Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ko, K. S. Articles by Song, J.-H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ko, K. S. Articles by Song, J.-H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2005, p. 2303-2306, Vol. 43, No. 5
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.5.2303-2306.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Molecular Characterization of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Isolates from Korea

Kwan Soo Ko,¹ Jin Yang Baek,¹ Ji-Young Lee,¹ Won Sup Oh,² Kyong Ran Peck,² NamYong Lee,³ Wee Gyo Lee,⁴ Kyungwon Lee,⁵ and Jae-Hoon Song^1,2*

Asian-Pacific Research Foundation for Infectious Diseases, Seoul, Korea,¹ Division of Infectious Diseases,² Department of Laboratory Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea,³ Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea,⁴ Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea⁵

Received 3 August 2004/ Returned for modification 8 November 2004/ Accepted 22 December 2004

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
A total of 98 vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) isolates from four tertiary-care hospitals in Korea during the period between 1998 and 2004 were analyzed for genotypic characteristics using the multiplex PCR, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and esp gene analysis. Ninety-two isolates of VREF with VanA phenotype and five of six isolates with VanB phenotype possessed the vanA gene. MLST analysis revealed 9 sequence types (STs), which belonged to a single clonal complex (CC78, clonal lineage C1). Five strains showing incongruence between phenotype and genotype (VanB-vanA) did not belong to the same genotypic clone. The esp gene was detected in all VREF strains, showing 12 different esp repeat profiles. Data suggest that an epidemic clonal group of VREF, CC78 with esp gene, is also present in Asia and has differentiated into multiple diverse genotypic clones during the evolutionary process.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Since the first isolation of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium in 1988 (17), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) have become one of the major threats to public health in many parts of the world. Although E. faecalis is more common in human infections, vancomycin resistance is more frequently observed in E. faecium isolates. Most vancomycin-resistant E. faecium (VREF) strains isolated in Korea showed the VanA phenotype, which is defined as having high-level resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin (2). VREF isolates with the VanB phenotype characterized by variable levels of resistance to vancomycin but by susceptibility to teicoplanin have been reported in Korea since 1997 (12). Generally, the vanA gene cluster confers the VanA phenotype and vanB gene cluster is associated with the VanB phenotype. Recently, however, VRE strains with the vanA gene and VanB phenotype have been found in Japan, Taiwan, and Korea (3, 6, 8, 11).

VREF is an important concern not only because VREF infection is difficult to treat in clinical practice but also because VREF clones can spread within hospitals as well as between regions or countries. Molecular epidemiologic studies could clarify the genetic relatedness and molecular evolution of VREF clones. In the current study, we have investigated the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of VREF isolates from four tertiary-care hospitals in Korea by using the broth microdilution test, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and analysis of the esp repeat profile.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
VREF isolates. A total of 98 vancomycin-resistant E. faecium (VREF) isolates from four tertiary-care hospitals in Korea (Samsung Medical Center, Severans Hospital, Kyunghee University Hospital, and Kyungbuk National University Hospital) were analyzed in this study. The most common specimen source was urine (25 isolates) followed by rectal swab (14 isolates), blood (13 isolates), pus (9 isolates), wound (5 isolates), fluid (5 isolates), sputum (2 isolates), and tissue (2 isolates). Duplicate strains from the same patient were not included in the study. Antimicrobial resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin were determined by measuring the MIC using broth dilution method according to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) procedures (14). Genomic DNA for molecular analysis was extracted by a simple boiling-lysis method. The DNA from each of the VREF strains was analyzed by multiplex PCR method for the presence of vancomycin resistance gene (1).

