Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Samaranayake, Y. H. Articles by Samaranayake, L. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Samaranayake, Y. H. Articles by Samaranayake, L. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2005, p. 818-825, Vol. 43, No. 2
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.2.818-825.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

In Vitro Method To Study Antifungal Perfusion in Candida Biofilms

Y. H. Samaranayake, J. Ye, J. Y. Y. Yau, B. P. K. Cheung, and L. P. Samaranayake^*

Oral Biosciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China

Received 20 October 2003/ Returned for modification 11 February 2004/ Accepted 5 August 2004

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Antimycotic perfusion through Candida biofilms was demonstrated by a modification of a simple in vitro diffusion cell bioassay system. Using this model, the perfusion of three commonly used antifungal agents, amphotericin B, fluconazole, and flucytosine, was investigated in biofilms of three different Candida species (i.e., Candida albicans, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida krusei) that were developed on microporous filters. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that C. albicans formed a contiguous biofilm with tightly packed blastospores and occasional hyphae compared with C. parapsilosis and C. krusei, which developed confluent biofilms displaying structural heterogeneity and a lesser cell density, after 48 h of incubation on nutrient agar. Minor structural changes were also perceptible on the superficial layers of the biofilm after antifungal perfusion. The transport of antifungals to the distal biofilm-substratum interface was most impeded by C. albicans biofilms in comparison to C. parapsilosis and C. krusei. Fluconazole and flucytosine demonstrated similar levels of perfusion, while amphotericin B was the least penetrant through all three biofilms, although the latter appeared to cause the most structural damage to the superficial cells of the biofilm compared with the other antifungals. These results suggest that the antifungal perfusion through biofilm mode of growth in Candida is dependent both on the antimycotic and the Candida species in question, and in clinical terms, these phenomena could contribute to the failure of Candida biofilm-associated infections. Finally, the in vitro model we have described should serve as a useful system to investigate the complex interactions that appear to operate in vivo within the biofilm-antifungal interphase.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Candida species are opportunistic pathogens which cause superficial and systemic disease in compromised individuals (26). Candida albicans is the main causative agent of oropharyngeal candidiasis, while the clinical significance of other non-C. albicans species such as Candida parapsilosis and Candida krusei are being increasingly recognized (16, 24, 28). The first step in the pathogenesis of candidal infection entails the adhesion of the yeast to the host surface or an associated prostheses, such as a denture or intravascular catheter material (18, 27, 34). It is thought that the presence of an indwelling denture or a catheter modifies the normal planktonic mode of growth of the yeasts in a yet unknown manner to a sessile biofilm mode of growth, leading to a structured community of cells encased in an extracellular polymer matrix. Once the biofilm mode of growth is established on prostheses such as heart valves and surgical implants (17, 19), the sessile yeasts begin to display unique characteristics, including resistance to antifungal agents (6). This in turn leads to failure of antifungal therapy and chronic infection, remediated by surgery and/or removal of these devices (33). Factors thought to contribute to antimycotic resistance in Candida biofilms include the growth rate of the yeast (2) and the low diffusion gradient of the antimicrobial through the extracellular polymer matrix of the biofilm (2, 3).

Although there are many reports on the phenomenon of incomplete penetration of antimicrobial agents through bacterial biofilms (1, 31, 32, 35), none so far have investigated this particular feature in Candida biofilms. Therefore, the main objective of the present study was to evaluate qualitatively the antifungal perfusion in Candida biofilms with a modified, novel assay system. For this purpose, we used a representative isolate of each of C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. krusei and three common antifungals: amphotericin B, fluconazole, and flucytosine. In addition, ultrastructural features were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to visualize and compare the cellular damage to the superficial layers of the Candida biofilm before and after antifungal perfusion.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Candida strains. Three Candida strains used in this study were C. albicans HK1Sa, from a human immunodeficiency virus-infected patient in Hong Kong, and C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and C. krusei ATCC 6258, from the American Type Culture Collection. The identity of all three strains were reconfirmed by using the API20C AUX system, germ tube formation, and the CHROM agar technique prior to the experiments. All three Candida strains were maintained on Sabouraud's dextrose agar slopes at –4°C.

