-2836.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    10. 10
  10. Rahman, M., A. Alam, K. Nessa, S. Nahar, D. K. Dutta, L. Yasmin, S. Monira, Z. Sultan, S. A. Khan, and M. J. Albert. 2001. Treatment failure with the use of ciprofloxacin for gonorrhea correlates with the prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains in Bangladesh. Clin. Infect. Dis. 15. 32:884-889.[CrossRef][Medline]
    11. 11
  11. Roberts, M., P. Piot, and S. Falkow. 1979. The ecology of gonococcal plasmids. J. Gen. Microbiol. 114:491-494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. van Doornum, G. J. J., L. M. Schouls, A. Pijl, I. Cairo, M. Buimer, and S. Bruisten. 2001. Comparison between the LCx Probe system and the COBAS AMPLICOR system for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in patients attending a clinic for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:829-835.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. Van Dyck, E., H. Smet, L. Van Damme, and M. Laga. 2001. Evaluation of the Roche Neisseria gonorrhoeae 16S rRNA PCR for confirmation of AMPLICOR PCR-positive samples and comparison of its diagnostic performance according to storage conditions and preparation of endocervical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2280-2282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    14. 14
  14. Whiley, D. M., M. E. Crisante, M. W. Syrmis, I. M. Mackay, and T. P. Sloots. 2003. Detection of Neisseria meningitidis by LightCycler PCR. Pathology 35:347-349.[CrossRef][Medline]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2004, p. 4332-4334, Vol. 42, No. 9
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.9.4332-4334.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Koressaar, T., Joers, K., Remm, M. (2009). Automatic identification of species-specific repetitive DNA sequences and their utilization for detecting microbial organisms. Bioinformatics 25: 1349-1355 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Peter-Getzlaff, S., Luethy, J., Springer, B., Kaul, K. L., Mangold, K. A. (2007). Diagnostic Value of Molecular Confirmation Assays for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 3856-3858 [Full Text]  
  • Mangold, K. A., Regner, M., Tajuddin, M., Tajuddin, A. M., Jennings, L., Du, H., Kaul, K. L. (2007). Neisseria Species Identification Assay for the Confirmation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae-Positive Results of the COBAS Amplicor PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 1403-1409 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lum, G., Garland, S. M., Tabrizi, S., Harnett, G., Smith, D. W., Sloots, T. P., Whiley, D. M., Tapsall, J. W., Lowe, P., O'Loughlin, P., Bartley, P. B., Vohra, R., Evans, K., White, M. (2006). Supplemental Testing Is Still Required in Australia for Samples Positive for Neisseria gonorrhoeae by Nucleic Acid Detection Tests.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 4292-4294 [Full Text]  
  • Lowe, P., O'Loughlin, P., Evans, K., White, M., Bartley, P. B., Vohra, R. (2006). Comparison of the Gen-Probe APTIMA Combo 2 Assay to the AMPLICOR CT/NG Assay for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Urine Samples from Australian Men and Women.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 2619-2621 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Whiley, D. M., Tapsall, J. W., Sloots, T. P. (2006). Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: An Ongoing Challenge. J. Mol. Diagn. 8: 3-15 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Geraats-Peters, C. W. M., Brouwers, M., Schneeberger, P. M., van der Zanden, A. G. M., Bruisten, S. M., Weers-Pothoff, G., Boel, C. H. E., van den Brule, A. J. C., Harmsen, H. G., Hermans, M. H. A. (2005). Specific and Sensitive Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Clinical Specimens by Real-Time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 5653-5659 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lum, G, Freeman, K, Nguyen, N L, Limnios, E A, Tabrizi, S N, Carter, I, Chambers, I W, Whiley, D M, Sloots, T P, Garland, S M, Tapsall, J W (2005). A cluster of culture positive gonococcal infections but with false negative cppB gene based PCR. Sex. Transm. Infect. 81: 400-402 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Boel, C. H. E., van Herk, C. M. C., Berretty, P. J. M., Onland, G. H. W., van den Brule, A. J. C. (2005). Evaluation of Conventional and Real-Time PCR Assays Using Two Targets for Confirmation of Results of the COBAS AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis/Neisseria gonorrhoeae Test for Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Clinical Samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 2231-2235 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tapsall, J. W., Limnios, E. A., Nguyen, N. L., Carter, I., Lum, G., Freeman, K., Tabrizi, S. N., Garland, S. M., Whiley, D. M., Sloots, T. P., Chambers, I. W. (2005). Cryptic-Plasmid-Free Gonococci May Contribute to Failure of cppB Gene-Based Assays To Confirm Results of BD ProbeTEC PCR for Identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 2036-2037 [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bruisten, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schirm, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bruisten, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schirm, J.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»