Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2005, p. 1851-1857, Vol. 43, No. 4
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.4.1851-1857.2005
National Center of HIV, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Received 20 May 2004/ Returned for modification 18 August 2004/ Accepted 7 November 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
DBS standard panel. Cultured 8E5 cells (8), which contain a single copy of the HIV genome per cell, were used to make positive controls. 8E5 cells were counted using a hemocytometer and diluted in whole blood from an HIV-seronegative donor to construct a standard DBS panel with various numbers of HIV-1 DNA copies in a constant human blood background. The respective 8E5 cell numbers in this panel were 0, 494, 1,482, 4,444, 13, 333, and 400,000 per ml.
DBS and DNA extraction. Fifty µl of EDTA venous blood specimens from human subjects and from the DBS standard panel were spotted onto the preprinted circle of filter paper (no. 903; Schleicher & Schuell) in a biosafety hood. The filter was air-dried at room temperature for 4 h and then placed in a liquid-tight bag (Saranex Series; VWR International, Atlanta, GA) with the desiccant and stored at 20°C. HIV-1 proviral DNA in DBS specimens stored at 20°C can be stable for at least up to 18 months (4). In this report, all the DBS samples were extracted within the first 6 months of their storage at 20°C. The entire DBS circle was punched with a paper punch (6 mm in diameter) several times to dislodge the blood-containing disks into a clean disposable weighing boat. Several paper punches were employed to speed up the punching process and were washed with water and dried between uses. To ensure that HIV-1 proviral DNA in DBS is detected, we devised an efficient DBS DNA extraction procedure followed by a DNA affinity isolation procedure (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). The blood filter disks were transferred into a 2-ml tube containing 280 µl of extraction buffer (10 mM Tris HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mM KCl, 0.45% Tween 20, and 0.45% NP-40) and 20 µl of proteinase K (20 mg/ml; QIAGEN). The DBS disks were completely submerged in the extraction buffer and incubated first at 56°C for 30 min and then at 90°C for 20 min with constant agitations at 1,000 rpm in an Eppendorf thermomixer (Model R; Brinkmann Instruments, Inc., Westbury, N.Y.). The entire contents were transferred into a QiaShredder column (QIAGEN) and centrifuged in a tabletop Eppendorf microfuge at 14,000 rpm for 1 min to remove the filter disks and large particulates. Buffer AL (300 µl; QIAGEN) was then added to the column, followed by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 1 min. The DBS disks remaining in the column were colorless after these extraction steps. The filtrate was then mixed with 300 µl of absolute alcohol, and the precipitated DNA was further processed using QIAGEN's Mini DNA kit. DNA was eluted in 65 µl of RNase- and DNase-free water at 6,000 rpm for 1 min. Approximately 50 µl of DNA solution was recovered.
Real-time PCR measurement of HIV and RNase P. The extracted DBS DNA (20 µl) was used in a 50-µl-volume real-time PCR assay. Prior to the establishment of the duplex assay, RNase P primer concentrations were examined so that the amplification of RNase P would be limited. The established assay contained 200 nM HIV long terminal repeat (LTR) forward primer (TGCTTAAGCCTCAATAAAGCTTGCCTTGA); 400 nM HIV reverse primer (TCTGAGGGATCTCTAGTTACCAG); 400 nM fluorescent probe (Fam-AAGTAGTGTGTGCCCGTCTGT-Qsy-7); 40 nM RNase P forward primer (AGATTTGGACCTGCGAGCG); 100 nM RNase P reverse primer (GAGCGGCTGTCTCCACAAGT); 200 nM RNase P fluorescent probe (Hex-TTCTGACCTGAAGGCTCTGCGCG-Qsy-7); 1x PCR buffer (Roche, Indianapolis, IN); 5 mM MgCl2; 200 nM each of dATP, dTTP, dGTP, and dCTP; and 400 nM dUTP; 200 nM Rox dye (Standard II; Synthegen, Houston, TX), 0.2 units of uracil DNA glycosylase (Roche), and 4 units of Amplitaq Gold DNA polymerase (Roche). Real-time PCR was performed in a model MX4000 instrument (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). HIV DNA amplification was detected at 516 nm, and RNase P amplification was detected at 555 nm. Since the reporter oligonucleotides (i.e., probes) for HIV-1 and RNase P genes were labeled with different fluorescent probes, the synthesis of HIV and RNase P DNA sequences during PCR amplification could be measured in the same reaction vessel in real time. Activation of the Amplitaq Gold DNA polymerase was first carried out at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 60 cycles of PCR amplification at 95°C for 15 seconds and 52°C for 1 min.
|
|
|---|
![]() ![]() ![]() View larger version (43K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Amplifications of HIV-1 LTR and RNase P DNA with 8E5 cellular DNA. (A) Amplification profiles of HIV-1 LTR. Chromosomal DNA was extracted from cultured 8E5 cells and amplified using an HIV LTR primer and probe set. The HIV forward primer, reverse primer, and probe are 200 nM, 400 nM, and 400 nM, respectively. The horizontal cutoff (threshold) lines are determined by MX4000 software and are 0.054. CT (20.75; one standard deviation, ± 0.25) is the cycle number where the fluorescence output exceeds the threshold. The relative fluorescence (dRn) was the fluorescence output normalized by Rox, which serves as the passive dye in the assay system. (B) Amplification profiles of HIV-1 LTR. The same isolated 8E5 DNA as shown in (A) was amplified with the RNase P primer and probe set. The typical RNase P forward primer, reverse primer, and probe are 200 nM, 200 nM, and 200 nM (diamonds), and the attenuated concentrations are 40 nM, 100 nM, and 200 nM (triangles). The cutoff for RNase P is 0.02. The RNase P CT at the typical concentrations is 23.15 (± 0.03), and that at the attenuated conditions is 26.02 (± 0.29). (C) The effect of the RNase P forward and reverse primer concentrations on RNase P amplification. The experiment was carried out with forward primer (solid circles) or reverse primer (open circles) concentrations varying from 20 to 200 nM, while the concentrations of their pairing primers were kept at 200 nM. The CT value obtained from each set of amplification conditions was plotted against the concentrations of the forward or reverse primer. Solid downward arrow, when the forward RNase P primer concentration was lowered from 200 nM to 40 nM, the RNase P CT increased slightly by 0.6 cycles; left open arrow, when the reverse primer concentration was lowered from 200 nM to 40 nM, the RNase P CT increased markedly by 4.8 cycles; the CT only increased by 0.9 cycles if the reverse primer was adjusted to 100 nM (right open arrow).
|
As shown in Fig. 1C, when the forward RNase P primer concentration was lowered from 200 nM to 40 nM, the RNase P CT increased slightly by 0.6 cycles. In contrast, when the reverse primer concentration was also lowered from 200 nM to 40 nM, the RNase P CT increased markedly by 4.8 cycles; the CT only increased by 0.9 cycles if the reverse primer was adjusted to 100 nM. To maintain RNase P amplification at a low but reproducible level, we chose the combination of 40 nM and 100 nM for the forward and reverse primers, respectively. As shown in Fig. 1B, with this combined reduction of both primer concentrations, RNase P amplification (CT = 26.02 ± 0.29) was delayed by 2.9 cycles, and the fluorescence output was reduced by 50% compared with the PCR using both primer concentrations at 200 nM.
Consistency of DNA recovery from DBS. With the exception of the first few steps, where we used in-house reagents and QIAGEN's Qiashredder column, we used QIAGEN's whole-blood kit to extract DNA from the DBS. We isolated the DNA specimens from DBS and from whole blood in parallel and examined them by the duplex assay. We spiked whole blood obtained from a healthy HIV-1-seronegative person with a known number of 8E5 cells to prepare DBS (200 8E5 cells per 50 µl of blood per DBS). We then extracted DNA from the DBS and its whole blood counterpart in quadruplicate. The RNase P CT value reflects the amount and the quality of the isolated chromosomal DNA. As shown in Table 1, samples isolated from the DBS and the whole blood yielded similar RNase P CT values. The spiked 8E5 cells constitute only a small portion of the total white blood cell population. Like RNase P CT values, HIV-1 CT values from DBS and whole blood are nearly identical. The small intrarun variations of the CTs of both HIV (one standard deviation = 0.09) and RNase P (0.35) indicate that our overall procedure of DBS DNA isolation and duplex assay is highly reproducible.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Recovery and consistency of DNA isolation from DBS and whole blooda
|
The intra-assay variability experiment (Fig. 2 and Table 2) was performed in quadruplicate. As shown in the HIV-1 amplification plots in Fig. 2A, the higher the HIV content of the DBS, the earlier the appearance of the HIV-specific fluorescent signal. Since only 40% of the isolated DNA was used for the real-time assay, the numbers of HIV copies used in the assay were from 9.9 to 800 copies per assay. The RNase P amplification plot of each panel member is almost identical, with an average of 24.41 ± 0.7 (Fig. 2B). The DBS sample without 8E5 cells does not show any HIV fluorescent signal over the entire 60 amplification cycles (Fig. 2A). Since this HIV-negative sample contains the same whole-blood background, it yields the same RNase P CT as other DBS panel members (Fig. 2B).