To prepare the yeast inoculum for the development of biofilms, a loopful of the candidal strain under investigation was transferred into 10 ml of liquid yeast nitrogen base (YNB; Difco) supplemented with 50 mM galactose and incubated at 37°C overnight on a rotary shaker at 75 rpm. Cells were harvested and washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.2), and a cell suspension of approximately 10⁷ CFU/ml was prepared by using a spectrophotometer (at 520 nm). Two types of agar media were used. First, Sabouraud's dextrose agar supplemented with 500 mM galactose was used for the development of biofilms, and second, Sabouraud's dextrose agar supplemented with both 500 mM galactose and the specific antimycotic agent was used for the antifungal penetration studies (see below).

Antifungals. Three antifungals commonly used to treat oropharyngeal and systemic candidiasis were selected for the study, viz., amphotericin B (Sigma), fluconazole (Pfizer), and flucytosine (Sigma). Three concentrations of the drugs, i.e., 150, 300, and 600 µg/ml were prepared for each antifungal. Stock solutions of the drugs in dimethyl sulfoxide (amphotericin B), dimethyl formamide (fluconazole), and sterile distilled water (flucytosine) were prepared prior to use and added to a YNB-500 mM galactose agar solution at a temperature of 40°C for the preparation of the nutrient agar plates, which were then stored at 4°C and used within 1 day.

Development of Candida biofilms for antifungal penetration studies. Candida biofilms were developed on Isopore membrane filters (diameter, 25 mm; pore size, 12 µm; Millipore) by using a modification of a method described by Anderl et al. (1). A schematic presentation of this method is shown in Fig. 1. At first the filter membranes were sterilized by exposure to UV light (15 min per side), and each membrane was aseptically placed on a Sabouraud's dextrose agar (500 mM galactose) plate. Afterwards, 50 µl of an overnight Candida inoculum (10⁷ CFU/ml) was carefully deposited on the membrane with a pipette. The nutrient agar plates with the inoculum were incubated at 37°C for 1 h (to dry the deposit), and then the plate was inverted and reincubated at 37°C for a period of 48 h. During this incubation period, each filter with the growing biofilm was manually lifted and repositioned on a fresh location on the plate every 10 to 12 h.

View larger version (25K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental system used to monitor antifungal penetration through Candida biofilms. The biofilm (a) was developed on a 25-mm-diameter microporous polycarbonate membrane (b) resting on the agar medium. A 13-mm-diameter microporous polycarbonate membrane (c) was placed on top of the biofilm, and then a moistened antibiotic disk (d) was placed on top of the polycarbonate membrane. The entire unit (components a through d) was then transferred to antifungal-laced agar (e). (B) Transverse view of the Isopore filter membrane placed on YNB-500 mM galactose agar and a surface view of the Isopore membrane inoculated with the yeast suspension (method adapted from Anderl et al. [1]).

After 48 h, the biofilms on the membrane filters were placed on an antibiotic-incorporated agar medium prepared as described above with the biofilm facing outwards. Black microporous membrane filters (diameter, 13 mm; pore size, 0.2 µm; Millipore) were then placed on top of 48-h-old Candida biofilms. A blank antibiotic (AB) disk (diameter, 9 mm; Difco) moistened with 10 µl of PBS (pH 7.2) was then placed on top of the 13-mm-diameter membrane (wetting the disk obviates passive capillary perfusion of the antifungal through the biofilm). The whole assembly was then incubated at 37°C for 4 h (Fig. 1).

A semiquantitative evaluation of the antifungals that diffused into an AB disk through the biofilm was performed as follows, with C. parapsilosis as an indicator organism. The disk was removed after the specified incubation time and placed on a fresh RPMI agar plate spread plated with 100 µl of (planktonic) C. parapsilosis. For this assay, C. parapsilosis was grown on Sabouraud's dextrose agar at 37°C, and the growth was diluted with PBS to an optical density of 0.05 (at 520 nm) prior to plating. The control used for the experiment was an AB disk placed on the two-membrane system devoid of a biofilm. Then the RPMI plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h, and the diameters of the growth inhibition zones (with and without biofilms) were measured by a computerized image analysis system (Quantimet 500 Qwin; Leica, Cambridge, United Kingdom). The assay was conducted in duplicate on three separate occasions for each Candida strain tested.