MLST analysis. MLST was performed as described previously (7, 19), based on seven housekeeping genes (atpA, ddl, gdh, purK, gyd, pstS, and adk). The allele number for each gene was assigned based on the E. faecium MLST database (http://efecium.mlst.net). Allelic profiles were represented as a series of 7 integers corresponding to the alleles at each of the loci, in the order of atpA, ddl, gdh, purK, gyd, pstS, and adk. Sequence type (ST) was designated for each unique allelic profile.

esp gene analysis. The presence of the esp gene was determined by use of a primer set (forward, 5'-GGT CAC AAA GCC CAA CTT GT-3'; reverse, 5'-ACG TCG AAA GTT CGA TTT CC-3'), which is expected to amplify 407-bp fragments (20). To determine repeat number variations of esp A and C repeats, two different primer combinations were used; esp_fs7F-esp_fm5R and esp_fm5F-esp_fs3R, respectively (9). The PCR products were subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis (1%) and the numbers of repeats were deduced from the sizes of the amplified fragments (9).

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. PFGE was performed as previously described (13). Agarose plugs containing genomic DNA were digested with SmaI (Gibco, BRL, Gaithersburg, Md.) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Electrophoresis was performed with a CHEF-Mapper apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Milan, Italy), at 6 V/cm for 22 h. The PFGE patterns were interpreted using the criteria suggested by Tenover et al. (16).

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Ninety-two of 98 VREF isolates (93.9%) showed the VanA phenotype with resistance to both vancomycin and teicoplanin, while six strains were resistant to vancomycin but susceptible to teicoplanin (VanB phenotype). Of these six VREF isolates with the VanB phenotype, only one possessed the vanB gene, whereas five isolates showed incongruence between phenotype and genotype (VanB phenotype and vanA genotype).

Ninety-eight VREF isolates showed nine sequence types (STs) in MLST analysis, including five newly identified STs (STs 203, 204, 205, 206, and 207) (Table 1). The predominant ST was ST78 (58 strains, 59.2%), followed by ST192 (13.3%), ST203 (12.2%), and ST17 (7.1%). The other STs included one or two VREF isolates. STs 192, 203, 17, 204, 117, and 205 are single-locus variants of ST78. ST207 is a single-locus variant of ST203, and ST206 is a double-locus variant of ST17. Thus, the MLST data suggested that all VREF isolates in this study belong to one clonal complex, CC78 (Fig. 1).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Genotypic characteristics of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium isolates from four Korean hospitals based on multilocus sequence typing and esp repeat profiles

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Speculative evolution of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium isolates analyzed in this study. Alterations in the allelic profile compared with ST78 are underlined. The number of strains for each ST is indicated in parentheses. The potential reason for allelic variations is shown as R (recombination) or PM (point mutation) in the corresponding housekeeping gene (parentheses).

In CC78, eight types of allelic variations have been identified due to either point mutation or recombinational process (4, 5). Three variations in the allelic profile of the atpA locus were due to the recombination (Fig. 1). All strains had the type 1 allele of the purK gene, which have been reported to be related to epidemic VREF strains (10, 18).

The esp gene was detected in all VREF isolates analyzed in this study. Among 98 VREF strains, the numbers of the A and C repeats of the esp gene varied from 3 to 7 and from 3 to 8, respectively (Table 1). Based on the esp A and C repeat profile, VREF isolates belonged to 12 different groups. The most prevalent esp profile was A6-C5 (59 isolates [60.2%]), followed by A5-C6 (14 isolates [14.3%]), A6-C3 (6 isolates [6.1%]), A4-C5 (5 isolates [5.1%]), and A5-C7 (4 isolates [4.1%]). The other esp profiles were displayed by only one or two strains. Isolates with the same STs showed different esp repeat profiles. Therefore, based on MLST and esp repeat profiles, a total of 29 genotypic clones were identified. Fifty-eight VREF isolates with ST78 showed eight esp repeat profiles, while ST192 and ST203 showed four and five different esp repeat profiles, respectively (Table 1). Overall, the most common genotypic clone among Korean VREF isolates was ST78 with A6-C5 esp repeat profile (ST78-A6-C5) (41 isolates [41.8%]). Including that clone, there were nine genotypic clones that contained multiple VREF isolates; the eight others were ST192-A6-C5 (10 isolates), ST78-A5-C6 (8 isolates), ST203-A5-C6 (4 isolates), ST203-A6-C5 (4 isolates), ST78-A4-C5 (2 isolates), ST203-A5-C7 (2 isolates), ST17-A5-C8 (2 isolates), and ST17-A4-C5 (2 isolates). Five VREF strains showing incongruence between phenotype and genotype of vancomycin resistance belonged to ST78 (4 isolates) and ST203 (1 isolate). The esp repeat profiles of these strains showed four different types, as follows: A4-C3 (2 isolates), A6-C5 (1 isolate), A4-C5 (1 isolate), and A7-C6 (1 isolate). Based on MLST and esp gene analysis, these five strains showed genetic backgrounds that were different from each other (Table 2). PFGE patterns also showed that these five strains do not belong to the same clone (Fig. 2).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Characteristics of five vancomycin-resistant E. faecium isolates with VanB phenotype-vanA genotype

