Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2005, p. 5384-5387, Vol. 43, No. 10
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.10.5384-5387.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Clinical Progression of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Vertebral Osteomyelitis Associated with Reduced Susceptibility to Daptomycin
Holenarasipur R. Vikram,1,2*
Nancy L. Havill,1
Laura M. Koeth,3 and
John M. Boyce1,2
Section of Infectious Diseases, Hospital of Saint Raphael,1
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut,2
Laboratory Specialists, Inc., Westlake, Ohio3
Received 6 June 2005/
Returned for modification 24 June 2005/
Accepted 1 August 2005

ABSTRACT
Daptomycin, a novel cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic, exhibits
rapid bactericidal activity in vitro against most clinically
relevant gram-positive organisms, including drug-resistant pathogens.
Herein we describe a patient in whom methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to daptomycin was responsible
for bacteremia and progressive vertebral osteomyelitis during
daptomycin therapy.

CASE REPORT
A 52-year-old Asian male with a history of Parkinson's-like
illness, micronodular cirrhosis, pulmonary fibrosis requiring
intermittent corticosteroid therapy, and diabetes mellitus presented
with right groin pain in June 2004. Blood cultures revealed
methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) of his right hip revealed septic iliopsoas
bursitis, and a transthoracic echocardiogram showed normal cardiac
valves without vegetations. He underwent irrigation and drainage
of the right hip and iliac bursa; cultures grew MRSA. He received
a 6-week course of vancomycin with prompt resolution of bacteremia
and right hip symptoms.
In July 2004, he presented with new-onset back pain a few days after completing vancomycin therapy. MRI of the thoracic spine revealed T10-T11 diskitis and osteomyelitis (Fig. 1). He was not bacteremic. Biopsy of the T10-T11 disk space revealed MRSA. Daptomycin was initiated at a daily dose of 6 mg/kg of body weight intravenously.
In August, during the 4th week of daptomycin therapy, he complained
of increasing back pain. Repeat spine MRI showed significant
progression of diskitis and osteomyelitis at T10-T11, collapse
of T11 with gibbus deformity, an epidural phlegmon, and spinal
cord compression (Fig.
2). His neurological exam was normal.
A biopsy of the involved disk was performed; blood and T10-T11
disk cultures grew MRSA. He was started on linezolid with resolution
of bacteremia. Linezolid was discontinued 10 days later due
to thrombocytopenia. Quinupristin-dalfopristin (Q-D) and rifampin
were initiated. Repeat MRI 2 weeks later showed progressive
compression of T11 and unchanged cord compression. Conservative
therapy was recommended by neurosurgery. He developed disabling
myalgias and arthralgias secondary to Q-D; given the lack of
alternate antimicrobials, Q-D was continued along with symptomatic
therapy. In September, a computed tomography scan of the abdomen
performed to evaluate persistent constipation revealed diffuse
pneumatosis coli. Blood cultures and stool enzyme immunoassay
for
Clostridium difficile were negative. Conservative management
was chosen, given the lack of abdominal pain or tenderness,
hemodynamic stability, and operative risk.
Four weeks into Q-D and rifampin therapy, he developed vomiting,
renal insufficiency, worsening hepatic encephalopathy, and lactic
acidosis. Abdominal computed tomography scan showed worsening
pneumatosis coli with possible perforation. Repeat blood cultures
were negative. His family opted for comfort care, and the patient
died. An autopsy revealed compression fracture of T10-T11 vertebrae
with no evidence of active osteomyelitis, micronodular cirrhosis,
bronchopneumonia, and submucosal colonic edema. Postmortem cultures
of the T10-T11 disks and vertebrae were negative.
Clinical isolates were identified as Staphylococcus aureus based on colony morphology and Staphaurex (Remel) slide coagulase test. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by automated microdilution broth testing (Microscan; Dade Behring). Methicillin resistance was confirmed by growth on commercially prepared oxacillin screen agar (BBL). Vancomycin screen agar (BBL) was used to screen for reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. The MIC of vancomycin was determined using Etest strips (AB Biodisk). Inducible clindamycin resistance was detected by the D-test as described elsewhere (3).
