JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsang, R. S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hallander, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsang, R. S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hallander, H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2005, p. 2449-2451, Vol. 43, No. 5
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.5.2449-2451.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Use of Monoclonal Antibodies To Serotype Bordetella pertussis Isolates: Comparison of Results Obtained by Indirect Whole-Cell Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and Bacterial Microagglutination Methods

Raymond S. W. Tsang,1* Michelle L. Sill,1 Abdolreza Advani,2 Dorothy Xing,3 Penny Newland,3 and Hans Hallander2

Vaccine Preventable Bacterial Diseases Division, National Microbiology Laboratory, Population and Public Health Branch, Health Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada,1 Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Solna, Sweden,2 Division of Bacteriology, National Institute for Biological Standards and Controls, Blanche Lane, Potters Bar, United Kingdom3

Received 26 November 2004/ Returned for modification 4 January 2005/ Accepted 6 January 2005


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Text
 References
 
Sixty-one Bordetella pertussis isolates were tested blindly in two laboratories to determine their serotype nature by monoclonal antibodies using two independent methods: the standard bacterial microagglutination assay and an indirect whole-cell enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Both methods gave concordant results in 60 of the 61 isolates.


    TEXT
 Top
 Abstract
 Text
 References
 
Many methods have been described for distinguishing strains of Bordetella pertussis, and these range from the traditional method of serotyping (3) to the more sophisticated genetic methods such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (2, 5, 6), ribotyping (13), randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (8), and multilocus sequence typing (14). Undoubtedly the more sensitive DNA methods are highly discriminative in distinguishing many strains of B. pertussis into different fingerprints or sequence types. Serotyping results, on the other hand, may vary within the same profile. Moreover serotype seems to change with population immunity, and serotyping has provided data to suggest that immunity towards whooping cough depends on the serotype specificity of the pertussis bacteria (12). This was evident when vaccines lacking one serotype given to a population resulted in pertussis cases caused by strains of the serotype not present in the vaccine preparation (4, 11, 15). In 1979, the World Health Organization recommended that whole-cell pertussis vaccine should contain both serotype 2 and 3 antigens (16). Therefore, together with the more sensitive DNA methods, serotyping continues to be a useful laboratory surveillance tool for studying the epidemiology of pertussis.

Based on reactions with specific antisera, B. pertussis can be divided into three types: serotype 2, serotype 3, and serotype 2,3. The major serotyping antigens of B. pertussis have been determined to be associated with their fimbriae. Traditionally serotyping is done by the bacterial agglutination test using the slide agglutination method with bacteria mixed with specific serotyping antisera on glass slides. Hybridoma monoclonal antibodies to the serotype 2 and serotype 3 fimbria antigens have also been produced and characterized (7). Attempts to standardize the serotyping method by means of microagglutination have also been made and published (9). Nevertheless, the bacterial agglutination method is still subjective and depends on the ability of the bacteria to form a smooth suspension. Therefore, we have explored the possibility of using an objective method of indirect whole-cell ELISA for the serotyping of B. pertussis isolates. This assay development was evaluated independently at two laboratories with strains of B. pertussis that had been serotyped by the microagglutination method in one laboratory and then tested blindly in a second laboratory by the indirect whole-cell ELISA using different batches of the same serotyping monoclonal antibodies. In this communication, we report our findings and compare the two methods for the determination of serotypes of B. pertussis isolates.

B. pertussis isolates used in this study were mostly from the culture collection of the Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control (SIIDC) and were selected to represent isolates from different periods as well as expressing different serotyping antigens of Fim2, Fim3, and Fim2,3. All isolates were retyped before they were sent blindly to the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) for testing by ELISA. A few Canadian patient isolates were typed by ELISA at NML and sent blindly to SIIDC for testing by the bacterial microagglutination assay.

Monoclonal antibodies that recognize serotype 2 and 3 fimbria antigens were made from hybridoma cell lines BPF2 (anti-Fim2) and BPC10 (anti-Fim3), which were originally developed by Brennan, Manclark, and Li (November 1992; U.S. patent 5,162,223) (7). Antibodies from the hybridoma cell lines were produced at the National Institute of Biological Standards and Control and made available to NML and SIIDC.

