JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pituch, H.
Right arrow Articles by van Belkum, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pituch, H.
Right arrow Articles by van Belkum, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2005, p. 472-475, Vol. 43, No. 1
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.1.472-475.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Clonal Spread of a Clostridium difficile Strain with a Complete Set of Toxin A, Toxin B, and Binary Toxin Genes among Polish Patients with Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea

Hanna Pituch,1* Deborah Kreft,2 Piotr Obuch-Woszczatynski,1 Dorota Wultanska,1 Felicja Meisel-Mikolajczyk,1 Miroslaw Luczak,1 and Alex van Belkum2

Department of Medical Microbiology, The Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland,1 Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands2

Received 14 June 2004/ Returned for modification 13 August 2004/ Accepted 1 September 2004


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Text
 References
 
Clinically relevant Clostridium difficile strains usually produce toxins A and B. Some C. difficile strains can produce an additional binary toxin. We report clonality among five strains carrying all toxin genes from Polish patients with C. difficile-associated diarrhea. In another strain, possible recombination between binary toxin genes is documented.


   TEXT
Top
 Abstract
 Text
References
 
Clostridium difficile is the main etiological agent of nosocomial diarrhea (3, 28). Clinically important C. difficile strains usually produce two toxins: toxin A (TcdA), which is an enterotoxin, and toxin B (TcdB), a cytotoxin (3, 5). Recently, toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive C. difficile strains have been recovered from patients with symptomatic illnesses from multiple countries (2, 11, 14, 17, 18, 27). In addition to TcdA and TcdB, some C. difficile strains can produce a third toxin, called the binary toxin (CDT) (16, 20). Most of the binary toxin-positive C. difficile strains produce TcdA and TcdB as well (23), but exceptions to this rule have been documented (7).

The etiological role of TcdA and TcdB in the pathogenesis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) has been established, but the significance of CDT in intestinal disorders has not yet been fully elucidated. CDT is related to the clostridial binary toxins, including the iota toxin produced by Clostridium perfringens type E, the toxin produced by Clostridium spiroforme, and the C2 toxin from Clostridium botulinum types C and D (1, 10, 15, 19, 25). TcdA and TcdB of C. difficile are encoded by two genes, tcdA and tcdB, located within the 19.6-kb pathogenicity island PaLoc (4). Different studies have described polymorphism in the C. difficile toxin A and B genes (21, 22, 24). CDT is encoded by two other genes, cdtA and cdtB, both located outside the PaLoc (22, 23). The genes encode two unlinked protein chains (CDTa and CDTb). The 45-kDa enzymatic component CDTa catalyses the ADP-ribosylation reaction of monomeric actin and induces disorganization of the cytoskeleton. The binding component CDTb, about 100 kDa in size, recognizes a cell surface receptor which facilitates translocation of CDTa (1, 9, 16). These combined activities suggest that the binary toxin could effectively contribute to pathogenicity, although this has not been explicitly proven to date. The first binary toxin-positive strain (CD196) was recognized among clinical isolates of C. difficile 15 years ago (20). The CDT locus from this strain was cloned and sequenced (GenBank accession number L76081) (16). C. difficile CCUG 20309 was the first binary toxin-positive strain producing TcdB but not TcdA. Also, the binary toxin genes for this strain were sequenced (GenBank accession number AF271719), showing 99.6% homology with the CD196 binary toxin genes (6). A cdtA gene with 98.3% nucleotide identity and 99.5% amino acid similarity with CD196 was reported for an isolate from a horse (5).

The aim of the present study was to detect and examine the genetic relationship between strains possessing binary toxin genes. The study was performed among Polish patients with CDAD.

