Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2005, p. 1940-1943, Vol. 43, No. 4
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.4.1940-1943.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Faculté de Médecine EA 3174, Limoges, France
Received 3 September 2004/ Returned for modification 22 October 2004/ Accepted 30 November 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The population structure of T. gondii is of considerable medical importance for understanding epidemiological patterns as well as heterogeneity in disease manifestations or for developing new strategies for vaccination, treatment, or diagnosis (16). In the domestic cycle of T. gondii (between cats, humans, and peri-domestic and meat-producing animals, such as pigs and sheep), there is a highly clonal population structure comprised of three widespread genotypes referred to as type I, type II, and type III (5, 10). In areas where breeding is recent or not intensive (such as Brazil and Africa) and in the wild cycle of Toxoplasma (e.g., in the Amazonian forest of French Guiana, where the cycle occurs between wild felids and a highly diverse set of wild intermediate hosts), atypical and recombinant genotypes prevail because of more-frequent genetic exchanges and a higher genetic diversity (2). Atypical and recombinant strains can also be encountered in Europe or the United States, although very rarely.
In humans, type II largely predominates in congenital toxoplasmosis, at least in Europe, but type I, atypical and recombinant genotypes are more frequently associated with severe forms of toxoplasmosis (1). Similarly, these last genotypes have been associated with severe cases of acquired toxoplasmosis in immunocompetent patients (4) and with acquired ocular toxoplasmosis (9). This correlation between disease and Toxoplasma genotype may justify the development of a typing method that will allow physicians to more aggressively monitor and treat infections in these cases.
Genotyping of isolates should be simple, rapid, reproducible, adapted to large series, and also informative enough to detect the genotype diversity of the species. With Toxoplasma, the majority of studies are based on PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the SAG2 gene as described primarily in reference 11. This method is rapid and easy to use, but technical problems, such as incomplete amplification of the SAG2 gene (7) or incomplete digestion of the DNA by restriction enzymes (12), have been reported; these problems may limit interest in the method and the reproducibility of its results. Furthermore, a monolocus analysis cannot detect recombination events or atypical alleles. Multilocus studies by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis have been performed (10) but require several PCR assays. The data generated by multilocus sequencing studies (12, 8, 15, 2) are essential to better understand the population structure of T. gondii and to try to establish a link between genotype and clinical disease. However, sequencing is time-consuming and not adapted to an important set of isolates. In our previous study (2), we analyzed the nucleotide polymorphism in microsatellites (MS) and the flanking regions of five MS markers by sequencing. Because the majority of DNA polymorphism in these sequences was due to length polymorphism in the microsatellite region, we propose here a multiplex PCR able to detect these length polymorphisms by GeneScan analysis with only one PCR (instead of five by sequencing) in less than 1 day.
The five MS markers with a chromosome location and GenBank accession numbers corresponding to sequencing data of strains RH and 43 other isolates are listed in Table 1. Eight T. gondii control strains (BK, ME49, NED, BOU, DEG, RMS-2001-MAU, PSP-2003-KOM, and GUY-2002-MAT), already sequenced at the five MS markers, were used in this study (Table 2). T. gondii DNA was extracted from haploid stages (tachyzoites or bradyzoites) present in brains or ascitic fluids of infected mice using the QIAamp DNA mini kit (QIAGEN, Courtaboeuf, France). Five pairs of primers were designed for a multiplex assay (Table 1). In each pair, one primer was 5'-end labeled with fluorescein (6-carboxyfluorescein [6FAM] or hexachloro-6-carboxyfluorescein [HEX]) to allow sizing of PCR products with an automatic sequencer. Primers were synthesized by Applied Biosystems (Courtab
uf, France).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Microsatellite markers and PCR primers used for multiplex PCR
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Correlation between microsatellite sequencing data and length polymorphism results from multiplex PCR
|
![]() View larger version (69K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Agarose gel electrophoresis of multiplex PCR amplification products with control isolates. Lanes: 1, BK; 2, ME49; 3, NED; 4, BOU; 5, DEG; 6, RMS-2001-MAU; 7, PSP-2003-KOM; 8, GUY-2002-MAT; V, molecular size markers.
|
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Electrophoresis of multiplex PCR amplification products from a type II isolate (ME49) with an automatic sequencer by using GeneScan software. The x axis indicates a size fragment scale (in base pairs). The y axis indicates a peak height scale corresponding to the fluorescence intensity of detected peaks. Size fragments of GeneScan size standard ROX 500 are indicated between 75 and 500 bp.
|
However, not all the genetic polymorphisms of microsatellite regions shown by sequencing can be detected by this multiplex assay because of different combinations of dinucleotide repeats or single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the microsatellite sequence. This is mainly the case for the W35 microsatellite sequence, which is made up of two different dinucleotide repeats. For instance, the 242-bp length at W35 by multiplex PCR corresponds to three different sequences: (TC)7(TG)2, which is allele 2, (TC)6(TG)3, which is allele 3, and (TC)6TT(TG)2, which is an atypical allele 7. Similarly, the 248-bp length at W35 corresponds either to (TC)10(TG)2, which is allele 1, or to (TC)9(TG)3, which is another atypical allele (allele 6). However, the association with the four other MS markers allows us to distinguish type I, II, or III or an atypical genotype. On the other hand, all length polymorphism may not be due to microsatellite length polymorphism but to rare insertions or deletions in flanking sequences which are detected by our multiplex assay; for instance, strain DEG has allele 2 at B18, which is (CA)9 and should be detected at 156 bp, but because of a deletion of 3 bp in flanking regions, the detected length is 153 bp. An insertion of 3 bp in GUY-2002-MAT explains the unusual length of 337 bp at B17 with the multiplex assay. In these insertion or deletion events, only sequencing can affiliate the correct MS allele.
In conclusion, we have developed a multiplex PCR for Toxoplasma strain typing which is (i) simple, as only one PCR is needed to perform multilocus typing with five markers; (ii) rapid, as the typing results can be available in 1 day; and (iii) reproducible and adapted to large series (the reproducibility of the multiplex PCR assay has been tested in a large series of isolates from 200 human patients with congenital cases collected in France by the different laboratories of the French parasitologist network for Toxoplasma isolate collection or the BRC ToxoBS group [see Acknowledgments]). The known overrepresentation (84.88% of strains) of only one multilocus genotype (type II) in human patients with congenital disease in France (1) has been confirmed with this multiplex assay (data available from the authors).
We thank the following members of the BRC ToxoBS group (French parasitologist network for Toxoplasma isolate collection) for providing isolates: J. M. Pinon, I. Villena, (Reims), P. Thulliez (Paris Institut de Puériculture), M. H. Bessieres (Toulouse), P. Marty (Nice), L. Paris (Paris Pitié-Salpétrière), J. Berthonneau (Poitiers), A. Bonnin (Dijon), E. Candolfi (Strasbourg), D. Chabasse (Angers), B. Couprie (Bordeaux), L. Delhaes (Lille), C. Duhamel (Caen), T. H. Duong (Tours), L. Favennec (Rouen), P. Flori (Saint Etienne), B. Fortier (Nancy), J. Franck (Marseille), J. P. Gangneux (Rennes), J. F. Garin (Paris Saint Louis), O. Morin (Nantes), G. Nevez (Amiens), H. Pelloux (Grenoble), F. Peyron (Lyon), R. Piarroux (Besançon), F. Pratlong (Montpellier), D. Quinio (Brest), and H. Yera (Paris Cochin).
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»