View larger version (146K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. SmaI macrorestriction patterns resolved in PFGE of five VREF isolates with the VanB phenotype and vanA genotype.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
In the current study, we investigated the genetic characteristics of VREF isolates from Korea by MLST, PFGE, and esp repeat profiles. Each method had a different ability to analyze the genotypes of VREF isolates. MLST based on seven housekeeping genes such as atpA, ddl, gdh, purK, gyd, pstS, and adk has identified nine different STs of VREF isolates in this study, while PFGE has shown more than 32 distinguishable fragment patterns (data not shown). Isolates with different PFGE pattern belonged to the same ST on MLST. Therefore, MLST is usually useful for long-term and evolutionary process of resistant clones, and PFGE is more adequate for short-term epidemiologic study. We have also used esp repeat profiles to analyze the VREF isolates. Previous report showed that strains originating from a single outbreak had identical esp repeat profiles, which were relatively stable (9). The esp repeat profiles could be utilized to investigate the outbreaks of resistant clones in combination with other genotyping methods (9). In our study, combination of the esp repeat profiles and MLST has increased the diversity of genotypes of VREF isolates. For instance, ST78 from MLST showed eight different esp repeat profiles. Thus, combination of MLST and esp repeat profiles could be more discriminatory in evaluating the genotypes of clinical isolates of VREF.

In this study, MLST and the esp repeat profiles suggested the epidemic nature of VREF isolates based on STs, purK-1 allele, and presence of esp gene (7, 10). All VREF isolates in this study belonged to CC78 with the purK-1 allele. Previous study showed that CC78 belongs to a subgroup of E. faecium, lineage C1 (7). The lineage C1 represents a cluster of epidemic E. faecium strains that has disseminated worldwide (7, 10). The esp gene that encodes the virulence-associated surface protein is uniquely present in the strains of this lineage (7, 10, 18). Therefore, the presence of the esp gene is suggestive of epidemicity of VREF isolates (9, 19).

In this study, the esp gene was detected in all VREF strains and the vanA gene complex was found in 97 of 98 isolates, which suggested the clonal nature of the isolates. Therefore, our data documented that epidemic clonal group CC78 with the esp gene is also present in Asia as it is in Europe, the United States, and Australia (7). However, PFGE and the esp gene repeat profiles showed multiple genotypes of VREF isolates, which were not consistent with the result of MLST. It is assumed that one clone of ancestral VREF lineages with esp gene has been differentiated into multiple diverse genotypic clones during evolutionary process.

Another interesting finding from this study was incongruence between phenotype and genotype for glycopeptide resistance in five VREF isolates. Of these, one isolate has caused acute bacterial meningitis, resulting in death of patient, and other isolates were isolated from wound and urinary tract infections. These five isolates were not related either epidemiologically or genetically. Therefore, these VREF isolates with the VanB phenotype and vanA genotype might have occurred independently. Previous studies have suggested that point mutations in the sensor domain of vanS gene (3, 6, 8) or impairment of accessory proteins VanY and VanZ (3, 6, 11, 15) would be the reason for loss of teicoplanin resistance in these strains. In the present study, three strains with the VanB phenotype and vanA genotype showed an IS1216V insertion into the vanX-vanY intergenic region accompanied by partial or whole deletion of vanY or vanZ. However, we could not find distinct mutations that may be responsible for teicoplanin susceptibility in another isolates. Further investigation to elucidate other molecular mechanism of incongruence is under way.

