This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Intapan, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Morakote, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Intapan, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Morakote, N.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2005, p. 1932-1933, Vol. 43, No. 4
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.4.1932-1933.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of the Quantitative Formalin Ethyl Acetate Concentration Technique and Agar Plate Culture for Diagnosis of Human Strongyloidiasis

P. M. Intapan,1* W. Maleewong,1 T. Wongsaroj,2 S. Singthong,3 and N. Morakote4

Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen,1 Bureau of General Communicable Diseases,2 Office of Prevention and Control Diseases Region VI, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi,3 Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand4

Received 29 August 2004/ Returned for modification 29 September 2004/ Accepted 7 December 2004


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
The quantitative formalin ethyl acetate concentration technique (QFEC) was compared to agar plate culture (APC) for the detection of Strongyloides stercoralis larvae. QFEC could substitute for APC only when the parasite load was higher than 50 larvae per g of stool. This study serves as a good reminder to those conducting stool exams about the sensitivity and specificity limitations of both techniques.


arrow
TEXT
 
Agar plate culture (APC) is a highly effective technique for the coprological diagnosis of human strongyloidiasis (1, 5-8, 10). But despite its high sensitivity, there are several disadvantages to APC. It is expensive, it takes a long time before results can be provided, and there is also a risk of infection for the technicians. The quantitative formalin ethyl acetate concentration technique (QFEC) is another effective and more rapid method to detect and quantify intestinal helminths, e.g., Ascaris lumbricoides (3) and Opisthorchis viverrini (4). In the present study, we compared APC results to the different intensities of Strongyloides stercoralis larvae determined by QFEC.

Stool samples (n = 1,233) were collected from populations in northeast Thailand and examined by APC (6) and QFEC (3). For APC, 3-g portions of individual fecal samples were placed in the centers of nutrient agar plates during the field survey. The plates were kept in a box and transported at room temperature (30 to 35°C) to the laboratory, where they were incubated for another 5 days at room temperature. The agar plates were examined under a stereomicroscope for the presence of tracks from moving larvae or free-living adults on the 3rd and 5th days. All microscopically positive dishes were further processed by washing the surface of the agar with a 10% formalin solution to collect worms for species identification. The differentiation of S. stercoralis larvae from hookworm larvae was performed under microscopic magnification of x40. For QFEC, 2 g of individual fecal samples was weighed out and then stirred well in a vial containing a merthiolate-iodine-formalin solution (2). The preserved stools were processed by QFEC (3). Briefly, the preserved fecal suspension was filtered through two layers of wet gauze into a centrifuge tube. The volume was adjusted to 10 ml with 10% formalin. Two milliliters of ethyl acetate was added, and the tube was closed and shaken for half a second. The stopper was removed, and the tube was centrifuged at 600 x g for 10 min. The plug of debris along with the merthiolate-iodine-formalin solution was discarded by inverting the tube, leaving only the sediment, which was resuspended. The entire suspension was examined under a microscope. The total number of larvae in the sediment was counted and is presented as the number of larvae per gram of stool (lpg). A negative result meant that no larvae were seen in the whole sediment. This study protocol was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Khon Kaen University.

Of the 1,233 stool samples, 303 (24.57%) were found to be positive by at least one of the two methods: 130 (10.54%) by QFEC and 290 (23.52%) by APC (Table 1). As expected, APC's superior sensitivity was demonstrated with 173 specimens that were negative by QFEC but positive by APC. Only 13 QFEC-positive specimens were negative by APC. Compared to APC, QFEC had a statistically significantly lower positivity rate (P < 0.001) (Pearson chi-square test, SPSS for Windows version 11.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill.). When we classified QFEC results into 10 lpg intervals, 45 (97.8%) out of 46 samples with more than 50 lpg by QFEC gave positive results by APC. This fact seems to indicate similar diagnostic values at that level of infection.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Comparative efficacies of APC and QFEC for the detection of S. stercoralis

APC has consistently been found to be 1.6 to 6.0 times more effective than the formalin-ether concentration technique (1, 7). In addition, it has been found to be more sensitive than QFEC (9). Even though it is less expensive and more rapid than APC, QFEC can substitute for APC only when the stool parasite load is higher than 50 lpg. In the present study, those instances constituted only 35.38% (46 of 130 specimens) of QFEC-positive stools. Thus, in community surveys for ascariasis and opisthorchiasis, where QFEC is a useful tool for the quantification of infections, it cannot be relied upon for a determination of the prevalence of strongyloidiasis. The low detection rate by QFEC may be attributed to several factors. One is that filtration of the fecal suspension through layers of gauze may remove feces containing larvae, resulting in the loss of larvae in the final sediment, but we have no data on this issue.

