Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2005, p. 3567-3569, Vol. 43, No. 7
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.7.3567-3569.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
| CASE REPORT |
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska University HospitalSolna, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
Received 15 November 2004/ Returned for modification 24 January 2005/ Accepted 16 March 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bacteriology. The bacteriological investigations were negative except for the blood cultures. Two sets of aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles comprising a total of four bottles were collected during a febrile episode on two separate occasions. Upon arrival at the laboratory, the four bottles were incubated in the BacT/ALERT 3D blood culture system (bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, N.C.). After 48 h of incubation at 35°C, growth in the two anaerobic bottles was detected by the system. Upon Gram staining and direct microscopy from the positive blood culture bottles, straight or slightly curved gram-positive bacilli with a tendency to branching could be observed. Subcultures were made on 5% horse blood agar plates (Svenska LABFAB, Ljusne, Sweden) and incubated aerobically and anaerobically at 37°C. After 2 to 3 days of incubation, visible growth of two morphologically distinct colonies was apparent on the blood agar plates incubated anaerobically (and none on the aerobically incubated plates). The two isolates were similar with regard to their Gram staining features but differed in their colony morphology, colony size, biochemical characteristics, and antibiograms (the zone diameters of clindamycin and imipenem for the two isolates were clearly distinct). A summary of the phenotypic differences between the two isolates is presented in Table 1, and a photograph of the growth of the two isolates on anaerobic blood culture plates is presented in Fig. 1. Further typing of the two isolates with a RapID ANA II identification kit (Remel, Inc., Lenexa, Kans.) was not satisfactory, because the codes suggested for both isolates were not included in the database.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Phenotypic differences between the two Actinobaculum species isolated in our laboratory
|
![]() View larger version (96K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Photograph showing the colonial appearance of the two isolated Actinobaculum species.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. PCR primers and sequencing primers used in the sequencing of 16S rRNA genes
|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Phylogenetic tree showing the relatedness of a partial segment of the 16S rRNA genes of the two Actinobaculum strains isolated in our laboratory (indicated by asterisks) to the seven closest matches by BLAST search.
|
The other three species have rarely been isolated from human sources but are believed to be human pathogens. They include Actinobaculum schaalii (sp. nov., 1997), which was first isolated from the blood of a 64-year-old man with chronic pyelonephritis (4) and in a second case was isolated from the urine of a child with pyeloureteral junction obstruction (6). The species Actinobaculum urinale (sp. nov., 2003) was first isolated from human urine by Hall et al. (2), while the third human pathogen, "Actinobaculum massiliae" (proposed sp. nov., 2002; name is not validly published), was isolated first from the urine of an elderly woman with recurrent catheter-associated cystitis (1) and recently in a case of superficial skin infection (7).
We report on the isolation of two species of Actinobaculum, namely, A. schaalii and A. urinale, from the blood of an elderly patient with a known history of chronic renal insufficiency which was aggravated by a bout of acute diarrhea. This finding undoubtedly raises the suspicion that these organisms may give rise to sepsis, despite the fact that previous similar reports are lacking. Nevertheless, it was difficult in our case to decide whether the deterioration in the patient's renal function could be ascribed to the diarrheal episode per se, to the septicemia caused by the two Actinobaculum species, or to both factors combined. It was not possible either to associate the chronic renal insufficiency observed in this patient with the isolation of these organisms from the patient's blood. Suggestively, a possible urinary tract infection caused by these organisms might have evolved to sepsis. Unfortunately, the urine cultures which were submitted concomitantly with blood cultures were cultured aerobically and thus were negative for Actinobaculum as well as for other urinary pathogens. It should be noted in this context, however, that due to the anaerobic growth characteristics of these organisms and their slow growth, they are often missed in routine urine cultures, and infections by these organisms may thus be underdiagnosed. It is suggested, therefore, that special culture procedures be applied whenever infection by such organisms is suspected. No further blood cultures were submitted to the laboratory after the antibiotic therapy, because the patient made an uneventful recovery from the acute febrile episode.
It has been stated by some authors that some strains belonging to Actinobaculum may exhibit phenotypic heterogeneity of the colonies after 5 days of incubation. This may lead to the erroneous interpretation of sample contamination with two different species of gram-positive bacilli or, alternatively, a false impression of double infection by two species of Actinobaculum when in fact only one species is present (1). In this case it was apparent from the beginning that the two isolates obtained in pure culture were distinct species based on the fact that they were different in their colonial morphological appearances and growth characteristics, prompting the laboratory to proceed with the identification of both variants. The urease test performed on both isolates was also discriminatory, because A. urinale is urease positive, while A. schaalii is urease negative. Furthermore, the discrepancy in the zone diameters of clindamycin and imipenem was obvious. These findings were subsequently confirmed by the 16S rRNA sequencing of the two isolates.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»