Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2005, p. 3140-3144, Vol. 43, No. 7
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.7.3140-3144.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,1 Department of Pediatric Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands,2 Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,3 Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands4
Received 8 November 2004/ Returned for modification 13 December 2004/ Accepted 23 March 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Regarding the role of pneumococci in the pathogenesis of otitis media, the findings have been rather ambiguous. Although pneumococci usually dominate in the bacterial mix present in middle ear effusions during acute otitis media (AOM) (28), until recently the majority of middle ear effusions in otitis media with effusion (OME) appeared to be culture negative (8, 11, 23, 24). The predominance of negative culture results has led to the hypothesis that OME results from an inflammatory response induced by residual bacterial metabolites subsequent to AOM (26). However, the introduction of new molecular techniques with significantly improved detection rates did show that in effusions that were negative by culture, bacterial DNA was present originating from often more than one bacterial species (e.g., Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Moraxella catarrhalis) (19, 20).
In addition to the identification of these pathogenic strains in middle ear effusions of children with otitis media S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and M. catarrhalis could also be cultured from the oropharynx (27), adenoid (13), and nasopharynx (9). Apparently, the upper respiratory region is an ideal habitat for these bacteria. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that samples simultaneously obtained from middle ear and nasopharynx from one patient sometimes contained identical bacterial strains or serotypes. From this it was concluded that microorganisms from the nasopharynx had entered the tympanic cavity via the Eustachian tube. However, this conclusion seems somewhat preliminary since it was not tested whether two different or two identical bacterial clones were involved, whereas isolates with the same serotype (and the same antibiotic resistance pattern) may yield different genotypic patterns (6). The value of this conclusion will certainly enhance if a genetic relatedness between the bacterial populations from both locations can be determined.
Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate in a group of children with OME whether there is a genetic relatedness between pneumococci originating from middle ear, adenoid, and/or oropharynx. As a reference, a group of children with AOM was also selected for the present study.
|
|
|---|
(ii) AOM. In addition, 15 AOM patients (1 to 7 years old) were randomly recruited from a group of children with positive cultures from middle ear effusions and nasopharynx. These children belonged to a control group enrolled in a larger, randomized double-blind study to determine whether pneumococcal vaccination prevents recurrence of AOM in children with previous episodes of AOM (29). All children had experienced at least two episodes of AOM during the year before recruitment. Half of the group already had ventilation tubes. The control group received hepatitis A (Havrix Junior; GlaxoSmithKline, Zeist, The Netherlands) or hepatitis B (Engerix-B; GlaxoSmithKline) vaccinations.
For both the AOM and the OME studies, written parental informed consent was obtained before inclusion in the study. Both study protocols were approved by the appropriate medical ethics committees.
Collection and analysis of samples. In the OME study, samples from middle ear fluid (aspirated if present), oropharynx (swab), and adenoid biopsy were obtained during anesthesia for insertion of ventilation tubes. All samples were plated within 6 h onto two 5% Columbia blood agar plates, a 5% Columbia blood agar plate with 5 mg of gentamicin/liter, and a chocolate agar plate. Agar plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h: the blood agar plates aerobically and anaerobically, the blood agar plate with gentamicin, and the chocolate agar plate with raised CO2 (5%). Identification of bacterial strains was based on colony morphology and conventional methods of determination. When S. pneumoniae was isolated, a single colony was picked up for further analysis by immunological serotyping (Quellung reaction with commercially available antisera [Statens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen, Denmark]). Whenever pneumococci were simultaneously recovered from two or three locations (oropharynx/adenoid/middle ear effusion), molecular typing was performed and used for genotypic comparison.
In the AOM study, bacterial culture from middle ear fluid was obtained at the time of the first AOM episode occurring at least 1 month after the last vaccination. After clinical confirmation of the diagnosis of AOM, middle ear fluid was collected by myringotomy or by spontaneous drainage near the perforation site with an aspirator or a sterile dry cotton-wool swab. In addition, nasopharyngeal samples were obtained with a flexible, sterile, dry cotton-wool swab. Samples were processed as described above. For the present study, 15 children with positive pneumococcal cultures both from middle ear effusion and from nasopharynx were selected and molecular typing was performed.