Serotyping of isolates by the bacterial microagglutination method was done as essentially described by Mooi et al. (9). Traditional slide agglutination was carried out according to the method described by Preston (10). Indirect whole-cell ELISA was done according to a procedure described for the serotyping of meningococci (1). Briefly, a smooth suspension of a loopful of bacteria grown for 48 h on a Bordet-Gengou agar plate was prepared in pH 7.4 sterile phosphate-buffered saline and heat inactivated at 56°C for 1 hour. The inactivated bacterial suspension was cooled and stored at 4°C until ready for testing. Such inactivated cell suspensions for the ELISA were found to be stable at 4°C for months and can be reused as antigens (e.g., as controls) in multiple assays. Antigen coating was done by adding 100 µl per well of the inactivated B. pertussis bacterial antigen, diluted in phosphate-buffered saline to give an optical density of about 0.1 at 620 nm, to a Nunc Maxisorp 96-well flat-bottomed Immuno microtiter plate (Nalge Nunc International, Rochester, NY). Detection of binding of the serotyping monoclonal antibodies to the bacterial cells was done by addition of a 1:5,000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G F(ab')2 fragment-specific antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, Pa.). Each assay was done in the presence of both a Fim2-positive control strain and a Fim3-positive control strain. Details of the different serological methods are available from the authors.

Optimal dilutions of the anti-Fim2 and anti-Fim3 monoclonal antibodies for use in the indirect whole-cell ELISA were determined by titration of each antibody against Fim2-positive and Fim3-positive reference strains. A dilution of 1:1,000 was chosen for both antibodies in subsequent ELISAs for the serotyping of B. pertussis isolates.

Out of the 54 Swedish isolates tested blindly by the indirect whole-cell ELISA method, 53 (98%) gave concordant results with the bacterial microagglutination method (Table 1). Of these 53 Swedish isolates that gave concordant results with both methods, 23 were serotype 2, 26 were serotype 3, and 4 were serotype 2,3. The only isolate that gave a discordant result was an isolate that was found to be serotype 3 by bacterial microagglutination but that was identified as serotype 2,3 by indirect whole-cell ELISA. This strain was retyped by both laboratories, and the results did not change. Potential reasons for this discrepant result may include the following. The microagglutination test was done on bacteria grown on charcoal agar plates for 72 h while the indirect ELISA was done on antigens prepared from cells grown for 48 h on Bordet-Gengou agar plates. Cells grown under different conditions may have different expression of their fimbria antigens (e.g., cells grown on charcoal agar may express only Fim3 antigen, or the Fim2 antigens may be expressed at low quantities or different qualities or at a subsurface location and therefore not be accessible to antibodies).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Serotyping results for 54 B. pertussis strains from the Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control using bacterial agglutination and indirect whole-cell ELISA methodsa

 
To further evaluate the ELISA method, eight Canadian isolates expressing the Fim3 antigens as determined by ELISA along with the single Swedish isolate that did not provide a matching result were sent blindly from NML to the SIIDC for testing by bacterial microagglutination. All eight Canadian isolates gave identical results regardless of the method of testing used, but the single Swedish isolate still tested as serotype 3 by the bacterial agglutination method but was typed as serotype 2,3 by ELISA.

Our data presented here show that the indirect whole-cell ELISA method for serotyping of B. pertussis is at least as good as the bacterial microagglutination assay (9). Several advantages of the indirect whole-cell ELISA method may make it a potentially attractive alternative method for serotyping pertussis strains. These advantages may include the method's objectivity and reproducibility and use of very small amounts of antibodies as well as its suitability for screening large numbers of strains. Therefore, based on this preliminary result, we propose to further evaluate and validate this method for the routine serotyping of B. pertussis in an interlaboratory trial involving several laboratories. Such studies may also involve the exchange of antigen preparations by different participating laboratories to compare antigenic presentation in cells prepared under different laboratory conditions, including the type of medium used to grow the bacteria, as well as to allow different laboratories to test the same batch of cells or antigens.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by a grant from Health Canada's Genomics Research and Development Fund.