Standard curves for antifungal concentration versus zone of inhibition. Standard curves of the drug concentration versus the radius of growth inhibition of the indicator organism for amphotericin B, fluconazole, and flucytosine were constructed by using the methodology described above.

SEM. For SEM, biofilms were developed on microporous filters for 4, 9, 19, and 24 h, as described earlier. The biofilms were then rinsed in (4% [vol/vol] formaldehyde, 1% [vol/vol] phosphate buffer) and placed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h. Samples were subsequently washed in distilled water, dehydrated in a series of ethanol washes (70% for 10 min, 95% for 10 min, and 100% for 20 min), and air dried in a desiccator prior to sputter coating with gold. Afterwards, the surface topographies of biofilms were visualized with a scanning electron microscope (Philips XL30CP) in high-vacuum mode at 10 kV, and the images were processed for display with Photoshop software (Adobe Systems, Inc., Mountain View, Calif.).

Statistics. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to determine (i) significant differences in diffusion of the three concentrations of each of the drugs with each of the three Candida species and (ii) significant differences between a single Candida species and a similar concentration of the three respective drugs. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare significant differences between the control and each single drug concentration for each of the Candida species.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Methodology. All three Candida species evaluated developed satisfactory biofilms on membrane filters, and the whole assembly could be easily detached from the substrate surface for the diffusion studies. The use of the AB disk with the antifungal and the antifungal sensitivity assay with C. parapsilosis as the indicator organism yielded reproducible results on repeat experiments conducted on separate occasions, indicating satisfactory sensitivity of the assay system.

Standard curves for antifungal concentration versus zone of inhibition. Standard curves of the drug concentration versus the radius of growth inhibition of the indicator organism for the three antifungals were constructed as shown in Fig. 2. However, these standard curves were curvilinear and hyperbolic, indicating that the radius of growth inhibition could be used to derive the perfusion of only the very low drug concentrations. For instance, amphotericin B and flucytosine showed a concentration-dependent difference in the range of 10 to 100 µg/ml, while fluconazole exhibited a slightly higher range of 10 to 220 µg/ml. Therefore, the percent inhibition of drug penetration for each experiment was expressed in a semiquantitative manner by using data obtained with a corresponding control AB disk without a biofilm (Table 1).

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. Standard curves for the three antifungal agents, showing the relationship between drug concentration and the radius of growth inhibition of a lawn of C. parapsilosis on RPMI agar. 5FC, flucytosine; FL, fluconazole; AmB, amphotericin B.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Percent drug penetration of the three antifungals through the three different Candida biofilms compared with biofilm-free controlsa

Antifungal perfusion. The variations in antifungal perfusion in the three different Candida biofilms for the three antimycotics studied were quantified in terms of the zone of inhibition of an indicator organism (C. parapsilosis) on RPMI agar. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in drug penetration through the three different Candida biofilms for each of the drug concentrations tested (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3).

View larger version (27K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG.3. Penetration of various concentrations (i.e., 150, 300, and 600 µg/ml) of the three antifungals, amphotericin B (a), fluconazole (b), and flucytosine (c), through 48-h-old C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. krusei biofilms shown in terms of the radii of growth inhibition zones on a lawn of C. parapsilosis on RPMI agar.

Amphotericin B. When the permeation of amphotericin B through the three different Candida biofilms was compared, a statistically significant reduction in drug diffusion was noted for all three Candida species for the 150-µg/ml concentration of the drug (P < 0.037). However, 300-µg/ml amphotericin B was inhibited significantly only by C. albicans (P < 0.046), while at a higher concentration of this drug, its penetration was significantly inhibited by C. parapsilosis (P < 0.05) and C. albicans (P < 0.046) but not by C. krusei (P = 0.346) (Fig. 3a).

