Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2005, p. 2070-2074, Vol. 43, No. 5
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.5.2070-2074.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Tuberculosis Division, Bacterial Diseases Programme, Medical Research Council Unit, Banjul, The Gambia,1 Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands2
Received 13 December 2004/ Returned for modification 18 January 2005/ Accepted 24 January 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
) detection with secreted antigens of M. tuberculosis, ESAT-6 and CFP-10, offers improved specificity over assays with the purified protein derivative (PPD) for the diagnosis of latent M. tuberculosis infection in The Gambia, a tropical setting where TB is endemic (9). However, when the results were compared to those of the PPD skin test, it appeared that the specificity gain was at the cost of some sensitivity, which supports the assertion that two M. tuberculosis-specific antigens may not be sufficient for the diagnosis of infection (14). Longitudinal follow-up studies to find secondary cases will shed more light on this issue. It is not known whether it is preferable to conduct the ELISPOT assay with recombinant protein or pools of peptides or whether increased sensitivity could be achieved through measurement of a combined peptide and protein response (3). In addition, a fusion protein of antigens is likely to offer a far cheaper and more realistic alternative for large-scale production and field testing. Therefore, we engineered a fusion protein of ESAT-6 and CFP-10 and formally evaluated its diagnostic value against and in addition to those of the respective peptides of the single antigens for the ability to detect M. tuberculosis infection in The Gambia.
|
|
|---|
The study was approved by The Gambia Government-Medical Research Council Joint Ethics Committee.
Laboratory procedures. Sputum smears were prepared and stained with auramine-phenol (8), and the results were confirmed by Ziehl-Neelsen staining. Decontaminated specimens were inoculated into Lowenstein-Jensen medium and BACTEC 9000 MB liquid medium for the isolation and identification of M. tuberculosis, as described previously (9).
Testing for HIV type 1 (HIV-1) or HIV-2 infection was by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Wellcome Laboratories, Kent, United Kingdom) and Western blotting (Diagnostics Pasteur, Marnes-la-Coquette, France).
Synthetic, sequential peptides spanning the lengths of ESAT-6 and CFP-10 (Advanced Biotech Centre, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom) were used. Each peptide was 15 amino acids long and overlapped its adjacent peptide by 10 residues. ESAT-6 and CFP-10 peptides, used at 5 µg/ml, were used in one pool each of 17 peptides. The positive control was phytohemagglutinin (Sigma-Aldrich, United Kingdom). All antigens were tested in duplicate wells.
The fusion protein of ESAT-6 (Rv3875) and CFP10 (Rv3874) was engineered as follows. The individual genes were amplified from M. tuberculosis H37Rv genomic DNA by PCR. During the amplification steps the genes were fused with a linker encoding asparagine-valine-alanine. The product was subsequently cloned by Gateway technology into bacterial expression vector pDEST17 (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) containing an N-terminal hexahistidine tag. Sequencing was performed to confirm the identity of the cloned DNA fragment. The recombinant fusion protein was overexpressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) and was purified as described previously (6). Recombinant protein batches were analyzed by 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by Coomassie brilliant blue staining and Western blotting with an anti-His antibody (Invitrogen), to confirm the size and purity of the protein. Residual endotoxin levels were determined by a Limulus amebocyte lysate assay (Cambrex) and were found to be less than 50 IU/mg recombinant protein. Protein batches were subsequently tested for nonspecific T-cell stimulation and for potential cellular toxicity in IFN-
release assays with peripheral blood mononuclear cells of M. tuberculosis-unexposed and M. bovis BCG-unvaccinated healthy Mantoux-negative donors. The fusion protein was used at a concentration of 10 µg/ml in the ELISPOT assays (see below).
The ex vivo ELISPOT assays for IFN-
were performed in duplicate, as described previously (10). Assays were scored with an ELISPOT counter (AID-GmbH, Strassberg, Germany). The number of spot-forming units (SFU) in each well was automatically entered into a database by using Matlab software (MathWorks). Supplementary details were added by double data entry by two immunologists blinded to subject details. Positive test wells were predefined as containing at least 10 SFU more than and at least twice as many as SFU as the negative control wells. For a positive ESAT-6/CFP-10 result, it was necessary for one or both pools of overlapping peptides to be positive. Phytohemagglutinin-positive control wells were set to at least 150 SFU/well/2 x 105 cells above the values for the negative control wells. Negative control wells were required to have less than 30 SFU.
Data management and statistical analysis. All data were entered by using double entry of the data into a Microsoft Access database, and the data were checked for errors. Agreement between the qualitative test results was assessed by use of the kappa statistic, and the significance of the discordance was assessed by McNemar's test. For analyses by exposure, contacts were stratified according to their proximity to the index case, as defined previously (9). The following categories were used: sleeping in the same bedroom as the index case, sleeping in a different bedroom in the same house as the index case, or sleeping in a different house in the same compound as the index case. A random-effects logistic regression model, which takes into account household clustering, was used to assess the relationship between exposure and test results. All statistical analyses were conducted by using Stata software (version 8; Stata Corp., College Station, TX).
|
|
|---|
, and an adequate specimen was taken. Of these, 488 (81%) contacts of 88 cases had both fusion protein and peptide ELISPOT assay results that met the inclusion criteria (Table 1). Overall, 88 (18%) subjects were positive for CFP-10 peptides, 148 (30%) subjects were positive for ESAT-6 peptides, 161 (33%) subjects were positive for either or both the CFF-10 and the ESAT-6 peptides, and 168 (34%) subjects were positive for the fusion protein. A total of 188 (39%) subjects had a positive result for one or more of the peptides or the fusion protein. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Characteristics of 488 contacts of 88 cases
|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Venn diagram of the number of subjects with each combination of fusion protein and peptide results (n = 488).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Univariable and multivariable ORs by logistic regression (household as a random effect) according to sleeping proximity to a case
|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Scatter graphs showing correlations between quantitative ELISPOT test results.