Patient's clinical isolates of MRSA were sent to the daptomycin reference laboratory (Laboratory Specialists, Inc., Westlake, OH). Daptomycin susceptibility was determined by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion and microdilution panels manufactured by TREK Diagnostics (Cleveland, OH). The daptomycin-containing wells were adjusted to contain physiological levels of calcium (50 mg/liter) after the addition of cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (5). The daptomycin susceptibility breakpoint for S. aureus was
1 µg/ml or a zone diameter of
16 mm. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed on available MRSA isolates.
Five MRSA isolates from the patient were available, including one dating back 6 months prior to his current illness (Table 1). Vancomycin MICs increased from 2.0 µg/ml (isolates obtained before and immediately after vancomycin therapy) to 4.0 µg/ml (after 4 weeks of daptomycin therapy). Daptomycin MICs increased from 0.5 µg/ml (isolate prior to daptomycin therapy) to 4.0 µg/ml (blood and T10-T11 disk isolate obtained during the 4th week of daptomycin therapy) (Table 1). All MRSA isolates (i) demonstrated inducible clindamycin resistance by the D-test; (ii) were susceptible to gentamicin, chloramphenicol, linezolid, Q-D, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and rifampin; and (iii) were indistinguishable by PFGE.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1. Vancomycin and daptomycin susceptibilities for MRSA isolates obtained prior to and during the course of daptomycin therapy
|
Daptomycin (Cubicin; Cubist Pharmaceuticals), a cyclic lipopeptide
antibiotic, exhibits rapid concentration-dependent bactericidal
activity against most gram-positive pathogens, including isolates
resistant to methicillin, vancomycin, and linezolid (
2). It
is currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections
caused by
S. aureus (including methicillin-resistant strains),
Streptococcus pyogenes,
Streptococcus agalactiae,
Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp.
equisimilis, and
Enterococcus faecalis (vancomycin-susceptible
strains only) at a dose of 4 mg/kg/day administered intravenously
(
2). Daptomycin is currently being studied for a variety of
other infections, including gram-positive bacteremia and endocarditis
(
1). Its unique mechanism of action involves binding to bacterial
membranes and rapid depolarization of membrane potential; the
resultant inhibition of protein, DNA, and RNA synthesis results
in bacterial cell death (
2). Hence, cross-resistance with other
antimicrobial classes has not been reported. The activity of
daptomycin is dependent on the presence of calcium ions; it
is two- to fourfold more active when tested in 50 mg/liter of
calcium (similar to the normal human serum concentration of
ionized calcium) (
5).
The convenience of once-daily dosing, minimal adverse effects, paucity of significant drug interactions, bactericidal activity against drug-resistant pathogens, and low potential for the development of drug resistance have prompted clinicians to use daptomycin for the treatment of deep-seated infections, such as endocarditis and osteomyelitis, despite the absence of published human studies. In a rat model of experimental MRSA endocarditis, daptomycin (with or without rifampin) at a dose equivalent to 6 mg/kg once daily in humans was superior to vancomycin monotherapy (12). In intravenous drug abusers being treated for gram-positive endocarditis and bacteremia, the bactericidal killing rate of daptomycin was significantly decreased in patient serum samples than the rate in broth (11). This may have been related to the high degree of protein binding (
93%) of daptomycin. In the same study, the bactericidal killing rate of daptomycin was greater when killing curves were performed with test strains in logarithmic- versus stationary-phase growth (11).
Clinical and laboratory studies on the effectiveness of daptomycin in treatment of bone and joint infections have been limited to date. In an experimental rabbit model of MRSA tibial osteomyelitis, 41% of daptomycin- and 39% of vancomycin-treated rabbits had negative tibial cultures for MRSA after 28 days of therapy (8). Compared to daptomycin, vancomycin was present in significantly higher levels in both infected and uninfected bone; daptomycin was not detectable in uninfected bone. The concentrations of vancomycin and daptomycin in bone were 6.0% and 1.3% of the corresponding peak serum concentrations (8). High protein binding of daptomycin was again considered to play a role. A patient with MRSA vertebral osteomyelitis was successfully treated with a 12-week course of daptomycin (6 mg/kg once daily) after he developed significant allergic reactions to vancomycin and linezolid (7). A bone biopsy specimen obtained during Q-D therapy continued to grow MRSA with reduced susceptibility to Q-D. Intraoperative cultures during daptomycin therapy were negative. Another report describes successful daptomycin therapy in 9 of 10 patients with drug-resistant gram-positive bone and joint infections (eight with MRSA and one each with Enterococcus and Streptococcus); relapse on daptomycin therapy in one patient was blamed on infrequent dosing (4). Six patients had osteomyelitis, and five patients had septic arthritis (4). Details of daptomycin dosage, location of infection, and possible surgical debridement were not provided.
The emergence of daptomycin resistance during therapy has been extremely uncommon (6, 13). During phase 2 and 3 trials, one clinical isolate of daptomycin-resistant S. aureus and E. faecalis were identified among more than 1,000 infected subjects (2). Three isolates of S. aureus with daptomycin MICs of 8 µg/ml were found among 88 staphylococcal isolates obtained from diverse geographic regions between 1996 and 2001 (6). The emergence of daptomycin resistance and treatment failure was reported in two cases of MRSA vertebral osteomyelitis (daptomycin dose of 6 mg/kg daily) (10). Recurrent MRSA bacteremia was noted in both patients. Increasing MIC to daptomycin was seen in isolates of MRSA obtained before and after daptomycin therapy, and all isolates from a given patient were indistinguishable by PFGE (10). Another report described a patient with prolonged MRSA bacteremia due to portal vein thrombophlebitis treated with daptomycin who subsequently developed daptomycin resistance (9).
Our patient relapsed with vertebral osteomyelitis after 6 weeks of vancomycin therapy for MRSA bacteremia and right ileopsoas bursitis. Recurrence of MRSA bacteremia and progression of vertebral osteomyelitis were noted during the 4th week of daptomycin therapy. Daptomycin MICs increased to levels considered to be nonsusceptible. The exact mechanism of resistance to daptomycin has not been identified. Increased protein binding and low daptomycin concentration in bone may have led to clinical failures even though daptomycin's activity is enhanced in the presence of high calcium concentrations (8). The patients described by us and Rezai et al. (10) failed a higher dose of daptomycin than is currently recommended for complicated skin and skin structure infections (2). It is unclear whether unique strain characteristics and/or certain clinical presentations of MRSA infections are associated with the emergence of daptomycin resistance. Caution and close monitoring are necessary when daptomycin is utilized for the treatment of osteomyelitis until further clinical and experimental investigations can document its efficacy in this setting.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Holenarasipur R. Vikram has served as a member of the Regional
Advisory Board for Cubist Pharmaceuticals.
Laura M. Koeth is a consultant for Cubist Pharmaceuticals, and Laboratory Specialists, Inc., is financially supported by Cubist Pharmaceuticals.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E. Shea Blvd., Scottsdale, AZ 85259. Phone: (480) 342-0115. Fax: (480) 342-2324. E-mail:
vikram.holenarasipur{at}mayo.edu.


REFERENCES
1 - Carpenter, C. F., and H. F. Chambers. 2004. Daptomycin: another novel agent for treating infections due to drug-resistant gram-positive pathogens. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38:994-1000.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Cubist Pharmaceuticals. 2003. Cubicin (daptomycin for injection) (package insert). Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Lexington, Mass.
3 - Fiebelkorn, K. R., S. A. Crawford, M. L. McElmeel, and J. H. Jorgensen. 2003. Practical disk diffusion method for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4740-4744.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Finney, M. S., C. W. Crank, and J. Segreti. 2004. Use of daptomycin to treat drug-resistant Gram-positive bone and joint infections, abstr. 427, p. 120. Program Abstr. 42nd Annu. Meet. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am., Boston, Mass. Infectious Diseases Society of America, Alexandria, VA.
5 - Fuchs, P. C., A. L. Barry, and S. D. Brown. 2000. Daptomycin susceptibility tests: interpretive criteria, quality control, and effect of calcium on in vitro tests. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 38:51-58.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - Jevitt, L. A., A. J. Smith, P. P. Williams, P. M. Raney, J. E. McGowan, Jr., and F. C. Tenover. 2003. In vitro activities of daptomycin, linezolid, and quinupristin-dalfopristin against a challenge panel of staphylococci and enterococci, including vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Microb. Drug Resist. 9:389-393.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 - Juthani-Mehta, M., H. R. Vikram, J. L. Gorelick, and J. M. Rappeport. 2003. Successful therapy of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) vertebral osteomyelitis (VOM) with daptomycin, abstr. 298, p. 83. Program Abstr. 41st Annu. Meet. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am., San Diego, Calif. Infectious Diseases Society of America, Alexandria, VA.
8 - Mader, J. T., and K. Adams. 1989. Comparative evaluation of daptomycin (LY146032) and vancomycin in the treatment of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in rabbits. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33:689-692.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Mangili, A., I. Bica, D. R. Snydman, and D. H. Hamer. 2005. Daptomycin-resistant, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 40:1058-1060.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Rezai, K., J. P. Quinn, R. Hayes, K. Lolans, R. A. Weinstein, and M. K. Hayden. 2004. Emergence of daptomycin resistance and treatment failure in two cases of S. aureus osteomyelitis, abstr. K97-a. Program Abstr. 44th Annu. Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
11 - Rybak, M. J., E. M. Bailey, K. C. Lamp, and G. W. Kaatz. 1992. Pharmacokinetics and bactericidal rates of daptomycin and vancomycin in intravenous drug abusers being treated for gram-positive endocarditis and bacteremia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:1109-1114.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Sakoulas, G., G. M. Eliopoulos, J. Alder, and C. T. Eliopoulos. 2003. Efficacy of daptomycin in experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1714-1718.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Streit, J. M., R. N. Jones, and H. S. Sader. 2004. Daptomycin activity and spectrum: a worldwide sample of 6737 clinical gram-positive organisms. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 53:669-674.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2005, p. 5384-5387, Vol. 43, No. 10
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.10.5384-5387.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Miro, J. M., Garcia-de-la-Maria, C., Armero, Y., Soy, D., Moreno, A., del Rio, A., Almela, M., Sarasa, M., Mestres, C. A., Gatell, J. M., Jimenez de Anta, M. T., Marco, F., and the Hospital Clinic Experimental Endocarditis,
(2009). Addition of Gentamicin or Rifampin Does Not Enhance the Effectiveness of Daptomycin in Treatment of Experimental Endocarditis Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 4172-4177
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Moise, P. A, Hershberger, E., Amodio-Groton, M. I, Lamp, K. C
(2009). Safety and Clinical Outcomes when Utilizing High-Dose (>=8 mg/kg) Daptomycin Therapy. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
43: 1211-1219
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kirby, A., Mohandas, K., Broughton, C., Neal, T. J., Smith, G. W., Pai, P., Nistal de Paz, C.
(2009). In vivo development of heterogeneous glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hGISA), GISA and daptomycin resistance in a patient with meticillin-resistant S. aureus endocarditis. J Med Microbiol
58: 376-380
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Camargo, I. L. B. d. C., Neoh, H.-M., Cui, L., Hiramatsu, K.
(2008). Serial Daptomycin Selection Generates Daptomycin-Nonsusceptible Staphylococcus aureus Strains with a Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Phenotype. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 4289-4299
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hawkey, P. M.
(2008). Pre-clinical experience with daptomycin. J Antimicrob Chemother
62: iii7-iii14
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Warren, R. E.
(2008). Daptomycin in endocarditis and bacteraemia: a British perspective. J Antimicrob Chemother
62: iii25-iii33
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Julian, K., Kosowska-Shick, K., Whitener, C., Roos, M., Labischinski, H., Rubio, A., Parent, L., Ednie, L., Koeth, L., Bogdanovich, T., Appelbaum, P. C.
(2007). Characterization of a Daptomycin-Nonsusceptible Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Strain in a Patient with Endocarditis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
51: 3445-3448
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rose, W. E., Rybak, M. J., Kaatz, G. W.
(2007). Evaluation of daptomycin treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacterial endocarditis: an in vitro and in vivo simulation using historical and current dosing strategies. J Antimicrob Chemother
60: 334-340
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Aiello, A. E., King, N. B., Foxman, B.
(2006). Ethical Conflicts in Public Health Research and Practice: Antimicrobial Resistance and the Ethics of Drug Development. AJPH
96: 1910-1914
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Denis, O., Deplano, A., Nonhoff, C., Hallin, M., De Ryck, R., Vanhoof, R., De Mendonca, R., Struelens, M. J.
(2006). In Vitro Activities of Ceftobiprole, Tigecycline, Daptomycin, and 19 Other Antimicrobials against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains from a National Survey of Belgian Hospitals.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 2680-2685
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Friedman, L., Alder, J. D., Silverman, J. A.
(2006). Genetic Changes That Correlate with Reduced Susceptibility to Daptomycin in Staphylococcus aureus.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 2137-2145
[Abstract]
[Full Text]