R. Tsang also thanks Nicole Guiso of Institut Pasteur, France, for the gift of the reference strains 2558 and Hav.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Vaccine Preventable Bacterial Diseases, National Microbiology Laboratory, 1015 Arlington Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 3R2. Phone: (204) 789-6020. Fax: (204) 789-2018. E-mail: rtsang{at}hc-sc.gc.ca. Back


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Text
 References
 

  1. Abdillahi, H., and J. T. Poolman. 1987. Whole-cell ELISA for typing Neisseria meningitidis with monoclonal antibodies. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 48:367-371.[CrossRef]
  2. Advani, A., D. Donelly, and H. Hallander. 2004. Reference system for characterization of Bordetella pertussis pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:2890-2897.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Ashworth, L. A. E., L. I. Irons, and A. B. Dowsett. 1982. Antigenic relationship between serotype-specific agglutinogens and fimbriae of Bordetella pertussis. Infect. Immun. 37:1278-1281.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Blaskett, A. C., J. Gulasekharam, and L. C. Fulton. 1971. The occurrence of Bordetella pertussis serotypes in Australia, 1950-1970. Med. J. Aust. 1:781-784.[Medline]
  5. Brennan, M., P. Strebel, H. George, W. K. Yih, R. Tachdjian, S. M. Lett, P. Cassiday, G. Sanden, and M. Wharton. 2000. Evidence for transmission of pertussis in schools, Massachusetts 1996: epidemiological data supported by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J. Infect. Dis. 181:210-215.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Hardwich, T. H., B. Plikaytis, P. K. Cassiday, G. Cage, M. S. Peppler, D. Shea, D. Boxrud, and G. N. Sanden. 2002. Reproducibility of Bordetella pertussis genomic DNA fragments generated by XbaI restriction and resolved by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:811-816.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Li, Z. M., M. J. Brennan, J. L. David, P. H. Carter, J. L. Cowell, and C. R. Manclark. 1988. Comparison of type 2 and type 6 fimbriae of Bordetella pertussis by using agglutinating monoclonal antibodies. Infect. Immun. 56:3184-3188.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Moissenet, D., M. Valcin, V. Marchand, E. Grimprel, P. Begue, A. Garbarg-Chenon, and H. Vu-Thien. 1996. Comparative DNA analysis of Bordetella pertussis clinical isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, randomly amplified polymorphic DNA, and ERIC polymerase chain reaction. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 143:127-132.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Mooi, F. R., H. Hallander, C. H. Wirsing von Konig, B. Hoet, and N. Guiso. 2000. Epidemiological typing of Bordetella pertussis isolates: recommendations for a standard methodology. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 19:174-181.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Preston, N. W. 1970. Technical problems in the laboratory diagnosis and prevention of whooping-cough. Lab. Pract. 19:482-486.[Medline]
  11. Preston, N. W. 1991. Importance of agglutinogen content in vaccines for inducing protection, p. 149-153. In C. R. Manclark (ed.), Proceedings of an informal consultation on the WHO requirements for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and combined vaccines. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Md.
  12. Preston, N. W., and E. J. Carter. 1992. Serotype specificity of vaccine-induced immunity to pertussis. Commun. Dis. Rep. Rev. 2:R155-R156.
  13. Register, K. B., A. Boisvert, and M. R. Ackermann. 1997. Use of ribotyping to distinguish Bordetella bronchiseptica. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47:678-683.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Van Loo, I. H. M., K. J. Heuvelman, A. J. King, and F. R. Mooi. 2002. Multilocus sequence typing of Bordetella pertussis based on surface protein genes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1994-2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Watanabe, M., Y. Nakase, T. Aoyama, H. Ozawa, Y. Murase, and T. Iwata. 1986. Serotype and drug susceptibility of Bordetella pertussis isolated in Japan from 1975 to 1984. Microbiol. Immunol. 30:491-494.[Medline]
  16. World Health Organization Expert Committee on Biological Standardization. 1979. Thirtieth report. WHO Tech. Rep. Ser. 638:65.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2005, p. 2449-2451, Vol. 43, No. 5
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.5.2449-2451.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsang, R. S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hallander, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsang, R. S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hallander, H.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS