Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Søgaard, M. Articles by Schønheyder, H. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Søgaard, M. Articles by Schønheyder, H. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2005, p. 1947-1949, Vol. 43, No. 4
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.4.1947-1949.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Direct Identification of Major Blood Culture Pathogens, Including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli, by a Panel of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Assays Using Peptide Nucleic Acid Probes

M. Søgaard,^1* H. Stender,² and H. C. Schønheyder¹

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Aalborg Hospital-Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark ,¹ AdvanDx Inc., Woburn, Massachusetts²

Received 20 August 2004/ Returned for modification 15 November 2004/ Accepted 14 December 2004

Top Abstract Text References

 
Rapid identification of four major pathogens from 1,231 positive blood cultures by fluorescence in situ hybridization with peptide nucleic acid probes (AdvanDx Inc., Woburn, Mass.) was evaluated. For Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans results agreed with conventional identification. The lower sensitivity of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa assay should not compromise the utility of the four assays.

Top Abstract Text References

 
Bacteremia is a serious condition, with mortality in the range of 10 to 40% (3, 6, 8). The prime objective of the laboratory is to provide timely reports on blood culture (BC) isolates that may guide antibiotic therapy. However, definite identification and susceptibility testing are time-consuming, and there is a demand for techniques that are directly applicable to positive BCs and thus obviate the need for subculture. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probes (AdvanDx Inc., Woburn, Mass.) is a new FISH technique using fluorescein-labeled PNA probes targeting rRNA for rapid and accurate identification of major BC pathogens (1, 4, 5, 9). In this noninterventional cohort study, PNA probes for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli (7) were evaluated in parallel with Staphylococcus aureus PNA FISH (KT001; AdvanDx Inc.) and Candida albicans PNA FISH (KT002; AdvanDx Inc.) in a routine setting (5, 9).

The study was conducted from May 2003 to April 2004 at the Department of Clinical Microbiology, Aalborg Hospital-Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

For adult patients a BC set comprised one standard aerobic (SA) bottle, one FAN aerobic (FA) bottle, and one standard anaerobic (SN) bottle (BacT/Alert3D; bioMérieux Marcy L’Etoile, France). For children, a pediatric aerobic FAN (PF) bottle was used. Positive BCs were examined by direct microscopy and Gram staining, and cultures with either gram-positive cocci in clusters, gram-negative rods, or yeast were included, given that only one morphological type was observed. To obtain a set of independent observations only one bottle per set was analyzed; if two or three bottles in a set were positive the FA bottle was examined; otherwise, the SN or the SA bottle, in that order, was included.

S. aureus PNA FISH and C. albicans PNA FISH were performed according to the manufacturer instructions, and probes for P. aeruginosa and E. coli were applied by the same procedure (5). In brief, 10 µl of BC broth was mixed on one-well Teflon-coated microscope slides with a drop of fixation solution, air dried, and fixed by flame fixation. One drop of hybridization solution containing the fluorescein-labeled PNA probe was added, and a coverslip was applied. For hybridization slides were incubated on a slide warmer (SM30; Grant Boekel) at 55°C for 90 min. Subsequently, coverslips were removed and the slides were submerged for 30 min in a preheated wash solution (55°C) in a water bath. Slides were mounted with mounting fluid, and coverslips were applied before examination with a fluorescence microscope (objective, 100x, Olympus BX40; Osram HBO 100 W/2 Hg lamp) equipped with a fluorescein isothiocyanate-Texas Red double filter (filter no. AC003; AdvanDx).

Two observers blind to the results of conventional identification examined the slides. Distinct green fluorescence in multiple fields of view was scored as a positive result (5, 9) and graded into two categories, faint and bright. Negative slides had a faintly reddish background smear; rarely a few fluorescent bacteria or bacterial clusters were observed, and such slides were also scored as negative.

For conventional identification subculture was performed on 5% horse blood agar, chocolate agar, CPS2 agar (bioMérieux) and vitamin K-enriched chocolate agar for anaerobic culture as deemed appropriate. BC isolates underwent definitive identification as follows: S. aureus by coagulase test with horse citrate plasma and Staph Plus (bioMérieux), C. albicans by chromogenic reaction on Candida ID plates (bioMérieux) and the Vitek2 system (bioMérieux), E. coli by the ß-glucuronidase reaction on the CPS2 plates provided a spot indole test was positive or, if the isolates were ß-glucuronidase or indole negative, by Vitek2. Finally P. aeruginosa was identified both by a conventional approach according to the Manual of Clinical Microbiology (2) and by Vitek2.