Isolates of C. difficile (n = 140) included in this study were isolated between 1999 and 2003 from as many patients hospitalized in a large university hospital and a distant pediatric hospital. Patients suffering from CDAD were those individuals who produced more than three liquid stools within 48 h, had an antibiotic therapy in their recent medical history, and had a hospitalization period of more than 5 days. Stool cultures should be negative for Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., pathogenic Escherichia coli strains, rotaviruses, and intestinal parasites. Among the C. difficile strains, 114 were isolated from adults hospitalized in the university hospital. Patients were nursed in different departments: transplantation (n = 48), internal medicine (n = 19), general surgery (n = 22), orthopedics (n = 15), intensive care (n = 4), pulmonology (n = 1), urology (n = 2), dermatology (n = 1), and gynecology (n = 1). One strain was isolated from an outpatient. A further 26 strains were isolated from children (age range, between 3 and 16 years) suffering from CDAD and being nursed in a separate pediatric hospital. For comparative reasons, we included a toxigenic control strain (VPI 10463) and a nontoxigenic reference strain (NIHBRIGGS 8050) in the cytotoxin assays and TcdA- and TcdB-specific PCR tests. An additional TcdA– TcdB+ strain (GAI 95601) isolated by H. Kato (Institute of Anaerobic Bacteriology, Gifu University School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan) was used as an internal control for detecting repeated sequences in the tcdA gene (12, 17). One reference strain, C. difficile CCUG 20309, was used as a control for PCR testing for detecting the binary toxin genes cdtA and cdtB.

All 140 C. difficile strains isolated from patients with CDAD included in this study were tested for production of TcdA and TcdB. A single colony was transferred into brain heart infusion broth (Difco, Detroit, Michigan) and grown for 48 h. Supernatants were collected by centrifugation at 3,000 x g for 15 min. TcdA was detected by the C. difficile toxin A test (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom). Additionally, the C. difficile TOX A/B test (TechLab, Inc., Blacksburg, Va.) was used for detection of either or both TcdA and TcdB. TcdB was detected by using the McCoy cell line (17). Tenfold serial dilutions of culture filtrate were added in duplicate to McCoy cells and incubated for 24 h. The cytopathic effect (CPE) was observed by inverse microscopy. If this CPE could be neutralized by polyclonal antiserum to C. difficile (C. difficile TOX-B Test, TechLab, Inc.), the test was considered positive. Albumin was used as a negative control. For detection of nonrepeating sequences in the tcdA and tcdB genes and repeating sequences in the tcdA gene, PCR was performed with specific primer pairs YT28-YT27, YT17-YT18, and NK9-NKV011 as described previously (12, 17, 18). Crude template DNA was prepared by using Genomic DNA PREP-PLUS (A&A Biotechnology, Warsaw, Poland) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For detection of the binary toxin genes, PCR was used as well. Primers designated to amplify regions of cdtA and cdtB were as follows: cdtA pos, 5'-TGAACCTGGAAAAGGTGATG-3' (position 507 to 526 in the cdtA gene); cdtA rev, 5'-AGGATTATTTACTGGACCATTTG-3' (position 882 to 860); cdtB pos, 5'-CTTAATGCAAGTAAATACTGAG-3' (position 368 to 389 in the cdtB gene); cdtB rev, 5'-AACGGATCTCTTGCTTCAGTC-3' (position 878 to 858). Template nucleic acid (2 µl) was added to 22.5 µl of Supermix (Gibco BRL, Paisley, United Kingdom) and 1 µl of each primer solution (25). PCR products were sequenced bidirectionally without prior purification by cycle sequencing performed commercially at BaseClear (Leiden, The Netherlands). Sequences obtained were aligned and investigated for single nucleotide polymorphisms by use of DNAStar software (Madison, Wis.).

C. difficile binary toxin-positive isolates were cultured for 24 h on Columbia agar. A few colonies were resuspended in 200 µl of lysis buffer, and DNA was isolated as described above. PCR-mediated ribotyping employed consensus primers SP1 and SP2 (5'-TTGTACACACACCGCCCGTCA-3' and 5'-GGTACCTTAGATGTTTCAGTTC-3') (13). Ten microliters of DNA was added to a PCR mixture (50 µl) containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.0), 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.01% gelatin (wt/vol), 0.1% Triton X-100 (vol/vol), 0.2 mM concentrations of each of the four deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates (Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom), 1.2 U of Super Taq DNA polymerase (HT Biotechnology, Cambridge, United Kingdom), and 50 pmol of each of the primers. Amplification was performed in a GeneAmp PCR system 9700 cycler (Applied Biosystems, Gouda, The Netherlands) with predenaturation at 94°C for 120 s followed by 40 cycles of 60 s at 94°C, 60 s at 55°C, and 60 s at 74°C. Amplicons were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 0.8% agarose gel for 3 h at 100 V. PCR ribotypes were defined on the basis of a single band position difference in the fingerprints (18, 26).