Detection of pneumococcal DNA by lytA PCR. DNA was isolated from 90 µl of middle ear effusion by using a MagNA Pure automated DNA extraction platform (Roche Diagnostics, Almere, The Netherlands) as recommended by the manufacturer. Detection of the autolysin gene was performed by a real-time PCR assay targeting the lytA gene with primers and probes described by McAvin et al. (15).
Appropriate positive and negative controls were used. To check for the presence of PCR inhibitors that may compromise the amplification reaction, an exogenous DNA target was added to the specimens prior to DNA extraction. This artificial DNA construct also served to verify proper functioning of all reagents and equipment. This target was amplified in a separate PCR.
Molecular typing by AFLP. DNA was isolated from colonies by using a MagNA Pure automated DNA extraction platform. Prior to extraction, cells were incubated with 50 U of mutanolysin (Sigma-Aldrich, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands) for 15 min at 37°C. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analyses were performed according to established protocols (14, 16) with the restriction enzyme combination EcoRI and MseI (Westburg, Leusden, The Netherlands). For amplification, a fluorescein-labeled EcoRI primer without extensions and an MseI primer extended with a G residue were used. Obtained amplification products were analyzed on a MegaBACE automated DNA analysis platform (Amersham Biosciences, Roosendaal, The Netherlands) under conditions recommended by the manufacturer.
Fingerprint patterns were analyzed for similarity using Gel Compar II software (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium). Cluster analysis was performed by using the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic averages with the Pearson correlation coefficient, expressed as a percentage of similarity. Strains were considered to be clonally related if proven to be >90% identical.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Number of culture-positive samples/OME patient, distributed over respective locations, represented in percentages of the total amount of children with positive pneumococcal cultures
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Presence of pneumococci in middle ear fluids as detected by standard culture and PCR, represented in percentages of the total number of effusions that were analyzed
|
AFLP. AFLP results are depicted in dendrograms in Fig. 1. (This figure also includes the results of serotyping.) One molecular pneumococcal fingerprint was obtained per anatomic site. These were compared to assess their genetic relatedness.
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Genetic relatedness between pneumococcal isolates from different locations within one patient and between patients based on AFLP fingerprints. The scale bar indicates the percentage of similarity. (A) Random selection of samples from OME patients; (B) samples from AOM patients. Serotypes per sample are included. NT, not typeable. Isolates are labeled as follows: NAS, isolates obtained from nasopharyngeal specimens (adenoid biopsies); ORO, oropharyngeal specimens (throat swab); and MEF, middle ear fluid specimens.
|
In 60% of the children with OME from which pneumococcal isolates were available derived from three locations within one patient (adenoid, oropharynx, and middle ear fluid), the degree of genetic relatedness between pneumococcal isolates per patient indicated a clonal origin (Table 1). In the group of OME children from which pneumococcal samples were derived from two locations (adenoid and oropharynx), clonal relatedness between paired pneumococcal isolates per patient was observed in 80% of the children (Table 1).
In the group of AOM children, almost 90% of the paired pneumococcal fingerprints per patient (derived from nasopharynx and middle ear effusion) showed a clonal origin.
|
|
|---|
In pneumococcal samples obtained from a minority of patients, different fingerprint patterns were found from different locations within one patient, which indicates that these pneumococci are not genetically related. An explanation for this can be found in the method. Although most children are colonized by several pneumococcal serotypes (1, 29), only a single colony from each culture was selected for further analysis because it was considered highly likely that this one colony will represent the most prevalent serotype in the pneumococcal population at that location. Obviously, the more colonies tested, the better the diversity of the pneumococcal population can be explored, but to achieve statistical significance this approach would be extremely time-consuming and expensive. Considering that the most uncommon serotype represents only 5% of the total pneumococcal population, at least 59 colonies from each sample would have to be serotyped to obtain 95% probability of collecting the second pneumococcal type (2, 7).