|
|
|
|---|
in 488 TB contacts above 6 months of age in a tropical setting where TB is endemic. As far as we are aware, this is the first formal assessment of the use of a fusion protein of ESAT-6 and CFP-10 as a reagent to monitor natural active M. tuberculosis infection in humans. The ESAT-6 and CFP-10 antigens, whether they are used as peptides or a fusion protein, all induced responses with increasing positivity according to the closeness of the contact to a TB index case. The changes in positivity across the TB exposure gradient are similar to those reported in our recent assessment of the ESAT-6 and CFP-10 peptides by the ELISPOT assay compared with the PPD skin test and the PPD ELISPOT assay (9). We therefore reconfirm with the fusion protein the potential for the use of a TB case-contact study design as a model for the study of natural infection with sensitivity across a gradient of exposure. We show the model to be reproducible, and we believe that it is ready to be applied for the testing of new interventions, including drugs and vaccines, in efficacy trials.
There was good agreement overall between the results obtained with the fusion protein and those obtained with the peptides in both the qualitative comparisons and the quantitative correlations. In effect, the fusion protein and peptide responses are mutual, and each serves as a control for the other. Interestingly, our data show that the response to the CFP-10 peptide antigen is significantly less than that to ESAT-6; in other studies in Zambia (5), India (11), Denmark (2), and The Netherlands (1), the converse was found. Both the ESAT-6 and the CFP-10 antigens are similar in size, are encoded in one operon, and are expressed simultaneously at similar ratios (4, 12). Differences in immune responses to individual ESAT-6 and CFP-10 antigens may be explained by polymorphism in the HLA type in the population and to the actual amino acid compositions of the individual proteins. An alternative explanation might relate to differences of M. tuberculosis strains in Africa.
By combining the data obtained with the peptide and the fusion protein, we found a small but significant gain in sensitivity. While peptides might be expected to stimulate mixed CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses, a response to the peptide in the absence of a response to the fusion protein implies a response that is exclusively mediated by CD8 T cells and representative of about 12% of the response.
Currently, there is no clear explanation for an exclusive protein response in the absence of a peptide response, although there may be several theoretical possibilities. Since the molar concentration of peptide antigen is at least fivefold higher than that of the protein, a lack of a peptide response is unlikely to be a concentration effect. Although the peptides used were 15 amino acids that overlapped by 10 amino acids, there is still a small chance that the peptides do not represent every conceivable sequential T-cell epitope. However, it would seem unlikely that so much of the response is due to sequentially unrepresentative epitopes. There is a possibility that "neoepitopes" are formed across the ESAT-6/CFP-10 junction and are therefore absent from the peptide pools. Yet, it is difficult to see how these might occur naturally. A more likely explanation comes from recent publications that have shown that CD8+ T-cell epitopes are spliced to form nonsequential sequences (7) within the proteosome (15). Our data, which showed differences between the unprocessed (peptide) and the processed (protein) antigen, support the possibility that spliced epitopes might also occur through a CD4 pathway. While confirmation is needed, the possibility remains that as much as 14% (protein positive, peptide negative) of the response to a recent M. tuberculosis infection could be due to spliced epitopes. We are conducting longitudinal follow-up of the subjects to assess the changes in responses to the peptides and proteins over time. Finally, since the readout deals only with IFN-
, discordance in the responses between the peptide and the protein could relate to the secretion of different cytokines.
Of note, since this study was nested in a large case-contact study, 464 of the 488 subjects also had a PPD skin test with a change in positivity across the exposure gradient of 20.8% to 61% (data not shown), which is very similar to the data that we reported previously (9). It is likely, therefore, that the gain in sensitivity in these studies is not enough to counter the sensitivity loss incurred by using only two antigens. We are exploring other ways to improve the sensitivity of the ELISPOT assay in our setting, including the use of mathematical modeling to access a lower cutoff for positivity and searching for new immunogenic, but M. tuberculosis-specific, diagnostic antigens.
In terms of practicality, the fusion protein will be much cheaper to manufacture than bulk peptides and costs half of what the individual proteins cost. However, the use of a combination of fusion protein with peptides is advantageous. First, the combination allows optimal detection of M. tuberculosis infection, at least by the ex vivo ELISPOT assay; and second, protein and peptide antigens act as quality controls for one another. The quality control issue becomes a lot more relevant when the assay is used in large field studies, as we did.
In conclusion, the present study has shown good agreement between the measurement of the immune response by ELISPOT assay to a fusion protein of ESAT-6 and CFP-10 and measurement of the immune response to the respective overlapping peptides. Improved sensitivity was gained through the addition of CFP-10 to ESAT-6 peptides and through the combined assessment of the peptide and the fusion protein responses. The fusion protein could be used as an alternative to pools of overlapping peptides or in addition to pools of overlapping peptides in settings where maximal sensitivity is a priority. Further studies will be required to explore the significance, if any, of exclusive responses to either the protein or the peptides, especially in relation to the time from exposure and the development of secondary TB disease.
This study was funded by the Medical Research Council (United Kingdom), the European Commission, Leiden University Medical Center, the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, and Netherlands Leprosy Relief.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»