Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2005, p. 3544-3547, Vol. 43, No. 7
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.7.3544-3547.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
| CASE REPORT |
Departments of Medical Microbiology,1 General Internal Medicine,3 Neurology,4 Nephrology, Radboud University, Nijmegen Medical Center,5 Nijmegen University Center for Infectious Diseases, Nijmegen, The Netherlands2
Received 28 September 2004/ Returned for modification 25 December 2004/ Accepted 12 February 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
She slowly recovered and was then transferred to a rehabilitation center because of a presumed critical illness neuropathy. One month later, she was readmitted with syncope, headache, generalized weakness, slurred speech, and a fever of 39°C. On neurological examination, she showed a diffuse encephalopathy with altered consciousness and slight dysarthria but no focal neurological signs. A subsequent computed tomography scan showed multiple small hypodense lesions in the basal ganglia and one larger lesion in the cerebellum. A magnetic resonance image (MRI) of the brain showed numerous miliary lesions with a hyperintense signal on T1-weighted images in basal ganglia, the cerebello-occipital area, and more diffusely in the cortical and subcortical areas (Fig. 1). The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) showed an elevated protein level (752 mg/liter) with elevated biochemical markers of neuronal and glial damage but no leukocytosis and a normal glucose level. Funduscopy showed chorioretinitis.
![]() View larger version (128K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. MRI of the cerebrum with multiple smaller and larger miliary lesions (arrows).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Differential diagnosis of infectious causes of the cerebral lesions and performed tests
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Serologic testing for T. gondii in subsequent samplesa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. PCR testing for T. gondii in subsequent samples
|
The patient was treated successfully with pyrimethamine at 75 mg/day and sulfadiazine at 1 g four times a day for 3 months. She made a full neurological recovery, but she lost part of her vision in both eyes due to the chorioretinitis.
T. gondii is a well-known opportunistic pathogen in AIDS and heart transplant patients, but it remains a rare but significant pathogen in renal transplant recipients. Surveillance studies of renal transplant recipients in other countries show asymptomatic infection in 2 to 8% (3, 10). In one series, 10 to 14% of seropositive patients showed serologic evidence of reactivation (rise in IgG titers) but only three patients (1.5%) developed clinical disease (10). So far, only 35 cases of visceral and cerebral toxoplasmosis complicating renal transplantation have been described.
Lack of clinical awareness and difficulties in establishing a diagnosis are thought to contribute to the high mortality of up to 65%. This is illustrated by the fact that 15 of 35 cases (43%) were diagnosed at autopsy (1, 2, 5, 10).
Toxoplasmosis in transplant patients may result from reactivation of latent infection or from primary infection. So far, in renal transplant recipients 7 cases (20%) have occurred in seropositive recipients and 16 (46%) in seronegative recipients while in 34% the serology was unknown (1, 2, 5, 10). Out of 16 cases with a primary infection, 15 had a seropositive donor and these infections were thought to be transplant related. Primary T. gondii infection has been documented between 1 day and 13 months after transplantation (median, 40 days). Reactivations have been described up to 7 years after transplantation (1, 2, 5, 10). In The Netherlands, renal transplant donors and recipients are not screened for toxoplasmosis since T. gondii infections in renal transplant recipients are thought to be rare. Because serum samples of our patient were stored, it could be determined that she was seronegative before transplantation and had a seropositive donor and it could be concluded that she suffered from a primary infection with the transplant as the most likely source of infection. The (long) interval of 4 months between transplantation and disease may be explained by the fact that the patient used P. carinii pneumonia prophylaxis for 3 months. TMP-SMZ given at a higher dosage and over a longer period of time has been reported to be effective in prevention of toxoplasmosis in cardiac transplant recipients (6, 9).
The clinical presentation of toxoplasmosis in renal transplant recipients varies. Fever is the most frequent clinical sign (80%), followed by pneumonia and generalized neurological signs such as headaches, drowsiness, and lethargy. Radiographic images of T. gondii pneumonia usually demonstrate interstitial infiltrates, but other patterns have been described (7, 8). In cerebral infection, typically deep-seated lesions with an asymmetric target sign, with variable signal intensity of T2-weighted images in the MRI are seen. Atypical manifestations with multiple miliary lesions have been described in bone marrow transplant patients and AIDS patients but so far not in renal transplant recipients (4, 14).
The diagnosis of T. gondii infection can be established by serology, by direct visualization of the parasite in tissue or clinical specimens, or by specific nucleic acid amplification by PCR assay for T. gondii. In the case of reactivation, the value of serology is limited (7, 8) but it can be used to diagnose a primary infection by showing seroconversion. In immunocompromised patients, absence of specific antibodies does not exclude active disease. In our patient, it took 8 days from the appearance of initial symptoms of fever and pneumonia for an antibody response to develop. At the time of cerebral toxoplasmosis, IgM was no longer present. IgG antibodies had a low avidity, which is thought to be indicative of recent infection. It is of note, however, that IgG was still of low avidity after 10 months, which indicates that low-to-high avidity switching in immunocompromised patients might be delayed (normally, 4 to 6 months) (8), making interpretation of serology results even more difficult. When serology is inconclusive, additional tests are needed. In our case, direct examination of BAL fluid for parasites with a Giemsa stain was negative but PCR assays of archival BAL fluid and plasma samples were positive (Table 3). It is not clear how long T. gondii can be detected in blood. In studies with rhesus monkeys, parasitemia was found for 14 days after primary infection (12). So far, four other renal transplant recipients have been reported with positive PCR assays of blood, two cases with a reactivation and two with a primary infection. The positive samples were collected 10 to 30 days after onset of disease (1). PCR assay of blood could therefore be a valuable diagnostic tool in the acute phase of primary infection.
Despite the extensive cerebral lesions in our patient, PCR assays of brain biopsy and CSF samples were negative. Sampling error may have been the cause. We have previously shown by PCR that T. gondii is only intermittently present in the CSF (13) and that testing of repeated samples can elevate the assay's sensitivity.
Toxoplasmosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of pneumonia, culture-negative sepsis, and encephalitis in renal transplant recipients. Disseminated cerebral infections may present with a radiological image of small miliary lesions, much different from the "classical" deep-seated ring-enhanced lesion with a asymmetric target sign. PCR assay of CSF is not always positive, but PCR assays of BAL fluid and plasma can be a valuable aid in making an early diagnosis. When T. gondii IgG antibodies are present, archival serum samples can help to make a diagnosis of primary toxoplasmosis by demonstrating seroconversion but antibodies can be absent early in the infection and the interpretation of IgG avidity is not as straightforward as suggested in the literature. In The Netherlands, pretransplant screening for T. gondii is deemed not to be cost effective because of the low seroprevalence. However, screening will help in identifying patients at risk, especially seronegative recipients with seropositive donors, and can help in establishing the diagnosis by showing seroconversion. If no standard screening is performed, specimens should be stored for later testing. Increased awareness and early diagnosis may improve an otherwise poor outcome of toxoplasmosis in renal transplant recipients.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»