A total of 142 C. difficile strains, including controls, were analyzed by immunoassays and latex tests for detection of TcdA and/or TcdB. In addition, cytotoxicity tests for the specific detection of TcdB were performed. Among these strains, 95 strains were TcdA+ TcdB+, as demonstrated by the C. difficile toxin A test, the TOX A/B test, and TcdB-dependent cytotoxicity testing on McCoy cells. Thirty-seven strains were TcdA– TcdB+, and a CPE was observed after cell line challenge. TcdA could not be detected by the commercial toxin A test. The toxin TOX A/B tests gave positive results for all 37 strains. The remaining 10 strains were TcdA– TcdB–, as shown by the fact that all tests to detect both toxin TcdA and toxin TcdB were negative. PCR amplification with YT28-YT29 and YT17-YT18 generated products of 630 and 399 bp for the tcdA and tcdB genes, respectively, for all 95 TcdA+ TcdB+ strains and 37 TcdA– TcdB+ strains. For the 37 TcdA– TcdB+ strains, PCR with the NK9-NK011 primer set generated a 700-bp product similar to that obtained for the Japanese GAI 95601 strain. For the 10 TcdA– TcdB– strains, PCR did not generate a product, since apparently, the tcdA and tcdB genes are fully absent.

The presence of the cdtA and cdtB genes was tested by PCR for the same set of strains. Both cdtA and cdtB were identified in six strains. All strains harboring cdtA and cdtB genes also produced TcdA and TcdB. Five TcdA+ TcdB+ and binary toxin-positive strains (118, 2509, 650, 908, and X-1) share identical partial cdtA and cdtB sequences. Strain 2145 showed deviating sequences (Table 1). The sequences comprised 327 bp of cdtA and 451 bp of cdtB. The data obtained by PCR ribotyping conformed with the binary toxin gene sequence classification (Table 1). The five identical C. difficile strains were isolated at different points in time, with one strain isolated from an outpatient. There was no apparent epidemiological linkage between the individuals. However, we still conclude that endemicity was the case in this hospital, although the source of the infections remains enigmatic. The level of endemicity was apparently different in the two hospitals (6 of 114 versus 0 of 26 binary toxin-positive strains). Similar differences for separate hospitals have been presented before from Paris, France, as well (8).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Survey of PCR ribotypes and partial sequences for the ADP-ribosylating binary toxin genes of various clinical C. difficile strains from Poland compared to the reference strains CD196 and CCUG 20309a

 
Strain 2145 shares significant sequence homology with CD196 in the cdtA portion; only three mutations were observed. The cdtB part, however, is strongly different from both reference sequences. The cdtB region of the reference strains is better conserved than the cdtA region (0 of 11 mutations versus 4 of 10 mutations; two-sided Fisher exact test, P = 0.0351). It has to be emphasized, however, that although they are statistically significant, these figures have to be interpreted with care because of the low number of entries. All Polish isolates can be distinguished from both reference sequences.

C. difficile is commonly isolated from patients with CDAD (28). TcdA and TcdB are the most common virulence factors (3), but the precise relevance of CDT is still a matter of scientific debate (16, 20). In the present study, we identified six clinical C. difficile strains with a complete set of binary toxin genes cdtA and cdtB. Overall, the prevalence as determined in Paris by Goncalves et al. (8) was similar. However, it has to be realized that five out of six Polish strains belong to one type, whereas six types were found among the 17 French isolates. These differences in clonal superstructure affect the genuine incidence of a particular type of C. difficile strain. Strains with a single binary toxin gene were not identified, which is in agreement with data from Stubbs et al. (25). C. difficile strains with only the cdtB gene were described by Perelle et al. (16). Our partial sequences of cdtA and cdtB for the six Polish strains clustered into two groups. Stubbs et al. (25) partially sequenced both binary toxin genes of 11 C. difficile strains and found three clusters for CDTa and five groups for CDTb. Our data suggest clonal spread of a binary toxin-positive strain in our institution. The recent study performed in Paris (8) failed to document clonality among strains except for those cases where a relapse of the infection was considered likely. Interestingly, strain 2145 shares significant sequence homology with reference strain CD196 in the cdtA portion. The cdtB part is strongly different from both reference sequences, suggesting the occurrence of recombination events between different toxin gene sets or an enhanced mutability of the CDTb-encoding gene. Although we do not know whether all binary toxin genes are equally well expressed among our strains, in order to define the clinical impact of the binary toxin, prospective clinical studies need to be undertaken.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was partially supported by a Concerted Action sponsored by the European Union (CA QLK2-CT-2001-01267).

We acknowledge the support of J. Mainil and C. Duchesnes (University of Liege, Liege, Belgium). We thank Maja Rupnik (Department of Biology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia) for C. difficile strain 8864 for comparison.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Chair and Department of Medical Microbiology, The Medical University of Warsaw, 5 Chalubinski Street, 02-004 Warsaw, Poland. Phone: 00478-226282739. Fax: 00478-226282739. E-mail: hanna.pituch{at}ib.amwaw.edu.pl. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Text
 References
 