A total of 1,231 positive BC sets from 946 patients were included. The distribution of the BCs by bottle type was as follows: FA, 737; SA, 257; SN, 172; PF, 65. The distribution of pathogens appears in Table 1. Results obtained by PNA FISH and conventional methods appear in Tables 2 and 3, and the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) of the four assays appear in Table 4. We found close to 100% concordance with conventional identification for S. aureus and C. albicans, corroborating previous reports (1, 4, 5, 9). This study is the first application of PNA FISH for gram-negative rods. For E. coli, the results agreed with those by conventional methods except for one false-positive reaction with 1 of the 63 Klebsiella pneumoniae BCs. Thirty-four BCs grew P. aeruginosa, and identification by PNA FISH was correct for 32. Among 615 BCs with other gram-negative rods 6 were false positive, 4 of which showed a faint staining. These spurious reactions (one isolate each) included reactions for E. coli, Agrobacterium radiobacter, an Achromobacter sp., an Acinetobacter sp., Burkholderia cepacia, and an unidentified Pseudomonas sp. Therefore, sensitivity and PPV for P. aeruginosa PNA FISH were somewhat lower than those for the three other assays.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Bacterial and fungal isolates from 1,231 BCs included in a prospective evaluation of PNA FISH for direct identification of E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and C. albicans

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Direct detection of E. coli and P. aeruginosa by PNA FISH compared to conventional identificationa

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 3. Direct detection of S aureus and C. albicans by PNA FISH compared to conventional identification

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 4. Performance characteristics for the four PNA FISH assays for E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and C. albicans

Polymicrobial growth was detected in 108 BCs. According to the protocol only one bottle per set was examined by PNA FISH, and discordant growth among bottles in some BC sets had an impact on the analysis of results (Table 1). Overall, we did not detect a poorer performance with polymicrobial samples; note, however, that two of five failures with the E. coli probe occurred with such samples (Table 2).

There are some limitations to the present study. It was conducted in a routine setting, and we cannot determine the exact cause of the spurious results. The preparatory steps prior to hybridization could be critical, as we obtained a bright staining of smears prepared from subcultures of one E. coli isolate and two P. aeruginosa isolates undetected by direct examination. Moreover, we cannot exclude the possibility that a Pseudomonas species actually was P. aeruginosa as indicated by PNA FISH.

Faint, but distinct, staining was seen both for P. aeruginosa and some other gram-negative rods belonging to the group of aerobic bacteria. Disregarding such reactions would lead to a lower sensitivity (30 of 34 BCs; 88.2%) and better specificity (613 of 615 BCs; 99.7%), the PPV would be better (30 of 32 BCs; 93.8%), and the NPV would be marginally lower (613 of 617 BCs; 99.4%). From a clinical point of view missing a P. aeruginosa diagnosis is undesirable, and therefore we favor a cutoff point as used in Tables 2 and 3.

Distinguishing E. coli and P. aeruginosa from other gram-negative rods should facilitate early directed antibiotic therapy. Negative results in both assays increase the likelihood of other gram-negative pathogens such as Klebsiella, Citrobacter, and Enterobacter spp., which often express chromosomal ß-lactamases.

 
Skillful assistance by biotechnicians Lone Person and Jeanett Sørensen is gratefully acknowledged.

This study was supported by grants from Nordjylland Amts Forskningsfond and Aalborg Hospital-Aarhus University Hospital to Mette Søgaard. Research at The Department of Clinical Microbiology, Aalborg Hospital-Aarhus University Hospital, is supported by Det Obelske Familiefond.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Clinical Microbiology, Aalborg Hospital Section South, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark. Phone: 45 99 32 32 19. Fax: 45 99 32 32 16. E-mail: aas.10915{at}nja.dk.