Fluconazole. The profile of fluconazole penetration through the biofilms was noted to be different than that of either amphotericin B or flucytosine. Thus, fluconazole permeation through C. albicans biofilms was significantly lower for all of the tested drug concentrations (P < 0.05), while C. parapsilosis exhibited a significant difference only for 150 and 300 µg/ml (P < 0.05) and C. krusei exhibited a significant difference only for 150 µg/ml (P > 0.05). This implied that the C. albicans biofilm was the most resistant to fluconazole perfusion. However, with increasing concentrations of fluconazole, a corresponding significant increase in drug perfusion (P < 0.05) was seen with all three Candida biofilms (Fig. 3b).

Flucytosine. For C. albicans, flucytosine did not demonstrate a significant difference in drug perfusion with either a 150-, 300-, or 600-µg/ml concentration compared with the control biofilm (P = 0.05). A similar trend in drug perfusion was observed for both C. parapsilosis and C. krusei biofilms. However, as observed for fluconazole, all three Candida biofilms demonstrated a significant increase in drug perfusion (P < 0.05) with increasing flucytosine concentrations (Fig. 3c).

Ultrastructural features. The ultrastructure of biofilm matrix observed through SEM varied depending on the Candida species investigated. Thus, C. albicans produced a more profuse biofilm relative to the two less commonly pathogenic C. parapsilosis and C. krusei. The latter two species first developed a basal blastospore cell layer sparsely dispersed on the filter surface devoid of either pseudohyphae or hyphae, whereas C. albicans essentially developed into a more contiguous biofilm intimately packed with blastospores and occasional pseudohyphae after 4 h of growth (Fig. 4A). Also, during the early phase of biofilm growth, C. parapsilosis cells adhered in relatively large numbers compared to C. krusei. These cells then gradually grew and developed a denser structure (at 7 h) mainly composed of noncontiguous small blastospore aggregates and channels in between (Fig. 4B and C). Both C. parapsilosis and C. krusei biofilms at this stage were less densely packed than C. albicans (Fig. 4D) and were devoid of extracellular polymeric material.

View larger version (166K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 4. SEM images of the Candida biofilms on polycarbonate microporous filters (diameter, 25 mm; pore size, 12 µm; Millipore). (A) C. albicans at 4 h; (B) C. parapsilosis at 7 h; (C) C. krusei at 7 h; (D) C. albicans at 7 h.

After 19 h of growth, C. albicans exhibited a multilayer biofilm structure with a few hyphae penetrating the matrix (Fig. 5A). However, even after 24 h, extracellular polymeric material could not be visualized in C. albicans biofilms, which at this stage was 12 to 15 cell layers thick (Fig. 5B). C. parapsilosis and C. krusei also developed confluent biofilms after approximately 24 h. Characteristically, the latter two species displayed structural heterogeneity with a lesser cell density (Fig. 5C and D) and channels traversing the cell mass than C. albicans.

View larger version (149K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 5. SEM images showing the biofilm architecture of different Candida biofilms on polycarbonate microporous filters (diameter, 25 mm; pore size, 12 µm; Millipore). (A) C. albicans at 19 h; (B) C. albicans at 24 h; (C) C. parapsilosis at 24 h; (D) C. krusei at 24 h. Note the lesser cell density of the latter two species than that of C. albicans.

Visualization of the ultrastructure in general revealed that the most damage to the biofilm constituents was caused by the highest concentrations of the three antifungals. However, amphotericin B caused the most extensive damage, especially to the most superficial cell layers of all three Candida biofilms, compared to fluconazole and flucytosine (Fig. 6, 7, and 8). Amphotericin B-treated sessile C. albicans cells demonstrated a range of changes, such as shrinkage of cells, ballooning blastospores, ruptured cell walls, and shrunken, wrinkled, or fused Candida blastospores. This suggests that despite the relative minimal diffusion, amphotericin B, compared with other drugs, may be exerting a fairly severe metabolic interference in Candida biofilms. Amphotericin B-perfused C. parapsilosis cells also demonstrated a high degree of destruction with ruptured and shrunken cells, while C. krusei blastospores exhibited the least damage.