The differences between AOM and OME patients are remarkable. A total of 21% of AOM effusions were culture positive for pneumococci (29), whereas in OME this percentage was only 5%. This finding may indicate AOM to be an active inflammatory process and OME to be a chronic disease. Comparison of fingerprints from nasopharyngeal pneumococci and middle ear pneumococci from one patient showed clonal relatedness in 90% of AOM patients. However, when pneumococcal fingerprints of OME children were compared (isolated from isolates obtained from nasopharyngeal specimens [adenoid biopsies], oropharyngeal specimens [throat swab], and middle ear fluid specimens), a clonal relationship was observed in 60% of the children. This may indicate that in AOM patients pneumococcal translocation via the Eustachian tube has occurred recently, whereas in OME patients pneumococcal passage may have occurred earlier. During that interim period the nasopharyngeal pneumococcal population may have changed, which may affect the degree of clonal relatedness.
Both conventional bacterial culture and lytA PCR were applied in the present study to establish the presence of pneumococci in middle ear fluids of children with OME. PCR analysis revealed a higher percentage of positive middle ear effusions (13%) than expected by pneumococcal culture (5%), which is in line with the results of Pereira et al. (17). However, Post et al. (19) evaluated a higher percentage of pneumococcus-positive effusions by using PCR (29.9%), although the percentage determined by conventional culture was similar (5%). This discrepancy may be due to a difference in PCR target. Post et al. applied a PCR method that targeted penicillin-binding protein gene 2B (PBP2B) (19). Given the fact that horizontal transfer of PBP genes may occur from pneumococci to viridans group streptococci present in the same niche (18), a PCR targeting the PBP2B gene may lead to the amplification of putative pneumococcal sequences, resulting in false positivity, whereas the lytA PCR method is of proven specificity (16).
Observations of negative or minor bacterial growth by culture, despite considerable amounts of bacterial DNA in effusions of OME patients, may be indicative of the presence of biofilms. Recently, it has been shown that bacterial biofilms were formed on the middle ear mucosae of chinchillas subsequent to experimental induction of otitis media by Haemophilus influenzae (5, 21). In addition, biofilms were found to be present on tympanostomy tubes derived from OME patients (21). These observations strongly indicate that biofilm formation may play a role in the pathogenesis of OME. In that case it is quite likely that only bacteria released from the biofilm are detected by culture.
Minor bacterial growth in middle ear effusions of OME patients may also be explained by the concept described by Domingue et al. (4), illustrating that bacteria exposed to a deleterious environment (i.e., host defense) can change into L forms that persist in a latent state within the host, causing pathological responses. These bacteria will not be detected by conventional culture methods because L forms do not form colonies under standard culture conditions. PCR may offer an alternative for culture analysis, although a drawback of this technique is that the nature of the identified DNA remains uncertain, since DNA of both live and dead bacteria may be amplified by PCR. However, from a study of Post et al. (22) it can be concluded that DNA in effusions originates from live bacteria, since these authors demonstrated that DNA from nonviable bacteria lacks persistence in middle ear effusions of chinchillas. In addition, bacterial mRNA was identified in culture-negative middle ear effusions of children with OME (25), which indicates the presence of viable, metabolically active, intact organisms, since bacterial mRNA has a very short half-life (several seconds to minutes). To establish whether bacterial L forms or biofilm bacteria are involved in OME, mucosal biopsies from several locations in the tympanic cavity are required, which for medical ethical reasons cannot be obtained from patients with OME only.
Although the exact bacterial modus vivendi remains unclear, we have shown here that pneumococci in middle ear effusions of OME and AOM patients most likely originate from the nasopharynx, since they show close genetic relatedness to their nasopharyngeal counterparts.
We thank Hanneke de Valk-van Haren and Corina Berns (Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital) for skillful technical assistance.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»