In summary, we characterized 98 VREF strains isolated from four tertiary-care hospitals in Korea by molecular typing methods. Most of the isolates showed the VanA phenotype-vanA genotype, but five isolates showed VanB phenotype-vanA genotype. All VREF strains belonged to one clonal complex (CC78) which is related to a globally epidemic E. faecium clone. Based on MLST and the esp gene repeat profiles, this clone might have been differentiated into 29 genotypic clones. The combination of MLST and the esp repeat profiles would be useful for genetic characterization of VREF isolates with regard to the evolutionary process and epidemicity of the clones.

 
This study was supported by the Asian-Pacific Research Foundation for Infectious Diseases.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Infectious Diseases, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Asian-Pacific Research Foundation for Infectious Diseases (ARFID), 50 Il-won dong, Kangnam-ku, Seoul 135-710, Korea. Phone: 82-2-3410-0320. Fax: 82-2-3410-0328. E-mail: jhsong{at}ansorp.org.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1
1. Bell, J. M., J. C. Paton, and J. Turnidge. 1998. Emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in Australia: phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2187-2190.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
2. Cetinkaya, Y., P. Falk, and C. G. Mayhall. 2000. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13:686-707.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3
3. Eom, J. S., I. S. Hwang, B. Y. Hwang, J. G. Lee, Y. J. Lee, H. J. Cheong, Y. H. Park, S. C. Park, and W. J. Kim. 2004. Emergence of vanA genotype vancomycin-resistant enterococci with low or moderate levels of teicoplanin resistance in Korea. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:1785-1786.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Feil, E. J. J. Maynard Smith, M. C. Enright, and B. G. Spratt. 2000. Estimating recombinational parameters in Streptococcus pneumoniae from multilocus sequence typing data. Genetics 154:1439-1450.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Feil, E. J., J. E. Cooper, H. Grundmann, D. A. Robinson, M. C. Enright, T. Berendt, S. J. Peacock, J. Maynard Smith, M. Murphy, B. G. Spratt, C. E. Moore, and N. P. J. Day. 2003. How clonal is Staphylococcus aureus? J. Bacteriol. 185:3307-3316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Hashimoto, Y., K. Tanimoto, Y. Ozawa, T. Murata, and Y. Ike. 2000. Amino acid substitutions in the VanS sensor of the VanA-type vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus strains result in high-level vancomycin resistance and low level teicoplanin resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 185:247-254.[CrossRef][Medline]
7
7. Homan, W. L., D. Tribe, S. Poznanski, M. Li, G. Hogg, E. Spalburg, J. D. A. van Embden, and R. J. L. Willems. 2002. Multilocus sequence typing scheme for Enterococcus faecium. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1963-1971.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8
8. Lauderdale, T. L., L. C. McDonald, Y. R. Shiau, P. C. Chen, H. Y. Wang, J. F. Lai, and M. Ho. 2002. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci from humans and retail chickens in Taiwan with unique VanB phenotype-vanA genotype incongruence. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:525-527.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. Leavis, H., J. Top, N. Shankar, K. Borgen, M. Bonten, J. van Embden, and R. J. L. Willems. 2004. A novel putative Enterococcal pathogenicity island linked to the esp virulence gene of Enterococcus faecium and associated with epidemicity. J. Bacteriol. 186:672-682.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10
10. Leavis, H. L., R. J. L. Willems, J. Top, E. Spalburg, E. M. Mascini, A. C. Fluit, A. Hoepelman, A. J. de Neeling, and M. J. M. Bonten. 2003. Epidemic and nonepidemic multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 9:1108-1115.[Medline]
11
11. Lee, W. G., J. Y. Huh, S. R. Cho, and Y. A. Lim. 2004. Reduction in glycopeptide resistance in vancomycin-resistant enterococci as a result of vanA cluster rearrangements. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1379-1381.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12
12. Lee, W. G., J. A. Jernigan, J. K. Rasheed, G. J. Anderson, and F. C. Tenover. 2001. Possible horizontal transfer of the vanB2 gene among genetically diverse strains of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a Korea hospital. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:1165-1168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13
13. Murray, B. E., K. V. Singh, J. D. Heath, B. R. Sharma, and G. M. Weinstock. 1990. Comparison of genomic DNAs of different enterococcal isolates using restriction endonucleases with infrequent recognition sites. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:2059-2063.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14
14. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2003. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 13^th informational supplement, vol. 23, no. 1. M100-S13. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
15
15. Simonsen, G. S. M. R. M. Myhre, K. H. Dahl, Ø. Olsvik, and A. Sundsfjord. 2000. Typeability of Tn1546-like elements in vancomycin-resistance enterococci using long-range PCRs and specific analysis of polymorphic regions. Microb. Drug Resist. 6:49-57.[Medline]
16
16. Tenover, F. C., R. D. Arbeit, R. V. Goering, P. A. Mickelsen, B. E. Murray, D. H. Persing, and B. Swaminathan. 1995. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2233-2239.[Medline]
17
17. Uttley, A. H. C., C. H. Collins, J. Naidoo, and R. C. George. 1988. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Lancet i:57-58.
18
18. Willems, R. J., W. Homan, J. Top, M. van Santen-Verheuvel, D. Tribe, X. Manzioros, C. Gaillard, C. M. J. E. Vandenbroucke-Grauls, E. M. Mascini, E. van Kregten, J. D. A. van Embden, and M. J. M. Bonten. 2001. Variant esp gene as a marker of distinct genetic lineage of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium spreading in hospitals. Lancet 357:853-855.[CrossRef][Medline]
19
19. Willems, R. J., J. Top, D. J. Smith, D. I. Roper, S. E. North, and N. Woodford. 2003. Mutations in the DNA mismatch repair proteins MutS and MutL of oxazolininone-resistant or -susceptible Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3061-3066.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20
20. Woodford, N., M. Soltani, and K. J. Hardy. 2001. Frequency of esp in Enterococcus faecium isolates. Lancet 358:584.