  1. Aktories, K., and A. Wegner. 1992. Mechanism of the cytopathic action of actin-ADP-ribosylating toxins. Mol. Microbiol. 6:2905-2908.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Alfa, M. J., A. Kabani, D. Lyerly, S. Moncrief, L. M. Neville, A. Al-Barrak, G. K. H. Harding, B. Dyck, K. Olekson, and J. M. Embil. 2000. Characterization of a toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive strain of Clostridium difficile responsible for a nosocomial outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2706-2714.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Boriello, S. P. 1998. Pathogenesis of Clostridium difficile infection. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 41(Suppl. C):13-19.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Braun, V., T. Hundsberger, P. Leukel, M. Sauerborn, and C. von Eichel-Streiber. 1996. Definition of the single integration site of the pathogenicity locus in Clostridium difficile. Gene 181:29-38.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Braun, V., C. Herholz, B. Straub, B. Choisat, J. Frey, J. Nicolet, and P. Kuhnert. 2000. Detection of the ADP-ribosyltransferase toxin gene (cdtA) and its activity in Clostridium difficile isolates from Equidae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 184:29-33.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Chang, S. Y., and K. P. Song. 2001. ADP-ribosylating binary toxin genes of Clostridium difficile strain CCUG 20309. DNA Sequence 12:115-120.[Medline]
  7. Geric, B., S. Johnson, D. N. Gerding, M. Grabnar, and M. Rupnik. 2003. Frequency of binary toxin genes among Clostridium difficile strains that do not produce large clostridial toxins. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5227-5232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Gonçalves, C., D. Decré, F. Barbut, B. Burghoffer, and J.-C. Petit. 2004. Prevalence and characterization of a binary toxin (actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase) from Clostridium difficile. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:1933-1939.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Gülke, I., G. Pfeifer, J. Liese, M. Fritz, F. Hofmann, K. Aktories, and H. Barth. 2001. Characterization of the enzymatic component of the ADP-ribosyltransferase toxin CDTa from Clostridium difficile. Infect. Immun. 69:6004-6011.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Hatheway, C. L. 1990. Toxigenic clostridia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 3:66-98.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Johnson, S., S. P. Sambol, J. S. Brazier, M. Delmée, V. Avesani, M. M. Merrigan, and D. N. Gerding. 2003. International typing study of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile variants. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:1543-1547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Kato, H., N. Kato, S. Katow, T. Muegawa, S. Nakamura, and D. Lyerly. 1999. Deletions in the repeating sequences of the toxin A gene of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile strains. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 175:197-203.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Kostman, J. R., T. D. Edlind, J. J. LiPuma, and T. L. Stull. 1992. Molecular epidemiology of Pseudomonas cepacia determined by polymerase chain reaction ribotyping. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:2084-2087.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Limaye, A. P., D. K. Turgeon, B. T. Cookson, and T. R. Fritsche. 2000. Pseudomembranous colitis caused by a toxin A– B+ strain of Clostridium difficile. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1696-1697.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Perelle, S., M. Gibert, P. Boquet, and M. R. Popoff. 1993. Characterization of Clostridium perfringens iota-toxin genes and expression in Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 61:5147-5156.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Perelle, S., M. Gibert, P. Bourlioux, G. Corthier, and M. R. Popoff. 1997. Production of a complete binary toxin (actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase) by Clostridium difficile CD196. Infect. Immun. 65:1402-1407.[Abstract]
  17. Pituch, H., N. van den Braak, W. van Leeuwen, A. van Belkum, G. Martirosian, P. Obuch-Woszczatyñski, F. Meisel-Mikolajczyk, and M. £uczak. 2001. Clonal dissemination of a toxin A-negative/toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile strain from patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in Poland. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 7:442-446.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Pituch, H., A. van Belkum, N. van den Braak, P. Obuch-Woszczatyñski, H. Verbrugh, F. Meisel-Mikolajczyk, and M. £uczak. 2003. Recent emergence of an epidemic clindamycin-resistant clone of Clostridium difficile among Polish patients with C. difficile-associated diarrhoea. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4184-4187.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Popoff, M. R., and P. Boquet. 1988. Clostridium spiroforme toxin is a binary toxin which ADP-ribosylates cellular actin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 152:1361-1368.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Popoff, M. R., E. J. Rubin, D. M. Gill, and P. Boquet. 1988. Actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase produced by a Clostridium difficile strain. Infect. Immun. 56:2299-2306.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Rupnik, M., V. Avesani, M. Janc, C. von Eichel-Streiber, and M. Delmée. 1998. A novel toxinotyping scheme and correlation of toxinotypes with serogroups of Clostridium difficile isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2240-2247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Rupnik, M. 2001. How to detect Clostridium difficile variant strains in a routine laboratory. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 7:417-420.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Rupnik, M., M. Grabnar, and B. Geric. 2003. Binary toxin producing Clostridium difficile strains. Anaerobe 9:289-294.
  24. Spigaglia, P., and P. Mastrantonio. 2002. Molecular analysis of the pathogenicity locus and polymorphism in the putative negative regulator of toxin production (TcdC) among Clostridium difficile clinical isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:3470-3475.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Stubbs, S., M. Rupnik, M. Gibert, J. S. Brazier, B. Duerden, and M. Popoff. 2000. Production of actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase (binary toxin) by strains of Clostridium difficile. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 186:307-312.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Stubbs, S. L. J., J. S. Brazier, G. L. O'Neill, and B. I. Duerden. 1999. PCR targeted to the 16S-23S rRNA gene intergenic spacer region of Clostridium difficile and construction of a library consisting of 116 different PCR ribotypes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:461-463.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. van den Berg, R. J., E. C. J. Claas, D. H. Oyib, C. H. W. Klaassen, L. Dijkshoorn, J. S. Brazier, and E. J. Kuijper. 2004. Characterization of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile isolates from outbreaks in different countries by amplified fragment length polymorphism and PCR ribotyping. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:1035-1041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Wilkins, T. D., and D. M. Lyerly. 2003. Clostridium difficile testing: after 20 years, still challenging. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:531-534.[Free Full Text]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2005, p. 472-475, Vol. 43, No. 1
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.1.472-475.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pituch, H.
Right arrow Articles by van Belkum, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pituch, H.
Right arrow Articles by van Belkum, A.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS