Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2005, p. 3471-3473, Vol. 43, No. 7
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.7.3471-3473.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Possible Tick-Borne Human Enterovirus Resulting in Aseptic Meningitis
Eric C. Freundt,
Douglas C. Beatty,
Teresa Stegall-Faulk, and
Stephen M. Wright*
Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37132
Received 14 December 2004/
Returned for modification 31 January 2005/
Accepted 9 March 2005

ABSTRACT
Enterovirus-specific genetic sequences were isolated from two
Amblyomma americanum tick pools. Identical genetic sequences
were later obtained from cerebrospinal fluid of a patient with
aseptic meningitis and a recent history of tick attachment.
These observations suggest the possibility of an emerging tick-borne
human enterovirus associated with aseptic meningitis.

TEXT
In 1999, several cases of possible enterovirus-associated aseptic
meningitis occurred in middle Tennessee. The individuals, all
local residents, presented with similar symptoms including fever,
myalgias, nausea, malaise, headache, and nuchal tenderness lasting
greater than 7 days. The patients were not related, and their
histories revealed no shared potential for disease acquisition,
with the exception of exposure to tick feeding. All four individuals
had removed attached ticks approximately 1 to 2 weeks prior
to symptom onset. All patients recovered without sequelae. No
ticks were retained for study. Symptomatology and limited laboratory
testing for one patient by a private firm resulted in a diagnosis
of aseptic meningitis. Laboratory tests were run for ehrlichiosis,
eastern equine encephalitis, western equine encephalitis, California
encephalitis, St. Louis encephalitis, Lyme disease, Rocky Mountain
spotted fever, murine typhus, and a panel of coxsackie A viruses
that included CAV7, CAV9, CAV10, and CAV16. An elevated titer
of complement-fixing antibody (1:16) was reported for coxsackievirus
A9 alone; all other tests were negative. Ticks were collected
from patients' counties of residence and examined for the presence
of enterovirus nucleic acid. During summer 2000, 192 ticks were
collected from middle Tennessee counties Rutherford and Williamson
using CO
2 traps as previously described (
11). Prior to dissection,
adults and nymphs were identified as
Dermacentor variabilis (40 ticks) and
Amblyomma americanum (152 ticks) using appropriate
keys (
2,
10). Gut contents were pooled in groups of four (10
Dermacentor pools and 38
Amblyomma pools), digested using proteinase
K, extracted with phenol-chloroform, and ethanol precipitated.
Potential viral RNA was reverse transcribed and amplified by
PCR. Primers were designed to bind to conserved enterovirus
regions within the 5' untranslated region. Primer sequences
were as follows: forward, 5' CAAGCACTTCTGTCTCCCCGG; reverse,
5' GAAACACGGACAGGGAAAGTAG (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville,
IA). PCR products were resolved by 1.25% agarose gel electrophoresis
and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. All PCR products
were applied to a nylon membrane (Hybond; Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech, Piscataway, NJ), and an enterovirus-specific digoxigenin-labeled
probe (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN) was allowed
to hybridize according to the manufacturer's instructions (DIG
Nucleic Acid Detection Kit; Roche Applied Science). The probe
sequence was 5' CGATGCGTTGCGCTCAGCAC (Integrated DNA Technologies).
Probe-binding amplicons were cleaned using a Quantum Prep cleaning
column (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and ligated into pGEM-T (Promega,
Madison, WI). Plasmids were transformed into
Escherichia coli JM109 (Promega), and transformants were selected by blue-white
screening. Plasmids were prepared by standard alkaline lysis
and bidirectionally sequenced on an Open Gene automated DNA
sequencer using a dye-primer cycle sequencing kit according
to the manufacturer's instructions (Visible Genetics, Toronto,
Ontario, Canada). None of the
Dermacentor pools were amplified.
Two of the 38 pools from
A. americanum ticks resulted in successful
amplification (Fig.
1A). Both positive pools were composed of
A. americanum nymphs collected in Williamson County and demonstrated
fragment sizes of approximately 400 bp (expected size, 402 bp;
lanes 3 and 5, Fig.
1A). Hybridization with the enterovirus
sequence-specific probe also occurred for both PCR-positive
pools (spots 1 and 2, Fig.
1B). The two reactive tick pools
were sequenced and were nearly identical (99%), differing at
a single nucleotide (GenBank accession numbers
AF409090 and
AY123425). A BLAST search of enteroviruses in the GenBank database
revealed that the greatest homology of the tick enterovirus
sequences occurred with poliovirus 2 (91% sequence identity),
polioviruses 1 and 3 (90%), coxsackievirus A11 (90%), and coxsackieviruses
A17 and A15 (89%). This sequence identity is consistent with
enterovirus nucleotide identity in the 5' untranslated region
(
8).
In September 2001, a 29-year-old male was seen in the emergency
room of a middle Tennessee hospital. The patient complained
of a headache worsening over 1 to 2 days with photophobia, nausea,
and vomiting, as well as neck pain. He exhibited a fever of
100.4°F, and initial physical examination revealed some
meningismus and rigidity of the neck. His joints were not swollen,
and a rash was not observed. The patient was admitted, and head
computed tomography (CT) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tests
were run. The patient later reported experiencing tick attachment
at least a week prior to the onset of symptoms. Additional tests
were ordered from a private laboratory and included Lyme disease
immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG screening for
Borrelia burgdorferi and a coxsackievirus A antibody panel. Titers for all of the
six coxsackie A virus antibodies were reactive (Table
1, limit
of reactive detection for complement-fixing antibody, <1:8).
Since complement-fixing antibody typically persists for only
a few months, the elevated titers suggested recent infection.
The patient recovered without event. Due to patient history
of tick attachment prior to developing meningitis, the CSF sample
was retained for more thorough evaluation for enterovirus genetic
sequences. Vero cells (American Type Culture Collection certified
cell line 81) in medium 199 supplemented with 10% fetal calf
serum, 2 mM
L-glutamine, and antibiotics (Sigma, St. Louis,
MO) were inoculated with the remaining CSF sample and incubated
at 37°C in 5% CO
2. Successful cultivation of the virus would
have allowed more complete virus characterization; however,
no cytopathogenic effect was observed after 10 days. The tissue
culture medium-CSF sample was treated for extraction of nucleic
acid and prepared for reverse transcription-PCR as already described.
Tissue culture medium from non-CSF-exposed cells was also evaluated
as a negative control. Tick samples were never prepared at the
same time that the CSF sample was amplified; distilled-H
2O negative
controls were always included. The forward primer was identical
to the primer used for tick gut samples, but the reverse primer
was 5' CTTGTTCACTACTAGCGTCC (Integrated DNA Technologies). This
primer was prepared in order to maintain complete sequence complementarity
with the sequences detected in ticks. Amplification of the CSF-tissue
culture extract resulted in a band of approximately 250 bp on
an electrophoretic gel (lane 7, Fig.
1A) (expected size, 252
bp) that was bound by the enterovirus-specific probe (spot 3,
Fig.
1B). The sequence obtained was identical to the tick pool
sequences (GenBank accession number
AF533014).
The titers of patient antibodies reactive to several coxsackie
A viruses (Table
1) are likely the result of the cross-reactivity
frequently noted within this group of viruses (
7). Problems
exist with heterotypic antibody responses, and antigenic variants
exist among the enteroviruses, with several reported as being
untypeable (
5). The failure of the CSF sample to cause noticeable
cytopathogenic effects in tissue culture has often been encountered
with other enteroviruses, particularly the coxsackie A viruses
(
8). The enterovirus sequences reported here may represent a
previously undescribed enterovirus. The cross-reactivity in
patient sera, lack of cytopathogenic effect in tissue culture,
and sequence similarity suggests that this virus may be a coxsackie
A virus.
Blood-feeding arthropods have not been reported in the natural transmission of enteroviruses (7). Although no conclusive association has been established by this study, our results raise the possibility that this virus may be a new and important etiologic agent of meningitis in humans that could be transmitted by ticks. Others have reported viruses from the family Picornaviridae in blood-feeding arthropods. A Cardiovirus was isolated from a tick, Ixodes persulcatus, that had been feeding on a boar (3). In one laboratory study, mosquitoes were allowed to feed on mice infected with coxsackievirus A6. Mosquitoes maintained detectable virus levels for up to 8 days and were able to transmit the virus to other mice (4). It remains to be determined whether this virus is capable of replication within the tick.
This study relates to the marked seasonality of enterovirus infections that exists in temperate climates. A seasonal increase in enterovirus meningitis during the summer and early fall has been documented in temperate climates (6, 9). Cases of aseptic meningitis that occur during the late summer months or early fall have a particularly high probability of enterovirus etiology (7). It has been speculated that increased fecal-oral transmission during the summer and fall may occur when less clothing is worn (1). In view of the present study, however, it seems plausible that tick transmission may contribute to the seasonality of enterovirus disease. Such a hypothesis should be considered since the frequency of enterovirus infections during the summer and early autumn corresponds to increased tick activity in temperate climates.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported in part by grant 0216716 from the National
Science Foundation.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biology, Box 60, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN 37132. Phone: (615) 898-2056. Fax: (615) 898-5093. E-mail:
smwright{at}mtsu.edu.

