Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2005, p. 6086-6090, Vol. 43, No. 12
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.12.6086-6090.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Pathogenobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China,1 Department of Pathology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York,2 Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland3
Received 10 February 2005/ Returned for modification 28 April 2005/ Accepted 17 August 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
A number of methods have been developed for detecting the pathogens in food and clinical specimens, including culture isolation using selective media, such as sorbitol-substituted MacConkey agar and methylumbelliferyl-ß-D-glucuronide agar, serological tests to detect O157 and H7 antigens, and immunological detection of Shiga toxins (5). To achieve sensitive, specific, and rapid detection of STEC and E. coli O157:H7 strains in clinical specimens and food products, several research teams have employed the PCR technique (1, 2). However, a number of drawbacks associated with such a PCR approach have limited its routine use in many laboratories (2).
We have recently developed a novel isothermal DNA amplification technology, termed ramification amplification or RAM (8). In this study, we developed a detection assay by combining magnetic bead-based DNA isolation, DNA amplification by RAM, and real-time fluorescence detection (9). The technique uses a circularizable probe to detect the target with subsequent amplification of the circular probe generated by a target-dependent ligation through a mechanism of primer extension, strand displacement, and ramification to achieve a billionfold amplification under isothermal conditions (Fig. 1) (11). The objective of this study was to determine the analytical sensitivity and specificity of the RAM assay for detecting the Shiga toxin 2 gene (stx2) and its feasibility for detecting E. coli O157:H7 and other STEC strains isolated from food and human specimens.
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Schematic representation of RAM assay. Target DNA, capture probe, C-probe, and paramagnetic bead are added to hybridization buffer to allow the formation of a hybrid complex. The hybrid is captured on a paramagnetic bead, allowing extensive washing to remove unbound C-probe and cellular components. The C-probe aligned on the target is linked together by a DNA ligase. RAM amplification is then carried out by the addition of forward ( ) and reverse ( ) primers and DNA polymerase (). The forward primer bound to the C-probe is extended by the polymerase and continues after one round of synthesis by displacing the bound forward primer and its extended product, generating a long single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) with repeated sequence. With the reactions taking place, multiple reverse primers can bind to the nascent ssDNA as their binding sites become available. Each bound reverse primer will be extended and displace the downstream primers and their extended products. The forward primer binding sites of the displaced ssDNA are then available for the forward primer to bind and extend in a similar fashion, thus forming a large ramifying DNA complex. Finally, the RAM products are examined by gel electrophoresis after EcoRI digestion. (Inset) The C-probe hybridizes to the target through their complementary regions (f and g), and the sequence at the noncomplementary region (e) is generic for the binding of primers. The C-probe-target hybrid is captured on a paramagnetic bead (a) through the binding of the biotin moiety (c) on the capture probe (d) to the streptavidin (b) that the beads were coated with.
|
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Characteristics and genotyping of bacterial isolates by PCR and RAM
|
For quantitative analysis of E. coli O157:H7, a bacterial colony was picked and dissolved in saline. The bacterial density was determined by densitometry, and the concentration was determined by comparing the optical density value with those of standards of known bacterial concentrations. The bacteria were diluted with saline in a series of 10-fold dilutions, starting from 105 to 10 bacteria/µl. One microliter of suspension was inoculated onto MacConkey agar, and the number of colonies formed was determined to confirm the number of bacteria in initial dilutions. The supernatant was removed, and 5 M GTC was added to each tube, boiled at 100°C for 10 min, and incubated at 60°C overnight.
PCR assay. PCR was carried out in a 50-µl reaction mixture composed of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM concentrations of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 10 pmol of each primer (Table 2), 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Roche, Indianapolis, IN), and 10 µl of bacterial lysate (2). The reaction was performed in a thermal cycler (GeneAmp 2700 PCR system; Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA) for 30 cycles of 94°C, 55°C, and 72°C for 1 min each. Fifteen microliters of PCR products was analyzed by gel electrophoresis using a 2.0% agarose gel and visualized after staining with 0.5 µg/ml of ethidium bromide. The expected PCR products are 614 bp for stx1 and 779 bp for stx2.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Sequences of circular probe, capture probe, RAM and PCR primers, and synthetic target sequence
|
Real-time RAM. The RAM reactions were carried out as described above except that 2.5 µl of 1:5,000 diluted SYBR Green I (Roche) was added to each reaction mixture. SYBR Green I is a fluorochrome that, upon binding to the minor groove of double-stranded DNA, emits an intense green fluorescent signal which can be readily detected using a fluorometer. The reactions were monitored at 37°C for 2 h in a SmartCycler (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA).
|
|
|---|
We initially determined the analytical sensitivity of the RAM assay using a synthetic stx2 DNA target (Table 2). The DNA was diluted in 100-fold serial dilutions from 105 to 103 to 101 molecules/2 µl and was used to initiate the RAM reaction. The lowest number of targets detected by RAM assay was 10 molecules (Fig. 2A), and the reactions were confirmed by finding the correct products (124 bp) in each lane after digestion with EcoRI, establishing the C-probe as their source. In the absence of a target molecule, no DNA was produced, validating a target-dependent amplification of the C-probe. The assay sensitivity was further determined using an E. coli O157:H7 strain. The bacterial concentration was determined by densitometry. The bacteria were lysed in 5 M GTC, diluted to 105, 103, and 101 copies/2 µl, and then used to initiate the RAM reaction. The results in Fig. 2B showed that the assay was able to detect as few as 10 bacteria, a sensitivity comparable to that of PCR.
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Sensitivity of RAM assay for detecting Shiga toxin target. (A) The RAM reactions were initiated with the synthetic Shiga toxin 2 targets of 105, 103, and 10 copies. The RAM products were examined on a 2% agarose gel following EcoRI digestion. The results showed that 10 copies of Shiga toxin 2 targets were detected. Lane 0, no target present; lane M, molecular marker (pBR 322/MspI; New England Biolabs). (B) Sensitivity was confirmed using E. coli O157:H7 that was diluted to 105, 103, and 10 copies. As few as 10 bacteria of E. coli O157:H7 can be detected. Lane 0, no target present; lane M, molecular marker (pBR 322/MspI; New England Biolabs).
|
|
View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Specificity of RAM assay for detecting Shiga toxin genes in bacteria. Seven bacterial isolates were tested with the RAM assay. Our results showed that the Shiga toxin 2 gene was present only in pathogenic E. coli. Lane 1, E. coli O157:H7; lanes 2 to 4, nonpathogenic E. coli; lane 5, E. coli O46:H38; lane 6, E. coli O111:NM; lane 7, S. dysenteriae.
|
It will be desirable to detect the RAM reaction by real-time monitoring instead of gel electrophoresis. We applied SYBR Green I dye in our RAM reactions. The initial experiment was performed using a lysed E. coli O157:H7 sample. Our results showed that as few as 10 bacteria could be detected and that the time needed for the emergence of a detectable signal was dependent on the target concentration (Fig. 4A). Additionally, we have employed this method for the detection of bacterial isolates, and Fig. 4B shows an example of real-time RAM assay of three isolates. This study showed that real-time RAM assay can be developed for diagnostic use, which can significantly shorten the assay time and eliminate the possibility of carryover contamination.
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Real-time RAM assay. (A) RAM assays were initiated with 107, 105, 103, and 10 cells of E. coli O157:H7 in the presence of SYBR Green I; (B) RAM reactions were monitored using a SmartCycler. Three isolates were assayed with RAM in the presence of SYBR Green I, and RAM products were detected as the intensity of the fluorescent signal increased.
|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»