Although it is widely accepted that formalin-ether sedimentation and related techniques are less sensitive than APC, one should bear in mind that a substantial portion of stools positive by these techniques were negative by APC. In the present study, 10% of QFEC-positive samples were negative by APC, while Sukhavat et al. (10) found that 20% of Strongyloides-positive stools examined by the formalin-ether sedimentation technique were negative by APC. No explanation was provided, and it remains to be explored which factors cause Strongyloides larvae not to grow and multiply under the sensitive APC technique.

This study is based upon screening a population in a field survey; thus, the subjects were not symptomatic patients. QFEC is expected to be more sensitive for symptomatic individuals, who, presumably, would have a much higher parasite burden. Thus, QFEC may be sufficient for clinical purposes, while APC can be added as a second-tier laboratory test. In conclusion, this study shows clearly that for epidemiologic purposes APC is preferable and QFEC should be used for confirming clinical diagnoses of strongyloidiasis.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by the Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health.

We thank Mark Roselieb for improving the English-language presentation of the manuscript.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand. Phone: 66-43-348387. Fax: 66-43-202475. E-mail: pewpan{at}kku.ac.th. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Arakaki, T., M. Iwanaga, F. Kinjo, A. Saito, R. Asato, and T. Ikeshiro. 1990. Efficacy of agar plate culture in detection of Strongyloides stercoralis infection. J. Parasitol. 76:425-428.[CrossRef][Medline]
    2. 2
  2. Beaver, P. C., R. C. Jung, and E. W. Cupp. 1984. Examination of specimens for parasites, p. 733-758. In P. C. Beaver, R. C. Jung, and E. W. Cupp (ed.), Clinical parasitology, 9th ed. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, Pa.
    3. 3
  3. Elkins, D. B., M. Haswell-Elkins, and R. M. Anderson. 1986. The epidemiology and control of intestinal helminths in the Pulicat Lake region of southern India. I. Study design and pre- and post-treatment observations on Ascaris lumbricoides infection. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 80:774-792.[Medline]
    4. 4
  4. Elkins, D. B., M. R. Haswell-Elkins, E. Mairiang, P. Mairiang, P. Sithithaworn, S. Kaewkes, V. Bhudhisawasdi, and T. Uttaravichien. 1990. A high frequency of hepatobiliary disease and suspected cholangiocarcinoma associated with heavy Opisthorchis viverrini infection in a small community in north-east Thailand. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 84:715-719.[CrossRef][Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Jongwutiwes, S., M. Charoenkorn, P. Sitthicharoenchai, P. Akarabovorn, and C. Putaporntip. 1999. Increased sensitivity of routine laboratory detection of Strongyloides stercoralis and hookworm by agar-plate culture. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 93:398-400.[CrossRef][Medline]
    6. 6
  6. Koga, K., S. Kasuya, C. Khamboonruang, K. Sukhavat, M. Ieda, N. Takatsuka, K. Kita, and H. Ohtomo. 1991. A modified agar plate method for detection of Strongyloides stercoralis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 45:518-521.
    7. 7
  7. Koga, K., S. Kasuya, C. Khamboonruang, K. Sukhavat, Y. Nakamura, S. Tani, M. Ieda, K. Tomita, S. Tomita, N. Hattan, M. Mori, and S. Makino. 1990. An evaluation of the agar plate method for the detection of Strongyloides stercoralis in northern Thailand. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 93:183-188.[Medline]
    8. 8
  8. Marchi Blatt, J., and G. A. Cantos. 2003. Evaluation of techniques for the diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive and HIV negative individuals in the city of Itajai, Brazil. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 7:402-408.[Medline]
    9. 9
  9. Salazar, S. A., C. Gutierrez, and S. L. Berk. 1995. Value of agar plate method for the diagnosis of intestinal strongyloidiasis. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 23:141-145.[CrossRef][Medline]
    10. 10
  10. Sukhavat, K., N. Morakote, P. Chaiwong, and S. Piangjai. 1994. Comparative efficacy of four methods for the detection of Strongyloides stercoralis in human stool specimens. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 88:95-96.[Medline]

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2005, p. 1932-1933, Vol. 43, No. 4
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.4.1932-1933.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Intapan, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Morakote, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Intapan, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Morakote, N.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»