![]() ![]() ![]() View larger version (52K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Quantitative measurement of HIV-1 proviral DNA content. 8E5 cells were diluted with the whole blood of a healthy HIV-1-seronegative person and spotted to generate five spots with decreasing HIV-1 DNA contents and a constant whole-blood background. A spot with only the seronegative blood was used as the negative DBS control. Extraction of DBS in quadruplicate was carried out in a single run, and the extracted DNA samples were assayed in a single real-time run to determine the intrarun variability (see also Table 2). DBS DNA was extracted and eluted in 50 µl of water, and 20 µl of the eluted DNA was used in the duplex assay. (A) Real-time HIV-1 amplification profiles. The HIV-1 copy numbers per ml of DBS (50 µl of whole blood per circle) are 0 (open circles), 494 (squares), 1,482 (solid triangles), 4,444 (crosses), 13,333 (open triangles), and 40,000 (solid circles). The threshold (cutoff) is 0.354. (B) Real-time RNase P amplification profiles to determine the human chromosomal DNA background of the same dried blood spots as in (A). The threshold is 0.034. (C) HIV-1 content quantification in DBS panel based on threshold cycles (CTs) or normalized threshold cycles (dCTs). The CTs (HIV LTR [diamonds] and RNase P [squares]) were plotted against their respective proviral copy numbers. Each datum was derived from the average of four determinations. Vertical bar: one standard deviation of CT or dCT. The dCT (triangle) is the difference between the HIV CT and its corresponding RNase P CT.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Real-time PCR intra- and interassay variabilitya
|
We also examined the interassay variability using the same standard panel samples, performed in quadruplicate (Table 2). The calculation of the observed HIV-1 copy numbers is based on the individual dCT plot generated from each interassay run. The interassay coefficients of variation are similar (16 to 28%) to those in the intravariation assays.
Evaluation of the duplex assay with U.S. adult specimens. Although our method is quantitative in nature, the specific aim of this report is to use it as a qualitative assay to identify HIV infection using DBS. To evaluate the performance of our duplex assay, we used DBS samples derived from 103 HIV-seropositive and 56 seronegative adults residing in the United States (Table 3). Of the 103 seropositive samples tested, HIV-1 LTR sequences were detected in 101 samples (sensitivity = 98.1%, 95% CI; 95.5% to 100%), with an average CT of 36.04 (range from 28.6 to 39.95; standard deviation = 2.06). All DBS samples from the 56 seronegative persons were negative for HIV LTR (specificity = 100%, 95% CI; 99% to 100%). The positive and negative predictive values are 100% and 96.6%, respectively. The average RNase P CT value in the 103 seropositive persons is 25.99 ± 2.49, while the corresponding RNase P CT value in the 56 seronegative persons is 23.52 ± 2.22.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Detection of HIV LTR and RNase P DNA using DBS from seropositive and seronegative persons residing in the United States
|
|
|
|---|
It is also possible that there are nucleotide polymorphisms in the RNaseP DNA of some persons. Such a polymorphism may lead to a suboptimal amplification of RNase P. We do not know if such polymorphisms existed in our tested population. To guard against this, a second internal chromosomal DNA control should be incorporated in the future improvement of this assay.
The average RNase P CT values in the seropositive and negative groups are 26.05 ± 2.45 and 23.52 ± 2.22, respectively. The RNase P CT difference between these two groups is statistically significant (P < 0.01). One possible explanation is that the white-cell counts in the HIV-infected persons were lower than those in the healthy seronegative persons.
Among the 103 seropositive samples tested, only 2 failed to yield HIV DNA amplification. These 2 DBS samples had respective RNase P CT values of 25.11 and 27.16 and thus were considered good DNA specimens. The DBS of the first PCR-negative person was extracted and assayed three additional times and found to be negative. The second DBS specimen was examined two more times and found positive once, with an RNase P CT of 28.8 and a high HIV CT of 42.8. The high HIV CT suggested that the proviral copy number in this sample was very low and thus rendered the detection of HIV inconsistent. We thus considered the detection of HIV in this patient a failure (Table 3).
Among the 101 HIV-1 DNA-positive samples, there was one specimen with an RNase P CT (CT = 31.46) that exceeded the high end of the 97.5% confidence interval (i.e., 25.99 plus two standard deviations, or 30.97) (Table 3). This sample had an HIV-1 CT of 37.1 and thus was clearly HIV positive. The highest HIV-positive CT found in this study was 39.95. Since the assay contains measures to prevent PCR carry-over contamination, samples with a positive HIV CT are considered positive. Samples with a negative HIV CT and an RNase P CT exceeding the 97.5% confidence interval are considered invalid, and the DNA should be prepared and tested again. If the same invalid result is reproduced again upon the second DBS DNA preparation and PCR test, the samples should be considered indeterminate. If a repeated sample showed an improved RNase P CT value (i.e., better DNA recovery or removal of impurities during isolation) and a positive HIV CT, it should be considered positive. On the other hand, if the repeated sample showed an improved RNase P CT but negative HIV PCR, then it should be called "HIV-1 not detected."
The HIV sequence that we targeted for real-time detection is in the well-conserved portion of the LTR. We have used these LTR primers and probe on specimens derived from several countries, including the United States, Uganda, Thailand, Malawi, the Ivory Coast, and Cameroon and commercial standard HIV-1 subtype panels (consisting of eight HIV-1 subtypes, A through H; Boston Biomedica, Inc.) with satisfactory results (Ou, unpublished data). Thus, our assay appears to be able to identify most of the HIV-1 subtypes. In addition to the one-step and closed-system format, our assay also uses dUTP/uracil DNA glycosylase to prevent potential false-positive results due to PCR contamination (13). Several published methods developed by others require a labor-intensive gel electrophoresis to visualize HIV amplified products and use two-step nested amplifications to increase their detection sensitivity (7, 17). Currently, there is not an effective contamination control that can be incorporated in the nested amplification system, and thus, these assays are highly susceptible to false-positive errors. Zhao et al. used real-time technology to measure HIV proviral content in whole-blood specimens but did not employ cellular internal controls (20). Some assays used cellular genes as an internal control, but the cellular gene is tested in a different tube (7, 17), adding to labor and reagent costs. Panteleeff et al. (17) showed that there was a high concentration of PCR inhibitors copurified with DBS DNA. They could only use 5 µl of DBS DNA in a 50-µl PCR volume, and they had to perform nested amplification in the absence of dUTP/uracil DNA glycosylase control. They tested 69 samples in duplicate to achieve a sensitivity of 88% and in quadruplicate to achieve a sensitivity of 96%. The uncertainty of the determination of a positive test based on one positive finding among two or four tests is extremely high. The source of the inhibitor was thought to be a heme compound (1). Our isolation procedure apparently removes most, if not all, of the inhibitors, and thus, we could use 20 µl of DBS DNA in a 50-µl PCR without inhibitory effects.
The total cost of this duplex assay is approximately 5 U.S. dollars. All the components of the assay are commercially available from several sources. To maintain the consistency and the quality of the assay, it is recommended that a large batch of the primers and probes be synthesized, calibrated, and stored in multiple aliquots. Although this assay was initially established with an MX4000 (Stratagene) instrument, it works essentially identically in MX3000P (Stratagene) and in Applied Biosystem's 7000 and 7700 instruments (data not shown). It is also advisable that this assay be performed in a centralized facility with laboratory personnel with proper training in molecular biology and a real-time instrument to maintain the work quality.
Our assay, upon further optimization and validation, may be useful in quantifying HIV proviral DNA content (Fig. 2). Most of the adult samples tested in this report appear to have a proviral DNA content between 10 and 2,000 copies per DBS (or 200 to 40,000 copies per ml of venous blood). In this study, we only explore the potential of this assay to identify HIV infection status qualitatively using DBS.
One of the major potential uses of this assay is in diagnosing infected infants born to HIV-infected mothers. DBS specimens are easier to collect than venous blood specimens in the pediatric settings, and there is no other reliable test to identify HIV infection in the first few months after birth. It has been reported that the proviral DNA load in infected mothers may be strongly correlated with vertical transmission (15, 18). Thus, there may be a need to have an accurate and reliable assay for proviral DNA measurement for such a population. Further evaluation of this duplex assay using DBS for HIV detection in infants born to HIV-infected mothers is in progress.
.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»