Top Abstract Text References

 

1
1. Gonzalez, V., E. Padilla, M. Gimenez, C. Vilaplana, A. Perez, G. Fernandez, M. D. Quesada, M. A. Pallares, and V. Ausina. 2004. Rapid diagnosis of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia using S. aureus PNA FISH. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 23:396-398.[CrossRef][Medline]
2
2. Kiska, D. L., and P. H. Gilligan. 2003. Pseudomonas, p. 719-728. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, J. H. Jorgensen, M. A. Pfaller and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 8th ed., vol. 1. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
3
3. Leibovici, L., I. Shraga, M. Drucker, H. Konigsberger, Z. Samra, and S. D. Pitlik. 1998. The benefit of appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment in patients with bloodstream infection. J. Intern. Med. 244:379-386.[CrossRef][Medline]
4
4. Oliveira, K., S. M. Brecher, A. Durbin, D. S. Shapiro, D. R. Schwartz, P. C. De Girolami, J. Dakos, G. W. Procop, D. Wilson, C. S. Hanna, G. Haase, H. Peltroche-Llacsahuanga, K. C. Chapin, M. C. Musgnug, M. H. Levi, C. Shoemaker, and H. Stender. 2003. Direct identification of Staphylococcus aureus from positive blood culture bottles. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:889-891.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Oliveira, K., G. W. Procop, D. Wilson, J. Coull, and H. Stender. 2002. Rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus directly from blood cultures by fluorescence in situ hybridization with peptide nucleic acid probes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:247-251.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Pedersen, G., H. C. Schønheyder, and H. T. Sørensen. 2003. Source of infection and other factors associated with case fatality in community-acquired bacteremia—a Danish population-based cohort study from 1992 to 1997. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 9:793-802.[CrossRef][Medline]
7
7. Perry-O'Keefe, H., S. Rigby, K. Oliveira, D. Sorensen, H. Stender, J. Coull, and J. J. Hyldig-Nielsen. 2001. Identification of indicator microorganisms using a standardized PNA FISH method. J. Microbiol. Methods 47:281-292.[CrossRef][Medline]
8
8. Pittet, D., and R. P. Wenzel. 1995. Nosocomial bloodstream infections. Secular trends in rates, mortality, and contribution to total hospital deaths. Arch. Intern. Med. 155:1177-1184.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. Rigby, S., G. W. Procop, G. Haase, D. Wilson, G. Hall, C. Kurtzman, K. Oliveira, S. Von Oy, J. J. Hyldig-Nielsen, J. Coull, and H. Stender. 2002. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with peptide nucleic acid probes for rapid identification of Candida albicans directly from blood culture bottles. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2182-2186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2005, p. 1947-1949, Vol. 43, No. 4
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.4.1947-1949.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Stevenson, L. G., Drake, S. K., Murray, P. R. (2010). Rapid Identification of Bacteria in Positive Blood Culture Broths by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48: 444-447 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Almeida, C., Azevedo, N. F., Iversen, C., Fanning, S., Keevil, C. W., Vieira, M. J. (2009). Development and Application of a Novel Peptide Nucleic Acid Probe for the Specific Detection of Cronobacter Genomospecies (Enterobacter sakazakii) in Powdered Infant Formula. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 2925-2930 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sogaard, M., Hansen, D. S., Fiandaca, M. J., Stender, H., Schonheyder, H. C. (2007). Peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization for rapid detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae from positive blood cultures. J Med Microbiol 56: 914-917 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sogaard, M., Norgaard, M., Schonheyder, H. C. (2007). First Notification of Positive Blood Cultures and the High Accuracy of the Gram Stain Report. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 1113-1117 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Peters, R. P. H., van Agtmael, M. A., Simoons-Smit, A. M., Danner, S. A., Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C. M. J. E., Savelkoul, P. H. M. (2006). Rapid Identification of Pathogens in Blood Cultures with a Modified Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 4186-4188 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ishii, Y., Alba, J., Maehara, C., Murakami, H., Matsumoto, T., Tateda, K., Furuya, N., Iwata, M., Yamaguchi, K. (2006). Identification of biochemically atypical Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates with three automated identification systems.. J Med Microbiol 55: 387-392 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Peters, R. P. H., Savelkoul, P. H. M., Simoons-Smit, A. M., Danner, S. A., Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C. M. J. E., van Agtmael, M. A. (2006). Faster Identification of Pathogens in Positive Blood Cultures by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Routine Practice. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 119-123 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Søgaard, M. Articles by Schønheyder, H. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Søgaard, M. Articles by Schønheyder, H. C.