View larger version (94K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 6. SEM images of 48-h C. albicans HK1Sa. (A) Control C. albicans HK1Sa; (B) C. albicans HK1Sa biofilm exposed to 600-µg/ml amphotericin B for 4 h; (C) C. albicans HK1Sa biofilm exposed to 600-µg/ml fluconazole for 4 h. Note the wrinkled, shrunk, ruptured, and ballooning effect of the drug on yeast cells.

View larger version (92K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 7. SEM images of 48-h C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019. (A) Control; (B) C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 biofilm exposed to 600-µg/ml amphotericin B for 4 h; (C) C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 biofilm exposed to 600-µg/ml fluconazole for 4 h. Note the ruptured and shrunken effect of the drug on yeast cells.

View larger version (92K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 8. SEM images of 48-h C. krusei ATCC 6258. (A) Control C. krusei ATCC 6258; (B) C. krusei ATCC 6258 biofilm exposed to 600-µg/ml amphotericin B for 4 h; (C) C. krusei ATCC 6258 biofilm exposed to 600-µg/ml fluconazole for 4 h.

The effect of fluconazole perfusion was more subtle. Effects of this drug were barely noticeable with C. albicans biofilms, whereas a small number of distorted cells were seen in the C. parapsilosis and C. krusei biofilms, especially on the superficial layers.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The development and characterization of Candida biofilms on bioprosthetic surfaces that are components of indwelling devices are well documented (5, 13, 14, 23). These studies have shown that Candida biofilm development is closely associated with the generation of an extracellular matrix and that mature biofilms show a highly heterogeneous structure and grow variably depending on the topography of the substrate. It has also been shown that C. albicans forms larger and more complex biofilms on silicone elastomer catheter material than C. parapsilosis, Candida pseudotropicalis and Candida glabrata and that differences occur between invasive and noninvasive Candida isolates from infective foci (12, 14).

It is now recognized that antibiotic resistance is a general trait associated with biofilm organisms, including bacteria (21, 22) and fungi (15, 23). Several theories have been proposed to explain this phenomenon, including the growth rate differentials (9, 10), a recalcitrant phenotypic state (4), the production of antibiotic-degrading enzymes (11), and the extracellular polymeric material that may act as an adsorbent or a reactant with the antimicrobial (30). Most of the foregoing studies, up to now, have been conducted with bacterial biofilms, and sparse information is available on the diffusion parameters of antimycotics in Candida biofilms. For instance, Baillie and Douglas observed that 20 times the MIC of commonly used antifungals such as amphotericin B, fluconazole, or flucytosine is required to cause a significant reduction in cell numbers (2). Further Chandra et al. (6) reported that C. albicans required low MICs of polyenes and fluconazole during the early biofilm development phase. However, during biofilm maturation, they became highly resistant to these drugs. These studies are hampered by the lack of an appropriately standardized model system to evaluate drug diffusion in candidal biofilms, and the present model was an attempt to address this issue. The advantages of such an in vitro membrane-supported biofilm system are (i) flexibility to investigate antifungal resistance by using simultaneous and parallel biofilm samples, (ii) the accessibility to both sides of the biofilm, after its removal from the membrane surface, and (iii) the possibility of using these biofilms as primitive models of pseudomembranous candidal infections. In our hands, we found this system to be relatively simple, inexpensive, and reliable for measurement of the qualitative differences in antifungal perfusion through Candida biofilms.

Our SEM studies revealed that the biofilms on micropore filters were distinct from those on polymethyl methacrylate strips or silicone elastomer disks, as reported by previous workers (5, 14). For instance, we observed large numbers of C. albicans microcolonies on the filter surface after only 4 h of incubation, unlike the smaller numbers that appeared during a similar incubation period with acrylic strips (5). There were only extremely sparse hyphal forms of C. albicans in mature filter surface biofilms, in comparison to profuse filamentation seen on polymethyl methacrylate strips (5), silicone elastomers (14), or polyvinyl chloride surfaces (13). This anomaly may be due to strain variation in germ tube and hyphal development (8, 25), and further studies with multiple Candida strains with the present system are required to confirm our findings.

