Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2005, p. 978-981, Vol. 43, No. 2
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.2.978-981.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
| CASE REPORT |
Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System,1 Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles,3 LSG & Associates, Santa Monica, California2
Received 19 June 2004/ Returned for modification 6 August 2004/ Accepted 30 September 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Time course of patient's P. vivax exposure, relapses, and treatment. See the text for details.
|
Clinical manifestations of P. vivax infection. Although P. vivax infection has been referred to as "benign" malaria, symptoms are frequently severe and debilitating (13). Although patients who are immunologically naïve tend to develop symptoms sooner than those with prior exposure to P. vivax, severe symptoms can occur in anyone (13). Typically, P. vivax infection produces high fever, chills, nausea, vomiting, and malaise. Paroxysms of fever are associated with high levels of tumor necrosis factor (11) induced by parasite glycosylphosphatidylinositol released during schizont rupture (20). Unlike P. falciparum, P. vivax does not cause microvascular sequestration of parasitized red cells. However, as illustrated by our case, P. vivax infection can be life threatening. ARDS and other pulmonary complications are well documented in P. vivax infection (2, 4, 7, 10, 14, 16, 17, 26, 27). Coinfection with P. falciparum should be considered in any patient with severe symptoms associated with P. vivax infection. Because of the severity of his initial presentation, our patient was initially treated for both P. falciparum and P. vivax infection, even though only P. vivax parasites were found on blood films. During a later relapse, P. falciparum infection was ruled out by PCR. The risk of ARDS may not be correlated with the level of parasitemia (26). Pulmonary dysfunction in P. vivax infection is probably more common than is generally recognized (2). Lung injury is thought to be mediated by inflammatory mechanisms, as demonstrated by studies showing increased pulmonary phagocytic activity in P. vivax patients (2). Interestingly, in a number of cases, the pulmonary manifestations became evident after antimalarial therapy was initiated (4, 7, 14, 26), perhaps suggesting that lysis of organisms provokes the inflammatory reaction that leads to lung injury. A similar phenomenon is seen in pneumonia due to Pneumocystis jiroveci.
Pitfalls in diagnosis of P. vivax infection. Direct microscopic examination of parasites in stained thin and thick blood films remains the standard diagnostic approach. Thick films allow a larger amount of blood to be examined, which increases the possibility of detecting the light parasitemia (usually <2%) seen with P. vivax infection, since P. vivax infects only immature red blood cells (12). Species identification within the genus Plasmodium requires examination of the thin film, in which the morphological characteristics of the parasites within the red blood cells can more easily be seen. Both types of blood films should be carefully examined prior to reporting "no parasites seen." It is also important to remember that one set of negative blood films does not rule out malaria, especially in patients with a low level of parasitemia (8).
Optimal morphology of malaria parasites is observed in finger stick blood films prepared at the bedside. However, finger stick blood collection has for the most part been replaced with venipuncture collection using anticoagulants. For this reason, morphological changes in the parasite resulting from venipuncture must be taken into consideration when reviewing the blood films. It is important to fill the tube with blood; this ensures a correct ratio of blood to anticoagulant. If this ratio is incorrect, parasite morphological distortion may occur. If the smears are prepared from anticoagulated blood that is >1 h old, the morphology of the parasites may not be typical and the film may wash off the slide during the staining procedure. After 6 h, the parasitemia will be less than that seen immediately after the blood is drawn. Also, the longer the blood stands in the tube prior to blood film preparation, the more morphological distortion of the parasites occurs. The overall organism morphology may begin to look quite different from slides prepared with finger stick blood, and identification errors can easily occur. Diagnostic characteristics that are commonly described may not be seen at all. For example, in cases of P. vivax malaria, the presence of stippling (Schüffner's dots) may not be visible (Fig. 2A to C). If the cap of the lavender-top EDTA tube is removed and the blood cools, conditions in the specimen will mimic those found in the mosquito vector. Consequently, if mature male gametocytes are present (Fig. 2E), these stages tend to undergo exflagellation and may mimic Borrelia organisms (Fig. 2F). If fertilization of the female gametocytes (Fig. 2D) occurs, the ookinetes of Plasmodium species other than P. falciparum may develop as if they were in the mosquito and may mimic the crescent-shaped gametocytes of P. falciparum (24). In order to avoid these potential problems, the immediate preparation of stained thick and thin blood films for manual examination is recommended. Each request for blood film examination for blood parasites should be considered a stat request.
![]() View larger version (109K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. P. vivax trophozoites (A, B, C) and gametocytes (D, E, F). The images of P. vivax trophozoites demonstrate (A) the absence of stippling (Schüffner's dots), (B) a "band" form (mimic of P. malariae but showing an enlarged cell), and (C) an enlarged erythrocyte without stippling present (lack of stippling was due to delay in blood film preparation from anticoagulated blood). The images of P. vivax gametocytes include (D) a female macrogametocyte (note the compact pink nuclear chromatin), (E) a male macrogametocyte (note the more diffuse pink nuclear chromatin), and (F) male microgametes with a residual body (produced from the exflagellation of the male microgametocyte due to delay in blood film preparation from anticoagulated blood).
|
Relapse prevention. Treatment of P. vivax infection involves administration of chloroquine followed by primaquine after glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency has been ruled out. Chloroquine is given to treat the asexual blood stages of the parasite, and primaquine is given to prevent relapse by eliminating hypnozoites latent in the liver. This drug combination strategy is referred to as a radical cure, defined as the complete eradication of parasites from the body. Since chloroquine resistance in P. vivax has now been described in several areas (28), follow-up blood smears should be obtained 28 days after chloroquine therapy to ensure that recrudescence of blood-stage infection has not occurred. Our patient's negative blood smears 23 and 45 days after treatment of infection in September and the timing of the reappearance of infection in December indicate relapse of latent liver infection. Relapse after appropriate therapy strongly indicates primaquine tolerance of the P. vivax strain causing infection in our patient.
A recent paper by Baird and Rieckmann reviews ways that P. vivax relapse prevention using primaquine can be improved (3). For example, preclinical studies of nonhuman primates and early clinical studies showed that the total dose of primaquine rather than the dosing schedule determined the efficacy of treatment (1, 6, 19). For many years, the standard dose of primaquine was 15 mg per day for 14 days (total dose, 210 mg) because studies performed >40 years ago showed that this was effective in preventing relapse for all P. vivax strains except the Chesson strain in New Guinea. Since that time, primaquine tolerance appears to have emerged in P. vivax strains found in many areas. Primaquine is only 80% effective in Southeast Asia (3), and in U.S. Army troops deployed to Somalia in 1993, the 210-mg regimen had a relapse prevention failure rate of 43% (25). For this reason, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have recently increased the recommended dose of primaquine from 15 to 30 mg per day for 14 days (http://www.cdc.gov/malaria/diagnosis_treatment/tx_clinicians.htm). Because higher primaquine doses are more effective than lower doses, these P. vivax strains are thought to be primaquine tolerant rather than truly resistant. However, because the organism cannot be propagated in vitro, inoculation in nonhuman primates is required to study the responsiveness of P. vivax strains to primaquine (15).
Several studies have indicated the importance of adjusting the total primaquine dose for the weight of the patient. A retrospective review of 15 Israeli travelers who returned from Ethiopia noted eight relapses in five of the patients despite a total dose of 210 mg of primaquine (15 mg per day for 14 days). Retrospective calculation of the primaquine dose per kilogram of body weight for the 23 treatment courses noted a lower total dose per kilogram in heavier patients. The mean calculated dose (±95% confidence interval) in the eight patients who failed treatment was 2.5 ± 0.3 mg/kg compared with 4.4 ± 0.5 mg/kg in the 15 successfully treated patients. They concluded that weight-adjusted dosing may prevent inadvertent subtherapeutic drug therapy and apparent primaquine failure (22). A study done in Brazil evaluated the cure rate in patients receiving 210 mg of primaquine for treatment of P. vivax infection and assessed the risk factors for failure. The dose per kilogram of body weight was calculated, and the association of this variable with relapses was assessed. Among the 50 patients, seven relapses were noted. The mean total dose of primaquine (mean ± standard deviation) was lower for the patients who relapsed (2.76 ± 0.52 mg/kg) than for the overall population of patients (3.26 ± 0.68 mg/kg) or for those who did not relapse (3.35 ± 0.67 mg/kg). The total primaquine dose per kilogram of body weight was the only variable associated with relapse (9).
Primaquine toxicity. Primaquine should never be given without testing for G6PD deficiency. Primaquine-induced acute intravascular hemolysis in patients with the Mediterranean B variant of G6PD deficiency can be life threatening. Many variants of this genetic disorder exist, and the level of G6PD activity is not necessarily correlated with the severity of hemolysis. In patients without G6PD deficiency, the primary side effects of primaquine involve gastrointestinal toxicity. Abdominal distress occurs in 5, 10, 35, and 100% of fasting volunteers given a single dose of 15, 30, 45, or 90 mg of primaquine, respectively (5). However, the same study reported complete relief of symptoms in patients given primaquine with food. Dosing of primaquine with a snack or meal is recommended to decrease gastrointestinal side affects.
Since primaquine remains the only drug available with hypnozoitocidal activity against P. vivax, physicians need to be familiar with how to effectively use primaquine for chemoprophylaxis and relapse prevention. The spread of primaquine-resistant P. vivax beyond Southeast Asia points to the need for newer antimalarial medications. A promising new primaquine analog named tafenoquine is currently in phase III clinical trials (3). Tafenoquine appears to have activity against P. vivax, and its improved pharmacokinetics (mean half-life, 361 h compared to primaquine's half-life of 6 h) would also address problems related to compliance with primaquine therapy. Given the shortcomings of current malaria prophylaxis regimens, health care providers need to have a heightened awareness and suspicion of malaria when evaluating acutely ill travelers from malarious regions, regardless of their chemoprophylaxis history. Clinicians should also be aware of how current methods for preparing blood smears affect the morphology of P. vivax parasites. As this report was being prepared, a second U.S. Army Ranger stationed in Afghanistan and Iraq presented to our facility with a case of P. vivax malaria. We anticipate that as military and civilian personnel continue to be deployed to malarious regions of the world, a greater number of patients with P. vivax infection will be cared for by physicians and microbiologists. It is essential that health care providers, both at the bedside and in the clinical microbiology laboratory, be familiar with the pitfalls in the diagnosis and treatment of malaria due to P. vivax.
There was no financial support for this work.
None of the authors had potential conflicts of interest.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»