Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2005, p. 6200-6201, Vol. 43, No. 12
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.12.6200-6201.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
| CASE REPORT |
Parasitology Reference Unit, National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
Received 1 June 2005/ Returned for modification 20 July 2005/ Accepted 15 September 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (153K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Photograph of an oval mite egg with a rough shell found in urine concentrate, measuring 123 µm in length and 78 µm in width.
|
There are very few articles in English medical publications that deal with the medical significance of finding mites or mite eggs in urine and stool specimens. Mite eggs in stool specimens have been described as spurious human infections when the eggs pass through the alimentary canal without causing infection (3). Adult house dust mites of the genus Tarsonemus have been found in human sputum, but their medical significance was unclear (7). Adult scabies mites, Sarcoptes scabiei, were found in a patient's urine. The urine was most probably contaminated by a scabies infection on the patient's penis and scrotum (5). Healthy people with scabies generally have a stable mite population of between 15 and 20 mites. Some immunocompromising conditions predispose patients to large infestations of up to thousands of mites per patient (crusted or Norwegian scabies). Persons typically at risk for this form of infection are infants, immobilized geriatric patients, and patients with AIDS, leprosy, or hematological malignancies, but there may be no clearly identifiable risk factors in a substantial proportion of cases (1, 6). Patients shedding large quantities of scabies mites are obviously more likely to contaminate urine specimens than those who are not. A study in China found that 3.5% of urine samples and 6.2% of stool samples contained adults, larvae, or eggs of environmental mites. On colonoscopy-guided biopsy specimens, live mites and eggs were observed in large-bowel mucosal lesions. On cystoscopy, adult mites were observed. Damage to the intestinal and bladder walls was noted. The prevalence of human intestinal and urinary acariasis (mite infection) was higher in individuals working in medicinal herb storehouses, rice storehouses, mills, and other sites where the density of mites is high (4). Whether there was a causal association with mucosal pathology, however, remains unresolved.
The size similarity between mite and schistosome eggs prompted the referral of the specimen, although the lack of a terminal spine would normally preclude misidentification as Schistosoma haematobium. Schistosoma mansoni eggs may (uncommonly) be found in urine because of ectopic fluke location or fecal contamination of urine. On the slide, these eggs may sometimes lie with their lateral spines in a vertical or oblique plane and therefore appear atypical. Gently pressing on or tapping the coverslip helps to move them into a more usual orientation and may also result in their hatching. The contents of nondegenerate schistosome and mite eggs are completely dissimilar, which would help resolve confusion, even if unhatched. We concluded that the microscopic objects in this urine specimen were most likely eggs of house dust or other free-living mites that had contaminated the urine container. To avoid contamination from mites, clean urine containers should be used when sampling patients, and containers should be kept closed until they are ready for examination. The finding of mite eggs and larvae in urine or stool specimens may not always be artifactual and of no clinical significance, particularly if the mite is not identified fully. From the laboratory's perspective, it may not be possible to decide whether the presence of mites is due to contamination, a spurious infection, or a true infection, as their identity and source are often unknown. The clinical significance of mites in urine samples largely hinges on the identification of the mite species. However, the referral of mites for expert identification is ideal but usually not practical because of the nonavailability of such expertise and the large size and diversity of the Acarina order. The possibility of gut or bladder mite infection should be entertained only after repeated identification of mites in urine or stool samples from a symptomatic patient with no other cause for the symptoms and where the possibilities of contamination and spurious infection have been excluded. In such cases, endoscopic examination may be indicated.
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»