Upon prolonged incubation, C. albicans biofilms developed into a dense mass stacked in a palisadic manner devoid of intracellular spaces. It is tempting to speculate that this exuberant growth mode may easily retard antifungal penetration into the basal layers of the biofilms, thus protecting them from the drug action. We also noted that C. albicans biofilms developed barely discernible matrix material under static incubation on nutrient agar plates, an observation similar to that of Hawser et al. (13).

In addition to C. albicans, we also used C. parapsilosis and C. krusei strains for the present pilot studies. The latter, in particular, exhibits intrinsic resistance to azoles, and to our knowledge, no one has evaluated its biofilms. Interestingly, the C. parapsilosis biofilms that were developed resembled their counterparts on polymethyl methacrylate disks cultured in YNB medium, where the yeast form was predominant (5). Compared with C. albicans, sparse numbers of C. parapsilosis and C. krusei microcolonies were seen on the filter surface after 4 h, and these slowly developed into less-dense biofilms, mostly of blastospores, during the ensuing 48-h period. When compared with C. albicans, these biofilms were of reduced thickness, less profuse, and devoid of hyphal elements.

When we evaluated antifungal perfusion in 48-h biofilms, it was noted that amphotericin B was likely to be the least penetrant through the biofilms of all three Candida species compared with fluconazole and flucytosine, both of which demonstrated almost a similar degree of drug penetration. However, further kinetic analyses have to be performed to confirm this data. One reason for the foregoing observation could be the large size of the amphotericin B molecule compared with flucytosine and fluconazole (20), which may hinder its diffusion. Another could be the hydrophobicity of amphotericin B, which lowers its solubility and, hence, its biofilm perfusion (7). Although, of the tested antifungals, amphotericin B was the least penetrant through the three Candida biofilms, SEM observations revealed that it caused the most damage to the biofilm surface layer in comparison to fluconazole and flucytosine.

In general, biofilms are encased within an exopolymer matrix which may restrict the diffusion of solutes and also bind antimicrobials. For example, extracellular polysaccharide matrices of bacterial biofilms are known to differentially regulate the diffusion of antibiotics (29). Stewart et al. (30) observed that chlorosulfamate penetrated bacterial biofilms more rapidly than hypochlorite due to a slower reaction rate with biofilm constituents. On the other hand, the ability of an antibiotic to penetrate the biofilm can be severely retarded if the antimicrobial agent is neutralized by its reactivity with the biofilm (30). These observations suggest that the extent of antibiotic penetration through bacterial biofilms is agent and organism specific, and it is likely that similar conditions may operate in candidal biofilms.

In conclusion, the results of our study indicate that the ultrastructure of different Candida biofilms is species specific, varies considerably, and may be affected by the substrate contents. The major differences in the spatial configurations of the three different Candida biofilms seen in our SEM images tend to suggest that genes encoding biofilm formation may be differentially regulated during this mode of growth. Finally, the present method appears to be simple and versatile for the study of differential perfusion of antifungals or other solutes through the biofilms of various Candida species. In clinical terms, it is difficult to determine if this type of in vitro biofilm morphology we observed resembles in vivo candidiasis on mucosal surfaces, inert catheters, or denture surfaces. Further studies with a large number of clinical Candida strains with the proposed method are required to demystify the complexities associated with the biofilm-solute interphase.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dean's Office, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, 34 Hospital Rd., Hong Kong, SAR, People's Republic of China. Phone: 852 2859 0480. Fax: 852 2547 6133. E-mail: lakshman{at}hku.hk.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1
1. Anderl, J. N., M. J. Franklin, and P. S. Stewart. 2000. Role of antibiotic penetration limitation in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm resistance to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:1818-1824.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
2. Baillie, G. S., and L. J. Douglas. 1998. Effect of growth rate on resistance of Candida albicans biofilms to antifungal agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:1900-1905.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3
3. Baillie, G. S., and L. J. Douglas. 1999. Candida biofilms and their susceptibility to antifungal agents. Methods Enzymol. 310:644-656.[Medline]
4
4. Brown, M. R. W., and P. Gilbert. 1993. Sensitivity of biofilms to antimicrobial agents. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 74:87S-97S.
5
5. Chandra, J., D. M. Kuhn, P. K. Mukherjee, L. L. Hoyer, and M. A. Ghannoum. 2001. Biofilm formation by the pathogen C. albicans: development, architecture, and drug resistance. J. Bacteriol. 183:5385-5394.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Chandra, J., P. K. Mukherjee, S. D. Leidich, F. F. Faddoul, L. L. Hoyer, L. J. Douglas, and M. A Ghannoum. 2001. Antifungal resistance of Candida biofilms formed on denture acrylic in vitro. J. Dent. Res. 80:903-908.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7
7. Costerton, J. W. 1999. Introduction to biofilm. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 11:217-221.[CrossRef][Medline]
8
8. Cutler, J. E. 1991. Putative virulence factors of Candida albicans. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 45:187-218.[CrossRef][Medline]
9
9. Evans, D. J., D. G. Allison, M. R. W. Brown, and P. Gilbert. 1991. Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli biofilms towards ciprofloxacin: effect of specific growth rate. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 27:177-184.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10
10. Gilbert, P., P. J. Collier, and M. R. W. Brown. 1990. Influence of growth rate on susceptibility to antimicrobial agents: biofilms, cell cycle, dormancy, and stringent response. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:1865-1868.[Free Full Text]
11
11. Giwercman, B., E. T. Jensen, N. Hoiby, A. Kharazmi, and J. W. Costerton. 1991. Induction of ß-lactamase production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:1008-1010.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12
12. Hawser, S. P., and L. J. Douglas. 1994. Biofilm formation by Candida species on the surface of catheter materials in vitro. Infect. Immun. 62:915-921.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13
13. Hawser, S. P., G. S. Baillie, and L. J. Douglas. 1998. Production of extracellular matrix by Candida albicans biofilms. J. Med. Microbiol. 47:253-256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14
14. Kuhn, D. M., T. George, J. Chandra, P. K. Mukherjee, and M. A. Ghannoum. 2002. Comparison of biofilms formed by Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis on bioprosthetic surfaces. Infect. Immun. 70:878-888.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15
15. Kuhn, D. M., T. George, J. Chandra, P. K. Mukherjee, and M. A. Ghannoum. 2002. Antifungal susceptibility of Candida biofilms: unique efficacy of amphotericin B lipid formulations and echinocandins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:1773-1780.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16
16. Levin, A. S., S. F. Costa, N. S. Mussi, M. Basso, S. I. Sinto, C. Machado, D. C. Geiger, M. C. B. Villares, A. Z. Schreiber, A. A. Barone, and M. L. M. Branchini. 1998. Candida parapsilosis fungemia associated with implantable and semi-implantable central venous catheters and the hands of healthcare workers. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 30:243-249.[CrossRef][Medline]
17
17. Mermel, L. A., B. M. Farr, R. J. Sheretz, I. I. Raad, N. O'Grady, J. S. Harris, and D. E. Craven. 2001. Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 32:1249-1272.[CrossRef][Medline]
18
18. Nguyen, M. H., J. E. Peacock, D. C. Tanner, A. J. Morris, M. L. Nguyen, D. R. Snydman, M. M. Wagener, and V. L. Yu. 1995. Therapeutic approaches in patients with candidemia. Evaluation in a multicenter, prospective, observational study. Arch. Intern. Med. 155:2429-2435.
19
19. Nucci, M., A. L. Colombo, F. Silveira, R. Richtmann, R. Salomao, M. L. Branchini, and N. Spector. 1998. Risk factors for death in patients with candidemia. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 19:846-850.[Medline]
20
20. Odds, F. C. 1988. Candida and candidosis: a review and bibliography, 2nd ed, p. E288-313. Bailliere Tindall, London, England.
21
21. Olsen, M. E., H. Ceri, D. W. Morck, A. G. Buret, and R. R. Read. 2002. Biofilm bacteria: formation and comparative susceptibility to antibiotics. Can. J. Vet. Res. 66:86-92.[Medline]
22
22. Passerini, L., K. Lam, J. W. Costerton, and E. G. King. 1992. Biofilms on indwelling vascular catheters. Crit. Care Med. 20:665-673.[Medline]
23
23. Ramage, G., K. VandeWalle, S. P. Bachmann, B. L. Wickes, and J. L. Lopez-Ribot. 2002. In vitro pharmacodynamic properties of three antifungal agents against preformed Candida albicans biofilms determined by time-kill studies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:3634-3636.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24
24. Reichart, P., L. P. Samaranayake, Y. H. Samaranayake, M. Grote, E. Pow, and B. Cheung. 2002. High oral prevalence of Candida species, especially Candida krusei, in burnt-out leprosy patients in northern Thailand. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:4479-4485.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25
25. Richardson, M. D., and H. Smith. 1981. Production of germ tubes by virulent and attenuated strains of Candida albicans. J. Infect. Dis. 144:565-568.[Medline]
26
26. Samaranayake, L. P., L. K. Cheung, and Y. H. Samaranayake. 2002. Candidiasis and other fungal diseases of the mouth. Dermatol. Ther. 15:252-270.
27
27. Samaranayake, L. P., and T. W. MacFarlane. 1980. An in vitro study of the adherence of Candida albicans to acrylic surfaces. Arch. Oral Biol. 25:603-609.[CrossRef][Medline]
28
28. Samaranayake, Y. H., and L. P. Samaranayake. 1994. Candida krusei: biology, epidemiology, pathogenicity and clinical manifestations of an emerging pathogen. J. Med. Microbiol. 41:295-310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29
29. Spoering, A. L., and K. Lewis. 2001. Biofilms and planktonic cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa have similar resistance to killing by antimicrobials. J. Bacteriol. 183:6746-6751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30
30. Stewart, P. S., J. Rayner, F. Roe, and W. M. Rees. 2001. Biofilm penetration and disinfection efficacy of alkaline hypochlorite and chlorosulfamates. J. Appl. Microbiol. 91:525-532.[CrossRef][Medline]
31
31. Stewart, P. S., and J. W. Costerton. 2001. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet 358:135-138.[CrossRef][Medline]
32
32. Suci, P. A., M. W. Mittelman, F. P. Yu, and G. G. Geesey. 1994. Investigation of ciprofloxacin penetration into Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:125-2133.
33
33. Tunney, M. M., S. P. Gorman, and S. Patrick. 1996. Infection associated with medical devices. Rev. Med. Microbiol. 7:195-205.
34
34. Weems, J. J., Jr. 1992. Candida parapsilosis: epidemiology, pathogenecity, clinical manifestations and antimicrobial susceptibility. Clin. Infect. Dis. 14:757-766.
35
35. Zheng, Z., and P. S. Stewart. 2002. Penetration of rifampin through Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:900-903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2005, p. 818-825, Vol. 43, No. 2
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.2.818-825.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Perumal, P., Mekala, S., Chaffin, W. L. (2007). Role for Cell Density in Antifungal Drug Resistance in Candida albicans Biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 2454-2463 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• El-Azizi, M. (2007). Enhancement of the in vitro activity of amphotericin B against the biofilms of non-albicans Candida spp. by rifampicin and doxycycline. J Med Microbiol 56: 645-649 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• LaFleur, M. D., Kumamoto, C. A., Lewis, K. (2006). Candida albicans Biofilms Produce Antifungal-Tolerant Persister Cells. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 3839-3846 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Samaranayake, Y. H. Articles by Samaranayake, L. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Samaranayake, Y. H. Articles by Samaranayake, L. P.