Present address: Laboratory of Immunology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892. 

REFERENCES
1 - Johnson, R. T. 1998. Viral infections of the nervous system, 2nd ed. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
2 - Keirans, J. E., and L. A. Durden. 1998. Illustrated key to nymphs of the tick genus Amblyomma (Acari: Ixodidae) found in the United States. J. Med. Entomol. 35:489-495.[Medline]
3 - Lvov, D. K., G. N. Leonova, V. L. Gromashevsky, V. L. Shestakov, Y. P. Gofman, T. M. Skvortsova, S. M. Klimenko, L. K. Berezina, V. A. Zakaryan, A. V. Safronov, and R. V. Belousova. 1978. Sikhote-Alin virus, a new member of the cardiovirus group (Picornaviridae) isolated from Ixodes persulcatus ticks in Primorie region. Acta Virol. 22:458-463.[Medline]
4 - Maguire, T. 1970. The laboratory transmission of coxsackie A6 virus by mosquitoes. J. Hyg. 68:625-630.
5 - Melnick, J. L. 1996. Enteroviruses: polioviruses, coxsackieviruses, echoviruses, and newer enteroviruses, p. 655-712, In B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
6 - Moore, M. 1982. Enteroviral disease in the United States, 1970-1979. J. Infect. Dis. 146:103-108.[Medline]
7 - Morens, D. M., and M. A. Pallansch. 1995. Epidemiology, p. 2-23. In H. A. Rotbart (ed.), Human enterovirus infections. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
8 - Muir, P., U. Kammerer, K. Korn, M. N. Mulders, T. Poyry, B. Weissbrich, R. Kandolf, G. M. Cleator, and A. M. van Loon. 1998. Molecular typing of enteroviruses: current status and future requirements. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11:202-227.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Rotbart, H. A. 2000. Viral meningitis. Semin. Neurol. 20:277-292.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Sonenshine, D. E. 1991. Biology of ticks, vol. I. Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y.
11 - Sonenshine, D. E. 1993. Biology of ticks, vol. II. Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2005, p. 3471-3473, Vol. 43, No. 7
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.7.3471-3473.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.