Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2004, p. 4414-4415, Vol. 42, No. 9
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.9.4414-4415.2004
| LETTER TO THE EDITOR |
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Alignment of the 16S rRNA sequence region described by Yoshida et al., including six oral bacteria compared to the E. coli sequence. The locations of the universal primers (Uni152-F and Uni220-R) and the probe (Uni177-T) are identical to the E. coli sequence as indicated. Strains: 1, DH5 ; 2, W83; 3, ATCC 29523; 4, ATCC 43037; 5, ATCC 33270, 6, ATCC 25611; 7, ATCC 10953. Dots, nucleotides identical to those in the E. coli sequence; dashes, deletions.
|
The E. coli amplification signals consistently showed an increasing CT range (i.e., decreasing amplification signal) between 15.9 and 26.3, which corresponded to 4.95 x 107 to 4.95 x 104 CFU equivalents/PCR. All the oral bacteria, however, showed a CT range between 29.5 and 33.5, which is at the level of the negative control signal (CT = 29.5). For A. actinomycetemcomitans, an amplification signal was obtained only with a high DNA concentration, corresponding to 10,000 CFU/ml, and the signals obtained with lower DNA concentrations were at the level of the negative control. To validate the DNA isolation, a real-time PCR with a specific primer-probe combination for E. coli (3) and P. gingivalis (1) was used. The amplification signals obtained with the specific PCR on the same DNA confirmed that the amount of DNA present in the dilution corresponded to the amount isolated.
In summary, the results with the eubacterium real-time PCR confirm the mismatches in the alignment but are in contradiction with the results on the same strains presented by Yoshida et al. In our laboratory, the primer and probe set described by Yoshida is not universal, does not amplify P. gingivalis, T. forsythensis, M. micros, P. intermedia, or F. nucleatum, and amplifies A. actinomycetemcomitans only at a high DNA concentration. We conclude that the universal real-time probe and primer set published by Yoshida et al. to detect A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis does not seem applicable for sensitive detection of oral bacterium species belonging to the major bacterial periodontal pathogens.
|
|
|---|
|
Khalil Boutaga Arie Jan van Winkelhoff Department of Periodontology Section of Oral Microbiology Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Christina M. J. E. Vandenbroucke-Grauls
|
||||||
|
* Phone: 31204440552, Fax: 31204440473, E-mail: p.savelkoul{at}vumc.nl |
|
|
|---|
Dr. Boutaga et al. commented on the universal primers and probes that we used for the real-time PCR assay that we described previously (4). They stated that our universal primers and probe set are not applicable for the sensitive detection of A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis. They pointed out that Greisen et al. (2) published the sequence that we used as a universal primer and that many more 16S rRNA gene sequences are now available in various databases. Using these data, they showed that there were three or four mismatches with the 24-base 5' primer Uni152-F.
However, the 3' sequence of Uni152-F matched all the bacteria listed in Fig. 1. The essential point is the correspondence of the 3' sequence of the universal primer to the sequence of the template DNA. We do not think that mismatches of three or four nucleotides in the middle of one primer have a serious effect. We subsequently reexamined the real-time PCR assay using five of the oral bacteria that they examined (all except P. micros) and E. coli. The bacteria studied were P. gingivalis W83, A. actinomycetemcomitans TN-1, T. forsythensis (formerly Bacteroides forsythus) ATCC 43037, F. nucleatum ATCC 10953, and P. intermedia ATCC 25611. This time, we used LightCycler FastStart DNA Master Hybridization probes and LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany) for the real-time PCR assay, instead of the 2x TaqMan Universal PCR Master and ABI Prism 7700 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). The real-time PCR conditions were as described in our report (4). Although we used different kits for the real-time PCR assay, we confirmed that the universal primer pairs and probes worked in all of these bacteria (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Alignment of the 16S rRNA sequence region described by Yoshida et al., including six oral bacteria compared to the E. coli sequence. The locations of the universal primers (Uni152-F and Uni220-R) and the probe (Uni177-T) are identical to the E. coli sequence as indicated. Strains: 1, DH5 ; 2, W83; 3, ATCC 29523; 4, ATCC 43037; 5, ATCC 33270, 6, ATCC 25611; 7, ATCC 10953. Dots, nucleotides identical to those in the E. coli sequence; dashes, deletions.
|
Of course, the accuracy of the relative amounts of bacteria is very important. However, nobody has established a truly accurate method of counting bacteria. The most important thing is to improve the accuracy of the counting procedure in small steps. Boutaga's suggestion is useful information for improving the accuracy of bacterial counting methods.
|
|
|---|
|
Akihiro Yoshida*
Department of Preventive Dentistry Kyushu Dental College Kitakyushu 803-8580, Japan
Nao Suzuki
Yoshio Nakano
Takahiko Oho
|
||||||
|
* Phone: 81 93 582 1131, ext. 2103, Fax: 81 93 5917736, E-mail: akihiro{at}kyu-dent.ac.jp |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»