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2005, p. 2303-2306, Vol. 43, No. 5
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.5.2303-2306.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Damborg, P., Top, J., Hendrickx, A. P. A., Dawson, S., Willems, R. J. L., Guardabassi, L. (2009). Dogs Are a Reservoir of Ampicillin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Lineages Associated with Human Infections. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 2360-2365 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Song, J.-H., Ko, K. S., Suh, J. Y., Oh, W. S., Kang, C.-I., Chung, D. R., Peck, K. R., Lee, N. Y., Lee, W. G. (2008). Clinical implications of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) with VanD phenotype and vanA genotype. J Antimicrob Chemother 61: 838-844 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Top, J., Willems, R., van der Velden, S., Asbroek, M., Bonten, M. (2008). Emergence of Clonal Complex 17 Enterococcus faecium in The Netherlands. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 214-219 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Abele-Horn, M., Vogel, U., Klare, I., Konstabel, C., Trabold, R., Kurihara, R., Witte, W., Kreth, W., Schlegel, P.-G., Claus, H. (2006). Molecular Epidemiology of Hospital-Acquired Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 4009-4013 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Oh, W. S., Ko, K. S., Song, J.-H., Lee, M. Y., Park, S., Peck, K. R., Lee, N. Y., Kim, C.-K., Lee, H., Kim, S.-W., Chang, H.-H., Kim, Y.-S., Jung, S.-I., Son, J. S., Yeom, J.-S., Ki, H. K., Woo, G.-J. (2005). High Rate of Resistance to Quinupristin-Dalfopristin in Enterococcus faecium Clinical Isolates from Korea. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 5176-5178 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ko, K. S. Articles by Song, J.-H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ko, K. S. Articles by Song, J.-H.